Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 9/2016

01-09-2016 | Original Article

Spine Tango registry data collection in a conservative spinal service: a feasibility study

Authors: Samuel Morris, James Booth, James Hegarty

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 9/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The study reports the feasibility of implementing routine registry data collection and sustaining a high rate of data capture within a secondary care spinal osteopathy service, using the Spine Tango Conservative registry data collection tool (STC) with multiple patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Neck Disability Index (NDI), COMI Low Back Conservative, COMI Neck Conservative and EQ-5D-3L.

Methods

Data collection rates were studied during the implementation of a registry data collection project from October 2011 to June 2015. The primary outcome was completion rate of PROMs and the STC, measured as a percentage of total expected data collection. Descriptive statistics were used to illustrate completion rates by year, age group, sex, region of spinal complaint, baseline ODI or NDI score and number of PROMs required to complete the data set.

Results

Data were collected on 349 patients. Overall data collection rates increased from 54.8 % in January–June 2012 to 90.4 % in January–June 2015. The percentage of fully completed data sets was lower in the patient group required to complete 4–5 PROMs at each data collection point (15.4 %) than it was in the patient group required to complete 2–3 PROMs (37.4 %). Other comparisons showed no clear patterns.

Conclusions

Our analysis shows that a high rate of data capture can be sustained in a clinical setting using the STC and multiple PROMs. However, increasing the burden of data collection on patients and practitioners was associated with increased data loss. We describe measures taken to reduce data loss in the future and to increase the efficiency of the data collection project.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Chou R, Huffman LH (2007) Nonpharmacologic therapies for acute and chronic low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society/American College of Physicians clinical practice guideline. Ann Intern Med 147:492–504CrossRefPubMed Chou R, Huffman LH (2007) Nonpharmacologic therapies for acute and chronic low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society/American College of Physicians clinical practice guideline. Ann Intern Med 147:492–504CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Standaert C, Friedly J, Erwin M, Lee M, Rechtine G, Henrikson N, Norvell D (2011) Comparative effectiveness of exercise, acupuncture and spinal manipulation for low back pain. Spine 36:S120–S130CrossRefPubMed Standaert C, Friedly J, Erwin M, Lee M, Rechtine G, Henrikson N, Norvell D (2011) Comparative effectiveness of exercise, acupuncture and spinal manipulation for low back pain. Spine 36:S120–S130CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Dagenais S, Caro J, Haldeman S (2008) A systematic review of low back pain cost of illness studies in the United States and internationally. Spine J 8:8–20CrossRefPubMed Dagenais S, Caro J, Haldeman S (2008) A systematic review of low back pain cost of illness studies in the United States and internationally. Spine J 8:8–20CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Röder C, Müller U, Aebi M (2006) The rationale for a spine registry. Eur Spine J 15(Suppl 1):S52–S56CrossRefPubMed Röder C, Müller U, Aebi M (2006) The rationale for a spine registry. Eur Spine J 15(Suppl 1):S52–S56CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Dawson J, Doll H, Fitzpatrick R, Jenkinson C, Carr A (2010) The routine use of patient reported outcome measures in healthcare settings. BMJ 340:c186CrossRefPubMed Dawson J, Doll H, Fitzpatrick R, Jenkinson C, Carr A (2010) The routine use of patient reported outcome measures in healthcare settings. BMJ 340:c186CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Kessler J, Melloh M, Aghayev E, Röder C (2011) Development of a documentation instrument for the conservative treatment of spinal disorders in the International Spine Registry. Spine Tango. Eur Spine J 20(3):369–379CrossRefPubMed Kessler J, Melloh M, Aghayev E, Röder C (2011) Development of a documentation instrument for the conservative treatment of spinal disorders in the International Spine Registry. Spine Tango. Eur Spine J 20(3):369–379CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Dowrick C, Leydon G, McBride A, Howe A, Burgess H, Clarke P, Maisley S, Kendrick T (2009) Patients’ and doctors’ views on depression severity questionnaires incentivised in UK quality and outcomes framework: qualitative study. BMJ 338:b663CrossRefPubMed Dowrick C, Leydon G, McBride A, Howe A, Burgess H, Clarke P, Maisley S, Kendrick T (2009) Patients’ and doctors’ views on depression severity questionnaires incentivised in UK quality and outcomes framework: qualitative study. BMJ 338:b663CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Chapman J, Norvell D, Hermsmeyer J, Bransford R, DeVine J, McGirt M, Lee M (2011) Evaluating common outcomes for measuring treatment success for chronic low back pain. Spine 36(Suppl 21):S54–S68CrossRefPubMed Chapman J, Norvell D, Hermsmeyer J, Bransford R, DeVine J, McGirt M, Lee M (2011) Evaluating common outcomes for measuring treatment success for chronic low back pain. Spine 36(Suppl 21):S54–S68CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Devine J, Norvell DC, Ecker E, Fourney D, Vackaro A, Wang J, Andersson G (2011) Evaluating the correlation and responsiveness of patient-reported pain with function and quality-of-life outcomes after spine surgery. Spine 36(Suppl 21):S69–S74CrossRefPubMed Devine J, Norvell DC, Ecker E, Fourney D, Vackaro A, Wang J, Andersson G (2011) Evaluating the correlation and responsiveness of patient-reported pain with function and quality-of-life outcomes after spine surgery. Spine 36(Suppl 21):S69–S74CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Zweig T, Mannion AF, Grob D, Melloh M, Munting E, Tuschel A, Aebi M, Röder C (2009) How to Tango: a manual for implementing Spine Tango. Eur Spine J 18(Suppl 3):312–320CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zweig T, Mannion AF, Grob D, Melloh M, Munting E, Tuschel A, Aebi M, Röder C (2009) How to Tango: a manual for implementing Spine Tango. Eur Spine J 18(Suppl 3):312–320CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Leydon G, Dowrick C, McBride A, Burgess H, Howe A, Clarke P, Maisey S, Kendrick T (2011) Questionnaire severity measures for depression: a threat to the doctor-patient relationship? Br J Gen Pract 61:117–123CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Leydon G, Dowrick C, McBride A, Burgess H, Howe A, Clarke P, Maisey S, Kendrick T (2011) Questionnaire severity measures for depression: a threat to the doctor-patient relationship? Br J Gen Pract 61:117–123CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference EuroQol Group (1990) EuroQol—a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 16(3):199–208CrossRef EuroQol Group (1990) EuroQol—a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 16(3):199–208CrossRef
18.
19.
go back to reference Fankhauser CD, Mutter U, Aghayev E, Mannion AF (2012) Validity and responsiveness of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) for the neck. Eur Spine J 21:101–114CrossRefPubMed Fankhauser CD, Mutter U, Aghayev E, Mannion AF (2012) Validity and responsiveness of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) for the neck. Eur Spine J 21:101–114CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Vernon H, Mior S (1991) The Neck Disability Index: a study of reliability and validity. J Manip Physiol Ther 14(7):409–415 Vernon H, Mior S (1991) The Neck Disability Index: a study of reliability and validity. J Manip Physiol Ther 14(7):409–415
21.
go back to reference Mannion AF, Porchet F, Kleinstück FS, Lattig F, Jeszensky D, Bartanusz V, Dvorak J, Grob D (2009) The quality of spine surgery from the patient’s perspective. Part 1: the Core Outcome Measures Index in clinical practice. Eur Spine J 18(Suppl 3):S367–S373CrossRef Mannion AF, Porchet F, Kleinstück FS, Lattig F, Jeszensky D, Bartanusz V, Dvorak J, Grob D (2009) The quality of spine surgery from the patient’s perspective. Part 1: the Core Outcome Measures Index in clinical practice. Eur Spine J 18(Suppl 3):S367–S373CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Mannion AF, Elfering A, Staerkle R, Junge A, Grob D, Semmer NK, Jacobshagen N, Cvorak J, Boos N (2005) Outcome assessment in low back pain: how low can you go? Eur Spine J 14:1014–1026CrossRefPubMed Mannion AF, Elfering A, Staerkle R, Junge A, Grob D, Semmer NK, Jacobshagen N, Cvorak J, Boos N (2005) Outcome assessment in low back pain: how low can you go? Eur Spine J 14:1014–1026CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Breakwell LM (2013) Understanding the need for spinal registries: Lee Breakwell reviews the importance of registries in spinal research and explains why the British Association of Spinal Surgeons (BASS) has decided to set up its own registry. Eur Spine J 22(Suppl 1):S5–S6. doi:10.1007/s00586-013-2666-z CrossRefPubMed Breakwell LM (2013) Understanding the need for spinal registries: Lee Breakwell reviews the importance of registries in spinal research and explains why the British Association of Spinal Surgeons (BASS) has decided to set up its own registry. Eur Spine J 22(Suppl 1):S5–S6. doi:10.​1007/​s00586-013-2666-z CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Godil SS, Parker SL, Zuckerman SL, Mendenhal SK, Devin Asher AL, McGirt MJ (2013) Determining the quality and effectiveness of surgical spine care: patient satisfaction is not a valid proxy. Spine J 13(9):1006–1012CrossRefPubMed Godil SS, Parker SL, Zuckerman SL, Mendenhal SK, Devin Asher AL, McGirt MJ (2013) Determining the quality and effectiveness of surgical spine care: patient satisfaction is not a valid proxy. Spine J 13(9):1006–1012CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Højmark K, Støttrup C, Carreon L, Andersen MO (2016) Patient-reported outcome measures unbiased by loss of follow-up. Single-center study based on DaneSpine, the Danish spine surgery registry. Eur Spine J 25(1):282–286CrossRefPubMed Højmark K, Støttrup C, Carreon L, Andersen MO (2016) Patient-reported outcome measures unbiased by loss of follow-up. Single-center study based on DaneSpine, the Danish spine surgery registry. Eur Spine J 25(1):282–286CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Spine Tango registry data collection in a conservative spinal service: a feasibility study
Authors
Samuel Morris
James Booth
James Hegarty
Publication date
01-09-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 9/2016
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4697-8

Other articles of this Issue 9/2016

European Spine Journal 9/2016 Go to the issue