Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 1/2016

01-05-2016 | Case Report

Vertebral body fracture after TLIF: a new complication

Authors: Philip A. Saville, Jason B. Anari, Harvey E. Smith, Vincent Arlet

Published in: European Spine Journal | Special Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The transforaminal posterior approach (TLIF) procedure was first described in 1982. Current literature indicates its equality in outcomes for fusion constructs as other anterior-posterior procedures. As a procedure becomes more popular and is more frequently performed the types and number of complications that occur increase. We report on a two case series that underwent TLIF. Both patients had satisfactory postoperative imaging, but presented later with coronal plane vertebral body fractures in the caudal vertebral body of the TLIF construct. We believe the complication may be related to: (a) unrecognized fracture of the endplate during cage impaction; (b) overloading the endplates by maximizing the lordosis achieved by using the reverse jackknife position on a Jackson table; (c) underlying mineral bone disease in patients. As the TLIF procedure increases in popularity, caution should be exercised to avoid the same potential complications.

Purpose

To describe a potential complication with the TLIF procedure.

Study design

Case report.

Patient sample

2.

Outcome measure

Revision surgery.

Methods

Case series.

Results

Caudal vertebral body fracture is a potential complication after TLIF.

Conclusion

TLIF procedures can result in an unstable vertebral body fracture potentially necessitating revision decompression & stabilization. We recommend extra caution in patients with mineral bone disease, as technical errors can be magnified.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Resnick DK (2008) Lumbar interbody fusion: current status. Neurosurg Q 18:77–82CrossRef Resnick DK (2008) Lumbar interbody fusion: current status. Neurosurg Q 18:77–82CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Humphreys SC, Hodges SD, Patwardhan AG et al (2001) Comparison of posterior and transforaminal approaches to lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 26:567–571CrossRefPubMed Humphreys SC, Hodges SD, Patwardhan AG et al (2001) Comparison of posterior and transforaminal approaches to lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 26:567–571CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Hee HT, Castro FP Jr, Majd ME et al (2001) Anterior/posterior lumbar fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: analysis of complications and predictive factors. J Spinal Disord 14:533–540CrossRefPubMed Hee HT, Castro FP Jr, Majd ME et al (2001) Anterior/posterior lumbar fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: analysis of complications and predictive factors. J Spinal Disord 14:533–540CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Villavicencio AT, Burneikiene S, Bulsara KR et al (2006) Perioperative complications in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus anterior-posterior reconstruction for lumbar disc degeneration and instability. J Spinal Disord Tech 19:92–97CrossRefPubMed Villavicencio AT, Burneikiene S, Bulsara KR et al (2006) Perioperative complications in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus anterior-posterior reconstruction for lumbar disc degeneration and instability. J Spinal Disord Tech 19:92–97CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Potter BK, Freedman BA, Verwiebe EG et al (2005) Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: clinical and radiographic results and complications in 100 consecutive patients. J Spinal Disord Tech 18:337–346CrossRefPubMed Potter BK, Freedman BA, Verwiebe EG et al (2005) Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: clinical and radiographic results and complications in 100 consecutive patients. J Spinal Disord Tech 18:337–346CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Hackenberg L, Halm H, Bullmann V et al (2005) Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a safe technique with satisfactory three to five year results. Eur Spine J 14:551–558CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hackenberg L, Halm H, Bullmann V et al (2005) Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a safe technique with satisfactory three to five year results. Eur Spine J 14:551–558CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Whitecloud TS 3rd, Roesch WW, Ricciardi JE (2001) Transforaminal interbody fusion versus anterior-posterior interbody fusion of the lumbar spine: a financial analysis. J Spinal Disord 14:100–103CrossRefPubMed Whitecloud TS 3rd, Roesch WW, Ricciardi JE (2001) Transforaminal interbody fusion versus anterior-posterior interbody fusion of the lumbar spine: a financial analysis. J Spinal Disord 14:100–103CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Hunt T, Shen FH, Shaffrey CI et al (2007) Contralateral radiculopathy after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J 16:S311–S314CrossRef Hunt T, Shen FH, Shaffrey CI et al (2007) Contralateral radiculopathy after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J 16:S311–S314CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Vertebral body fracture after TLIF: a new complication
Authors
Philip A. Saville
Jason B. Anari
Harvey E. Smith
Vincent Arlet
Publication date
01-05-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue Special Issue 1/2016
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4517-1

Other articles of this Special Issue 1/2016

European Spine Journal 1/2016 Go to the issue