Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 12/2015

01-12-2015 | Original Article

The evaluation of cervical spine mobility without significant spondylosis by kMRI

Authors: Chengjie Xiong, Akinobu Suzuki, Michael D. Daubs, Trevor Scott, Kevin Phan, Jeffrey Wang

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 12/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Study design

Retrospective analysis of kinetic magnetic resonance images (kMRI).

Objective

To analyse the kinematics of cervical spine inpatients without significant spondylosis and to understand the normal movement of the cervical spine as reference for future comparison.

Summary of background data

Although some studies have been conducted to describe the normal mobility of the cervical spine, prior studies did not establish a relationship between the kinematics of cervical spine and disc degeneration. Only a few studies of the kinematics of the non-degenerated cervical spine have been reported; however, they focused on single level and not all the levels of cervical spine.

Methods

468 symptomatic patients underwent upright cervical kMRI, and cervical disc degeneration was evaluated with a new grading system. This grading system consists of four grades (0–III), and the cervical spines with grade 0 and grade I discs were included in this study. Finally, 61 symptomatic patients were studied 34 male and 27 female with an average age of 41.9 years. kMRI was used to define the normal mobility of the cervical spine by calculating the translation motion, angular variation and percentage angular contribution to the total cervical spine.

Results

The translation motion of the cervical spine at each level was 0.85 ± 1.22 mm at C2/3, 1.05 ± 1.19 mm at C3/4, 0.63 ± 1.19 mm at C4/5, 0.57 ± 0.91 mm at C5/6, 0.16 ± 0.86 mm at C6/7 and −0.11 ± 0.81 at C7/T1. In general, the translation motion decreased from proximal segment to distal segment. The angular variation of the cervical spine at each level was 5.58 ± 3.86° at C2/3, 8.26 ± 4.81° at C3/4, 9.11 ± 4.87° at C4/5, 10.05 ± 5.26° at C5/6, 8.31 ± 4.30° at C6/7 and 4.87 ± 3.28 ° at C7/T1. The angular variation at C2/3 and C7/T1 was significantly lower compared to other levels (P < 0.05). The contribution of each cervical level to the total angular mobility of cervical spine was the greatest at C5/6 (21.68 ± 10.31 %) and least at C7/T1 (11.11 ± 7.60 %) (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

This study demonstrates the normal cervical segmental mobility for the entire cervical spine using kMRI. These results will be helpful to understand the normal mobility of the cervical spine and for understanding the relationship between kinematics of the cervical spine and disc degeneration for future comparisons.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Matsumoto M, Okada E, Ichihara D, Watanabe K, Chiba K, Toyama Y, Fujiwara H, Momoshima S, Nishiwaki Y, Iwanami A (2010) Anterior cervical decompression and fusion accelerates adjacent segment degeneration: comparison with asymptomatic volunteers in a ten-year magnetic resonance imaging follow-up study. Spine 35(1):36–43CrossRefPubMed Matsumoto M, Okada E, Ichihara D, Watanabe K, Chiba K, Toyama Y, Fujiwara H, Momoshima S, Nishiwaki Y, Iwanami A (2010) Anterior cervical decompression and fusion accelerates adjacent segment degeneration: comparison with asymptomatic volunteers in a ten-year magnetic resonance imaging follow-up study. Spine 35(1):36–43CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Hwang S-H, Kayanja M, Milks RA, Benzel EC (2007) Biomechanical comparison of adjacent segmental motion after ventral cervical fixation with varying angles of lordosis. Spine J 7(2):216–221CrossRefPubMed Hwang S-H, Kayanja M, Milks RA, Benzel EC (2007) Biomechanical comparison of adjacent segmental motion after ventral cervical fixation with varying angles of lordosis. Spine J 7(2):216–221CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Frobin W, Leivseth G, Biggemann M, Brinckmann P (2002) Sagittal plane segmental motion of the cervical spine. A new precision measurement protocol and normal motion data of healthy adults. Clin Biomech 17(1):21–31CrossRef Frobin W, Leivseth G, Biggemann M, Brinckmann P (2002) Sagittal plane segmental motion of the cervical spine. A new precision measurement protocol and normal motion data of healthy adults. Clin Biomech 17(1):21–31CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Penning L (1978) Normal movements of the cervical spine. Am J Roentgenol 130(2):317–326CrossRef Penning L (1978) Normal movements of the cervical spine. Am J Roentgenol 130(2):317–326CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Pfirrmann CW, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Boos N (2001) Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine 26(17):1873–1878CrossRefPubMed Pfirrmann CW, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Boos N (2001) Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine 26(17):1873–1878CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Suzuki A DM, Hayashi T, Ruangchainikom M, Xiong C, Phan K, Scott TP, Wang JC (2014) Magnetic resonance classification system of cervical intervertebral disc degeneration—its validity and meaning. J Spinal Disord Tech Suzuki A DM, Hayashi T, Ruangchainikom M, Xiong C, Phan K, Scott TP, Wang JC (2014) Magnetic resonance classification system of cervical intervertebral disc degeneration—its validity and meaning. J Spinal Disord Tech
8.
go back to reference Morishita Y, Hida S, Miyazaki M, Hong S-W, Zou J, Wei F, Naito M, Wang JC (2008) The effects of the degenerative changes in the functional spinal unit on the kinematics of the cervical spine. Spine 33(6):E178–E182CrossRefPubMed Morishita Y, Hida S, Miyazaki M, Hong S-W, Zou J, Wei F, Naito M, Wang JC (2008) The effects of the degenerative changes in the functional spinal unit on the kinematics of the cervical spine. Spine 33(6):E178–E182CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Bogduk N, Mercer S (2000) Biomechanics of the cervical spine. I: normal kinematics. Clin Biomech 15(9):633–648CrossRef Bogduk N, Mercer S (2000) Biomechanics of the cervical spine. I: normal kinematics. Clin Biomech 15(9):633–648CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Miyazaki M, Hong SW, Yoon SH, Zou J, Tow B, Alanay A, Abitbol J-J, Wang JC (2008) Kinematic analysis of the relationship between the grade of disc degeneration and motion unit of the cervical spine. Spine 33(2):187–193CrossRefPubMed Miyazaki M, Hong SW, Yoon SH, Zou J, Tow B, Alanay A, Abitbol J-J, Wang JC (2008) Kinematic analysis of the relationship between the grade of disc degeneration and motion unit of the cervical spine. Spine 33(2):187–193CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Fei Z, Fan C, Ngo S, Xu J, Wang J (2011) Dynamic evaluation of cervical disc herniation using kinetic MRI. J Clin Neurosci 18(2):232–236CrossRefPubMed Fei Z, Fan C, Ngo S, Xu J, Wang J (2011) Dynamic evaluation of cervical disc herniation using kinetic MRI. J Clin Neurosci 18(2):232–236CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Miyazaki M, Hong SW, Yoon SH, Morishita Y, Wang JC (2008) Reliability of a magnetic resonance imaging-based grading system for cervical intervertebral disc degeneration. J Spinal Disord Tech 21(4):288–292CrossRefPubMed Miyazaki M, Hong SW, Yoon SH, Morishita Y, Wang JC (2008) Reliability of a magnetic resonance imaging-based grading system for cervical intervertebral disc degeneration. J Spinal Disord Tech 21(4):288–292CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Reitman CA, Mauro KM, Nguyen L, Ziegler JM, Hipp JA (2004) Intervertebral motion between flexion and extension in asymptomatic individuals. Spine 29(24):2832–2843CrossRefPubMed Reitman CA, Mauro KM, Nguyen L, Ziegler JM, Hipp JA (2004) Intervertebral motion between flexion and extension in asymptomatic individuals. Spine 29(24):2832–2843CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Eck JC, Humphreys SC, Lim T-H, Jeong ST, Kim JG, Hodges SD, An HS (2002) Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion. Spine 27(22):2431–2434CrossRefPubMed Eck JC, Humphreys SC, Lim T-H, Jeong ST, Kim JG, Hodges SD, An HS (2002) Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion. Spine 27(22):2431–2434CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Watanabe S, Inoue N, Yamaguchi T, Hirano Y, Orías AAE, Nishida S, Hirose Y, Mizuno J (2012) Three-dimensional kinematic analysis of the cervical spine after anterior cervical decompression and fusion at an adjacent level: a preliminary report. Eur Spine J 21(5):946–955PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Watanabe S, Inoue N, Yamaguchi T, Hirano Y, Orías AAE, Nishida S, Hirose Y, Mizuno J (2012) Three-dimensional kinematic analysis of the cervical spine after anterior cervical decompression and fusion at an adjacent level: a preliminary report. Eur Spine J 21(5):946–955PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Ruangchainikom M, Daubs MD, Suzuki A, Hayashi T, Weintraub G, Lee CJ, Inoue H, Tian H, Aghdasi B, Scott TP (2014) Effect of cervical kyphotic deformity type on the motion characteristics and dynamic spinal cord compression. Spine 39(12):932–938CrossRefPubMed Ruangchainikom M, Daubs MD, Suzuki A, Hayashi T, Weintraub G, Lee CJ, Inoue H, Tian H, Aghdasi B, Scott TP (2014) Effect of cervical kyphotic deformity type on the motion characteristics and dynamic spinal cord compression. Spine 39(12):932–938CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The evaluation of cervical spine mobility without significant spondylosis by kMRI
Authors
Chengjie Xiong
Akinobu Suzuki
Michael D. Daubs
Trevor Scott
Kevin Phan
Jeffrey Wang
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 12/2015
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4101-0

Other articles of this Issue 12/2015

European Spine Journal 12/2015 Go to the issue