Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 6/2014

01-06-2014 | Original Article

MRI evaluation of lumbar spinal stenosis: is a rapid visual assessment as good as area measurement?

Authors: Greger Lønne, Bent Ødegård, Lars Gunnar Johnsen, Tore K. Solberg, Kjell Arne Kvistad, Øystein P. Nygaard

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 6/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is commonly assessed on MRI by measuring dural sac cross-sectional area (DSCA). A new method, morphological grading A–D, has recently been introduced as an alternative method.

Objective

The aim of this study is to compare these two different methods for assessing LSS on MRI and study their reliability and intercorrelation.

Methods

On pretreatment MRI of 84 patients, two experienced radiologists independently classified level L2/L3, L3/L4 and L4/L5 as no, relative or significant stenosis using both methods. Agreement was analyzed by weighted Kappa. The correlation between the two methods was analysed using Spearman correlation, and visualized in a box plot.

Results

The interobserver agreement (95 % CI) was 0.69 (0.61–0.77) and 0.65 (0.56–0.74), respectively. The intraobserver agreements for DSCA were 0.77 (0.60–0.74) and 0.80 (0.66–0.93). On morphological grading A–D it was 0.78 (0.65–0.92) and 0.81 (0.68–0.94). The correlation coefficient between the two methods was 0.85 (p < 0.001). Grades C and D were under the limit value for significant stenosis using the DSCA.

Conclusions

The study shows that the inter- and intraobserver agreements of DSCA and morphological grading A–D were acceptable and their intercorrelation is strong. Both methods may be used in the MRI evaluation of LSS.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Verbiest H (1975) Pathomorphologic aspects of developmental lumbar stenosis. Orthop Clin N Am 6:177–196 Verbiest H (1975) Pathomorphologic aspects of developmental lumbar stenosis. Orthop Clin N Am 6:177–196
2.
go back to reference Amundsen T, Weber H, Lilleås F et al (1995) Lumbar spinal stenosis. Clinical and radiologic features. Spine 20:1178–1186CrossRefPubMed Amundsen T, Weber H, Lilleås F et al (1995) Lumbar spinal stenosis. Clinical and radiologic features. Spine 20:1178–1186CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Cheng F, You J, Rampersaud YR (2010) Relationship between spinal magnetic resonance imaging findings and candidacy for spinal surgery. Can Fam Physician 56:e323–e330PubMedCentralPubMed Cheng F, You J, Rampersaud YR (2010) Relationship between spinal magnetic resonance imaging findings and candidacy for spinal surgery. Can Fam Physician 56:e323–e330PubMedCentralPubMed
6.
go back to reference Schönström N, Bolender NF, Spengler DM (1985) The pathomorphology of spinal stenosis as seen on CT scans of the lumbar spine. Spine 10:806–811CrossRefPubMed Schönström N, Bolender NF, Spengler DM (1985) The pathomorphology of spinal stenosis as seen on CT scans of the lumbar spine. Spine 10:806–811CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Boden SD, McCowin PR, Davis DO et al (1990) Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the cervical spine in asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:1178–1184PubMed Boden SD, McCowin PR, Davis DO et al (1990) Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the cervical spine in asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:1178–1184PubMed
12.
go back to reference Ishimoto Y, Yoshimura N, Muraki S et al (2012) Prevalence of symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis and its association with physical performance in a population-based cohort in Japan: the Wakayama Spine Study. Osteoarthr Cartil 20:1103–1108. doi:10.1016/j.joca.2012.06.018 CrossRefPubMed Ishimoto Y, Yoshimura N, Muraki S et al (2012) Prevalence of symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis and its association with physical performance in a population-based cohort in Japan: the Wakayama Spine Study. Osteoarthr Cartil 20:1103–1108. doi:10.​1016/​j.​joca.​2012.​06.​018 CrossRefPubMed
13.
17.
go back to reference Andreisek G, Imhof M, Wertli M et al (2013) A systematic review of semiquantitative and qualitative radiologic criteria for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis. Am J Roentgenol 201:W735–W746. doi:10.2214/AJR.12.10163 CrossRef Andreisek G, Imhof M, Wertli M et al (2013) A systematic review of semiquantitative and qualitative radiologic criteria for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis. Am J Roentgenol 201:W735–W746. doi:10.​2214/​AJR.​12.​10163 CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Boden SD, Davis DO, Dina TS et al (1990) Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:403–408PubMed Boden SD, Davis DO, Dina TS et al (1990) Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:403–408PubMed
Metadata
Title
MRI evaluation of lumbar spinal stenosis: is a rapid visual assessment as good as area measurement?
Authors
Greger Lønne
Bent Ødegård
Lars Gunnar Johnsen
Tore K. Solberg
Kjell Arne Kvistad
Øystein P. Nygaard
Publication date
01-06-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 6/2014
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3248-4

Other articles of this Issue 6/2014

European Spine Journal 6/2014 Go to the issue