Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 1/2014

01-01-2014 | Original Article

Clinical outcomes following sublaminar-trimming laminoplasty for extensive lumbar canal stenosis

Authors: Wen-Jiunn Liu, Shih-Wun Hong, Da-Yon Liou, Tung-Wu Lu

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Current surgical approaches for treatment of lumbar canal stenosis are often associated with relatively high rates of reoperation and recurrent stenosis. We have developed a new approach for treatment of this condition: sublaminar-trimming laminoplasty. To describe the surgical approach of sublaminar-trimming laminoplasty and to assess associated outcomes.

Methods

Patients with extensive lumbar canal stenosis who received sublaminar-trimming laminoplasty from 2006 to 2008 were considered for inclusion in the study. The surgery comprised aspects of laminotomy and laminectomy. The following were assessed before surgery and 3 years after surgery: leg and back pain by visual analog scale (VAS), extent of disability by Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), severity of back pain by Japanese Orthopedic Association Score for Back Pain (JOA), walking tolerance, and leg numbness. Complications were noted.

Results

A total of 49 patients were included in the study (mean age 65.6 ± 10.6 years). VAS leg and back pain, ODI, and JOA scores significantly changed from before surgery to 3 years after surgery (P < 0.001). Mean changes (95 % confidence interval) were −6.2 (−6.7, −5.7), −4.3 (−4.8, −3.8), −21.4 (−23.4, −19.5), and 13.4 (12.1, 14.7) for leg pain, back pain, ODI, and JOA scores, respectively. Patients experienced significant improvements in walking tolerance and leg numbness (P < 0.001). There were no instances of recurrent stenosis or postoperative spinal instability. Complications included intraoperative dural tear (n = 2), postoperative urinary tract infection (n = 2), and inadequate decompression and junctional stenosis during follow-up (both n = 1).

Conclusion

Sublaminar-trimming laminoplasty shows promise as an effective treatment for extensive lumbar canal stenosis.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Verbiest H (2001) A radicular syndrome from developmental narrowing of the lumbar vertebral canal. 1954. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1:3–9CrossRef Verbiest H (2001) A radicular syndrome from developmental narrowing of the lumbar vertebral canal. 1954. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1:3–9CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Deyo RA, Ciol MA, Cherkin DC et al (1993) Lumbar spinal fusion. A cohort study of complications, reoperations, and resource use in the Medicare population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 18:1463–1470 Deyo RA, Ciol MA, Cherkin DC et al (1993) Lumbar spinal fusion. A cohort study of complications, reoperations, and resource use in the Medicare population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 18:1463–1470
3.
go back to reference Deyo RA, Gray DT, Kreuter W et al (2005) United States trends in lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative conditions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:1441–1445 (discussion 1446–1447)CrossRef Deyo RA, Gray DT, Kreuter W et al (2005) United States trends in lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative conditions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:1441–1445 (discussion 1446–1447)CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Deyo RA, Mirza SK, Martin BI et al (2010) Trends, major medical complications, and charges associated with surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in older adults. JAMA 303:1259–1265PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Deyo RA, Mirza SK, Martin BI et al (2010) Trends, major medical complications, and charges associated with surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in older adults. JAMA 303:1259–1265PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Mazanec DJ, Podichetty VK, Hsia A (2002) Lumbar canal stenosis: start with nonsurgical therapy. Cleve Clin J Med 69:909–917PubMedCrossRef Mazanec DJ, Podichetty VK, Hsia A (2002) Lumbar canal stenosis: start with nonsurgical therapy. Cleve Clin J Med 69:909–917PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Spivak JM (1998) Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80:1053–1066PubMed Spivak JM (1998) Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80:1053–1066PubMed
7.
go back to reference Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD et al (2010) Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis four-year results of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:1329–1338CrossRef Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD et al (2010) Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis four-year results of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:1329–1338CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Simotas AC (2001) Nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 384:153–161PubMedCrossRef Simotas AC (2001) Nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 384:153–161PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Hulen CA (2008) A review of the significance, indications, techniques, and outcomes of revision lumbar laminectomy surgery. Semin Spine Surg 20:270–276CrossRef Hulen CA (2008) A review of the significance, indications, techniques, and outcomes of revision lumbar laminectomy surgery. Semin Spine Surg 20:270–276CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Jakola AS, Sorlie A, Gulati S et al (2010) Clinical outcomes and safety assessment in elderly patients undergoing decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective study. BMC Surg 10:34PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Jakola AS, Sorlie A, Gulati S et al (2010) Clinical outcomes and safety assessment in elderly patients undergoing decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective study. BMC Surg 10:34PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ahn Y, Lee SH, Park WM et al (2003) Posterolateral percutaneous endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy for L5–S1 foraminal or lateral exit zone stenosis. Technical note. J Neurosurg 99:320–323PubMedCrossRef Ahn Y, Lee SH, Park WM et al (2003) Posterolateral percutaneous endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy for L5–S1 foraminal or lateral exit zone stenosis. Technical note. J Neurosurg 99:320–323PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Christie SD, Song JK (2006) Minimally invasive lumbar discectomy and foraminotomy. Neurosurg Clin N Am 17:459–466PubMedCrossRef Christie SD, Song JK (2006) Minimally invasive lumbar discectomy and foraminotomy. Neurosurg Clin N Am 17:459–466PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Yucesoy K, Ozer E (2002) Inverse laminoplasty for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27:316–320CrossRef Yucesoy K, Ozer E (2002) Inverse laminoplasty for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27:316–320CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Fu YS, Zeng BF, Xu JG (2008) Long-term outcomes of two different decompressive techniques for lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:514–518CrossRef Fu YS, Zeng BF, Xu JG (2008) Long-term outcomes of two different decompressive techniques for lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:514–518CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Englund J (2007) Lumbar spinal stenosis. Curr Sports Med Rep 6:50–55PubMed Englund J (2007) Lumbar spinal stenosis. Curr Sports Med Rep 6:50–55PubMed
16.
go back to reference Weiner BK, Walker M, Brower RS et al (1999) Microdecompression for lumbar spinal canal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24:2268–2272CrossRef Weiner BK, Walker M, Brower RS et al (1999) Microdecompression for lumbar spinal canal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24:2268–2272CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Tai CL, Hsieh PH, Chen WP et al (2008) Biomechanical comparison of lumbar spine instability between laminectomy and bilateral laminotomy for spinal stenosis syndrome—an experimental study in porcine model. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 9:84PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Tai CL, Hsieh PH, Chen WP et al (2008) Biomechanical comparison of lumbar spine instability between laminectomy and bilateral laminotomy for spinal stenosis syndrome—an experimental study in porcine model. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 9:84PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
18.
19.
go back to reference Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB (2000) The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:2940–2952 (discussion 2952)CrossRef Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB (2000) The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:2940–2952 (discussion 2952)CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Nakamura M, Miyamoto K, Shimizu K (2009) Difference in evaluation of patients with low back pain using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score for Back Pain and the Japanese Version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. J Orthop Sci 14:367–373PubMedCrossRef Nakamura M, Miyamoto K, Shimizu K (2009) Difference in evaluation of patients with low back pain using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score for Back Pain and the Japanese Version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. J Orthop Sci 14:367–373PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Javid MJ, Hadar EJ (1998) Long-term follow-up review of patients who underwent laminectomy for lumbar stenosis: a prospective study. J Neurosurg 89:1–7PubMedCrossRef Javid MJ, Hadar EJ (1998) Long-term follow-up review of patients who underwent laminectomy for lumbar stenosis: a prospective study. J Neurosurg 89:1–7PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Postacchini F, Cinotti G (1992) Bone regrowth after surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. J Bone Joint Surg B 74:862–869 Postacchini F, Cinotti G (1992) Bone regrowth after surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. J Bone Joint Surg B 74:862–869
Metadata
Title
Clinical outcomes following sublaminar-trimming laminoplasty for extensive lumbar canal stenosis
Authors
Wen-Jiunn Liu
Shih-Wun Hong
Da-Yon Liou
Tung-Wu Lu
Publication date
01-01-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 1/2014
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2888-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

European Spine Journal 1/2014 Go to the issue