Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
European Spine Journal
Published in: European Spine Journal 7/2013

01-07-2013 | Original Article

Flexion and extension radiographic evaluation for the clearance of potential cervical spine injures in trauma patients

Authors: Bonnie McCracken, Eric Klineberg, Brian Pickard, David H. Wisner

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 7/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Flexion and extension radiographs are often used in the setting of trauma to clear a cervical spine injury. The utility of such tests, however, remains to be determined. We hypothesized that in patients who underwent a negative computed tomography (CT) cervical spine scan, flexion and extension radiographs did not yield useful additional information.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective chart review of all patients admitted to a Level I trauma center who had a negative CT scan of the cervical spine and a subsequent cervical flexion–extension study for evaluation of potential cervical spine injury. All flexion–extension films were independently reviewed to determine adequacy as defined by C7/T1 visualization and 30° of change in the angle from flexion to extension. The independent reviews were compared to formal radiology readings and the influence of the flexion–extension studies on clinical decision making was also reviewed.

Results

One thousand patients met inclusion criteria for the study. Review of the flexion–extension radiographs revealed that 80 % of the films either did not adequately demonstrate the C7/T1 junction or had less than 30° range of motion. There was one missed injury that was also missed on magnetic resonance imaging. Results of the flexion–extension views had minimal effects on clinical decision making.

Conclusion

Adequate flexion extension films are difficult to obtain and are minimally helpful for clearance of the cervical spine in awake and alert trauma patients.
Literature
1.
El-Hoary GY, Kathol M, Daniel W (1995) Imaging of acute injuries of the cervical spine: value of plain radiography, CT, and MR imaging. Am J Roentgenol 164:43–50CrossRef
2.
Hoffman JR, Mower WR, Wolfson AB, Todd KH, Zucker MI (2000) Validity of a set of clinical criteria to rule out injury to the cervical spine in patients with blunt trauma. N Engl J Med 343(2):94–99PubMedCrossRef
3.
Hogan GJ, Mirvis SE, Shanmuganathan K, Scalea TM (2005) Exclusion of unstable cervical spine injury in obtunded patients with blunt trauma: is MR imaging needed when multi-detector row CT findings are normal? Radiology 237:106–113PubMedCrossRef
4.
Anderson PA, Muchow RD, Munoz A, Tontz WL, Resnick DK (2001) Clearance of the asymptomatic cervical spine: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Trauma 24:100–106CrossRef
5.
Barba CA, Taggert J, Morgan AS, Guerra J, Bernstein B, Lorenzo M, Gershon A, Espstein N (2001) A new cervical spine clearance protocol using computed tomography. J Trauma 51:652–657PubMedCrossRef
6.
Chiu WC, Haap JM, Cushing BM, Kramer ME, Scalea TM (2001) Ligamentous injuries of the cervical spine in unreliable blunt trauma patients: incidence, evaluation and outcome. J Trauma 50:457–464PubMedCrossRef
7.
Como JJ, Leukhardt WH, Anderson JS, Wilczewski PA, Samia H, Claridge JA (2011) Computed tomography alone may clear the cervical spine in obtunded blunt trauma patients: a prospective evaluation of a revised protocol. J Trauma 70:349–351CrossRef
8.
Crim JR, Moore K, Brodke D (2001) Clearance of the cervical spine in multitrauma patients: the role of advanced imaging musculoskeletal MRI and CT. Semin Ultrasounds CT MR 22:283–305CrossRef
9.
Daffner RH, Hackney DB (2007) ACR appropriateness criteria on suspected spine trauma. J Am Coll Radiol 4:762–775PubMedCrossRef
10.
Diaz JJ, Aulino JM, Collier B, Roman C, May AK, Miller RS, Guillamondequi O, Morris JA (2005) The early work-up for isolated ligamentous injury of the cervical spine: does computed tomography scan have a role? J Trauma 59:897–904PubMedCrossRef
11.
Harrison JL, Ostlere SJ (2004) Diagnosing purely ligamentous injuries of the cervical spine in the unconscious trauma patient. Br J Radiol 77:276–278PubMedCrossRef
12.
Anderson P, Zbigniew G, Lindsey R, Schoenfeld A, Harris M (2010) Clearing the cervical spine in the blunt trauma patient. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 18(3):149–159PubMed
13.
Davis JW, Parks SN, Detlefs CL, Williams JL, Smith RW (1995) Clearing the cervical spine in obtunded patients: the use of dynamic fluoroscopy. J Trauma 39(3):435–438PubMedCrossRef
14.
Insko EK, Gracias VH, Gupta R, Goettler CE, Gaieski DF, Dalinka MK (2002) Utility of flexion and extension radiographs of the cervical spine in the acute evaluation of blunt trauma. J Trauma 53:426–429PubMedCrossRef
15.
Khan SN, Erickson G, Sena ML, Gupta MC (2011) Use of flexion extension radiographs of the cervical spine to rule out acute instability in patients with negative computed tomography. J Orthop Trauma 25:51–56PubMedCrossRef
16.
Knopp R, Parker J, Tashijian J, Ganz W (2001) Defining radiographic criteria for flexion-extension studies of the cervical spine. Ann Emerg Med 38:31–35PubMedCrossRef
17.
Quint U, Hans HJ (2008) Grading of degenerative disk disease and function impairment: imaging versus patho-anatomical findings. Eur Spine J 17(12):1705–1713PubMedCrossRef
18.
Schuster R, Waxman K, Sanchez B, Becerra S, Chung R, Conner S, Jones T (2005) Magnetic resonance imaging is not needed to clear cervical spines in blunt trauma patients with normal computed tomographic results and no motor deficits. Arch Surg 140:762–766PubMedCrossRef
19.
Dickinson G, Stiell IG, Schull M, Brison R, Clement CM, Vandemheen KL, Cass D, McKnight D, Greenberg G, Worthington JR, Reardon M, Morrison L, Eisenhauer MA, Dreyer J, Wells GA (2004) Retrospective application of the NEXUS low-risk criteria for cervical spine radiography in canadian emergency departments. Ann Emerg Med 43:D507–D514CrossRef
20.
Metadata
Title
Flexion and extension radiographic evaluation for the clearance of potential cervical spine injures in trauma patients
Authors
Bonnie McCracken
Eric Klineberg
Brian Pickard
David H. Wisner
Publication date
01-07-2013
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 7/2013
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2598-z

Other articles of this Issue 7/2013

European Spine Journal 7/2013 Go to the issue

Original Article

Predictors for long-term disability in women with persistent postpartum pelvic girdle pain

Original Article

An anatomic consideration of C2 vertebrae artery groove variation for individual screw implantation in axis

Original Article

Cervical curvature, spinal cord MRIT2 signal, and occupying ratio impact surgical approach selection in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament

Original Article

Differential blood contamination levels and powder–liquid ratios can affect the compressive strength of calcium phosphate cement (CPC): a study using a transpedicular vertebroplasty model

Original Article

Anterior approach versus posterior approach for the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a systemic review and meta-analysis

Original Article

The correlation between cervical range of motion and misplacement of cervical pedicle screws during cervical posterior spinal fixation surgery using a CT-based navigation system