Top

European Spine Journal

Published in:

01-09-2012 | Original Article

Quantitative MRI analysis of the surface area, signal intensity and MRI index of the central bright area for the evaluation of early adjacent disc degeneration after lumbar fusion

Authors: Shun-Wu Fan, Zhi-Jie Zhou, Zhi-Jun Hu, Xiang-Qian Fang, Feng-Dong Zhao, Jian Zhang

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 9/2012

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate early ASD at short-term follow-up in fused and unoperated patients with degenerative disc disease, using quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) analysis of the area, signal intensity and their product, i.e., MRI index of the central bright area of the disc as well as measures of intervertebral disc height and Pfirrmann grading scale. The further purpose was to determine whether fusion accelerates ASD compared with non-surgical treatment in short-term follow-up.

Methods

One hundred and eight chronic low back patients diagnosed as L4/L5 degeneration undertook either one-level instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion or conservative treatment. They were followed up for about 1 year. Finally 46 fused and 45 conservatively treated patients with MRI follow-up were included. Pre- and post-treatment MRIs were compared to determine the progression of disc degeneration at the two cranial adjacent segments.

Results

The area, signal intensity and MRI index of the central bright area of the adjacent discs decreased in the operated and unoperated groups from pre-treatment to follow-up, except for an insignificant decrease of signal intensity at the second adjacent segment in the unoperated group. The changes in these parameters were statistically greater at the first than the second adjacent segment in the fused group, but not in the unoperated group. And the changes in the fused group were more pronounced than those at both neighbouring levels in the unoperated group. However, the Pfirrmann grading scale and intervertebral disc height did not detect any changes at adjacent discs in either group.

Conclusions

Decrease in the parameters of quantitative MRI analysis indicated early degeneration at discs adjacent to lumbar spinal fusion. Fusion had an independent effect on the natural history of ASD during short-term follow-up. Continued longitudinal follow-up is required to determine whether these MRI changes lead to pathologic changes.

Booth KC, Bridwell KH, Eisenberg BA, Baldus CR, Lenke LG (1999) Minimum 5-year results of degenerative spondylolisthesis treated with decompression and instrumented posterior fusion. Spine 24:1721–1727PubMedCrossRef

Guigi P, Lambert P, Lassale B, Deburge A (1997) Long term outcome of adjacent levels of posterolateral lumbar fusion. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 83:685–696

Hambly MF, Wiltse LL, Raghavan N, Schneiderman G, Koenig C (1998) The transition zone above a lumbosacral fusion. Spine 23:1785–1792PubMedCrossRef

Ishihara H, Osada R, Kanamori M, Kawaguchi Y, Ohmori K, Kimura T, Matsui H, Tsuji H (2001) Minimum 10-year follow-up study of anterior lumbar interbody fusion for isthmic spondylolisthesis. J Spinal Disord 14:91–99PubMedCrossRef

Kumar MN, Baklanov A, Chopin D (2001) Correlation between sagittal plane changes and adjacent segment degeneration following lumbar spine fusion. Eur Spine J 10:314–319PubMedCrossRef

Kumar MN, Jacquot F, Hall H (2001) Long-term follow-up of functional outcomes and radiographic changes at adjacent levels following lumbar spine fusion for degenerative disc disease. Eur Spine J 10:309–313PubMedCrossRef

Miyakoshi N, Abe E, Shimada Y, Okuyama K, Suzuki T, Sato K (2000) Outcome of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis and postoperative intervertebral disc degeneration adjacent to the fusion. Spine 25:1837–1842PubMedCrossRef

Anandjiwala J, Seo JY, Ha KY, Oh IS, Shin DC (2011) Adjacent segment degeneration after instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion: a prospective cohort study with a minimum five-year follow-up. Eur Spine J 20:1951–1960PubMedCrossRef

Lee CK (1988) Accelerated degeneration of the segment adjacent to a lumbar fusion. Spine 13:375–377PubMedCrossRef

10.

Yang JY, Lee JK, Song HS (2008) The impact of adjacent segment degeneration on the clinical outcome after lumbar spinal fusion. Spine 33:503–507PubMedCrossRef

11.

Park JY, Cho YE, Kuh SU, Cho JH, Chin DK, Jin BH, Kim KS (2007) New prognostic factors for adjacent-segment degeneration after 360° fixation for spondylolytic spondylolisthesis: special reference to the usefulness of pelvic incidence angel. J Neurosurg Spine 7:139–144PubMedCrossRef

12.

Lee CS, Hwang CJ, Lee SW, Ahn YJ, Kim YT, Lee DH, Lee MY (2009) Risk factors for adjacent segment disease after lumbar fusion. Eur Spine J 18:1637–1643PubMedCrossRef

13.

Videman T, Nummi P, Battié M, Gill K (1994) Digital assessment of MRI for lumbar disc desiccation. A comparative of digital versus subjective assessments and digital intensity profiles versus discogram and macroanatomic findings. Spine 19:192–198PubMedCrossRef

14.

Benneker LM, Heini PF, Anderson SE, Alini M, Ito K (2005) Correlation of radiographic and MRI parameters to morphological and biochemical assessment of intervetebral disc degeneration. Eur Spine J 14:27–35PubMedCrossRef

15.

Rajasekaran S, Venkatadass K, Babu JN, Ganesh K, Shetty AP (2008) Pharmacological enhancement of disc diffusion and differentiation of healthy, ageing and degenerated discs. Results from in vivo serial post-contrast MRI studies in 365 human lumbar discs. Eur Spine J 17:626–634PubMedCrossRef

16.

Simth LJ, Kurmis AP, Slavotinek JP, Fazzalari NL (2011) In vitro evaluation of a manganese chloride phantom-based MRI technique for quantitative determination of lumbar intervertebral disc composition and condition. Eur Spine J 20:434–439CrossRef

17.

Videman T, Gibbons LE, Battié MC (2008) Age- and pathology-specific measures of disc degeneration. Spine 33:2781–2788PubMedCrossRef

18.

Sobajima S, Kompel JF, Kim JS, Wallach CJ, Robertson DD, Vogt MT, Kang JD, Gilbertson D (2005) A slowly progressive and reproducible animal model of intervetebral disc degeneration characterized by MRI, X-ray, and histology. Spine 30:15–24PubMed

19.

Park P, Garton HJ, Gala VC, Hoff JT, McGillicuddy JE (2004) Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: review of the literature. Spine 29:1938–1944PubMedCrossRef

20.

Min JH, Jang JS, Jung BJ, Lee HY, Choi WC, Shim CS, Choi G, Lee SH (2008) The clinical characteristics and risk factors for the adjacent segment degeneration in instrumented lumbar fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech 21:305–309PubMedCrossRef

21.

Paajanen H, Lehto I, Alanen A, Erkintalo M, Komu M (1994) Diurnal fluid changes of lumbar discs measured indirectly by magnetic resonance imaging. J Orthop Res 12(4):509–514PubMedCrossRef

22.

Hangai M, Kaneoka K, Kuno S, Hinotsu S, Sakane M, Mamizuka N, Sakai S, Ochiai N (2008) Factors associated with lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration in the elderly. Spine J 8:732–740PubMedCrossRef

23.

Pech P, Haughton VM (1985) Lumbar intervertebral disk: correlative MR and anatomic study. Radiology 156:699–701PubMed

24.

Yu SW, Haughton VM, Ho PS, Sether LA, Wagner M, Ho KC (1988) Progressive and regressive changes in the nucleus pulposus Part II. The adult. Radiology 169:93–97PubMed

25.

Luoma K, Raininko R, Nummi P, Luukkonen R (1993) Is the signal intensity of cerebrospinal fluid constant? Intensity measurements with high and low field magnetic resonance images. Magn Reson Imaging 11:549–555PubMedCrossRef

26.

Pfirrmann CW, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Boos N (2001) Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine 26:1873–1878PubMedCrossRef

27.

Schulte TL, Leistra F, Bullmann V, Osada N, Vieth V, Marquardt B, Lerner T, Liljenqvist U, Hackenberg L (2007) Disc height reduction in adjacent segments and clinical outcome 10 years after lumbar 360° fusion. Eur Spine J 16:2152–2158PubMedCrossRef

28.

Morishita Y, Ohta H, Naito M, Matsumoto Y, Huang G, Tatsumi M, Takemitsu Y, Kida H (2011) Kinematic evaluation of the adjacent segments after lumbar instrumented surgery: a comparison between rigid fusion and dynamic non-fusion stabilization. Eur Spine J 20:1480–1485PubMedCrossRef

29.

Ekman P, Möller H, Shalabi A, Yu YX, Hedlund R (2009) A prospective randomized study on the long-term effect of lumbar fusion on adjacent disc degeneration. Eur Spine J 18:1175–1186PubMedCrossRef

30.

Boras PA, Jacobson JA, Scibek JS, Dover GC (2005) Comparison of dynamic sonography to stress radiography for assessing glenohumeral laxity in asymptomatic shoulders. Am J Sports Med 33:734–741CrossRef

31.

Vaga S, Brayda-Bruno M, Perona F, Fornari M, Raimondi MT, Petruzzi M, Grava G, Costa F, Caiani EG, Lamartina C (2009) Molecular MR imaging for the evaluation of the effect of dynamic stabilization on lumbar intervertebral discs. Eur Spine J 18:40S–48SCrossRef

32.

Disch AC, Schmoelz W, Matziolis G, Schneider SV, Knop C, Putzier M (2008) High risk of adjacent segment degeneration after floating fusions: long-term outcome after low lumbar spine fusions. J Spinal Disord Tech 21:79–85PubMedCrossRef

33.

Phillips FM, Reuben J, Wetzel FT (2002) Intervertebral disc degeneration adjacent to a lumbar fusion. An experimental rabbit model. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84:289–294PubMedCrossRef

34.

Hiqashino K, Hamasaki T, Kim JH, Okada M, Yoon ST, Boden SD, Hutton WC (2010) Do the adjacent level intervertebral discs degenerate after a lumbar spinal fusion? An experimental study using a rabbit model. Spine 35:1144–1152CrossRef

35.

Gruber HE, Gordon B, Williams C, Ingram JA, Norton HJ, Hanley EN Jr (2009) A new small animal model for the study of spine fusion in the sand rat: pilot studies. Lab Anim 43:272–277PubMedCrossRef

Title: Quantitative MRI analysis of the surface area, signal intensity and MRI index of the central bright area for the evaluation of early adjacent disc degeneration after lumbar fusion
Authors: Shun-Wu Fan
Zhi-Jie Zhou
Zhi-Jun Hu
Xiang-Qian Fang
Feng-Dong Zhao
Jian Zhang
Publication date: 01-09-2012
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: European Spine Journal / Issue 9/2012
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2293-0

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Quantitative MRI analysis of the surface area, signal intensity and MRI index of the central bright area for the evaluation of early adjacent disc degeneration after lumbar fusion

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 9/2012

Parameters of lengthened sacroiliac screw fixation: a radiological anatomy study

Is pregnancy related pelvic girdle pain associated with altered kinematic, kinetic and motor control of the pelvis? A systematic review

Intervertebral disc cell- and hydrogel-supported and spontaneous intervertebral disc repair in nucleotomized sheep

A novel “pelvic ring augmentation construct” for lumbo-pelvic reconstruction in tumour surgery

Sacroiliac joint pain after lumbar/lumbosacral fusion: current knowledge

Respiratory effects, hemodynamic changes and cement leakage during multilevel cement balloon kyphoplasty