Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 2/2012

01-02-2012 | Original Article

Clinical results of and patient satisfaction with cervical laminoplasty for considerable cord compression with only slight myelopathy

Authors: Masashi Neo, Shunsuke Fujibayashi, Mitsuru Takemoto, Takashi Nakamura

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 2/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

There is no established consensus on the indications for surgery in patients with considerable cord compression but only slight myelopathy. The purpose of this study is to stimulate discussion about the indications for surgery in these patients.

Methods

The records of consecutive patients who underwent cervical laminoplasty (CLP) during 3.5 years were reviewed. Those patients whose pre-operative Japanese Orthopaedic Association score (JOA score, maximum 17) for cervical myelopathy was 16 points or more, indicating that they had very slight myelopathy, were selected. The postoperative JOA scores of these patients were checked via a chart review, and they were sent a survey asking about their degree of satisfaction with the results of surgery.

Results

Of 143 patients who underwent CLP, 14 presented with a preoperative JOA score of 16 or more. No patients showed a postoperative deterioration in JOA score. Nine patients complained of pre-operative hand numbness and this symptom disappeared postoperatively in seven cases. Most patients were satisfied with the results of the surgery: “very satisfied” in 11 cases and none selected “slightly dissatisfied” or “very dissatisfied”.

Conclusions

We believe that surgery can rescue well-informed and deliberately selected patients with only slight myelopathy, because their symptoms improve and they are freed from persistent anxiety.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Klineberg E (2010) Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a review of the evidence. Orthop Clin N Am 41:193–202CrossRef Klineberg E (2010) Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a review of the evidence. Orthop Clin N Am 41:193–202CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Shimomura T, Sumi M, Nishida K, Maeno K, Tadokoro K, Miyamoto H, Kurosaka M, Doita M (2007) Prognostic factors for deterioration of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy after nonsurgical treatment. Spine 32:2474–2479PubMedCrossRef Shimomura T, Sumi M, Nishida K, Maeno K, Tadokoro K, Miyamoto H, Kurosaka M, Doita M (2007) Prognostic factors for deterioration of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy after nonsurgical treatment. Spine 32:2474–2479PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ratliff JK, Cooper PR (2003) Cervical laminoplasty: a critical review. J Neurosurg 98(suppl 3):230–238PubMed Ratliff JK, Cooper PR (2003) Cervical laminoplasty: a critical review. J Neurosurg 98(suppl 3):230–238PubMed
5.
go back to reference Hosono N, Yonenobu K, Ono K (1996) Neck and shoulder pain after laminoplasty A noticeable complication. Spine 21:1969–1973PubMedCrossRef Hosono N, Yonenobu K, Ono K (1996) Neck and shoulder pain after laminoplasty A noticeable complication. Spine 21:1969–1973PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Sakaura H, Hosono N, Mukai Y, Ishii T, Yoshikawa H (2003) C5 palsy after decompression surgery for survical myelopathy: review of the literature. Spine 28:2447–2451PubMedCrossRef Sakaura H, Hosono N, Mukai Y, Ishii T, Yoshikawa H (2003) C5 palsy after decompression surgery for survical myelopathy: review of the literature. Spine 28:2447–2451PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kimura A, Seichi A, Inoue H, Hoshino Y (2011) Long-term results of double-door laminoplasty using hydroxyapatite spacers in patients with compressive cervical myelopathy. Eur Spine J 20(9):1560–1566PubMedCrossRef Kimura A, Seichi A, Inoue H, Hoshino Y (2011) Long-term results of double-door laminoplasty using hydroxyapatite spacers in patients with compressive cervical myelopathy. Eur Spine J 20(9):1560–1566PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Miyata M, Neo M, Fujibayashi S, Takemoto M, Nakamura T (2008) Double-door cervical laminoplasty with the use of suture anchors, technical note. J Spinal Disord Tech 21:575–578PubMedCrossRef Miyata M, Neo M, Fujibayashi S, Takemoto M, Nakamura T (2008) Double-door cervical laminoplasty with the use of suture anchors, technical note. J Spinal Disord Tech 21:575–578PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Shiraishi T (2002) A new technique for exposure of the cervical spine laminae. Technical note. J Neurosurg 96(suppl 1):122–126 Shiraishi T (2002) A new technique for exposure of the cervical spine laminae. Technical note. J Neurosurg 96(suppl 1):122–126
10.
go back to reference Young GJ, Meterko M, Desai KR (2000) Patient satisfaction with hospital care: effects of demographic and institutional characteristics. Med Care 38:325–334PubMedCrossRef Young GJ, Meterko M, Desai KR (2000) Patient satisfaction with hospital care: effects of demographic and institutional characteristics. Med Care 38:325–334PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Hekkert KD, Cihangir S, Kleefstra SM, van den Berg B, Kool RB (2009) Patient satisfaction revisited: a multilevel approach. Soc Sci Med 69:68–75PubMedCrossRef Hekkert KD, Cihangir S, Kleefstra SM, van den Berg B, Kool RB (2009) Patient satisfaction revisited: a multilevel approach. Soc Sci Med 69:68–75PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Clinical results of and patient satisfaction with cervical laminoplasty for considerable cord compression with only slight myelopathy
Authors
Masashi Neo
Shunsuke Fujibayashi
Mitsuru Takemoto
Takashi Nakamura
Publication date
01-02-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 2/2012
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-2050-9

Other articles of this Issue 2/2012

European Spine Journal 2/2012 Go to the issue

Announcements

Announcements