Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 4/2012

01-04-2012 | Original Article

Optimal stiffness of a pedicle-screw-based motion preservation implant for the lumbar spine

Authors: Antonius Rohlmann, Thomas Zander, Georg Bergmann, Hadi N. Boustani

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 4/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Pedicle-screw-based dynamic implants are intended to preserve intervertebral mobility while releasing certain spinal structures. The aim of the study was to determine the as yet unknown optimal stiffness value of the longitudinal rods that fulfils best these opposing tasks.

Methods

A finite element model of the lumbar spine was used which includes the posterior implant at level L4/5. More than 250 variations of this model were generated by varying the diameter of the longitudinal rods between 6 and 12 mm and their elastic modulus between 10 MPa and 200 MPa. The loading cases flexion, extension, lateral bending and axial rotation were simulated. Evaluated optimization criteria were the ranges of motion, forces in the facet joints, posterior bulgings of the intervertebral disc and the intradiscal pressures. Various objective functions were evaluated.

Results

The results show that the objective values depend more on the axial stiffness of the rods than on bending and torsional stiffness, rod diameter and elastic modulus. The optimal stiffness value for most of the investigated objective functions is approximately 50 N/mm and is achieved, e.g. using a rod diameter of 6 mm and an elastic modulus of 50 MPa. The design with the least axial stiffness was the best one with regard to the mobility. The forces in the facet joints and the intradiscal pressures were reduced mostly by an implant with the highest axial stiffness. When minimal posterior disc bulging was the criterion, the optimal axial stiffness was also approximately 50 N/mm.

Conclusions

The optimal axial stiffness of a pedicle-screw-based motion preservation implant for the lumbar spine is approximately 50 N/mm.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ahn YH, Chen WM, Lee KY, Park KW, Lee SJ (2008) Comparison of the load-sharing characteristics between pedicle-based dynamic and rigid rod devices. Biomed Mater 3:44101CrossRef Ahn YH, Chen WM, Lee KY, Park KW, Lee SJ (2008) Comparison of the load-sharing characteristics between pedicle-based dynamic and rigid rod devices. Biomed Mater 3:44101CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Rohlmann A, Nabil Boustani H, Bergmann G, Zander T (2010) Effect of a pedicle-screw-based motion preservation system on lumbar spine biomechanics: a probabilistic finite element study with subsequent sensitivity analysis. J Biomech 43:2963–2969PubMedCrossRef Rohlmann A, Nabil Boustani H, Bergmann G, Zander T (2010) Effect of a pedicle-screw-based motion preservation system on lumbar spine biomechanics: a probabilistic finite element study with subsequent sensitivity analysis. J Biomech 43:2963–2969PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Stoll TM, Dubois G, Schwarzenbach O (2002) The dynamic neutralization system for the spine: a multi-center study of a novel nonfusion system. Eur Spine J 11(Suppl. 2):S170–S178PubMed Stoll TM, Dubois G, Schwarzenbach O (2002) The dynamic neutralization system for the spine: a multi-center study of a novel nonfusion system. Eur Spine J 11(Suppl. 2):S170–S178PubMed
4.
go back to reference Wilke HJ, Heuer F, Schmidt H (2009) Prospective design delineation and subsequent in vitro evaluation of a new posterior dynamic stabilization system. Spine 34:255–261PubMedCrossRef Wilke HJ, Heuer F, Schmidt H (2009) Prospective design delineation and subsequent in vitro evaluation of a new posterior dynamic stabilization system. Spine 34:255–261PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Schmidt H, Heuer F, Wilke HJ (2009) Which axial and bending stiffnesses of posterior implants are required to design a flexible lumbar stabilization system? J Biomech 42:48–54PubMedCrossRef Schmidt H, Heuer F, Wilke HJ (2009) Which axial and bending stiffnesses of posterior implants are required to design a flexible lumbar stabilization system? J Biomech 42:48–54PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Rohlmann A, Burra NK, Zander T, Bergmann G (2007) Comparison of the effects of bilateral posterior dynamic and rigid fixation devices on the loads in the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis. Eur Spine J 16:1223–1231PubMedCrossRef Rohlmann A, Burra NK, Zander T, Bergmann G (2007) Comparison of the effects of bilateral posterior dynamic and rigid fixation devices on the loads in the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis. Eur Spine J 16:1223–1231PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Zander T, Rohlmann A, Calisse J, Bergmann G (2001) Estimation of muscle forces in the lumbar spine during upper-body inclination. Clin Biomech 16:S73–S80CrossRef Zander T, Rohlmann A, Calisse J, Bergmann G (2001) Estimation of muscle forces in the lumbar spine during upper-body inclination. Clin Biomech 16:S73–S80CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Rohlmann A, Bauer L, Zander T, Bergmann G, Wilke HJ (2006) Determination of trunk muscle forces for flexion and extension by using a validated finite element model of the lumbar spine and measured in vivo data. J Biomech 39:981–989PubMedCrossRef Rohlmann A, Bauer L, Zander T, Bergmann G, Wilke HJ (2006) Determination of trunk muscle forces for flexion and extension by using a validated finite element model of the lumbar spine and measured in vivo data. J Biomech 39:981–989PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Zander T, Rohlmann A, Bergmann G (2009) Influence of different artificial disc kinematics on spine biomechanics. Clin Biomech 24:135–142CrossRef Zander T, Rohlmann A, Bergmann G (2009) Influence of different artificial disc kinematics on spine biomechanics. Clin Biomech 24:135–142CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Zander T, Rohlmann A, Bock B, Bergmann G (2007) Biomechanische Konsequenzen von verschiedenen Positionierungen bewegungserhaltender Bandscheibenimplantate. Eine Finite-Elemente-Studie an der Lendenwirbelsäule. Orthopade 36:205–211PubMedCrossRef Zander T, Rohlmann A, Bock B, Bergmann G (2007) Biomechanische Konsequenzen von verschiedenen Positionierungen bewegungserhaltender Bandscheibenimplantate. Eine Finite-Elemente-Studie an der Lendenwirbelsäule. Orthopade 36:205–211PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Rohlmann A, Zander T, Rao M, Bergmann G (2009) Applying a follower load delivers realistic results for simulating standing. J Biomech 42:1520–1526PubMedCrossRef Rohlmann A, Zander T, Rao M, Bergmann G (2009) Applying a follower load delivers realistic results for simulating standing. J Biomech 42:1520–1526PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Dreischarf M, Rohlmann A, Bergmann G, Zander T (submitted) Optimised in vitro applicable loads for the simulation of lateral bending in the lumbar spine Dreischarf M, Rohlmann A, Bergmann G, Zander T (submitted) Optimised in vitro applicable loads for the simulation of lateral bending in the lumbar spine
13.
go back to reference Dreischarf M, Rohlmann A, Bergmann G, Zander T (2011) Optimised loads for the simulation of axial rotation in the lumbar spine. J Biomech 44:2323–2327PubMedCrossRef Dreischarf M, Rohlmann A, Bergmann G, Zander T (2011) Optimised loads for the simulation of axial rotation in the lumbar spine. J Biomech 44:2323–2327PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Rohlmann A, Zander T, Rao M, Bergmann G (2009) Realistic loading conditions for upper body bending. J Biomech 42:884–890PubMedCrossRef Rohlmann A, Zander T, Rao M, Bergmann G (2009) Realistic loading conditions for upper body bending. J Biomech 42:884–890PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kettler A, Rohlmann F, Ring C, Mack C, Wilke HJ (2011) Do early stages of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration really cause instability? Evaluation of an in vitro database. Eur Spine J 20:578–584PubMedCrossRef Kettler A, Rohlmann F, Ring C, Mack C, Wilke HJ (2011) Do early stages of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration really cause instability? Evaluation of an in vitro database. Eur Spine J 20:578–584PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Rohlmann A, Zander T, Schmidt H, Wilke H-J, Bergmann G (2006) Analysis of the influence of disc degeneration on the mechanical behaviour of a lumbar motion segment using the finite element method. J Biomech 39:2484–2490PubMedCrossRef Rohlmann A, Zander T, Schmidt H, Wilke H-J, Bergmann G (2006) Analysis of the influence of disc degeneration on the mechanical behaviour of a lumbar motion segment using the finite element method. J Biomech 39:2484–2490PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Ueno K, Liu YK (1987) A three-dimensional nonlinear finite element model of lumbar intervertebral joint in torsion. J Biomech Eng 109:200–209PubMedCrossRef Ueno K, Liu YK (1987) A three-dimensional nonlinear finite element model of lumbar intervertebral joint in torsion. J Biomech Eng 109:200–209PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Shirazi-Adl A, Ahmed AM, Shrivastava SC (1986) Mechanical response of a lumbar motion segment in axial torque alone and combined with compression. Spine 11:914–927PubMedCrossRef Shirazi-Adl A, Ahmed AM, Shrivastava SC (1986) Mechanical response of a lumbar motion segment in axial torque alone and combined with compression. Spine 11:914–927PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Eberlein R, Holzapfel GA, Schulze-Bauer CAJ (2000) An anisotropic model for annulus tissue and enhanced finite element analysis of intact lumbar disc bodies. Comp Meth Biomech Biomed Eng 4:209–229 Eberlein R, Holzapfel GA, Schulze-Bauer CAJ (2000) An anisotropic model for annulus tissue and enhanced finite element analysis of intact lumbar disc bodies. Comp Meth Biomech Biomed Eng 4:209–229
20.
go back to reference Nolte LP, Panjabi MM, Oxland TR (1990) Biomechanical properties of lumbar spinal ligaments. In: Heimke G, Soltesz U, Lee AJC (eds) Clinical Implant Materials Advances in Biomaterials. Elsevier, Heidelberg, pp 663–668 Nolte LP, Panjabi MM, Oxland TR (1990) Biomechanical properties of lumbar spinal ligaments. In: Heimke G, Soltesz U, Lee AJC (eds) Clinical Implant Materials Advances in Biomaterials. Elsevier, Heidelberg, pp 663–668
21.
go back to reference Sharma M, Langrana NA, Rodriguez J (1995) Role of ligaments and facets in lumbar spinal stability. Spine 20:887–900PubMedCrossRef Sharma M, Langrana NA, Rodriguez J (1995) Role of ligaments and facets in lumbar spinal stability. Spine 20:887–900PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Optimal stiffness of a pedicle-screw-based motion preservation implant for the lumbar spine
Authors
Antonius Rohlmann
Thomas Zander
Georg Bergmann
Hadi N. Boustani
Publication date
01-04-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 4/2012
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-2047-4

Other articles of this Issue 4/2012

European Spine Journal 4/2012 Go to the issue