Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 3/2010

Open Access 01-03-2010 | Original Article

Comparative analysis between shape memory alloy-based correction and traditional correction technique in pedicle screws constructs for treating severe scoliosis

Authors: Yan Wang, Guoquan Zheng, Xuesong Zhang, Yonggang Zhang, Songhua Xiao, Zheng Wang

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 3/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

The three-dimensional correction of severe rigid scoliosis has been improved by segmental pedicle screw instrumentation. However, there can be significant difficulty related to the use of a rigid rod, especially in the apex region of severe scoliosis. This study is a retrospective matched cohort study to evaluate the advantages of Nitinol shape memory alloy (SMA) rod-based correction by comparing the clinical and radiographic results obtained from using a temporary SMA rod and those from a standard rod in the correction of severe scoliosis. From May 2004 to September 2006, patients with matched curve type, ages at surgery, operative methods and fusion levels in our institute and instrumented with either SMA rods (n = 14) or traditional correction techniques (n = 16) were reviewed. In SMA group, the SMA rods served as a temporary intraoperative tool for deformity correction and were replaced by standard rods. The blood loss at surgery averaged 778 ± 285 ml in the traditional group and 585 ± 188 ml in the SMA group (P < 0.05). Operative time averaged 284 ± 53 min in the SMA group and 324 ± 41 min in the traditional group (P < 0.05). In the SMA group, the preoperative major curve was 92.6° ± 13.7° with a flexibility of 25.5 ± 7.3% was corrected to 29.4° ± 5.7° demonstrating a 68.4% immediate postoperative correction. In the traditional group, the preoperative major curve was 88.6° ± 14.6° with a flexibility of 29.3 ± 6.6% was corrected to 37.2° ± 7.3° demonstrating a 57.8% immediate postoperative correction. There was a statistic difference between the SMA group and traditional group in correction rate of the major thoracic curve. In the SMA group, one case suffered from deep infection 2 months postoperatively. In the traditional group, 6 of 16 cases suffered pedicle screw pull out or loosening during placement of the standard rod at the apex vertebrae on the concave side. In three cases, the mono-axial pedicle screws near the apex were abandoned and in five cases replaced with poly-axial pedicle screws. This study shows that the temporary use of SMA rod may reduce the operative time, blood loss, while improve the correction of the coronal plane when compared with standard techniques.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Betz RR, Kim J, D’Andrea LP et al (2003) An innovative technique of vertebral body stapling for the treatment of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a feasibility, safety, and utility study. Spine 28(Suppl):255–265CrossRef Betz RR, Kim J, D’Andrea LP et al (2003) An innovative technique of vertebral body stapling for the treatment of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a feasibility, safety, and utility study. Spine 28(Suppl):255–265CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Bezzi M, Orsi F, Salvatori FM et al (1994) Self-expandable nitinol stent for the management of biliary obstruction: long-term clinical results. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 5:287–293CrossRef Bezzi M, Orsi F, Salvatori FM et al (1994) Self-expandable nitinol stent for the management of biliary obstruction: long-term clinical results. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 5:287–293CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Bradford DS, Tribus CB (1997) Vertebral column resection for the treatment of rigid coronal decompensation. Spine 22:1590–1599CrossRefPubMed Bradford DS, Tribus CB (1997) Vertebral column resection for the treatment of rigid coronal decompensation. Spine 22:1590–1599CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Braun JT, Hines JL, Akyuz E et al (2006) Relative versus absolute modulation of growth in the fusionless treatment of experimental scoliosis. Spine 15:1776–1782CrossRef Braun JT, Hines JL, Akyuz E et al (2006) Relative versus absolute modulation of growth in the fusionless treatment of experimental scoliosis. Spine 15:1776–1782CrossRef
5.
6.
go back to reference Bullmann V, Halm HFH, Schulte T et al (2006) Combined anterior and posterior instrumentation in severe and rigid idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 15:440–448CrossRefPubMed Bullmann V, Halm HFH, Schulte T et al (2006) Combined anterior and posterior instrumentation in severe and rigid idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 15:440–448CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Cotrel Y, Dubousset J, Guillaumat M (1988) New universal instrumentation in spinal surgery. Clin Orthop 227:10–23PubMed Cotrel Y, Dubousset J, Guillaumat M (1988) New universal instrumentation in spinal surgery. Clin Orthop 227:10–23PubMed
8.
go back to reference Dobbs MB, Lenke LG, Kim YJ et al (2006) Anterior/posterior spinal instrumentation versus posterior instrumentation alone for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliotic curves more than 90 degrees. Spine 31:2386–2391CrossRefPubMed Dobbs MB, Lenke LG, Kim YJ et al (2006) Anterior/posterior spinal instrumentation versus posterior instrumentation alone for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliotic curves more than 90 degrees. Spine 31:2386–2391CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Harrington PR (1962) Treatment of scoliosis: correction and internal fixation by spine instrumentation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 44:591–610PubMed Harrington PR (1962) Treatment of scoliosis: correction and internal fixation by spine instrumentation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 44:591–610PubMed
10.
go back to reference Henry M, Amor M, Beyar R et al (1996) Clinical experience with a new nitinol selfexpanding stent in peripheral arteries. J Endovasc Surg 3:369–379CrossRefPubMed Henry M, Amor M, Beyar R et al (1996) Clinical experience with a new nitinol selfexpanding stent in peripheral arteries. J Endovasc Surg 3:369–379CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Kuklo TR, Lenke LG, O’Brien MF et al (2005) Accuracy and efficacy of thoracic pedicle screws in curves more than 90°. Spine 30:222–226CrossRefPubMed Kuklo TR, Lenke LG, O’Brien MF et al (2005) Accuracy and efficacy of thoracic pedicle screws in curves more than 90°. Spine 30:222–226CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Labelle H, Dansereau J, Bellefleur C et al (1995) Comparison between preoperative and postoperative three-dimensional reconstructions of idiopathic scoliosis with the Cotrel–Dubousset procedure. Spine 20:2487–2492PubMedCrossRef Labelle H, Dansereau J, Bellefleur C et al (1995) Comparison between preoperative and postoperative three-dimensional reconstructions of idiopathic scoliosis with the Cotrel–Dubousset procedure. Spine 20:2487–2492PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Lenke LG (2003) Anterior endoscopic discectomy and fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 28:S36–S43CrossRefPubMed Lenke LG (2003) Anterior endoscopic discectomy and fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 28:S36–S43CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Lu SB, Wang JF, Guo JF (1986) Treatment of scoliosis with a shape-memory alloy rod. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 24: 129–132, 187 Lu SB, Wang JF, Guo JF (1986) Treatment of scoliosis with a shape-memory alloy rod. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 24: 129–132, 187
15.
go back to reference Niemeyer T, Freeman BJC, Grevitt MP et al (2000) Anterior thoracoscopic surgery followed by posterior instrumentation and fusion in spinal deformity. Eur Spine J 9:499–504CrossRefPubMed Niemeyer T, Freeman BJC, Grevitt MP et al (2000) Anterior thoracoscopic surgery followed by posterior instrumentation and fusion in spinal deformity. Eur Spine J 9:499–504CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Puttlitz CM, Masaru F, Barkley A et al (2007) A biomechanical assessment of thoracic spine stapling. Spine 32:766–771CrossRefPubMed Puttlitz CM, Masaru F, Barkley A et al (2007) A biomechanical assessment of thoracic spine stapling. Spine 32:766–771CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Sanders JO, Sanders AE, More R et al (1993) A preliminary investigation of shape memory alloys in the surgical correction of scoliosis. Spine 18:1640–1646CrossRefPubMed Sanders JO, Sanders AE, More R et al (1993) A preliminary investigation of shape memory alloys in the surgical correction of scoliosis. Spine 18:1640–1646CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Schmerling MA, Wilkov MA, Sanders AE et al (1976) Using the shape recovery of nitinol in the Harrington rod treatment of scoliosis. J Biomed Mater Res 10:879–892CrossRefPubMed Schmerling MA, Wilkov MA, Sanders AE et al (1976) Using the shape recovery of nitinol in the Harrington rod treatment of scoliosis. J Biomed Mater Res 10:879–892CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Suk S, Kim JH, Cho KJ et al (2007) Is anterior release necessary in severe scoliosis treated by posterior segmental pedicle screw fixation. Eur Spine J 16:1359–1365CrossRefPubMed Suk S, Kim JH, Cho KJ et al (2007) Is anterior release necessary in severe scoliosis treated by posterior segmental pedicle screw fixation. Eur Spine J 16:1359–1365CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Suk S, Lee CK, Kim W et al (1995) Segmental pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 20:1399–1405PubMed Suk S, Lee CK, Kim W et al (1995) Segmental pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 20:1399–1405PubMed
21.
go back to reference Tokunaga M, Minami S, Kitahara H et al (2000) Vertebral decancellation for severe scoliosis. Spine 25:469–474CrossRefPubMed Tokunaga M, Minami S, Kitahara H et al (2000) Vertebral decancellation for severe scoliosis. Spine 25:469–474CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Vieweg U, van Roost D, Wolf HK et al (1999) Corrosion on an internal spinal fixator system. Spine 24:946–951CrossRefPubMed Vieweg U, van Roost D, Wolf HK et al (1999) Corrosion on an internal spinal fixator system. Spine 24:946–951CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Wang JC, Yu WD, Sandhu HS et al (1999) Metal debris from titanium spinal implants. Spine 24:899–903CrossRefPubMed Wang JC, Yu WD, Sandhu HS et al (1999) Metal debris from titanium spinal implants. Spine 24:899–903CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Wang Y, Zhang YG, Zhang XS et al (2008) A single posterior approach for multilevel modified vertebral column resection in adults with severe rigid congenital kyphoscoliosis: a retrospective study of 13 cases. Eur Spine J 17:361–372CrossRefPubMed Wang Y, Zhang YG, Zhang XS et al (2008) A single posterior approach for multilevel modified vertebral column resection in adults with severe rigid congenital kyphoscoliosis: a retrospective study of 13 cases. Eur Spine J 17:361–372CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Wever DJ, Elstrodt JA, Veldhuizen AG et al (2002) Scoliosis correction with shape-memory metal: results of an experimental study. Eur Spine J 11:100–106CrossRefPubMed Wever DJ, Elstrodt JA, Veldhuizen AG et al (2002) Scoliosis correction with shape-memory metal: results of an experimental study. Eur Spine J 11:100–106CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Comparative analysis between shape memory alloy-based correction and traditional correction technique in pedicle screws constructs for treating severe scoliosis
Authors
Yan Wang
Guoquan Zheng
Xuesong Zhang
Yonggang Zhang
Songhua Xiao
Zheng Wang
Publication date
01-03-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 3/2010
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-1207-2

Other articles of this Issue 3/2010

European Spine Journal 3/2010 Go to the issue