Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 2/2010

01-02-2010 | Original Article

Hybrid construct for two levels disc disease in lumbar spine

Authors: Stephane Aunoble, Robert Meyrat, Yasser Al Sawad, C. Tournier, Philip Leijssen, Jean-Charles Le Huec

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 2/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Prospective study. To study the validity of Hybrid construction (Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion) ALIF at one level and total disc arthroplasty (TDA) at adjacent, for two levels disc disease in lumbar spine as surgical strategy. With growing evidence that fusion constructs in the treatment of degenerative disc disease (DDD) may alter sagittal balance and contribute to undesirable complications in the long-term, total disc arthroplasty (TDA) slowly becomes an accepted treatment option for a selected group of patients. Despite encouraging early and intermediate term results of single-level total disc arthroplasty reported in the literature, there is growing evidence that two-level arthroplasty does not fare as well. Hybrid fusion is an attempt to address two-level DDD by combining the advantages of a single-level ALIF with those of a single-level arthroplasty. 42 patients (25 females and 17 males) underwent Hybrid fusion and had a median follow-up of 26.3 months. The primary functional outcomes were assessed before and after surgery with Oswestry Disability Index and the visual analogue score of the back and legs. Patients were divided into four groups according to the percentage improvement between preop and postop ODI scores. A total of 42 patients underwent a hybrid fusion as follows: 35 L5-S1 ALIF/L4-5 prosthesis, 3 L4-5 ALIF/L3-4 prosthesis, 2 L5-S1 ALIF/L4-5 prosthesis/L3-4 prosthesis, 1 L5-S1 prosthesis/L4-5 ALIF, and 1 L5-S1 ALIF/L4-5 ALIF/L3-4 prosthesis. At 2-years clinical outcomes, mean reduction in ODI is 24.9 points (53.0% improvement compared to preop ODI). The visual analogue score for the back is 64.6% improvement. At 2-year clinical outcomes, Hybrid fusion is a viable surgical alternative for the treatment of two-level DDD in comparison with two-level TDA and with two-level fusion.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Andersson GB (1978) Epidemiological features of chronic low back pain. Lancet 354:581–585CrossRef Andersson GB (1978) Epidemiological features of chronic low back pain. Lancet 354:581–585CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Fritzell P, Hägg O, Wessberg P, Nordwall A, Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group (2001) Volvo award winner in clinical studies: lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain: a multicenter randomized controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Spine 26:2521–2532 discussion 32-34CrossRefPubMed Fritzell P, Hägg O, Wessberg P, Nordwall A, Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group (2001) Volvo award winner in clinical studies: lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain: a multicenter randomized controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Spine 26:2521–2532 discussion 32-34CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Aunoble S, Hoste D, Donkersloot P, Liquois F, Basso Y, Le Huec JC (2006) Video-assisted ALIF with cage and anterior plate fixation for L5–S1 spondylolisthesis. J Spinal Disord Tech 19(7):471–476CrossRefPubMed Aunoble S, Hoste D, Donkersloot P, Liquois F, Basso Y, Le Huec JC (2006) Video-assisted ALIF with cage and anterior plate fixation for L5–S1 spondylolisthesis. J Spinal Disord Tech 19(7):471–476CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Burkus JK, Transfeldt EE, Kitchel SH, Watkins RG, Balderston RA (2002) Clinical and radiographic outcomes of anterior lumbar interbody fusion using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2. Spine 27(21):2396–2408CrossRefPubMed Burkus JK, Transfeldt EE, Kitchel SH, Watkins RG, Balderston RA (2002) Clinical and radiographic outcomes of anterior lumbar interbody fusion using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2. Spine 27(21):2396–2408CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Pellisé F, Hernández A, Vidal X, Minguell J, Martínez C, Villanueva C (2007) Radiologic assessment of all unfused lumbar segments 7.5 years after instrumented posterior spinal fusion. Spine 32(5):574–579CrossRefPubMed Pellisé F, Hernández A, Vidal X, Minguell J, Martínez C, Villanueva C (2007) Radiologic assessment of all unfused lumbar segments 7.5 years after instrumented posterior spinal fusion. Spine 32(5):574–579CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Schlegel JD, Smith JA, Schleusener RL (1996) Lumbar motion segment pathology adjacent to thoracolumbar, lumbar, and lumbosacral fusions. Spine 21:970–981CrossRefPubMed Schlegel JD, Smith JA, Schleusener RL (1996) Lumbar motion segment pathology adjacent to thoracolumbar, lumbar, and lumbosacral fusions. Spine 21:970–981CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Hilibrand AS, Robbins M (2004) Adjacent segment degeneration and adjacent segment disease: the consequences of spinal fusion? Spine J 4(6 Suppl):190S–194SCrossRefPubMed Hilibrand AS, Robbins M (2004) Adjacent segment degeneration and adjacent segment disease: the consequences of spinal fusion? Spine J 4(6 Suppl):190S–194SCrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Shono Y, Kaneda K, Abumi K, McAfee PC, Cunningham BW (1998) Stability of posterior spinal instrumentation and its effects on adjacent motion segments in the lumbosacral spine. Spine 23:1550–1558CrossRefPubMed Shono Y, Kaneda K, Abumi K, McAfee PC, Cunningham BW (1998) Stability of posterior spinal instrumentation and its effects on adjacent motion segments in the lumbosacral spine. Spine 23:1550–1558CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Throckmorton TW, Hilibrand AS, Mencio GA, Hodge A, Spengler DM (2003) The impact of adjacent level disc degeneration on health status outcomes following lumbar fusion. Spine 28:2546–2550CrossRefPubMed Throckmorton TW, Hilibrand AS, Mencio GA, Hodge A, Spengler DM (2003) The impact of adjacent level disc degeneration on health status outcomes following lumbar fusion. Spine 28:2546–2550CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Bertagnoli R, Tropiano P, Zigler J, Karg A, Voigt S (2005) Hybrid constructs. Orthop Clin North Am 36(3):379–388CrossRefPubMed Bertagnoli R, Tropiano P, Zigler J, Karg A, Voigt S (2005) Hybrid constructs. Orthop Clin North Am 36(3):379–388CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Goel VK, Grauer JN, TCH Patel, Biyani A, Sairyo K, Vishnubhotla S, Matyas A, Cowgill I, Shaw M, Long R, Dick D, Panjabi MM, Serhan H (2005) Effects of charité artificial disc on the implanted and adjacent spinal segments mechanics using a hybrid testing protocol. Spine 30(24):2755–2764CrossRefPubMed Goel VK, Grauer JN, TCH Patel, Biyani A, Sairyo K, Vishnubhotla S, Matyas A, Cowgill I, Shaw M, Long R, Dick D, Panjabi MM, Serhan H (2005) Effects of charité artificial disc on the implanted and adjacent spinal segments mechanics using a hybrid testing protocol. Spine 30(24):2755–2764CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Panjabi M, Henderson G, Abjornson C, Yue J (2007) Multidirectional testing of one- and two- level ProDisc-L versus simulated fusions. Spine 2007:20; 32:1311–1319 Panjabi M, Henderson G, Abjornson C, Yue J (2007) Multidirectional testing of one- and two- level ProDisc-L versus simulated fusions. Spine 2007:20; 32:1311–1319
13.
go back to reference Geisler FH, Blumenthal SL, Guyer RD et al (2004) Neurological Complications of lumbar artificial disc replacement and comparison of clinical results with those related to lumbar arthrodesis in the literature: results of a multicenter, prospective, randomised investigational device exemption study of Charite intervertebral disc. From the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and peripheral Nerves. J Neurosurg Spine 1:143–154 Geisler FH, Blumenthal SL, Guyer RD et al (2004) Neurological Complications of lumbar artificial disc replacement and comparison of clinical results with those related to lumbar arthrodesis in the literature: results of a multicenter, prospective, randomised investigational device exemption study of Charite intervertebral disc. From the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and peripheral Nerves. J Neurosurg Spine 1:143–154
14.
go back to reference Lemaire JP, Carrier H, Sariali El-H, Skalli W, Lavaste F (2005) Clinical and radiological outcomes with the Charité artificial disc: a 10-year minimum follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech 18(4):353–359CrossRefPubMed Lemaire JP, Carrier H, Sariali El-H, Skalli W, Lavaste F (2005) Clinical and radiological outcomes with the Charité artificial disc: a 10-year minimum follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech 18(4):353–359CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Lemaire JP, Skalli W, Lavaste F, Templier A, Mendes F, Diop A, Sauty V, Laloux E (1997) Intervertebral disc prosthesis: results and prospects for the year 2000. Clin Orthop Relat Res 337:64–76 Lemaire JP, Skalli W, Lavaste F, Templier A, Mendes F, Diop A, Sauty V, Laloux E (1997) Intervertebral disc prosthesis: results and prospects for the year 2000. Clin Orthop Relat Res 337:64–76
16.
go back to reference McAfee PC, Fedder IL, Saiedy S, Shucosky EM, Cunningham BW (2003) SB Charité disc replacement: report of 60 prospective randomized cases in a US center. J Spinal Disord Tech 16:424–433PubMed McAfee PC, Fedder IL, Saiedy S, Shucosky EM, Cunningham BW (2003) SB Charité disc replacement: report of 60 prospective randomized cases in a US center. J Spinal Disord Tech 16:424–433PubMed
17.
go back to reference Tropiano P, Huang RC, Girardi FP, Cammisa FP Jr, Marnay T (2005) Lumbar total disc replacement: seven to eleven-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(3):490–496CrossRefPubMed Tropiano P, Huang RC, Girardi FP, Cammisa FP Jr, Marnay T (2005) Lumbar total disc replacement: seven to eleven-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(3):490–496CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Tropiano P, Huang RC, Girardi FP, Marnay T (2003) Lumbar disc replacement: preliminary results with ProDisc II after a minimum follow-up period of 1 year. J Spinal Disord Tech 16:362–368PubMed Tropiano P, Huang RC, Girardi FP, Marnay T (2003) Lumbar disc replacement: preliminary results with ProDisc II after a minimum follow-up period of 1 year. J Spinal Disord Tech 16:362–368PubMed
19.
go back to reference Zigler JE, Burd TA, Vialle EN, Sachs BL, Rashbaum RF, Ohnmeiss DD (2003) Lumbar spine arthroplasty: early results using the ProDisc II: a prospective randomized trial of arthroplasty versus fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech 16:352–361PubMed Zigler JE, Burd TA, Vialle EN, Sachs BL, Rashbaum RF, Ohnmeiss DD (2003) Lumbar spine arthroplasty: early results using the ProDisc II: a prospective randomized trial of arthroplasty versus fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech 16:352–361PubMed
20.
go back to reference Siepe CJ, Mayer HM, Heinz-Leisenheimer M, Korge A (2007) Total lumbar disc replacement: different results for different levels. Spine 32:782–790CrossRefPubMed Siepe CJ, Mayer HM, Heinz-Leisenheimer M, Korge A (2007) Total lumbar disc replacement: different results for different levels. Spine 32:782–790CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Aunoble S, Hoste D, Donkersloot P, Liquois F, Basso Y, Le Huec JC (2006) Video-assisted ALIF with cage and anterior plate fixation for L5–S1 spondylolisthesis. J Spinal Disord Tech 19:471–476CrossRefPubMed Aunoble S, Hoste D, Donkersloot P, Liquois F, Basso Y, Le Huec JC (2006) Video-assisted ALIF with cage and anterior plate fixation for L5–S1 spondylolisthesis. J Spinal Disord Tech 19:471–476CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Regan JJ, Yuan H, McAfee PC (1999) Laparoscopic fusion of the lumbar spine: minimally invasive spine surgery: a prospective multicenter study evaluating open and laparoscopic lumbar fusion. Spine 15:402–411CrossRef Regan JJ, Yuan H, McAfee PC (1999) Laparoscopic fusion of the lumbar spine: minimally invasive spine surgery: a prospective multicenter study evaluating open and laparoscopic lumbar fusion. Spine 15:402–411CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Glassman S, Gornet MF, Branch C, Polly D Jr, Peloza J, Schwender JD, Carreon L (2006) MOS short form 36 and Oswestry Disability Index outcomes in lumbar fusion: a multicenter experience. Spine J 6:21–26CrossRefPubMed Glassman S, Gornet MF, Branch C, Polly D Jr, Peloza J, Schwender JD, Carreon L (2006) MOS short form 36 and Oswestry Disability Index outcomes in lumbar fusion: a multicenter experience. Spine J 6:21–26CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Barrick WT, Schofferman JA, Reynolds JB, Goldthwaite ND, McKeehen M, Keaney D, White AH (2000) Anterior lumbar fusion improves discogenic pain at levels of prior posterolateral fusion. Spine 25:853–857CrossRefPubMed Barrick WT, Schofferman JA, Reynolds JB, Goldthwaite ND, McKeehen M, Keaney D, White AH (2000) Anterior lumbar fusion improves discogenic pain at levels of prior posterolateral fusion. Spine 25:853–857CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Christensen FB (2004) Lumbar spinal fusion: outcome in relation to surgical methods, choice of implant and postoperative rehabilitation. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 75:2–43CrossRefPubMed Christensen FB (2004) Lumbar spinal fusion: outcome in relation to surgical methods, choice of implant and postoperative rehabilitation. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 75:2–43CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Fritzell P, Hägg O, Wessberg P, Nordwall A, Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group (2002) Chronic low back pain and fusion: a comparison of three surgical techniques: a prospective multicenter randomized study from the Swedish lumbar spine study group. Spine 27:1131–1141CrossRefPubMed Fritzell P, Hägg O, Wessberg P, Nordwall A, Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group (2002) Chronic low back pain and fusion: a comparison of three surgical techniques: a prospective multicenter randomized study from the Swedish lumbar spine study group. Spine 27:1131–1141CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Jang JS, Lee SH, Min JH, Kim SK, Han KM, Maeng DH (2007) Surgical treatment of failed back surgery syndrome due to sagittal imbalance. Spine 32(26):3081–3087CrossRefPubMed Jang JS, Lee SH, Min JH, Kim SK, Han KM, Maeng DH (2007) Surgical treatment of failed back surgery syndrome due to sagittal imbalance. Spine 32(26):3081–3087CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Lazennec JY, Ramaré S, Arafati N, Laudet CG, Gorin M, Roger B, Hansen S, Saillant G, Maurs L, Trabelsi R (2000) Sagittal alignment in lumbosacral fusion: relations between radiological parameters and pain. Eur Spine J 9(1):47–55CrossRefPubMed Lazennec JY, Ramaré S, Arafati N, Laudet CG, Gorin M, Roger B, Hansen S, Saillant G, Maurs L, Trabelsi R (2000) Sagittal alignment in lumbosacral fusion: relations between radiological parameters and pain. Eur Spine J 9(1):47–55CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Le Huec J, Basso Y, Mathews H, Mehbod A, Aunoble S, Friesem T, Zdeblick T (2005) The effect of single-level, total disc arthroplasty on sagittal balance parameters: a prospective study. Eur Spine J 14(5):480–486CrossRefPubMed Le Huec J, Basso Y, Mathews H, Mehbod A, Aunoble S, Friesem T, Zdeblick T (2005) The effect of single-level, total disc arthroplasty on sagittal balance parameters: a prospective study. Eur Spine J 14(5):480–486CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Tournier C, Aunoble S, Le Huec JC, Lemaire JP, Tropiano P, Lafage V, Skalli W (2007) Total disc arthroplasty: consequences for sagittal balance and lumbar spine movement. Eur Spine J 16(3):411–421CrossRefPubMed Tournier C, Aunoble S, Le Huec JC, Lemaire JP, Tropiano P, Lafage V, Skalli W (2007) Total disc arthroplasty: consequences for sagittal balance and lumbar spine movement. Eur Spine J 16(3):411–421CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Park CK, Ryu KS, Jee WH (2008) Degenerative changes of discs and facet joints in lumbar total disc replacement using ProDisc II: minimum two-year follow-up. Spine 33:1755–1761CrossRefPubMed Park CK, Ryu KS, Jee WH (2008) Degenerative changes of discs and facet joints in lumbar total disc replacement using ProDisc II: minimum two-year follow-up. Spine 33:1755–1761CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Boulay C, Tardieu C, Hecquet J, Benaim C, Mouilleseaux B, Marty C, Prat-Pradal D, Legaye J, Duval-Beaupère G, Pélissier J (2006) Sagittal alignment of spine and pelvis regulated by pelvic incidence: standard values and prediction of lordosis. Eur Spine J 15(4):415–422CrossRefPubMed Boulay C, Tardieu C, Hecquet J, Benaim C, Mouilleseaux B, Marty C, Prat-Pradal D, Legaye J, Duval-Beaupère G, Pélissier J (2006) Sagittal alignment of spine and pelvis regulated by pelvic incidence: standard values and prediction of lordosis. Eur Spine J 15(4):415–422CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J (2003) Geometrical and mechanical analysis of lumbar lordosis in an asymptomatic population: proposed classification. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 89(7):632–639 FrenchPubMed Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J (2003) Geometrical and mechanical analysis of lumbar lordosis in an asymptomatic population: proposed classification. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 89(7):632–639 FrenchPubMed
34.
go back to reference Gornet MF, Burkus JK, Mathews HH, et al. (2007) MAVERICK total disc replacement vs. anterior lumbar interbody fusion with the infuse bone graft/LT-CAGE device: A prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter trial. Presented at the 22nd annual North American Spine Society, Austin, Texas, October 23–27 Gornet MF, Burkus JK, Mathews HH, et al. (2007) MAVERICK total disc replacement vs. anterior lumbar interbody fusion with the infuse bone graft/LT-CAGE device: A prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter trial. Presented at the 22nd annual North American Spine Society, Austin, Texas, October 23–27
35.
go back to reference Panjabi M, Malcolmson G, Teng E, Tominaga Y, Henderson G, Serhan H (2007) Hybrid testing of lumbar CHARITE discs versus fusions. Spine 32(9):959–966 discussion 967CrossRefPubMed Panjabi M, Malcolmson G, Teng E, Tominaga Y, Henderson G, Serhan H (2007) Hybrid testing of lumbar CHARITE discs versus fusions. Spine 32(9):959–966 discussion 967CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Bertagnoli R, James Y, Rahul S et al. (2006) The treatment of disabling single-level lumbar discogenic low back pain with total disc arthroplasty utilizing the prodisc prosthesis: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine 4(2):91 Bertagnoli R, James Y, Rahul S et al. (2006) The treatment of disabling single-level lumbar discogenic low back pain with total disc arthroplasty utilizing the prodisc prosthesis: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine 4(2):91
Metadata
Title
Hybrid construct for two levels disc disease in lumbar spine
Authors
Stephane Aunoble
Robert Meyrat
Yasser Al Sawad
C. Tournier
Philip Leijssen
Jean-Charles Le Huec
Publication date
01-02-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 2/2010
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-1182-7

Other articles of this Issue 2/2010

European Spine Journal 2/2010 Go to the issue

Intro Open Operating Theatre

Ganga Operative Spine Course

Ganga Operative Spine Course

Dual growth rods for infantile scoliosis