Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 9/2009

01-09-2009 | Original Article

In vivo range of motion of the lumbar spinous processes

Authors: Qun Xia, Shaobai Wang, Peter G. Passias, Michal Kozanek, Gang Li, Brian E. Grottkau, Kirkham B. Wood, Guoan Li

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 9/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

The study design included an in vivo laboratory study. The objective of the study is to quantify the kinematics of the lumbar spinous processes in asymptomatic patients during un-restricted functional body movements with physiological weight bearing. Limited data has been reported on the motion patterns of the posterior spine elements. This information is necessary for the evaluation of traumatic injuries and degenerative changes in the posterior elements, as well as for improving the surgical treatment of spinal diseases using posterior procedures. Eight asymptomatic subjects with an age ranging from 50 to 60 years underwent MRI scans of their lumbar segments in a supine position and 3D models of L2–5 were constructed. Next, each subject was asked to stand and was positioned in the following sequence: standing, 45° flexion, maximal extension, maximal left and right twisting, while two orthogonal fluoroscopic images were taken simultaneously at each of the positions. The MRI models were matched to the osseous outlines of the images from the two orthogonal views to quantify the position of the vertebrae in 3D at each position. The data revealed that interspinous process (ISP) distance decreased from L2 to L3 to L4 to L5 when measured in the supine position; with significantly higher values at L2–3 and L3–4 compared with L4–5. These differences were not seen with weight-bearing conditions. During the maximal extension, the ISP distance at the L2–3 motion segment was significantly reduced, but no significant changes were detected at L3–4 and L4–5. During flexion the ISP distances were not significantly different than those measured in the MRI position at all segments. Going from the left to right twist positions, the L4–5 segment had greater amounts of ISP rotation, while all segments had similar ranges of translation in the transverse plane. The interspinous process distances were dependent on body posture and vertebral level.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
5.
go back to reference Hanson GR, Suggs JF, Freiberg AA, Durbhakula S, Li G (2006) Investigation of in vivo 6DOF total knee arthroplasty kinematics using a dual orthogonal fluoroscopic system. J Orthop Res 24:974–981. doi:10.1002/jor.20141 PubMedCrossRef Hanson GR, Suggs JF, Freiberg AA, Durbhakula S, Li G (2006) Investigation of in vivo 6DOF total knee arthroplasty kinematics using a dual orthogonal fluoroscopic system. J Orthop Res 24:974–981. doi:10.​1002/​jor.​20141 PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kim DH, Albert TJ (2007) Interspinous process spacers. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 15:200–207PubMed Kim DH, Albert TJ (2007) Interspinous process spacers. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 15:200–207PubMed
8.
go back to reference Li G, DeFrate LE, Park SE, Gill TJ, Rubash HE (2005) In vivo articular cartilage contact kinematics of the knee: an investigation using dual-orthogonal fluoroscopy and magnetic resonance image-based computer models. Am J Sports Med 33:102–107. doi:10.1177/0363546504265577 PubMedCrossRef Li G, DeFrate LE, Park SE, Gill TJ, Rubash HE (2005) In vivo articular cartilage contact kinematics of the knee: an investigation using dual-orthogonal fluoroscopy and magnetic resonance image-based computer models. Am J Sports Med 33:102–107. doi:10.​1177/​0363546504265577​ PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Neumann P, Wang Y, Karrholm J, Malchau H, Nordwall A (1999) Determination of inter-spinous process distance in the lumbar spine: evaluation of reference population to facilitate detection of severe trauma. Eur Spine J 8:272–278. doi:10.1007/s005860050172 PubMedCrossRef Neumann P, Wang Y, Karrholm J, Malchau H, Nordwall A (1999) Determination of inter-spinous process distance in the lumbar spine: evaluation of reference population to facilitate detection of severe trauma. Eur Spine J 8:272–278. doi:10.​1007/​s005860050172 PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Zucherman JF, Hsu KY, Hartjen CA, Mehalic TF, Implicito DA, Martin MJ, Johnson DR 2nd, Skidmore GA, Vessa PP, Dwyer JW, Puccio ST, Cauthen JC, Ozuna RM (2005) A multicenter, prospective, randomized trial evaluating the X STOP interspinous process decompression system for the treatment of neurogenic intermittent claudication: two-year follow-up results. Spine 30:1351–1358. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000166618.42749.d1 PubMedCrossRef Zucherman JF, Hsu KY, Hartjen CA, Mehalic TF, Implicito DA, Martin MJ, Johnson DR 2nd, Skidmore GA, Vessa PP, Dwyer JW, Puccio ST, Cauthen JC, Ozuna RM (2005) A multicenter, prospective, randomized trial evaluating the X STOP interspinous process decompression system for the treatment of neurogenic intermittent claudication: two-year follow-up results. Spine 30:1351–1358. doi:10.​1097/​01.​brs.​0000166618.​42749.​d1 PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
In vivo range of motion of the lumbar spinous processes
Authors
Qun Xia
Shaobai Wang
Peter G. Passias
Michal Kozanek
Gang Li
Brian E. Grottkau
Kirkham B. Wood
Guoan Li
Publication date
01-09-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 9/2009
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-1068-8

Other articles of this Issue 9/2009

European Spine Journal 9/2009 Go to the issue