Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 11/2008

01-11-2008 | Original Article

Footprint mismatch in lumbar total disc arthroplasty

Authors: Gstoettner Michaela, Heider Denise, Michael Liebensteiner, Bach Christian Michael

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 11/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Lumbar disc arthroplasty has become a popular modality for the treatment of degenerative disc disease. The dimensions of the implants are based on early published geometrical measurements of vertebrae; the majority of these were cadaver studies. The fit of the prosthesis in the intervertebral space is of utmost importance. An undersized implant may lead to subsidence, loosening and biomechanical failure due to an incorrect center of rotation. The aim of the present study was to measure the dimensions of lumbar vertebrae based on CT scans and assess the accuracy of match in currently available lumbar disc prostheses. A total of 240 endplates of 120 vertebrae were included in the study. The sagittal and mediolateral diameter of the upper and lower endplates were measured using a digital measuring system. For the levels L4/L5 and L5/S1, an inappropriate size match was noted in 98.8% (Prodisc L) and 97.6% (Charite) with regard to the anteroposterior diameter. Mismatch in the anterior mediolateral diameter was noted in 79.3% (Prodisc L) and 51.2% (Charite) while mismatch in the posterior mediolateral diameter was observed in 91.5% (Prodisc L) and 78% (Charite) of the endplates. Surgeons and manufacturers should be aware of the size mismatch of currently available lumbar disc prostheses, which may endanger the safety and efficacy of the procedure. Larger footprints of currently available total disc arthroplasties are required.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Bertagnoli R, Yue JJ, Shah RV, Nanieva R, Pfeiffer F, Fenk-Mayer A et al (2005) The treatment of disabling multilevel lumbar discogenic low back pain with total disc arthroplasty utilizing the ProDisc prosthesis: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow-up. Spine 30(19):2192–2199. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000181061.43194.18 PubMedCrossRef Bertagnoli R, Yue JJ, Shah RV, Nanieva R, Pfeiffer F, Fenk-Mayer A et al (2005) The treatment of disabling multilevel lumbar discogenic low back pain with total disc arthroplasty utilizing the ProDisc prosthesis: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow-up. Spine 30(19):2192–2199. doi:10.​1097/​01.​brs.​0000181061.​43194.​18 PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Gilad I, Nissan M (1985) Sagittal radiographic measurements of the cervical and lumbar vertebrae in normal adults. Br J Radiol 58(695):1031–1034PubMedCrossRef Gilad I, Nissan M (1985) Sagittal radiographic measurements of the cervical and lumbar vertebrae in normal adults. Br J Radiol 58(695):1031–1034PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Gilad I, Nissan M (1985) Sagittal evaluation of elemental geometrical dimensions of human vertebrae. J Anat 143:115–120PubMed Gilad I, Nissan M (1985) Sagittal evaluation of elemental geometrical dimensions of human vertebrae. J Anat 143:115–120PubMed
8.
go back to reference Grant JP, Oxland TR, Dvorak MF (2001) Mapping the structural properties of the lumbosacral vertebral endplates. Spine 26(8):889–896PubMedCrossRef Grant JP, Oxland TR, Dvorak MF (2001) Mapping the structural properties of the lumbosacral vertebral endplates. Spine 26(8):889–896PubMedCrossRef
9.
11.
go back to reference Huang RC, Girardi FP, Cammisa FP, Wright TM (2003) The implication of constrained in lumbar total disc replacement. J Spinal Disord 16:412–417 Huang RC, Girardi FP, Cammisa FP, Wright TM (2003) The implication of constrained in lumbar total disc replacement. J Spinal Disord 16:412–417
16.
go back to reference Panjabi MM, Goel V, Oxland T, Takata K, Duranceau J, Krag M, Price M (1992) Human lumbar vertebrae. Quantitative three-dimensional anatomy. Spine 17(3):299–306PubMedCrossRef Panjabi MM, Goel V, Oxland T, Takata K, Duranceau J, Krag M, Price M (1992) Human lumbar vertebrae. Quantitative three-dimensional anatomy. Spine 17(3):299–306PubMedCrossRef
17.
19.
go back to reference Punt IM, Visser VM, van Rhijn LW, Kurtz SM, Antonis J, Schurink GW et al (2008) Complications and reoperations of the SB Charité lumbar disc prosthesis: experience in 75 patients. Eur Spine J 17(1):36–43. doi:10.1007/s00586-007-0506-8 PubMedCrossRef Punt IM, Visser VM, van Rhijn LW, Kurtz SM, Antonis J, Schurink GW et al (2008) Complications and reoperations of the SB Charité lumbar disc prosthesis: experience in 75 patients. Eur Spine J 17(1):36–43. doi:10.​1007/​s00586-007-0506-8 PubMedCrossRef
20.
25.
go back to reference Van Ooij A, Oner FC, Verbout AJ (2003) Complications of artificial disc replacement: a report of 27 patients with the SB Charite disc. J Spinal Disord Tech 16:369–383PubMed Van Ooij A, Oner FC, Verbout AJ (2003) Complications of artificial disc replacement: a report of 27 patients with the SB Charite disc. J Spinal Disord Tech 16:369–383PubMed
26.
go back to reference White AAIII, Panjabi MM (1990) Clinical biomechanics of the spine, 2nd edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia White AAIII, Panjabi MM (1990) Clinical biomechanics of the spine, 2nd edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia
27.
28.
go back to reference Zigler J, Delamarter R, Spivak JM, Linovitz RJ, Danielson GO 3rd, Haider TT et al (2007) Results of the prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement versus circumferential fusion for the treatment of 1-level degenerative disc disease. Spine 32(11):1155–1162. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e318054e377 discussion 1163PubMedCrossRef Zigler J, Delamarter R, Spivak JM, Linovitz RJ, Danielson GO 3rd, Haider TT et al (2007) Results of the prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement versus circumferential fusion for the treatment of 1-level degenerative disc disease. Spine 32(11):1155–1162. doi:10.​1097/​BRS.​0b013e318054e377​ discussion 1163PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Footprint mismatch in lumbar total disc arthroplasty
Authors
Gstoettner Michaela
Heider Denise
Michael Liebensteiner
Bach Christian Michael
Publication date
01-11-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 11/2008
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-008-0780-0

Other articles of this Issue 11/2008

European Spine Journal 11/2008 Go to the issue