Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 8/2008

Open Access 01-08-2008 | Original Article

Tissue identification with micro-magnetic resonance imaging in a caprine spinal fusion model

Authors: M. P. Uffen, M. R. Krijnen, R. J. Hoogendoorn, G. J. Strijkers, V. Everts, P. I. Wuisman, T. H. Smit

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 8/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Nonunion is a major complication of spinal interbody fusion. Currently X-ray and computed tomography (CT) are used for evaluating the spinal fusion process. However, both imaging modalities have limitations in judgment of the early stages of this fusion process, as they only visualize mineralized bone. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) could be of great value as it is able to discriminate between different types of tissue. A feasibility study was performed in nine animals from a goat spinal fusion study, to evaluate the detection capacity of different tissues with micro-MRI. In this study bioresorbable polylactic acid cages were used. Six- and 12-months follow-up specimens were scanned in a 6.3 T micro-MRI scanner. After scanning, the specimens were processed for histology. Different types of tissue as well as the degradable cage material were identified in the fusion zone and designated as regions of interest (ROIs). Subsequently, the location of these ROIs was determined on the corresponding micro-MRI image, and average signal intensities of every individual ROI were measured. An excellent match was seen between the histological sections and micro-MRI images. The micro-MRI images showed quantifiable differences in signal intensity between bone with adipose marrow, bone with hematopoietic marrow, fibrocartilage, fibrous tissue, and degradable implant material. In time the signal intensity of bone with adipose marrow, bone with hematopoietic red marrow, and of fibrous tissue remained relatively constant. On the other hand, the signal intensity of the degradable implant material and the fibrocartilage changed significantly in time, indicating change of structure and composition. In conclusion, in our model using bioresorbable cages the MRI provides us with detailed information about the early fusion process and may therefore, allow early diagnosis of non-union.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Alikacem N, Stroman PW, Marois Y et al (1995) Noninvasive follow-up of tissue encapsulation of foreign materials. Are magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy breakthroughs? ASAIO J 41:M617–M624CrossRefPubMed Alikacem N, Stroman PW, Marois Y et al (1995) Noninvasive follow-up of tissue encapsulation of foreign materials. Are magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy breakthroughs? ASAIO J 41:M617–M624CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Augat P, Burger J, Schorlemmer S et al (2003) Shear movement at the fracture site delays healing in a diaphyseal fracture model. J Orthop Res 21:1011–1017CrossRefPubMed Augat P, Burger J, Schorlemmer S et al (2003) Shear movement at the fracture site delays healing in a diaphyseal fracture model. J Orthop Res 21:1011–1017CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Blumenthal SL, Gill K (1993) Can lumbar spine radiographs accurately determine fusion in postoperative patients? Correlation of routine radiographs with a second surgical look at lumbar fusions. Spine 18:1186–1189CrossRefPubMed Blumenthal SL, Gill K (1993) Can lumbar spine radiographs accurately determine fusion in postoperative patients? Correlation of routine radiographs with a second surgical look at lumbar fusions. Spine 18:1186–1189CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Carter DR, Beaupre GS, Giori NJ et al. (1998) Mechanobiology of skeletal regeneration. Clin Orthop Relat Res S41-S55 Carter DR, Beaupre GS, Giori NJ et al. (1998) Mechanobiology of skeletal regeneration. Clin Orthop Relat Res S41-S55
5.
go back to reference Christensen FB (2004) Lumbar spinal fusion. Outcome in relation to surgical methods, choice of implant and postoperative rehabilitation. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 75:2–43CrossRefPubMed Christensen FB (2004) Lumbar spinal fusion. Outcome in relation to surgical methods, choice of implant and postoperative rehabilitation. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 75:2–43CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Dawson EG, Clader TJ, Bassett LW (1985) A comparison of different methods used to diagnose pseudarthrosis following posterior spinal fusion for scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67:1153–1159PubMed Dawson EG, Clader TJ, Bassett LW (1985) A comparison of different methods used to diagnose pseudarthrosis following posterior spinal fusion for scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67:1153–1159PubMed
7.
go back to reference Deyo RA, Gray DT, Kreuter W et al (2005) United States trends in lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative conditions. Spine 30:1441–1445CrossRefPubMed Deyo RA, Gray DT, Kreuter W et al (2005) United States trends in lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative conditions. Spine 30:1441–1445CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Hojo Y, Kotani Y, Ito M et al (2005) A biomechanical and histological evaluation of a bioresorbable lumbar interbody fusion cage. Biomaterials 26:2643–2651CrossRefPubMed Hojo Y, Kotani Y, Ito M et al (2005) A biomechanical and histological evaluation of a bioresorbable lumbar interbody fusion cage. Biomaterials 26:2643–2651CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Kant AP, Daum WJ, Dean SM et al (1995) Evaluation of lumbar spine fusion. Plain radiographs versus direct surgical exploration and observation. Spine 20:2313–2317CrossRefPubMed Kant AP, Daum WJ, Dean SM et al (1995) Evaluation of lumbar spine fusion. Plain radiographs versus direct surgical exploration and observation. Spine 20:2313–2317CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Krijnen MR, Smit TH, Strijkers GJ et al (2004) The use of high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging for monitoring interbody fusion and bioabsorbable cages: an ex vivo pilot study. Neurosurg Focus 16:E3CrossRefPubMed Krijnen MR, Smit TH, Strijkers GJ et al (2004) The use of high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging for monitoring interbody fusion and bioabsorbable cages: an ex vivo pilot study. Neurosurg Focus 16:E3CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Krijnen MR, Mullender MG, Smit TH et al (2006) Radiographic, histologic, and chemical evaluation of bioresorbable 70/30 poly-L-lactide-CO-D, L-lactide interbody fusion cages in a goat model. Spine 31:1559–1567CrossRefPubMed Krijnen MR, Mullender MG, Smit TH et al (2006) Radiographic, histologic, and chemical evaluation of bioresorbable 70/30 poly-L-lactide-CO-D, L-lactide interbody fusion cages in a goat model. Spine 31:1559–1567CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Krijnen MR, Valstar ER, Smit TH, Wuisman PI (2006) Does bioresorbable cage material influence segment stability in spinal interbody fusion? Clin Orthop Relat Res 448:33–38CrossRefPubMed Krijnen MR, Valstar ER, Smit TH, Wuisman PI (2006) Does bioresorbable cage material influence segment stability in spinal interbody fusion? Clin Orthop Relat Res 448:33–38CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Lang P, Chafetz N, Genant HK et al (1990) Lumbar spinal fusion. Assessment of functional stability with magnetic resonance imaging. Spine 15:581–588CrossRefPubMed Lang P, Chafetz N, Genant HK et al (1990) Lumbar spinal fusion. Assessment of functional stability with magnetic resonance imaging. Spine 15:581–588CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Larsen JM, Rimoldi RL, Capen DA et al (1996) Assessment of pseudarthrosis in pedicle screw fusion: a prospective study comparing plain radiographs, flexion/extension radiographs, CT scanning, and bone scintigraphy with operative findings. J Spinal Disord 9:117–120CrossRefPubMed Larsen JM, Rimoldi RL, Capen DA et al (1996) Assessment of pseudarthrosis in pedicle screw fusion: a prospective study comparing plain radiographs, flexion/extension radiographs, CT scanning, and bone scintigraphy with operative findings. J Spinal Disord 9:117–120CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Lee C, Dorcil J, Radomisli TE (2004) Nonunion of the spine: a review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 71–75 Lee C, Dorcil J, Radomisli TE (2004) Nonunion of the spine: a review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 71–75
17.
go back to reference Liem MD, Zegel HG, Balduini FC et al (1991) Repair of Achilles tendon ruptures with a polylactic acid implant: assessment with MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 156:769–773CrossRefPubMed Liem MD, Zegel HG, Balduini FC et al (1991) Repair of Achilles tendon ruptures with a polylactic acid implant: assessment with MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 156:769–773CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Ling CR, Foster MA (1982) Changes in NMR relaxation time associated with local inflammatory response. Phys Med Biol 27:853–860CrossRefPubMed Ling CR, Foster MA (1982) Changes in NMR relaxation time associated with local inflammatory response. Phys Med Biol 27:853–860CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference McCully K, Shellock FG, Bank WJ et al (1992) The use of nuclear magnetic resonance to evaluate muscle injury. Med Sci Sports Exerc 24:537–542CrossRefPubMed McCully K, Shellock FG, Bank WJ et al (1992) The use of nuclear magnetic resonance to evaluate muscle injury. Med Sci Sports Exerc 24:537–542CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Pearcy M, Burrough S (1982) Assessment of bony union after interbody fusion of the lumbar spine using a biplanar radiographic technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br 64:228–232PubMed Pearcy M, Burrough S (1982) Assessment of bony union after interbody fusion of the lumbar spine using a biplanar radiographic technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br 64:228–232PubMed
21.
go back to reference Perren SM (2002) Evolution of the internal fixation of long bone fractures. The scientific basis of biological internal fixation: choosing a new balance between stability and biology. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84:1093–1110CrossRefPubMed Perren SM (2002) Evolution of the internal fixation of long bone fractures. The scientific basis of biological internal fixation: choosing a new balance between stability and biology. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84:1093–1110CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Raiszadeh R, Heggeness M, Esses SI (2000) Thoracolumbar pseudarthrosis. Am J Orthop 29:513–520PubMed Raiszadeh R, Heggeness M, Esses SI (2000) Thoracolumbar pseudarthrosis. Am J Orthop 29:513–520PubMed
23.
go back to reference Regatte RR, Schweitzer ME (2007) Ultra-high-field MRI of the musculoskeletal system at 7.0T. J Magn Reson Imaging 25:262–269CrossRefPubMed Regatte RR, Schweitzer ME (2007) Ultra-high-field MRI of the musculoskeletal system at 7.0T. J Magn Reson Imaging 25:262–269CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Semelka RC, Armao DM, Elias J Jr et al (2007) Imaging strategies to reduce the risk of radiation in CT studies, including selective substitution with MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 25:900–909CrossRefPubMed Semelka RC, Armao DM, Elias J Jr et al (2007) Imaging strategies to reduce the risk of radiation in CT studies, including selective substitution with MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 25:900–909CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Smit TH, Thomas KA, Hoogendoorn RJ et al (2007) Sterilization and strength of 70/30 polylactide cages: e-beam versus ethylene oxide. Spine 32:742–747CrossRefPubMed Smit TH, Thomas KA, Hoogendoorn RJ et al (2007) Sterilization and strength of 70/30 polylactide cages: e-beam versus ethylene oxide. Spine 32:742–747CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Steinmann JC, Herkowitz HN (1992) Pseudarthrosis of the spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res 80–90 Steinmann JC, Herkowitz HN (1992) Pseudarthrosis of the spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res 80–90
27.
go back to reference Stroman PW, Dorvil JC, Marois Y et al (1999) In vivo time course studies of the tissue responses to resorbable polylactic acid implants by means of MRI. Magn Reson Med 42:210–214CrossRefPubMed Stroman PW, Dorvil JC, Marois Y et al (1999) In vivo time course studies of the tissue responses to resorbable polylactic acid implants by means of MRI. Magn Reson Med 42:210–214CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Turner JA, Ersek M, Herron L et al (1992) Patient outcomes after lumbar spinal fusions. JAMA 268:907–911CrossRefPubMed Turner JA, Ersek M, Herron L et al (1992) Patient outcomes after lumbar spinal fusions. JAMA 268:907–911CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Vaccaro AR, Singh K, Haid R et al (2003) The use of bioabsorbable implants in the spine. Spine J 3:227–237CrossRefPubMed Vaccaro AR, Singh K, Haid R et al (2003) The use of bioabsorbable implants in the spine. Spine J 3:227–237CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference van Dijk M, Smit TH, Burger EH et al (2002) Bioabsorbable poly-L-lactic acid cages for lumbar interbody fusion: three-year follow-up radiographic, histologic, and histomorphometric analysis in goats. Spine 27:2706–2714CrossRefPubMed van Dijk M, Smit TH, Burger EH et al (2002) Bioabsorbable poly-L-lactic acid cages for lumbar interbody fusion: three-year follow-up radiographic, histologic, and histomorphometric analysis in goats. Spine 27:2706–2714CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Vande Berg BC, Galant C, Lecouvet FE et al (2000) The lumbar vertebral body and diskovertebral junction. Radio MR imaging anatomic correlations. Radiol Clin North Am 38:1153–1175CrossRef Vande Berg BC, Galant C, Lecouvet FE et al (2000) The lumbar vertebral body and diskovertebral junction. Radio MR imaging anatomic correlations. Radiol Clin North Am 38:1153–1175CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Olson PR et al (2006) United States’ trends and regional variations in lumbar spine surgery: 1992–2003. Spine 31:2707–2714CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Olson PR et al (2006) United States’ trends and regional variations in lumbar spine surgery: 1992–2003. Spine 31:2707–2714CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
go back to reference Wuisman PI, van Dijk M, Smit TH (2002) Resorbable cages for spinal fusion: an experimental goat model. J Neurosurg 97:433–439PubMed Wuisman PI, van Dijk M, Smit TH (2002) Resorbable cages for spinal fusion: an experimental goat model. J Neurosurg 97:433–439PubMed
Metadata
Title
Tissue identification with micro-magnetic resonance imaging in a caprine spinal fusion model
Authors
M. P. Uffen
M. R. Krijnen
R. J. Hoogendoorn
G. J. Strijkers
V. Everts
P. I. Wuisman
T. H. Smit
Publication date
01-08-2008
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 8/2008
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-008-0689-7

Other articles of this Issue 8/2008

European Spine Journal 8/2008 Go to the issue

Announcements

Announcements