Top

Published in:

01-07-2007 | Original Article

Spinal mechanical load: a predictor of persistent low back pain? A prospective cohort study

Authors: Eric W. P. Bakker, Arianne P. Verhagen, Cees Lucas, Hans J. C. M. F. Koning, Bart W. Koes

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 7/2007

Abstract

Prospective inception cohort. To assess the prognostic value of spinal mechanical load, assessed with the 24-hour schedule (24HS), in subjects with acute non-specific low back pain (ALBP) and to examine the influence of spinal mechanical load on the course of ALBP. In view of the characteristics of the natural course of ALBP, this should be viewed as a persistent condition in many patients rather that a benign self-limiting disease. Therefore, secondary prevention could be beneficial. Spinal mechanical load is a risk factor for ALBP and possibly a (modifiable) prognostic factor for persistent (i.e. recurrent and/or chronic) LBP. One hundred patients from primary care with ALBP were eligible for inclusion. At 6 months, 88 subjects completed the follow-up. For the follow-up assessment a research assistant, unaware of our interest in the prognostic factors, contacted the subjects by telephone. Questionnaires were completed focusing on changes in demographic data and on the course and current status of ALBP. Persistent LBP occurred in 60% subjects. After multivariate regression analysis smoking (harmful) and advanced age (protective) were associated with persistent LBP. Differences in 24HS scores at baseline and follow-up were univariate-related to persistent LBP. Spinal mechanical load, quantified with the 24HS, is not a prognostic factor for persistent LBP. Modification of spinal mechanical load in terms of 24HS scores could be beneficial for secondary prevention in patients with acute LBP.

Altman DG (1980) Statistics and ethics in medical research: III. How large a sample. Br Med J 281:1336–1338

Altman DG (1997) Relation between several variables. In: Altman DG (ed) Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton pp 325–361

Bakker EWP, Koning JCMF, Verhagen AP, Koes BW (2003) Interobserver reliability of the 24-hour schedule in patients with low back pain. JMPT 26(4):226–232PubMed

Bakker EWP, Verhagen AP, Lucas C, Koning JCMF, Haan de RJ, Koes BW (2006) Daily spinal mechanical loading as a risk factor for acute non-specific low back pain. Eur Spine J (epub ahead of print)

Chavannes AW, Mens JMA, Koes BW, Lubbers WJ, Ostelo R, Spinnewijn WEM, Kolnaar BGM (2005) NHG-standaard lage rugpijn. Huisarts Wet 48(3):113–123

Croft PR, Macfarlane GJ, Papageorgiou AC, Thomas E, Silman AJ (1998) Outcome of low back pain in general practice: a prospective study. BMJ 316(7141):1356–1359PubMed

Dionne CE, Koepsell TD, Von Korff M, Deyo RA, Barlow WE, Checkoway H (1997) Predicting long-term functional limitations among back pain patients in primary care settings. J Clin Epidemiol 50(1):31–43PubMedCrossRef

Dunn KM, Croft PR (2004) Epidemiology and natural history of low back pain. Eura Medicophys 40(1):9–13PubMed

Erdman RA, Passchier J, Kooijman M, Stronks DL (1993) The Dutch version of the Nottingham Health Profile: investigations of psychometric aspects. Psychol Rep 72(3 Pt 1):1027–1035PubMed

10.

Faas A, Chavannes AW, Koes BW, Hoogen JMM van den, Mens JMA, Smeele LJM (1996) NHG-standaard lage rugpijn. Huisarts Wet 39:18–31

11.

Frymoyer JW (1988) Back pain and sciatica. N Engl J Med 318:291–300PubMedCrossRef

12.

Hoogen van den HJ, Koes BW, Deville W, van Eijk JT, Bouter LM (1997) The prognosis of low back pain in general practice. Spine 1 22(13):1515–1521CrossRef

13.

Jeaschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH (1990) A comparison of seven-point and visual analogue scales. Control Clin Trials 11:43–51CrossRef

14.

Koes BW, van Tulder MW, Ostelo R, Kim Burton A, Waddell G (2001) Clinical guidelines for the management of low back pain in primary care: an international comparison. Spine 26(22):2504–2513PubMedCrossRef

15.

Maniadakis N, Gray A (2000) The economic burden of back pain in the UK. Pain 84(1):95–103PubMedCrossRef

16.

Nachemson A (1975) Towards a better understanding of low-back pain: a review of the mechanics of the lumbar disc. Rheumatol Rehabil 14(3):129–143PubMedCrossRef

17.

OPCS (1994) Office of Population Censuses and Surveys. Monitor MB5 94/1 Morbidity Statistics from General Practice 1991/2 (MSGP4). HMSO, London

18.

Papageorgiou AC, Macfarlane GJ, Thomas E, Croft PR, Jayson MIV, Silman AJ (1997) Psychosocial factors in the work place—do they predict new episodes of low back pain? Spine 22:1137–1142PubMedCrossRef

19.

Pengel LHM, Herbert RD, Maher CG, Refshauge KM (2003) Acute low back pain: systematic review of its prognosis. BMJ 327(7410):323PubMedCrossRef

20.

Pincus T, Burton AK, Vogel S, Field AP (2002) A systematic review of psychological factors as predictors of chronicity/disability in prospective cohorts of low back pain. Spine 27:E109–E120PubMedCrossRef

21.

Reis S, Hermoni D, Borkan JM, Biderman A, Tabenkin C, Porat A (1999) A new look at low back complaints in primary care: a RAMBAM Israeli Family Practice Research Network study. J Fam Pract 48:299–303PubMed

22.

Rossignol M, Suissa S, Abenhaim L (1988) Working disability due to occupational back pain: three years follow-up of 2300 compensated workers in Quebec. J Occup Med 30:502–505PubMedCrossRef

23.

Sackett DL, Haynes RB, Guyatt GH, Tugwell P (1991) Clinical epidemiology, a basic science for clinical medicine. Little, Brown, Boston

24.

Sato K, Kikuchi S, Yonezawa T (1999) In vivo intradiscal pressure measurement in healthy individuals and in patients with ongoing back problems. Spine 24(23):2468–2474PubMedCrossRef

25.

Seferlis T, Nemeth G, Carlsson AM (2000) Prediction of functional disability, recurrences, and chronicity after 1 year in 180 patients who required sick leave for acute low-back pain. J Spinal Disord 13:470–477PubMedCrossRef

26.

Schiottz-Christensen B, Nielsen GL, Hansen VK, Schodt T, Sorensen HT, Olesen F (1999) Long-term prognosis of acute low back pain in patients seen in general practice: a 1-year prospective follow-up study. Fam Pract 16:223–232PubMedCrossRef

27.

Thomas E, Silman AJ, Croft PR, Papageorgiou AC, Jayson MI, Macfarlane GJ (1999) Predicting who develops chronic low back pain in primary care: a prospective study. BMJ 19 318(7199):1662–1667

28.

Vlaeyen JWS, Heuts PHTG (2000) Gedragsgeoriënteerde behandeling bij lage rugpijn. Bohn Stafleu Van Loghum, Houten/Diegem

29.

Waddell G (1987) A new clinical model for the treatment of low back pain. Spine 12:632–644PubMedCrossRef

30.

Waddell G (2004) The back pain revolution, 2nd edn. Churchill Livingstone, London

31.

Walker BF (2000) The prevalence of low back pain: a systematic review of the literature from 1966 to 1998. J Spinal Disord 13(3):205–217PubMedCrossRef

Title: Spinal mechanical load: a predictor of persistent low back pain? A prospective cohort study
Authors: Eric W. P. Bakker
Arianne P. Verhagen
Cees Lucas
Hans J. C. M. F. Koning
Bart W. Koes
Publication date: 01-07-2007
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: European Spine Journal / Issue 7/2007
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-007-0347-5

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Spinal mechanical load: a predictor of persistent low back pain? A prospective cohort study

Abstract

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 7/2007

Modic changes following lumbar disc herniation

Headache in patients with cervical radiculopathy: a prospective study with selective nerve root blocks in 275 patients

Relation of inflammatory modic changes to intradiscal steroid injection outcome in chronic low back pain

Announcements May 2007

Depression is associated with poorer outcome of lumbar spinal stenosis surgery

Somatic comorbidity and younger age are associated with life dissatisfaction among patients with lumbar spinal stenosis before surgical treatment