Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 9/2007

01-09-2007 | Original Article

The use of physical biomodelling in complex spinal surgery

Authors: Maree T. Izatt, Paul L. P. J. Thorpe, Robert G. Thompson, Paul S. D’Urso, Clayton J. Adam, John W. S. Earwaker, Robert D. Labrom, Geoffrey N. Askin

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 9/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Prior studies have suggested that biomodels enhance patient education, preoperative planning and intra-operative stereotaxy; however, the usefulness of biomodels compared to regular imaging modalities such as X-ray, CT and MR has not been quantified. Our objective was to quantify the surgeon’s perceptions on the usefulness of biomodels compared to standard visualisation modalities for preoperative planning and intra-operative anatomical reference. Physical biomodels were manufactured for a series of 26 consecutive patients with complex spinal pathologies using a stereolithographic technique based on CT data. The biomodels were used preoperatively for surgical planning and customising implants, and intra-operatively for anatomical reference. Following surgery, a detailed biomodel utility survey was completed by the surgeons, and informal telephone interviews were conducted with patients. Using biomodels, 21 deformity and 5 tumour cases were performed. Surgeons stated that the anatomical details were better visible on the biomodel than on other imaging modalities in 65% of cases, and exclusively visible on the biomodel in 11% of cases. Preoperative use of the biomodel led to a different decision regarding the choice of osteosynthetic materials used in 52% of cases, and the implantation site of osteosynthetic material in 74% of cases. Surgeons reported that the use of biomodels reduced operating time by a mean of 8% in tumour patients and 22% in deformity procedures. This study supports biomodelling as a useful, and sometimes essential tool in the armamentarium of imaging techniques used for complex spinal surgery.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Barker TM, Earwaker WJS, Frost N, Wakeley G (1993) Integration of 3-D medical imaging and rapid prototyping to create stereolithographic models. Aust Phys Eng Sci Med 16(2):79–85 Barker TM, Earwaker WJS, Frost N, Wakeley G (1993) Integration of 3-D medical imaging and rapid prototyping to create stereolithographic models. Aust Phys Eng Sci Med 16(2):79–85
2.
go back to reference Bonnier L, Ayadi K, Vasdev A, Crouzet G, Raphael B (1991) Three-dimensional reconstruction in routine computerized tomography of the skull and spine. J Neuroradiol 18(3):250–66PubMed Bonnier L, Ayadi K, Vasdev A, Crouzet G, Raphael B (1991) Three-dimensional reconstruction in routine computerized tomography of the skull and spine. J Neuroradiol 18(3):250–66PubMed
3.
go back to reference D’Urso PS (1993) Stereolithographic modelling process [Australian Patent 684546; US Patent 5741215] D’Urso PS (1993) Stereolithographic modelling process [Australian Patent 684546; US Patent 5741215]
4.
go back to reference D’Urso PS, Askin GN, Earwaker WJS, Merry GS, Thompson RG, Barker TM, Effeney DJ (1999) Spinal biomodeling. Spine 24(12):1247–1251PubMedCrossRef D’Urso PS, Askin GN, Earwaker WJS, Merry GS, Thompson RG, Barker TM, Effeney DJ (1999) Spinal biomodeling. Spine 24(12):1247–1251PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference D’Urso PS, Barker TM, Earwaker WJS, Bruce LJ, Atkinson L, Lanigan MW, Arvier JF, Effeney DJ (1999) Stereolithographic biomodeling in cranio-maxillofacial surgery: a prospective trial. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 27(1):30–37PubMed D’Urso PS, Barker TM, Earwaker WJS, Bruce LJ, Atkinson L, Lanigan MW, Arvier JF, Effeney DJ (1999) Stereolithographic biomodeling in cranio-maxillofacial surgery: a prospective trial. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 27(1):30–37PubMed
6.
go back to reference D’Urso PS, Hall BI, Atkinson RL, Weidmann MJ, Redmond MJ (1999) Biomodel guided stereotaxy. Neurosurgery 44(5):1084–1094PubMedCrossRef D’Urso PS, Hall BI, Atkinson RL, Weidmann MJ, Redmond MJ (1999) Biomodel guided stereotaxy. Neurosurgery 44(5):1084–1094PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference D’Urso PS, Williamson OD, Thompson RG (2005) Biomodeling as an aid to spinal instrumentation. Spine 30(24):2841–2845PubMedCrossRef D’Urso PS, Williamson OD, Thompson RG (2005) Biomodeling as an aid to spinal instrumentation. Spine 30(24):2841–2845PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Furderer S, Hopf C, Schwarz M, Voth D (1999) Orthopedic and neurosurgical treatment of severe Kyphosis in myelomeningocele. Neurosurg Rev 22(1):45–49PubMedCrossRef Furderer S, Hopf C, Schwarz M, Voth D (1999) Orthopedic and neurosurgical treatment of severe Kyphosis in myelomeningocele. Neurosurg Rev 22(1):45–49PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Hadley MN, Sonntag VKH, Amos MR, Hodak JA, Lopez LJ (1987) Three-dimensional computed tomography in the diagnosis of vertebral column pathological conditions. Neurosurgery 21(2):186–192PubMedCrossRef Hadley MN, Sonntag VKH, Amos MR, Hodak JA, Lopez LJ (1987) Three-dimensional computed tomography in the diagnosis of vertebral column pathological conditions. Neurosurgery 21(2):186–192PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Hull CW (1986) Apparatus for production of three-dimensional objects by stereolithography. US patent 4575330. 3D Systems, Valencia Hull CW (1986) Apparatus for production of three-dimensional objects by stereolithography. US patent 4575330. 3D Systems, Valencia
11.
go back to reference Lohfeld S, Barron V, McHugh PE (2005) Biomodels of bone: a review. Ann Biomed Eng 33(10):1295–1311PubMedCrossRef Lohfeld S, Barron V, McHugh PE (2005) Biomodels of bone: a review. Ann Biomed Eng 33(10):1295–1311PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Niall DM, Dowling FE, Fogarty EE, Moore DP, Goldberg C (2004) Kyphectomy in children with myelomeningocele: a long-term outcome study. J Pediatr Orthop 24(1):37–44PubMed Niall DM, Dowling FE, Fogarty EE, Moore DP, Goldberg C (2004) Kyphectomy in children with myelomeningocele: a long-term outcome study. J Pediatr Orthop 24(1):37–44PubMed
13.
go back to reference Starshak RJ, Crawford CR, Waisman RC, Sty JR (1989) Three-dimensional CT of the pediatric spine. Appl Radiol 18:15–26 Starshak RJ, Crawford CR, Waisman RC, Sty JR (1989) Three-dimensional CT of the pediatric spine. Appl Radiol 18:15–26
14.
go back to reference Van Dijk M, Smit TH, Jiya TU, Wuisman PI (2001) Polyurethane Real-size models used in planning complex spinal surgery. Spine 26(17):1920–1926PubMedCrossRef Van Dijk M, Smit TH, Jiya TU, Wuisman PI (2001) Polyurethane Real-size models used in planning complex spinal surgery. Spine 26(17):1920–1926PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Virapongse C, Shapiro M, Gmitro A, Sarwar M (1986) Three-dimensional computed tomographic reformation of the spine, skull and brain from axial images. Neurosurgery 18(1):53–58PubMedCrossRef Virapongse C, Shapiro M, Gmitro A, Sarwar M (1986) Three-dimensional computed tomographic reformation of the spine, skull and brain from axial images. Neurosurgery 18(1):53–58PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The use of physical biomodelling in complex spinal surgery
Authors
Maree T. Izatt
Paul L. P. J. Thorpe
Robert G. Thompson
Paul S. D’Urso
Clayton J. Adam
John W. S. Earwaker
Robert D. Labrom
Geoffrey N. Askin
Publication date
01-09-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 9/2007
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-0289-3

Other articles of this Issue 9/2007

European Spine Journal 9/2007 Go to the issue