Skip to main content
Top

01-03-2007 | Original Article

Changes in the total Oswestry Index and its ten items in females and males pre- and post-surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a 1-year follow-up

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 3/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

To study the characteristics and changes in the total Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and in its ten component items in female and male patients pre- and post-surgery for lumbar disc herniation. Ninety-eight patients [mean (SD) age 43 (13), 61% males] undergoing lumbar disc herniation surgery were selected for this clinical 12-month follow-up. Subjective disability and back and leg pain were assessed by ODI version 1.0 and the visual analog scale. Pre-operatively females had a significantly higher mean (SD) total ODI [59(3)] than males [51(2)] (P = 0.030). Females were more disabled in the walking, sex life, social life and travelling items of the ODI compared to males. The total Oswestry decreased by 38 (95% CI − 44 to − 31) in females and by 34 (− 39 to − 30) in males at the 1-year follow-up. Most of the improvement (88% in females and 80% in males) occurred during the first 6 weeks; thereafter the changes were minor. In males the changes were greatest in pain, social life and travelling and in females in walking, social life and travelling. Internal consistency value of ODI was 0.88 (95% CI 0.82–0.91). Item analysis of the ODI showed that all the items except pain had high corrected item correlation. As recovery following lumbar disc surgery occurred to a great extent during the first 6 weeks, the early post-operative outcome appears to be quite a reliable indicator of the overall post-operative outcome over the 1-year follow-up. The ODI proved to capture a wide range of disability in these lumbar disc surgery patients, thereby supporting the future use of the index. The “pain intensity” component, which collects data on the use of painkillers in version 1.0 of the ODI did not support the item structure of the index in this study. The use of ODI version 2.0 might remove this problem.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Angevine PD, McCormick PC (2002) Outcomes research and lumbar discectomy. Neurosurg Focus 13:1–4CrossRef Angevine PD, McCormick PC (2002) Outcomes research and lumbar discectomy. Neurosurg Focus 13:1–4CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Asch HL, Lewis PJ, Moreland DB, Egnatchik JG, Yu YJ, Clabeaux DE, Hyland AH (2002) Prospective multiple outcomes study of outpatient lumbar microdiscectomy: should 75 to 80% success rates be the norm? J Neurosurg 96(1 Suppl):34–44PubMed Asch HL, Lewis PJ, Moreland DB, Egnatchik JG, Yu YJ, Clabeaux DE, Hyland AH (2002) Prospective multiple outcomes study of outpatient lumbar microdiscectomy: should 75 to 80% success rates be the norm? J Neurosurg 96(1 Suppl):34–44PubMed
3.
go back to reference Atlas SJ, Keller RB, Wu YA, Deyo RA, Singer DE (2005) Long-term outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of sciatica secondary to a lumbar disc herniation: 10 year results from the maine lumbar spine study. Spine 30:927–935PubMedCrossRef Atlas SJ, Keller RB, Wu YA, Deyo RA, Singer DE (2005) Long-term outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of sciatica secondary to a lumbar disc herniation: 10 year results from the maine lumbar spine study. Spine 30:927–935PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Bombardier C, Hayden J, Beaton DE (2001) Minimal clinically important difference. Low back pain: outcome measures. J Rheumatol 28:431–438PubMed Bombardier C, Hayden J, Beaton DE (2001) Minimal clinically important difference. Low back pain: outcome measures. J Rheumatol 28:431–438PubMed
5.
go back to reference Dedering A, Harms-Ringdahl K, Nemeth G (2005) Back extensor muscle fatigue in patients with lumbar disc herniation pre-operative and post-operative analysis of electromyography, endurance time and subjective factors. Eur Spine J:Jun 7; [Epub ahead of print] Dedering A, Harms-Ringdahl K, Nemeth G (2005) Back extensor muscle fatigue in patients with lumbar disc herniation pre-operative and post-operative analysis of electromyography, endurance time and subjective factors. Eur Spine J:Jun 7; [Epub ahead of print]
6.
go back to reference Deyo RA, Andersson G, Bombardier C, Cherkin DC, Keller RB, Lee CK, Liang MH, Lipscomb B, Shekelle P, Spratt KF, Weinstein JN (1994) Outcome measures for studying patients with low back pain. Spine 19:2032S–2036SPubMedCrossRef Deyo RA, Andersson G, Bombardier C, Cherkin DC, Keller RB, Lee CK, Liang MH, Lipscomb B, Shekelle P, Spratt KF, Weinstein JN (1994) Outcome measures for studying patients with low back pain. Spine 19:2032S–2036SPubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Dixon S, Bird H (1981) Reproducibility along a 10 cm visual analogue scale. Ann Rheum Dis 40:87–89PubMedCrossRef Dixon S, Bird H (1981) Reproducibility along a 10 cm visual analogue scale. Ann Rheum Dis 40:87–89PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Fairbank JCT, Couper J, Davies JB, O’Brien JP (1980) The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 66:271–273PubMed Fairbank JCT, Couper J, Davies JB, O’Brien JP (1980) The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 66:271–273PubMed
9.
go back to reference Findlay GF, Hall BI, Musa BS, Oliveira MD, Fear SC (1998) A 10-year follow-up of the outcome of lumbar microdiscectomy. Spine 15:1168–1171CrossRef Findlay GF, Hall BI, Musa BS, Oliveira MD, Fear SC (1998) A 10-year follow-up of the outcome of lumbar microdiscectomy. Spine 15:1168–1171CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Graven-Nielsen T, Lund H, Arendt-Nielsen L, Danneskiold-Samsoe B, Bliddal H (2002) Inhibition of maximal voluntary contraction force by experimental muscle pain: a centrally mediated mechanism. Muscle Nerve 26:708–712PubMedCrossRef Graven-Nielsen T, Lund H, Arendt-Nielsen L, Danneskiold-Samsoe B, Bliddal H (2002) Inhibition of maximal voluntary contraction force by experimental muscle pain: a centrally mediated mechanism. Muscle Nerve 26:708–712PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Graver V, Haaland AK, Magnaes B, Loeb M (1999) Seven-year clinical follow-up after lumbar disc surgery: results and predictors of outcome. Br J Neurosurg 13:178–184PubMedCrossRef Graver V, Haaland AK, Magnaes B, Loeb M (1999) Seven-year clinical follow-up after lumbar disc surgery: results and predictors of outcome. Br J Neurosurg 13:178–184PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Hagg O, Fritzell P, Nordwall A (2003) Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. The clinical importance of changes in outcome scores after treatment for chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J 12:12–20PubMed Hagg O, Fritzell P, Nordwall A (2003) Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. The clinical importance of changes in outcome scores after treatment for chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J 12:12–20PubMed
13.
go back to reference Hartvigsen J, Christensen K, Frederiksen H (2004) Back and neck pain exhibit many common features in old age: a population-based study of 4,486 Danish twins 70–102 years of age. Spine 29:576–580PubMedCrossRef Hartvigsen J, Christensen K, Frederiksen H (2004) Back and neck pain exhibit many common features in old age: a population-based study of 4,486 Danish twins 70–102 years of age. Spine 29:576–580PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Hurme M, Alaranta H (1987) Factors predicting the results of surgery for lumbar intervertebral disc herniation. Spine 12:933–938PubMedCrossRef Hurme M, Alaranta H (1987) Factors predicting the results of surgery for lumbar intervertebral disc herniation. Spine 12:933–938PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Krishnan E, Sokka T, Häkkinen A, Hannonen P (2005) Impact of age and comorbidities on the criteria for remission and response in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 64:1350–1352PubMedCrossRef Krishnan E, Sokka T, Häkkinen A, Hannonen P (2005) Impact of age and comorbidities on the criteria for remission and response in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 64:1350–1352PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Loupasis GA, Stamos K, Katonis PG, Sapkas G, Korres DS, Hartofilakidis G (1999) Seven- to 20-year outcome of lumbar discectomy. Spine 24:2313–2317PubMedCrossRef Loupasis GA, Stamos K, Katonis PG, Sapkas G, Korres DS, Hartofilakidis G (1999) Seven- to 20-year outcome of lumbar discectomy. Spine 24:2313–2317PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Mannion AF, Elfering A, Staerkle R, Junge A, Grob D, Semmer NK, Jacobshagen N, Dvorak J, Boos N (2005) Outcome assessment in low back pain: how low can you go? Eur Spine J 14:1014–1026PubMedCrossRef Mannion AF, Elfering A, Staerkle R, Junge A, Grob D, Semmer NK, Jacobshagen N, Dvorak J, Boos N (2005) Outcome assessment in low back pain: how low can you go? Eur Spine J 14:1014–1026PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Moore AJ, Chilton JD, Uttley D (1994) Long-term results of microlumbar discectomy. Br J Neurosurg 8:319–326PubMedCrossRef Moore AJ, Chilton JD, Uttley D (1994) Long-term results of microlumbar discectomy. Br J Neurosurg 8:319–326PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Ostelo R, de Vet HC (2005) Clinically important outcomes in low back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 19:593–607PubMedCrossRef Ostelo R, de Vet HC (2005) Clinically important outcomes in low back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 19:593–607PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Roland M, Fairbank J (2000) The Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire. Spine 25:3115–3124PubMedCrossRef Roland M, Fairbank J (2000) The Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire. Spine 25:3115–3124PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Roland M, Morris R (1983) A study of the natural history of back pain. Part 1: Development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. Spine 8:141–144PubMedCrossRef Roland M, Morris R (1983) A study of the natural history of back pain. Part 1: Development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. Spine 8:141–144PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Stucki G, Sigl M (2003) Assessment of the impact of disease on the individual. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 17:451–473PubMedCrossRef Stucki G, Sigl M (2003) Assessment of the impact of disease on the individual. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 17:451–473PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Weber H (1983) Lumbar disc herniation. A controlled, prospective study with ten years of observation. Spine 8:131–140PubMedCrossRef Weber H (1983) Lumbar disc herniation. A controlled, prospective study with ten years of observation. Spine 8:131–140PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference WHO (2001) International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF, 1st edn. WHO, Geneva WHO (2001) International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF, 1st edn. WHO, Geneva
25.
go back to reference Wood EG, Hanley EN (1991) Lumbar disc herniation and open limited discectomy: indications, techniques, and results. Oper Tech Orthop 1:23–28CrossRef Wood EG, Hanley EN (1991) Lumbar disc herniation and open limited discectomy: indications, techniques, and results. Oper Tech Orthop 1:23–28CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Yorimitsu E, Chiba K, Toyama Y, Hirabayashi K (2001) Long-term outcomes of standard discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a follow-up study of more than 10 years. Spine 26:652–657PubMedCrossRef Yorimitsu E, Chiba K, Toyama Y, Hirabayashi K (2001) Long-term outcomes of standard discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a follow-up study of more than 10 years. Spine 26:652–657PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Changes in the total Oswestry Index and its ten items in females and males pre- and post-surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a 1-year follow-up
Publication date
01-03-2007
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 3/2007
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-0187-8