Top

Published in:

01-12-2006 | Original Article

The effect of osteoporotic vertebral fracture on predicted spinal loads in vivo

Authors: Andrew M. Briggs, Tim V. Wrigley, Jaap H. van Dieën, Bev Phillips, Sing Kai Lo, Alison M. Greig, Kim L. Bennell

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 12/2006

Abstract

The aetiology of osteoporotic vertebral fractures is multi-factorial, and cannot be explained solely by low bone mass. After sustaining an initial vertebral fracture, the risk of subsequent fracture increases greatly. Examination of physiologic loads imposed on vertebral bodies may help to explain a mechanism underlying this fracture cascade. This study tested the hypothesis that model-derived segmental vertebral loading is greater in individuals who have sustained an osteoporotic vertebral fracture compared to those with osteoporosis and no history of fracture. Flexion moments, and compression and shear loads were calculated from T2 to L5 in 12 participants with fractures (66.4 ± 6.4 years, 162.2 ± 5.1 cm, 69.1 ± 11.2 kg) and 19 without fractures (62.9 ± 7.9 years, 158.3 ± 4.4 cm, 59.3 ± 8.9 kg) while standing. Static analysis was used to solve gravitational loads while muscle-derived forces were calculated using a detailed trunk muscle model driven by optimization with a cost function set to minimise muscle fatigue. Least squares regression was used to derive polynomial functions to describe normalised load profiles. Regression co-efficients were compared between groups to examine differences in loading profiles. Loading at the fractured level, and at one level above and below, were also compared between groups. The fracture group had significantly greater normalised compression (p = 0.0008) and shear force (p < 0.0001) profiles and a trend for a greater flexion moment profile. At the level of fracture, a significantly greater flexion moment (p = 0.001) and shear force (p < 0.001) was observed in the fracture group. A greater flexion moment (p = 0.003) and compression force (p = 0.007) one level below the fracture, and a greater flexion moment (p = 0.002) and shear force (p = 0.002) one level above the fracture was observed in the fracture group. The differences observed in multi-level spinal loading between the groups may explain a mechanism for increased risk of subsequent vertebral fractures. Interventions aimed at restoring vertebral morphology or reduce thoracic curvature may assist in normalising spine load profiles.

Aaron JE, Shore PA, Shore RC et al (2000) Trabecular architecture in women and men of similar bone mass with and without vertebral fracture II. Three-dimensional histology. Bone 27:277–82PubMedCrossRef

Alexeeva L, Burckhardt P, Christiansen C et al (1994) Report of a World Health Organization study group. Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. WHO, Geneva

Black DM, Arden NK, Palermo L et al (1999) Prevalent vertebral deformities predict hip fractures and new vertebral deformities but not wrist fractures. Study of osteoporotic fractures research group. J Bone Miner Res 14:821–828PubMedCrossRef

Briggs A, Wark J, Phillips B et al (2005) Subregional bone mineral density characteristics in the lumbar spine: an in vivo pilot study using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Annual scientific meeting of the Australian and New Zealand bone and mineral society, Perth, Australia, 7–9 September 2005

Briggs AM, Greig AM, Wark JD et al (2004) A review of anatomical and mechanical factors affecting vertebral body integrity. Int J Med Sci 1:170–180PubMed

Briggs AM, Tully EA, Adams PE et al (2005) Vertebral centroid and Cobb angle measures of thoracic kyphosis. Intern Med J 35:A96

Briggs AM, Wark JD, Kantor S et al (2006) Bone mineral density distribution in thoracic and lumbar vertebrae: an ex vivo study using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Bone 38:286–288PubMedCrossRef

Bürklein D, Lochmuller EM, Kuhn V et al (2001) Correlation of thoracic and lumbar vertebral failure loads with in situ vs. ex situ dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. J Biomech 34:579–587PubMedCrossRef

Crowninshield RD, Brand RA (1981) A physiologically based criterion of muscle force prediction in locomotion. J Biomech 14:793–801PubMedCrossRef

10.

Dieën JHv (1997) Are recruitment patterns of the trunk musculature compatible with a synergy based on maximization of endurance? J Biomech 30:1095–1100CrossRef

11.

Dieën JHv, Kingma I (2005) Effects of antagonistic co-contraction on differences between electromyography based and optimization based estimates of spinal forces. Ergonomics 48:411–426

12.

Dublin AB, Hartman J, Latchaw RE et al (2005) The vertebral body fracture in osteoporosis: restoration of height using percutaneous vertebroplasty. Am J Neuroradiol 26:489–492PubMed

13.

Duval-Beaupere G, Robain G (1987) Visualization of full spine radiographs of the anatomical connections of the centres of the segmental body mass supported by each vertebra and measured in vivo. Int Orthop 11:261–269PubMedCrossRef

14.

Ebbesen EN, Thomsen JS, Beck-Nielsen H et al (1999) Lumbar vertebral body compressive strength evaluated by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, quantitative computed tomography, and ashing. Bone 25:713–724PubMedCrossRef

15.

Eckstein F, Fischbeck M, Kuhn V et al (2004) Determinants and heterogeneity of mechanical competence throughout the thoracolumbar spine of elderly women and men. Bone 35:364–374PubMedCrossRef

16.

Edmondston SJ, Singer KP, Day RE et al (1994) In-vitro relationships between vertebral body density, size, and compressive strength in the elderly thoracolumbar spine. Clin Biomech 9:180–186CrossRef

17.

Edmondston SJ, Singer KP, Day RE et al (1997) Ex vivo estimation of thoracolumbar vertebral body compressive strength: the relative contributions of bone densitometry and vertebral morphometry. Osteoporos Int 7:142–148PubMedCrossRef

18.

El-Rich M, Shirazi-Adl A, Arjmand N (2004) Muscle activity, internal loads, and stability of the human spine in standing postures: combined model and in vivo studies. Spine 29:2633–2642PubMedCrossRef

19.

Farooq N, Park JC, Pollintine P et al (2005) Can vertebroplasty restore normal load-bearing to fractured vertebrae? Spine 30:1723–1730PubMedCrossRef

20.

Felsenberg D, Boonen S (2005) The bone quality framework: determinants of bone strength and their interrelationships, and implications for osteoporosis management. Clin Ther 27:1–11PubMedCrossRef

21.

Ford CM, Keaveny TM (1996) The dependence of shear failure properties of trabecular bone on apparent density and trabecular orientation. J Biomech 29:1309–1317PubMedCrossRef

22.

Gardner-Morse MG, Laible JP, Stokes IAF (1990) Incorporation of spinal flexibility measurements into finite element analysis. J Biomech Eng 112:481–483PubMed

23.

Genant HK, Jergas M (2003) Assessment of prevalent and incident vertebral fractures in osteoporosis research. Osteoporos Int 14:S43–S55PubMedCrossRef

24.

Gilsanz V, Loro LM, Roe TF et al (1995) Vertebral size in elderly women with osteoporosis: mechanical implications and relationships to fractures. J Clin Invest 95:2332–2337PubMedCrossRef

25.

Goh S, Price RI, Leedman PJ et al (2000) A comparison of three methods for measuring thoracic kyphosis: implications for clinical studies. Rheumatology 39:310–315PubMedCrossRef

26.

Hansson T, Roos B, Nachemson A (1980) The bone mineral content and ultimate compressive strength of lumbar vertebrae. Spine 5:46–55PubMedCrossRef

27.

Harrison DE, Cailliet R, Harrison DD et al (2001) Reliability of centroid, Cobb, and Harrison posterior tangent methods: which to choose for analysis of thoracic kyphosis. Spine 26:E227–E234PubMedCrossRef

28.

Hedlund LR, Gallagher JC, Meeger C et al (1989) Change in vertebral shape in spinal osteoporosis. Calcif Tissue Int 44:168–172PubMed

29.

Homminga J, Van-Rietbergen B, Lochmuller EM et al (2004) The osteoporotic vertebral structure is well adapted to the loads of daily life, but not to infrequent error loads. Bone 34:510–516PubMedCrossRef

30.

Huang MH, Barrett-Connor E, Greendale GA et al (2006) Hyperkyphotic posture and risk of future osteoporotic fractures: the Rancho Bernado study. J Bone Miner Res 21:419–423PubMedCrossRef

31.

Jensen RK, Fletcher P (1994) Distribution of mass to the segments of elderly males and females. J Biomech 27:89–96PubMedCrossRef

32.

Kanis JA (2002) Assessing the risk of vertebral osteoporosis. Singapore Med J 43:100–105PubMed

33.

Keaveny TM, Morgan EF, Niebur GL et al (2001) Biomechanics of trabecular bone. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 3:307–333PubMedCrossRef

34.

Keller TS, Harrison DE, Colloca CJ et al (2003) Prediction of osteoporotic spinal deformity. Spine 28:455–462PubMedCrossRef

35.

Keller TS, Holm SH, Hansson TH et al (1990) The dependence of intervertebral disc mechanical properties on physiologic conditions. Spine 15:751–761PubMedCrossRef

36.

Klotzbuecher CM, Ross PD, Landsman PB et al (2000) Patients with prior fractures have an increased risk of future fractures: a summary of the literature and statistical synthesis. J Bone Miner Res 15:721–739PubMedCrossRef

37.

Kopperdahl DL, Pearlman JL, Keaveny TM (2000) Biomechanical consequences of an isolated overload on the human vertebral body. J Orthop Res 18:685–690PubMedCrossRef

38.

Lindsay R, Silverman SL, Cooper C et al (2001) Risk of new vertebral fracture in the year following a fracture. JAMA 285:320–323PubMedCrossRef

39.

McCloskey EV, Spector TD, Eyres KS et al (1993) The assessment of vertebral deformity: a method for use in population studies and clinical trials. Osteoporos Int 3:138–147PubMedCrossRef

40.

Motulsky H, Christopoulos A (2003) Fitting models to biological data using linear and non-linear regression: a practical guide to curve fitting. GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego

41.

Oleksik A, Ott SM, Vedi S et al (2000) Bone structure in patients with low bone mineral density with or without vertebral fractures. J Bone Miner Res 15:1368–1375PubMedCrossRef

42.

Pearsall DJ, Reid JG, Livingston LA (1996) Segmental inertial parameters of the human trunk as determined from computed tomography. Ann Biomed Eng 24:198–210PubMed

43.

Rohlmann A, Bergmann G, Graichen F (1999) Loads on internal spinal fixators measured in different body positions. Eur Spine J 8:354–359PubMedCrossRef

44.

Ross PD, Davis JW, Epstein RS et al (1991) Pre-existing fractures and bone mass predict vertebral fracture incidence in women. Ann Intern Med 114:919–923PubMed

45.

Ross PD, Genant HK, Davis JW et al (1993) Predicting vertebral fracture incidence from prevalent fractures and bone density among non-black, osteoporotic women. Osteoporos Int 3:120–126PubMedCrossRef

46.

Simpson EK, Parkinson IH, Manthey B et al (2001) Intervertebral disc disorganisation is related to trabecular bone architecture in the lumbar spine. J Bone Miner Res 16:681–687PubMedCrossRef

47.

Singer K, Edmondston S, Day R et al (1995) Prediction of thoracic and lumbar vertebral body compressive strength. Correlations with bone mineral density and vertebral region. Bone 17:167–174PubMedCrossRef

48.

Stokes IAF, Gardner-Morse M (1999) Quantitative anatomy of the lumbar musculature. J Biomech 32:311–316PubMedCrossRef

49.

Winter DA (1990) Biomechanics and motor control of human movement, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

Title: The effect of osteoporotic vertebral fracture on predicted spinal loads in vivo
Authors: Andrew M. Briggs
Tim V. Wrigley
Jaap H. van Dieën
Bev Phillips
Sing Kai Lo
Alison M. Greig
Kim L. Bennell
Publication date: 01-12-2006
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: European Spine Journal / Issue 12/2006
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-0158-0

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

The effect of osteoporotic vertebral fracture on predicted spinal loads in vivo

Abstract

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 12/2006

Announcements December 2006

Misleading history of pain location in 51 patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures

Risk factors of developing new symptomatic vertebral compression fractures after percutaneous vertebroplasty in osteoporotic patients

Letter to the Editor concerning “In vitro investigation of heat transfer in calf spinal cord during polymethylmethacrylate application for vertebral body reconstruction” (by Aydin S et al.)

Bone mineral density of the thoracolumbar spine in relation to burst fractures: a quantitative computed tomography study

Thoracolumbar fractures surgically treated by “in situ contouring”