Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 3/2006

01-08-2006 | Original Article

Regulation of gene expression in intervertebral disc cells by low and high hydrostatic pressure

Authors: Cornelia Neidlinger-Wilke, Karin Würtz, Jill P. G. Urban, Wolfgang Börm, Markus Arand, Anita Ignatius, Hans-Joachim Wilke, Lutz E. Claes

Published in: European Spine Journal | Special Issue 3/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

Intervertebral disc structures are exposed to wide ranges of intradiscal hydrostatic pressure during different loading excercises and are at their minimum during lying or relaxed sitting and at maximum during lifting weights with a round back. We hypothesize that these different loading magnitudes influence the intervertebral disc (IVD) by alteration of disc matrix turnover depending on their magnitudes. Therefore the aim of this study was to assess changes in gene expression of human nucleus cells after the application of low hydrostatic pressure (0.25 MPa) and high hydrostatic pressure (2.5 MPa). IVD cells isolated from the nucleus of human (n = 18) and bovine (n = 24 from four animals) disc biopsies were seeded into three-dimensional collagen type-I matrices and exposed to the different loading magnitudes by specially developed pressure chambers. The lower pressure range (0.25 MPa, 30 min, 0.1 Hz) was applied with a recently published device by using an external compression cylinder. For the application of higher loads (2.5 MPa, 30 min, 0.1 Hz) the cell-loaded collagen gels were sealed into sterile bags with culture medium and stimulated in a newly developed water-filled compression cylinder by using a loading frame. These methods allowed the comparison of loading regimes in a wide physiological range under an equal three-dimensional culture conditions. Cells were harvested 24 h after the end of stimulation and changes in the expression of genes known to influence IVD matrix turnover (collagen-I, collagen-II, aggrecan, MMP1, MMP2, MMP3, MMP13) were analyzed by real-time RT-PCR. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test1 and a Wilcoxon 2-sample test2 were performed to detect differences between the stimulated and control samples1 and differences between low and high hydrostatic pressure2. Multiple testing was considered by adjusting the p value appropriately. Both regimes of hydrostatic pressure influenced gene expression in nucleus cells with opposite tendencies for the matrix forming proteins aggrecan and collagen type-I in response to the two different pressure magnitudes: Low hydrostatic-pressure (0.25 MPa) tended to increase collagen-I and aggrecan expression of human nucleus cells (P < 0.05) but only to a small degree. High hydrostatic pressure (2.5 MPa) tended to decrease gene expression of all anabolic proteins with significant effects on aggrecan expression of nucleus cells (P = 0.004). Low hydrostatic pressure had no influence on the expression of matrix metalloproteinases (MMP1, MMP2, MMP3 and MMP13). In contrast, high hydrostatic pressure tended to increase the expression of MMP1, MMP3 and MMP13 of human nucleus cells with high individual-individual variations. The decreased expression of aggrecan (P = 0.008) and collagen type II (P = 0.023) and the increased MMP3 expression (P = 0.008) in response to high hydrostatic pressure could be confirmed in additional experiments with bovine nucleus cells. These results suggest that hydrostatic pressure as one of the physiological stimuli of the IVD may influence matrix turnover in a magnitude dependent way. Low hydrostatic pressure (0.25 MPa) has quite small influences with a tendency to anabolic effects, whereas high hydrostatic pressure (2.5 MPa) tends to decrease the matrix protein expression with a tendency to increase some matrix-turnover enzymes. Therefore, hydrostatic pressure may regulate disc matrix turnover in a dose-dependent way.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Adams MA, McNally DS, Dolan P (1996) ‘Stress’ distributions inside intervertebral discs. The effects of age and degeneration. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78(6):965–72PubMedCrossRef Adams MA, McNally DS, Dolan P (1996) ‘Stress’ distributions inside intervertebral discs. The effects of age and degeneration. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78(6):965–72PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Bibby SR, Urban JP (2004) Effect of nutrient deprivation on the viability of intervertebral disc cells. Eur Spine J 13 (8):695–701PubMedCrossRef Bibby SR, Urban JP (2004) Effect of nutrient deprivation on the viability of intervertebral disc cells. Eur Spine J 13 (8):695–701PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Brand RA, Stanford CM, Nicolella DP (2001) Primary adult human bone cells do not respond to tissue (continuum) level strains. J Orthop Sci 6(3):295–301PubMedCrossRef Brand RA, Stanford CM, Nicolella DP (2001) Primary adult human bone cells do not respond to tissue (continuum) level strains. J Orthop Sci 6(3):295–301PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Buckwalter JA (1995) Aging and degeneration of the human intervertebral disc. Spine 20(11):1307–14PubMed Buckwalter JA (1995) Aging and degeneration of the human intervertebral disc. Spine 20(11):1307–14PubMed
5.
go back to reference Fehrenbacher A, Steck E, Rickert M, Roth W, Richter W (2003) Rapid regulation of collagen but not metalloproteinase 1, 3, 13, 14 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1, 2, 3 expression in response to mechanical loading of cartilage explants in vitro. Arch Biochem Biophys 410(1):39–47PubMedCrossRef Fehrenbacher A, Steck E, Rickert M, Roth W, Richter W (2003) Rapid regulation of collagen but not metalloproteinase 1, 3, 13, 14 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1, 2, 3 expression in response to mechanical loading of cartilage explants in vitro. Arch Biochem Biophys 410(1):39–47PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Frost HM (1990) Skeletal structural adaptations to mechanical usage (SATMU): 4. Mechanical influences on intact fibrous tissues. Anat Rec 226(4):433–439PubMedCrossRef Frost HM (1990) Skeletal structural adaptations to mechanical usage (SATMU): 4. Mechanical influences on intact fibrous tissues. Anat Rec 226(4):433–439PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Hall AC (1999) Differential effects of hydrostatic pressure on caution transport pathways of isolated articular chondrocytes. J Cell Physiol 178(2):197–204PubMedCrossRef Hall AC (1999) Differential effects of hydrostatic pressure on caution transport pathways of isolated articular chondrocytes. J Cell Physiol 178(2):197–204PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Handa T, Ishihara H, Ohshima H, Osada R, Tsuji H, Obata K (1997) Effects of hydrostatic pressure on matrix synthesis and matrix metalloproteinase production in the human lumbar intervertebral disc. Spine 22(10):1085–1091PubMedCrossRef Handa T, Ishihara H, Ohshima H, Osada R, Tsuji H, Obata K (1997) Effects of hydrostatic pressure on matrix synthesis and matrix metalloproteinase production in the human lumbar intervertebral disc. Spine 22(10):1085–1091PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Ishihara H, McNally DS, Urban JP, Hall AC (1996) Effects of hydrostatic pressure on matrix synthesis in different regions of the intervertebral disk. J Appl Physiol 80(3):839–846PubMed Ishihara H, McNally DS, Urban JP, Hall AC (1996) Effects of hydrostatic pressure on matrix synthesis in different regions of the intervertebral disk. J Appl Physiol 80(3):839–846PubMed
10.
go back to reference Kasra M, Goel V, Martin J, Wang ST, Choi W, Buckwalter J (2003) Effect of dynamic hydrostatic pressure on rabbit intervertebral disc cells. J Orthop Res 21(4):597–603PubMedCrossRef Kasra M, Goel V, Martin J, Wang ST, Choi W, Buckwalter J (2003) Effect of dynamic hydrostatic pressure on rabbit intervertebral disc cells. J Orthop Res 21(4):597–603PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Maclean JJ, Lee CR, Alini M, Iatridis JC (2004) Anabolic and catabolic mRNA levels of the intervertebral disc vary with the magnitude and frequency of in vivo dynamic compression. J Orthop Res 22(6):1193–1200PubMedCrossRef Maclean JJ, Lee CR, Alini M, Iatridis JC (2004) Anabolic and catabolic mRNA levels of the intervertebral disc vary with the magnitude and frequency of in vivo dynamic compression. J Orthop Res 22(6):1193–1200PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Neidlinger-Wilke C, Wurtz K, Liedert A et al (2005) A three-dimensional collagen matrix as a suitable culture system for the comparison of cyclic strain and hydrostatic pressure effects on intervertebral disc cells. J Neurosurg Spine 2(4):457–465PubMedCrossRef Neidlinger-Wilke C, Wurtz K, Liedert A et al (2005) A three-dimensional collagen matrix as a suitable culture system for the comparison of cyclic strain and hydrostatic pressure effects on intervertebral disc cells. J Neurosurg Spine 2(4):457–465PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Setton LA, Chen J (2004) Cell mechanics and mechanobiology in the intervertebral disc. Spine 29(23):2710–2723PubMedCrossRef Setton LA, Chen J (2004) Cell mechanics and mechanobiology in the intervertebral disc. Spine 29(23):2710–2723PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Shirazi-Adl A, Ahmed AM, Shrivastava SC (1986) A finite element study of a lumbar motion segment subjected to pure sagittal plane moments. J Biomech 19(4):331–350PubMedCrossRef Shirazi-Adl A, Ahmed AM, Shrivastava SC (1986) A finite element study of a lumbar motion segment subjected to pure sagittal plane moments. J Biomech 19(4):331–350PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Stanford CM, Morcuende JA, Brand RA (1995) Proliferative and phenotypic responses of bone-like cells to mechanical deformation. J Orthop Res 13(5):664–670PubMedCrossRef Stanford CM, Morcuende JA, Brand RA (1995) Proliferative and phenotypic responses of bone-like cells to mechanical deformation. J Orthop Res 13(5):664–670PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Stokes IA, Iatridis JC (2004) Mechanical conditions that accelerate intervertebral disc degeneration: overload versus immobilization. Spine 29(23):2724–2732PubMedCrossRef Stokes IA, Iatridis JC (2004) Mechanical conditions that accelerate intervertebral disc degeneration: overload versus immobilization. Spine 29(23):2724–2732PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Urban JP, Roberts S (2003) Degeneration of the intervertebral disc. Arthritis Res Ther 5(3):120–130PubMedCrossRef Urban JP, Roberts S (2003) Degeneration of the intervertebral disc. Arthritis Res Ther 5(3):120–130PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Videman T, Leppavuori J, Kaprio J et al (1998) Intragenic polymorphisms of the vitamin D receptor gene associated with intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine 23(23):2477–2485PubMedCrossRef Videman T, Leppavuori J, Kaprio J et al (1998) Intragenic polymorphisms of the vitamin D receptor gene associated with intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine 23(23):2477–2485PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Videman T, Gibbons LE, Battie MC et al (2001) The relative roles of intragenic polymorphisms of the vitamin d receptor gene in lumbar spine degeneration and bone density. Spine 26(3):E7–E12PubMedCrossRef Videman T, Gibbons LE, Battie MC et al (2001) The relative roles of intragenic polymorphisms of the vitamin d receptor gene in lumbar spine degeneration and bone density. Spine 26(3):E7–E12PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Wilke HJ, Neef P, Caimi M, Hoogland T, Claes LE (1999) New in vivo measurements of pressures in the intervertebral disc in daily life. Spine 24(8):755–762PubMedCrossRef Wilke HJ, Neef P, Caimi M, Hoogland T, Claes LE (1999) New in vivo measurements of pressures in the intervertebral disc in daily life. Spine 24(8):755–762PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Regulation of gene expression in intervertebral disc cells by low and high hydrostatic pressure
Authors
Cornelia Neidlinger-Wilke
Karin Würtz
Jill P. G. Urban
Wolfgang Börm
Markus Arand
Anita Ignatius
Hans-Joachim Wilke
Lutz E. Claes
Publication date
01-08-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue Special Issue 3/2006
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-0112-1

Other articles of this Special Issue 3/2006

European Spine Journal 3/2006 Go to the issue