Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 6/2006

01-06-2006 | Original Article

Three-dimensional relation of skin markers to lumbar vertebrae of healthy subjects in different postures measured by open MRI

Authors: Falk Mörl, Reinhard Blickhan

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 6/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

The debate is to which extent external skin markers represent true underlying vertebral position and motion. Skin markers and lumbar vertebrae L3 and L4 were examined by vertically open magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) within different postures to investigate whether, and to which extent the position and orientation of skin markers represent the corresponding information of assigned underlying vertebra. Nine healthy volunteers sat within an open MRI scanner in five different seating postures: upright, low flexion, heavy flexion, upright left turn and upright right turn. Skin markers were fixed at lumbar levels L3 and L4. A set of landmarks defines corresponding positions on the vertebrae. Translation-vectors quantify the change of co-ordinates while changing position. Orientation (Cardan-angles) of each level in space was calculated from co-ordinates of three skin-markers and the corresponding vertebral landmarks respectively. The close relation between the position of the individual skin marker and its corresponding landmark on the vertebrae is conserved through all postures (regression coefficients: 0.720<b<0.972, 0.916<r<0.993, p<0.0001). Despite the high sensitivity to measurement errors there is a strong relation between the translation-vectors of external markers and the corresponding translation of the landmark on the vertebrae (0.68<r<0.99, p<0.0001). Within the resolution of the MR-imaging the orientation of the vertebrae can be predicted from the external markers (regression coefficients: 0.936<b<1.189, 0.769<r<0.959, p<0.0001). Positions and motions of skin markers can be taken as a first estimate to calculate the position and spatial orientation of underlying vertebrae. The use of skin markers may help to investigate spinal positions in daily life situations where internal imaging is not possible.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Baumgartner W, Grob D, Kramers-de Quervain I, Stüssi E (2001) Novel in vivo motion analysis of the healthy lower lumbar spine during standardized movements and complex daily activities. ISB 2001, Zürich Baumgartner W, Grob D, Kramers-de Quervain I, Stüssi E (2001) Novel in vivo motion analysis of the healthy lower lumbar spine during standardized movements and complex daily activities. ISB 2001, Zürich
2.
go back to reference Bryant JT, Reid JG, Smith BL, Sleven JM (1989) Method for Determining vertebral bodypositions in the sagittal plane using skin markers. Spine 14:258–265PubMed Bryant JT, Reid JG, Smith BL, Sleven JM (1989) Method for Determining vertebral bodypositions in the sagittal plane using skin markers. Spine 14:258–265PubMed
3.
go back to reference Dimnet J, Fischer LP, Gonon G, Carret JP (1978) Radiographic studies of lateral flexion in the lumbar spine. J Biomech 11(3):143–150CrossRefPubMed Dimnet J, Fischer LP, Gonon G, Carret JP (1978) Radiographic studies of lateral flexion in the lumbar spine. J Biomech 11(3):143–150CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Gracovetsky S, Newman N, Pawlowsky M (1995) A database for estimating normal spinal motion derived from noninvasive measurements. Spine 20:1036–1046PubMed Gracovetsky S, Newman N, Pawlowsky M (1995) A database for estimating normal spinal motion derived from noninvasive measurements. Spine 20:1036–1046PubMed
5.
go back to reference Harada M, Abumi K, Ito M, Kaneda K (2000) Cineradiographic motion analysis of normal lumbar spine during forward and backward flexion. Spine 25(15):1932–1937CrossRefPubMed Harada M, Abumi K, Ito M, Kaneda K (2000) Cineradiographic motion analysis of normal lumbar spine during forward and backward flexion. Spine 25(15):1932–1937CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Hindle R, Pearcy M, Cross A, Miller D (1990) Three-dimensional kinematics of the human back. Clin Biomech 5:218–228CrossRef Hindle R, Pearcy M, Cross A, Miller D (1990) Three-dimensional kinematics of the human back. Clin Biomech 5:218–228CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kramers-de Quervain I, Baumgartner W, Stüssi E, Grob D (2001) Segmental motion of L3/4 and L4/5 of the lumbar spine during stair ambulation. ISB 2001, Zürich Kramers-de Quervain I, Baumgartner W, Stüssi E, Grob D (2001) Segmental motion of L3/4 and L4/5 of the lumbar spine during stair ambulation. ISB 2001, Zürich
8.
go back to reference Labesse F, Cheze L, Dimnet J (1996) Determination of optimal locations for further identification of the moving spine model. In. Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium, Grenoble Labesse F, Cheze L, Dimnet J (1996) Determination of optimal locations for further identification of the moving spine model. In. Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium, Grenoble
9.
go back to reference Lundberg A (1996) On the use of bone and skin markers in kinematics research. Hum Mov Sci 15(4):411–422CrossRef Lundberg A (1996) On the use of bone and skin markers in kinematics research. Hum Mov Sci 15(4):411–422CrossRef
10.
go back to reference McGregor AH, McCarthy ID, Hughes SP (1995) Motion characteristics of the lumbar spine in a normal population. Spine 20:2421–2428PubMed McGregor AH, McCarthy ID, Hughes SP (1995) Motion characteristics of the lumbar spine in a normal population. Spine 20:2421–2428PubMed
11.
go back to reference McGregor AH, Anderton L, Gedroyc W (2002) The assessment of intersegmental motion and pelvic tilt in elite oarsmen. Med Sci Sports Exerc 34(7):1143–1149CrossRefPubMed McGregor AH, Anderton L, Gedroyc W (2002) The assessment of intersegmental motion and pelvic tilt in elite oarsmen. Med Sci Sports Exerc 34(7):1143–1149CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Okawa A, Shinomiya K, Komori H, Muneta T, Arai Y, Nakai O (1998) Dynamic motion study of the whole lumbar spine by videofluoroscopy. Spine 23(16):1743–1749CrossRefPubMed Okawa A, Shinomiya K, Komori H, Muneta T, Arai Y, Nakai O (1998) Dynamic motion study of the whole lumbar spine by videofluoroscopy. Spine 23(16):1743–1749CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Pearcy MJ (1985) Stereoradiography of lumbar spine motion. Acta Orthop Scand 56:212 Pearcy MJ (1985) Stereoradiography of lumbar spine motion. Acta Orthop Scand 56:212
14.
go back to reference Pearcy MJ (1986) Measurement of back and spinal mobility. Clin Biomech 1:44–51CrossRef Pearcy MJ (1986) Measurement of back and spinal mobility. Clin Biomech 1:44–51CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Pearcy MJ, Whittle MW (1982) Movements of the lumbar spine measured by three-dimensional X-ray analysis. J Biomed Eng 4(2):107–112PubMed Pearcy MJ, Whittle MW (1982) Movements of the lumbar spine measured by three-dimensional X-ray analysis. J Biomed Eng 4(2):107–112PubMed
16.
go back to reference Pearcy MJ, Portek I, Sheperd J (1985) The affects of low Back pain on lumbar spine movements measured by three-dimensional X-ray analysis. Spine 10:150–153PubMed Pearcy MJ, Portek I, Sheperd J (1985) The affects of low Back pain on lumbar spine movements measured by three-dimensional X-ray analysis. Spine 10:150–153PubMed
17.
go back to reference Söderkvist I, Wedin PA (1993) Determining the movements of skeleton using wellconfigured markers. J Biomech 26:1473–1477CrossRefPubMed Söderkvist I, Wedin PA (1993) Determining the movements of skeleton using wellconfigured markers. J Biomech 26:1473–1477CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Steffen T, Rubin RK, Baramki HG, Antoniou J, Marchesi D, Aebi M (1997) A new technique for measuring lumbar segmental motion in vivo. Method, accuracy, and preliminary results. Spine 22(2):156–166CrossRefPubMed Steffen T, Rubin RK, Baramki HG, Antoniou J, Marchesi D, Aebi M (1997) A new technique for measuring lumbar segmental motion in vivo. Method, accuracy, and preliminary results. Spine 22(2):156–166CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Stokes IA, Bevins TM, Lunn RA (1987) Back surface curvature and measurement of lumbar spinal motion. Spine 12(4):355–361PubMed Stokes IA, Bevins TM, Lunn RA (1987) Back surface curvature and measurement of lumbar spinal motion. Spine 12(4):355–361PubMed
20.
go back to reference Vitzthum HE, König A, Seifert V (2000) Dynamic examination of the lumbar spine by using vertical, open magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosurg 93:58–64PubMed Vitzthum HE, König A, Seifert V (2000) Dynamic examination of the lumbar spine by using vertical, open magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosurg 93:58–64PubMed
21.
go back to reference Vogt L, Pfeifer K, Portscher M, Banzer W (2001) Influences of nonspecific low back pain on three-dimensional lumbar spine kinematics in locomotion. Spine 26(17):1910–1919CrossRefPubMed Vogt L, Pfeifer K, Portscher M, Banzer W (2001) Influences of nonspecific low back pain on three-dimensional lumbar spine kinematics in locomotion. Spine 26(17):1910–1919CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Woltring HJ (1991) Representation and calculation of 3-D joint movement. Hum Mov Sci 10:603–616CrossRef Woltring HJ (1991) Representation and calculation of 3-D joint movement. Hum Mov Sci 10:603–616CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Zhang X, Xiong J (2003) Model-guided derivation of lumbar vertebral kinematics in vivo reveals the difference between external marker-defined and internal segmental rotations. J Biomech 36:9–17CrossRefPubMed Zhang X, Xiong J (2003) Model-guided derivation of lumbar vertebral kinematics in vivo reveals the difference between external marker-defined and internal segmental rotations. J Biomech 36:9–17CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Three-dimensional relation of skin markers to lumbar vertebrae of healthy subjects in different postures measured by open MRI
Authors
Falk Mörl
Reinhard Blickhan
Publication date
01-06-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 6/2006
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-005-0960-0

Other articles of this Issue 6/2006

European Spine Journal 6/2006 Go to the issue