Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 3/2006

01-03-2006 | Original Article

The borders of the odontoid process of c2 in adults and in children including the estimation of odontoid/body ratio

Authors: Cengiz Çokluk, Keramettin Aydın, Cemil Rakunt, Omer Iyigun, Arif Onder

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 3/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

The odontoid process of C2 projects upward from the superior roof of the body of C2. There is a confusion about the inferior border of the odontoid. The aims of this clinical study were to describe the inferior border of the odontoid process based on the remnant of dentocentral synchondrosis in adults, and the estimation of the odontoid/body ratio in pediatric and adult ages. Sixty-six cases were included for this study. Forty-four of them were in adult ages and the remaining 22 of them were in pediatric ages. The region of occiput, C1, C2, and C3, was examined with the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in all cases. The length of the odontoid process was estimated by using radiological images of MR from the tip of the odontoid to the remnant of dentocentral synchondrosis. The portion located under the level of synchondrosis was considered as the body of C2. The average length of the odontoid was 18. 6 mm in pediatric and 21. 3 mm in adult cases. In adult females, the length of the odontoid process (19. 1 mm in length) was smaller than those of adult males (23. 6 mm in length). The average ratio of odontoid/body was two in pediatric and 1.8 in adult cases. This study demonstrated that the neck of the odontoid segment at the level of superior articulating facets is not the synchondrosis between the odontoid process and the body of C2. The synchondrosis is located well below the level of superior articulating facets. It can be demonstrated with sagittal and coronal images of MR in both of pediatric and adult individuals.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Benzel EC, Hart BL, Ball PA, Baldwin NG, Orrison WW, Espinosa M (1994) Fractures of the C-2 vertebral body. J Neurosurg 81:206–212PubMed Benzel EC, Hart BL, Ball PA, Baldwin NG, Orrison WW, Espinosa M (1994) Fractures of the C-2 vertebral body. J Neurosurg 81:206–212PubMed
2.
go back to reference Doherty BJ, Heggeness MH (1995) Quantitative anatomy of the second cervical vertebra. Spine 20:513–517PubMed Doherty BJ, Heggeness MH (1995) Quantitative anatomy of the second cervical vertebra. Spine 20:513–517PubMed
3.
go back to reference Ebraheim NA, Fow J, Xu R, Yeasting RA (2001) The location of the pedicle and pars interarticularis in the axis. Spine 26:34–37CrossRef Ebraheim NA, Fow J, Xu R, Yeasting RA (2001) The location of the pedicle and pars interarticularis in the axis. Spine 26:34–37CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Garton HJL, Park P, Papadopoulos SM (2002) Fracture dislocation of the neurocentral syncondroses of the axis. Case illustration. J Neurosurg Spine 96:350 Garton HJL, Park P, Papadopoulos SM (2002) Fracture dislocation of the neurocentral syncondroses of the axis. Case illustration. J Neurosurg Spine 96:350
5.
go back to reference Heggeness MH, Doherty BJ (1993) The trabecular anatomy of the axis. Spine 14:1945–1949 Heggeness MH, Doherty BJ (1993) The trabecular anatomy of the axis. Spine 14:1945–1949
6.
go back to reference Koebke J (1979) Morfological and functional studies on the odontoid process of the human axis. Anat Ebryol (Berl) 155:197–208CrossRef Koebke J (1979) Morfological and functional studies on the odontoid process of the human axis. Anat Ebryol (Berl) 155:197–208CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Mandel IM, Kambach BJ, Petersilge CA, Johnstone B, Yoo JU (2000) Morphologic consideration of C2 isthmus dimentions for the placement of transarticular screws. Spine 25:1542–1547CrossRefPubMed Mandel IM, Kambach BJ, Petersilge CA, Johnstone B, Yoo JU (2000) Morphologic consideration of C2 isthmus dimentions for the placement of transarticular screws. Spine 25:1542–1547CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Schaffler MB, Alson MD, Heller JG, Garfin SR (1992) Morfology of the dens. A quantitative study. Spine 17:738–743PubMed Schaffler MB, Alson MD, Heller JG, Garfin SR (1992) Morfology of the dens. A quantitative study. Spine 17:738–743PubMed
9.
go back to reference Stillerman CB, Roy RS, Weiss MH (1996) Cervical spine injuries: diagnosis and management. In: Wilkins RH, Rengachary SS (eds) Neurosurgery, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 2875- 2904 Stillerman CB, Roy RS, Weiss MH (1996) Cervical spine injuries: diagnosis and management. In: Wilkins RH, Rengachary SS (eds) Neurosurgery, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 2875- 2904
10.
go back to reference Xu R, Burgar A, Ebraheim NA, Yeasting RA (1999) The quantitative anatomy of the laminas of the spine. Spine 15:107–113CrossRef Xu R, Burgar A, Ebraheim NA, Yeasting RA (1999) The quantitative anatomy of the laminas of the spine. Spine 15:107–113CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The borders of the odontoid process of c2 in adults and in children including the estimation of odontoid/body ratio
Authors
Cengiz Çokluk
Keramettin Aydın
Cemil Rakunt
Omer Iyigun
Arif Onder
Publication date
01-03-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 3/2006
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-005-0946-y

Other articles of this Issue 3/2006

European Spine Journal 3/2006 Go to the issue