Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 10/2005

01-12-2005 | Original Article

Health-related quality of life assessment by the EuroQol-5D can provide cost-utility data in the field of low-back surgery.

Authors: Tore K. Solberg, Jan-Abel Olsen, Tor Ingebrigtsen, Dag Hofoss, Øystein P Nygaard

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 10/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

There is limited data on the cost-utility of low-back surgical procedures. The EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) is a generic health-related quality of life (HRQL) instrument, which was designed for cost-utility analyses and for comparisons of therapeutic effects across different diseases. Disease-specific (HRQL) instruments cannot be used for such purposes. However, there is little evidence of the usefulness of the EQ-5D in the field of low-back surgery, and it might be too general to assess specific conditions. We therefore tested its validity and responsiveness against a widely used disease-specific HRQL instrument [the Oswestry disability index (ODI)], in a prospective study on 326 patients operated for degenerative disorders in the lumbar spine. The reliability of the EQ-5D was also evaluated. Follow-up time was 12 months. Cross-sectional construct validity of the EQ-5D and ODI in the assessments of pain, functional status, health state and employment status were equal. The ODI performed better only in the assessment of walking capability. Only small differences in responsiveness were found. The reliability of the EQ-5D was solid. Our results indicate that the EQ-5D is useful for estimating health state values and for monitoring outcome of patients undergoing low-back surgery. Hence, this instrument would provide valid data for cost–utility analyses.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Badia X, Monserrat S, Roset M, Herdman M (1999) Feasibility, validity and test-retest reliability of scaling methods for health states: the visual analogue scale and the time trade-off. Qual Life Res 8:303–310 Badia X, Monserrat S, Roset M, Herdman M (1999) Feasibility, validity and test-retest reliability of scaling methods for health states: the visual analogue scale and the time trade-off. Qual Life Res 8:303–310
2.
go back to reference Baker DJ, Pynsent PB, Fairbank CT (1990) The Oswestry Disability Index revisited: its reliability, repeatability and validity, and a comparison with the St Thomas’s Disability Index. In: Roland M, Jenner JR (eds) Back Pain. New approaches to rehabilitation and education. Manchester University Press, Manchester, pp. 174–186 Baker DJ, Pynsent PB, Fairbank CT (1990) The Oswestry Disability Index revisited: its reliability, repeatability and validity, and a comparison with the St Thomas’s Disability Index. In: Roland M, Jenner JR (eds) Back Pain. New approaches to rehabilitation and education. Manchester University Press, Manchester, pp. 174–186
3.
go back to reference Beurskens AJ, Vet HC, Koke AJ (1996) Responsiveness of functional status in low back pain: a comparison of different instruments. Pain 65:71–76 Beurskens AJ, Vet HC, Koke AJ (1996) Responsiveness of functional status in low back pain: a comparison of different instruments. Pain 65:71–76
4.
go back to reference Brazier J, Deverill M, Green C, Harper R, Booth A (1999) A review of the use of health status measures in economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 3:1–164 Brazier J, Deverill M, Green C, Harper R, Booth A (1999) A review of the use of health status measures in economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 3:1–164
5.
go back to reference Brooks R (1996) EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy 37:53–72 Brooks R (1996) EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy 37:53–72
6.
go back to reference Carmines EG, Zeller RA (1979) Reliability and validity assessment. Quantitiative applications in the social sciences. Sage University, Beverly Hills, paper 17, pp 1–71 Carmines EG, Zeller RA (1979) Reliability and validity assessment. Quantitiative applications in the social sciences. Sage University, Beverly Hills, paper 17, pp 1–71
7.
go back to reference Coons SJ, Rao S, Keininger DL, Hays RD (2000) A comparative review of generic quality-of-life instruments. Pharmacoeconomics 17:13–35 Coons SJ, Rao S, Keininger DL, Hays RD (2000) A comparative review of generic quality-of-life instruments. Pharmacoeconomics 17:13–35
8.
go back to reference Cronbach LJ (1951) Co-efficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16:297–334 Cronbach LJ (1951) Co-efficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16:297–334
9.
go back to reference Deyo RA, Centor RM (1986) Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: an analogy to diagnostic test performance. J Chronic Dis 39:897–906 Deyo RA, Centor RM (1986) Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: an analogy to diagnostic test performance. J Chronic Dis 39:897–906
10.
go back to reference Dionne CE, Von Korff M, Koepsell TD, Deyo RA, Barlow WE, Checkoway H (1999) A comparison of pain, functional limitations, and work status indices as outcome measures in back pain research. Spine 24:2339–2345 Dionne CE, Von Korff M, Koepsell TD, Deyo RA, Barlow WE, Checkoway H (1999) A comparison of pain, functional limitations, and work status indices as outcome measures in back pain research. Spine 24:2339–2345
11.
go back to reference Dolan P (1996) Modelling valuations for health states: the effect of duration. Health Policy 38:189–203 Dolan P (1996) Modelling valuations for health states: the effect of duration. Health Policy 38:189–203
12.
go back to reference Dolan P (1997) Modelling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care 35:1095–1108 Dolan P (1997) Modelling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care 35:1095–1108
13.
go back to reference Dolan P, Gudex C, Kind P, Williams A (1996) The time trade-off method: results from a general population study. Health Econ 5:141–154 Dolan P, Gudex C, Kind P, Williams A (1996) The time trade-off method: results from a general population study. Health Econ 5:141–154
14.
go back to reference Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, O’Brien JP (1980) The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 66:271–273 Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, O’Brien JP (1980) The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 66:271–273
15.
go back to reference Garratt AM, Klaber MJ, Farrin AJ (2001) Responsiveness of generic and specific measures of health outcome in low back pain. Spine 26:71–77 Garratt AM, Klaber MJ, Farrin AJ (2001) Responsiveness of generic and specific measures of health outcome in low back pain. Spine 26:71–77
16.
go back to reference Hagg O, Fritzell P, Romberg K, Nordwall A (2001) The general function score: a useful tool for measurement of physical disability. Validity and reliability. Eur Spine J 10:203–210 Hagg O, Fritzell P, Romberg K, Nordwall A (2001) The general function score: a useful tool for measurement of physical disability. Validity and reliability. Eur Spine J 10:203–210
17.
go back to reference Katz JN, Larson MG, Phillips CB, Fossel AH, Liang MH (1992) Comparative measurement sensitivity of short and longer health status instruments. Med Care 30:917–925 Katz JN, Larson MG, Phillips CB, Fossel AH, Liang MH (1992) Comparative measurement sensitivity of short and longer health status instruments. Med Care 30:917–925
18.
go back to reference Kazis LE, Anderson JJ, Meenan RF (1989) Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status. Med Care 27:S178–S189 Kazis LE, Anderson JJ, Meenan RF (1989) Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status. Med Care 27:S178–S189
19.
go back to reference Malter AD, Weinstein J (1996) Cost-effectiveness of lumbar discectomy. Spine 21:69S–74S Malter AD, Weinstein J (1996) Cost-effectiveness of lumbar discectomy. Spine 21:69S–74S
20.
go back to reference Nord E (1991) EuroQol: health-related quality of life measurement. Valuations of health states by the general public in Norway. Health Policy 18:25–36 Nord E (1991) EuroQol: health-related quality of life measurement. Valuations of health states by the general public in Norway. Health Policy 18:25–36
21.
go back to reference Patrick DL, Deyo RA (1989) Generic and disease-specific measures in assessing health status and quality of life. Med Care 27:S217–S232 Patrick DL, Deyo RA (1989) Generic and disease-specific measures in assessing health status and quality of life. Med Care 27:S217–S232
22.
go back to reference Patrick DL, Deyo RA, Atlas SJ, Singer DE, Chapin A, Keller RB (1995) Assessing health-related quality of life in patients with sciatica. Spine 20:1899–1908 Patrick DL, Deyo RA, Atlas SJ, Singer DE, Chapin A, Keller RB (1995) Assessing health-related quality of life in patients with sciatica. Spine 20:1899–1908
23.
go back to reference Rabin R, de Charro F (2001) EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Ann Med 33:337–343 Rabin R, de Charro F (2001) EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Ann Med 33:337–343
24.
go back to reference Stromqvist B, Jonsson B, Fritzell P, Hagg O, Larsson BE, Lind B (2001) The Swedish National Register for lumbar spine surgery: Swedish society for spinal surgery. Acta Orthop Scand 72:99–106 Stromqvist B, Jonsson B, Fritzell P, Hagg O, Larsson BE, Lind B (2001) The Swedish National Register for lumbar spine surgery: Swedish society for spinal surgery. Acta Orthop Scand 72:99–106
25.
go back to reference Suarez-Almazor ME, Kendall C, Johnson JA, Skeith K, Vincent D (2000) Use of health status measures in patients with low back pain in clinical settings. Comparison of specific, generic and preference-based instruments. Rheumatology (Oxford) 39:783–790 Suarez-Almazor ME, Kendall C, Johnson JA, Skeith K, Vincent D (2000) Use of health status measures in patients with low back pain in clinical settings. Comparison of specific, generic and preference-based instruments. Rheumatology (Oxford) 39:783–790
26.
go back to reference Terwee CB, Dekker FW, Wiersinga WM, Prummel MF, Bossuyt PM (2003) On assessing responsiveness of health-related quality of life instruments: guidelines for instrument evaluation. Qual Life Res 12:349–362 Terwee CB, Dekker FW, Wiersinga WM, Prummel MF, Bossuyt PM (2003) On assessing responsiveness of health-related quality of life instruments: guidelines for instrument evaluation. Qual Life Res 12:349–362
27.
go back to reference The EuroQol Group (1990) EuroQol–a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. The EuroQol Group. Health Policy 16:199–208 The EuroQol Group (1990) EuroQol–a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. The EuroQol Group. Health Policy 16:199–208
28.
go back to reference Weber H (1983) Lumbar disc herniation. A controlled, prospective study with ten years of observation. Spine 8:131–140 Weber H (1983) Lumbar disc herniation. A controlled, prospective study with ten years of observation. Spine 8:131–140
29.
go back to reference Wood-Dauphinee SL (2001) Assessment of back-related quality of life: the continuing challenge. Spine 26:857–861 Wood-Dauphinee SL (2001) Assessment of back-related quality of life: the continuing challenge. Spine 26:857–861
Metadata
Title
Health-related quality of life assessment by the EuroQol-5D can provide cost-utility data in the field of low-back surgery.
Authors
Tore K. Solberg
Jan-Abel Olsen
Tor Ingebrigtsen
Dag Hofoss
Øystein P Nygaard
Publication date
01-12-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 10/2005
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-005-0898-2

Other articles of this Issue 10/2005

European Spine Journal 10/2005 Go to the issue

Announcements

December 2005