Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 6/2005

01-08-2005 | Original Article

Long-term effects of supervised physical training in secondary prevention of low back pain

Authors: Irina Maul, Thomas Läubli, Michael Oliveri, Helmut Krueger

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 6/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

Background and objectives: In the last few years, several studies have focused on short-term treatment effects of exercise therapy. However, there is a lack of knowledge concerning the long-term treatment effects recorded after several years. Hence, this study was performed to investigate the short- and long-term effects of supervised physical training on functional ability, self-rated pain and disability in secondary prevention of low back pain. Methods: One hundred and eighty-three hospital employees with chronic low back pain were randomly assigned either to back school (comparison group), or three-months supervised physical training including a back school (exercise group). Various measurements of functional ability were performed and subjects completed questionnaires on self-rated pain, disability, and general well-being before treatment, immediately after intervention, and at six-months follow-up. At one-year and at ten-years follow-up participants evaluated treatment effectiveness. Results: Out of 183 employees, 148 completed the program. Participation at follow-ups ranged from 66 to 96%. Supervised physical training significantly improved muscular endurance and isokinetic strength during a six-months follow-up, and effectively decreased self-rated pain and disability during a one-year follow-up. At ten-years follow-up the subjects’ assessment of the effectiveness of treatment was significantly better in the exercise group. Conclusions: Supervised physical training effectively improved functional capacity and decreased LBP and disability up to one-year follow-up. The subjects’ positive evaluation of the treatment effect at ten-years follow-up suggests a long-term benefit of training.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Antonovsky A (1987) Unraveling the mystery of health. How people manage stress and stay well. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco Antonovsky A (1987) Unraveling the mystery of health. How people manage stress and stay well. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
2.
go back to reference Bendix AE, Bendix T, Ostenfeld S, Busch E, Andersen A (1995) Active treatment programs for patients with chronic low back pain: a prospective, randomized, observer-blinded study. Eur Spine J 4:148–152CrossRef Bendix AE, Bendix T, Ostenfeld S, Busch E, Andersen A (1995) Active treatment programs for patients with chronic low back pain: a prospective, randomized, observer-blinded study. Eur Spine J 4:148–152CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Bendix AE, Bendix T, Heatrup C, Busch E (1998) A prospective, randomized 5-year follow-up study of functional restoration in chronic low back pain patients. Eur Spine J 7:111–119CrossRef Bendix AE, Bendix T, Heatrup C, Busch E (1998) A prospective, randomized 5-year follow-up study of functional restoration in chronic low back pain patients. Eur Spine J 7:111–119CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Biering-Soerensen F (1984) Physical measurement as risk indicators for low-back trouble over a one-year period. Spine 9:106–119PubMed Biering-Soerensen F (1984) Physical measurement as risk indicators for low-back trouble over a one-year period. Spine 9:106–119PubMed
5.
go back to reference Bigos S, Bowyer O, Braen G et al. (1995) Acute low back problems in adults. Clinical practice guideline No. 14. AHCPR Publication No. 95-0642. Public Health Service, Rockville Bigos S, Bowyer O, Braen G et al. (1995) Acute low back problems in adults. Clinical practice guideline No. 14. AHCPR Publication No. 95-0642. Public Health Service, Rockville
6.
go back to reference Capra P, Mayer T, Gatchel R (1985) Adding psychological scales to your back pain assessment. J Musculoskel Med 2:41–52 Capra P, Mayer T, Gatchel R (1985) Adding psychological scales to your back pain assessment. J Musculoskel Med 2:41–52
7.
go back to reference Cronbach LJ (1970) Essentials of psychological testing. Harper and Row, New York Cronbach LJ (1970) Essentials of psychological testing. Harper and Row, New York
8.
go back to reference Downie WW, Leatham PA, Rhind VM et al. (1978) Studies with pain rating scales. Ann Rheum Dis 37:378–381 Downie WW, Leatham PA, Rhind VM et al. (1978) Studies with pain rating scales. Ann Rheum Dis 37:378–381
9.
go back to reference DuPuy HJ, Ulin PR, Bullinger M et al. (1993) PGWB psychological general well-being index. In: Westhoff G (ed) Handbuch psychosozialer Messinstrumente. Hogrefe, Göttingen, pp 642–646 DuPuy HJ, Ulin PR, Bullinger M et al. (1993) PGWB psychological general well-being index. In: Westhoff G (ed) Handbuch psychosozialer Messinstrumente. Hogrefe, Göttingen, pp 642–646
10.
go back to reference Frost H, Lamb SE, Klaber Moffett JA et al. (1998) A fitness programme for patients with chronic low back pain: 2-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. Pain 75:273–279CrossRef Frost H, Lamb SE, Klaber Moffett JA et al. (1998) A fitness programme for patients with chronic low back pain: 2-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. Pain 75:273–279CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Glomsrod B, Lonn JH, Soukup MG et al. (2001) “Active back school”, prophylactic management for low back pain: three-year follow-up of a randomized, controlled trial. J Rehabil Med 33:26–30CrossRef Glomsrod B, Lonn JH, Soukup MG et al. (2001) “Active back school”, prophylactic management for low back pain: three-year follow-up of a randomized, controlled trial. J Rehabil Med 33:26–30CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Gunnari H, Evjenth O, Brady MM (1984) Sequence exercise. The sensible approach to all-round fitness. Dreyers, Oslo Gunnari H, Evjenth O, Brady MM (1984) Sequence exercise. The sensible approach to all-round fitness. Dreyers, Oslo
13.
go back to reference Hansen, FR, Bendix T, Skov P et al. (1993) Intensive, dynamic back muscle exercises, conventional physiotherapy, or placebo-control treatment of low-back pain. A randomized, observer-blind trial. Spine 18:98–108 Hansen, FR, Bendix T, Skov P et al. (1993) Intensive, dynamic back muscle exercises, conventional physiotherapy, or placebo-control treatment of low-back pain. A randomized, observer-blind trial. Spine 18:98–108
14.
go back to reference Hildebrandt J, Pfingsten M, Saur P et al. (1997) Prediction of success from a multidisciplinary treatment program for chronic low back pain. Spine 22:990–1001CrossRefPubMed Hildebrandt J, Pfingsten M, Saur P et al. (1997) Prediction of success from a multidisciplinary treatment program for chronic low back pain. Spine 22:990–1001CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Hodselmans AP, Jaegers SM, Goeken LN (2001) Short-term outcomes of a back school program for chronic low back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 82:1099–1105CrossRef Hodselmans AP, Jaegers SM, Goeken LN (2001) Short-term outcomes of a back school program for chronic low back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 82:1099–1105CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Holten O (1991) Medical exercise therapy—the basic principles. Fysioterapeuten 58:27–32 Holten O (1991) Medical exercise therapy—the basic principles. Fysioterapeuten 58:27–32
17.
go back to reference Isernhagen SJ (1991) Functional capacity evaluation and work hardening perspectives. In: Mayer TG, Mooney V, Gatchel RJ (eds) Contemporary conservative care for painful spinal disorders. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, pp 328–345 Isernhagen SJ (1991) Functional capacity evaluation and work hardening perspectives. In: Mayer TG, Mooney V, Gatchel RJ (eds) Contemporary conservative care for painful spinal disorders. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, pp 328–345
18.
go back to reference Kankaanpää M, Taimela S, Airaksinen O et al. (1999) The efficacy of active rehabilitation in chronic low back pain. Effect on pain intensity, self-experienced disability, and lumbar fatigability. Spine 24:1034–1042CrossRef Kankaanpää M, Taimela S, Airaksinen O et al. (1999) The efficacy of active rehabilitation in chronic low back pain. Effect on pain intensity, self-experienced disability, and lumbar fatigability. Spine 24:1034–1042CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Kannus P, Jozsa L, Renström P et al. (1992) The effects of training, immobilization, and remobilization on musculoskeletal tissue. Scand J Rehab Med 2:100–118 Kannus P, Jozsa L, Renström P et al. (1992) The effects of training, immobilization, and remobilization on musculoskeletal tissue. Scand J Rehab Med 2:100–118
20.
go back to reference Keel PJ, Wittig R, Deutschmann R et al. (1998) Effectiveness of in-patient rehabilitation for sub-chronic and chronic low back pain by an integrative group treatment program (Swiss Multicentre Study). Scand J Rehab Med 30:211–219CrossRef Keel PJ, Wittig R, Deutschmann R et al. (1998) Effectiveness of in-patient rehabilitation for sub-chronic and chronic low back pain by an integrative group treatment program (Swiss Multicentre Study). Scand J Rehab Med 30:211–219CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Keeley J, Mayer TG, Cox R et al. (1986) Quantification of lumbar function. Part 5: reliability of range-of-motion measures in the sagittal plane and an in vivo torso rotation measurement technique. Spine 11:31–35 Keeley J, Mayer TG, Cox R et al. (1986) Quantification of lumbar function. Part 5: reliability of range-of-motion measures in the sagittal plane and an in vivo torso rotation measurement technique. Spine 11:31–35
22.
go back to reference Kuorinka I, JonssonB, Kilbom A et al. (1987) Standardised nordic questionnaires for the analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms. Applied Ergonomics 18:233–237CrossRef Kuorinka I, JonssonB, Kilbom A et al. (1987) Standardised nordic questionnaires for the analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms. Applied Ergonomics 18:233–237CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Läubli T, Thomas C, Hinnen U et al. (1991) Erfassung muskuloskeletaler Beschwerden mittels Fragebogen. Sozial- und Präventivmedizin 36:25–33 Läubli T, Thomas C, Hinnen U et al. (1991) Erfassung muskuloskeletaler Beschwerden mittels Fragebogen. Sozial- und Präventivmedizin 36:25–33
24.
go back to reference Lonn JH, Glomsrod B, Soukup MG et al. (1999) Active back school: prophylactic management for low back pain. A randomized, controlled, 1-year follow-up study. Spine 24:865–871CrossRef Lonn JH, Glomsrod B, Soukup MG et al. (1999) Active back school: prophylactic management for low back pain. A randomized, controlled, 1-year follow-up study. Spine 24:865–871CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Malmivaara A, Hakkinen U, Aro T et al. (1995) The treatment of acute low back pain–bed rest, exercises, or ordinary activity?. N Engl J Med 332:351–355CrossRef Malmivaara A, Hakkinen U, Aro T et al. (1995) The treatment of acute low back pain–bed rest, exercises, or ordinary activity?. N Engl J Med 332:351–355CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Manniche C (1996) Clinical benefit of intensive dynamic exercises for low back pain. Scand J Med Sci Sports 6:82–87 Manniche C (1996) Clinical benefit of intensive dynamic exercises for low back pain. Scand J Med Sci Sports 6:82–87
27.
go back to reference Mannion AF, Müntener M, Taimela S et al. (1999) A randomized clinical trial of three active therapies for chronic low back pain. Spine 24:2435–2448CrossRefPubMed Mannion AF, Müntener M, Taimela S et al. (1999) A randomized clinical trial of three active therapies for chronic low back pain. Spine 24:2435–2448CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Matheson LN (1993) Work hardening for patients with back pain. J Musculoskel Med 10:53–63 Matheson LN (1993) Work hardening for patients with back pain. J Musculoskel Med 10:53–63
29.
go back to reference Mayer TG, Barnes D, Nichols G et al. (1988) Progressive isoinertial lifting evaluation I. A standardized protocol and normative database. Spine 13:993–997PubMed Mayer TG, Barnes D, Nichols G et al. (1988) Progressive isoinertial lifting evaluation I. A standardized protocol and normative database. Spine 13:993–997PubMed
30.
go back to reference Mayer TG, Gatchel RJ, Kishino H et al. (1985) Objective assessment of spine function following industrial injury. A prospective study with comparison group and one-year follow-up. Spine 10:482–493 Mayer TG, Gatchel RJ, Kishino H et al. (1985) Objective assessment of spine function following industrial injury. A prospective study with comparison group and one-year follow-up. Spine 10:482–493
31.
go back to reference Mayer TG, Gatchel RJ, Mayer H et al. (1987) A prospective two-year study of functional restoration in industrial low back injury. An objective assessment procedure. JMA 258:1763–1767CrossRef Mayer TG, Gatchel RJ, Mayer H et al. (1987) A prospective two-year study of functional restoration in industrial low back injury. An objective assessment procedure. JMA 258:1763–1767CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Mayer TG, Gatchel RJ (1988) Functional restoration for spinal disorders: the sports medicine approach. Lea & Felbiger, Philadelphia Mayer TG, Gatchel RJ (1988) Functional restoration for spinal disorders: the sports medicine approach. Lea & Felbiger, Philadelphia
33.
go back to reference Mayer, TG, Smith SS. Keeley J et al. (1985) Quantification of lumbar function. Part 2: Sagittal plane trunk strength in chronic low-back pain patients. Spine 10:765–772 Mayer, TG, Smith SS. Keeley J et al. (1985) Quantification of lumbar function. Part 2: Sagittal plane trunk strength in chronic low-back pain patients. Spine 10:765–772
34.
go back to reference Melzack R (1987) The short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire. Pain 30:191–197CrossRef Melzack R (1987) The short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire. Pain 30:191–197CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Oliveri M, Kopp HG, Läubli T et al. (1996) Die Bedeutung von körperlicher Aktivität und physischer Leistungsfähigkeit für die Prävention und Behandlung chronischer Rückenbeschwerden. In: Keel P, Perini Ch, Schütz-Petitjean D (eds) Chronifizierung von Rückenschmerzen: Hintergründe, Auswege. Eular, Basel, pp 52–69 Oliveri M, Kopp HG, Läubli T et al. (1996) Die Bedeutung von körperlicher Aktivität und physischer Leistungsfähigkeit für die Prävention und Behandlung chronischer Rückenbeschwerden. In: Keel P, Perini Ch, Schütz-Petitjean D (eds) Chronifizierung von Rückenschmerzen: Hintergründe, Auswege. Eular, Basel, pp 52–69
36.
go back to reference Pollock ML, Wilmore JH, Fox SM (1984) Exercise in health and disease. Evaluation and prescription for prevention and rehabilitation. Saunders, Philadelphia Pollock ML, Wilmore JH, Fox SM (1984) Exercise in health and disease. Evaluation and prescription for prevention and rehabilitation. Saunders, Philadelphia
37.
go back to reference Roland M, Morris R (1983) A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I. Development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low back pain. Spine 8:141–144PubMed Roland M, Morris R (1983) A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I. Development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low back pain. Spine 8:141–144PubMed
38.
go back to reference van Tulder M, Malmivaara A, Esmail R et al. (2000) Exercise therapy for low back pain. A systematic review within the framework of the Cochrane collaboration back review group. Spine 25:2784–2796CrossRef van Tulder M, Malmivaara A, Esmail R et al. (2000) Exercise therapy for low back pain. A systematic review within the framework of the Cochrane collaboration back review group. Spine 25:2784–2796CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Waddell G (1987) Clinical assessment of lumbar impairment. Clin Orthop 221:110–120 Waddell G (1987) Clinical assessment of lumbar impairment. Clin Orthop 221:110–120
40.
go back to reference Waddell G (1987) A new clinical model for the treatment of low back pain. Spine 12:632–644 Waddell G (1987) A new clinical model for the treatment of low back pain. Spine 12:632–644
Metadata
Title
Long-term effects of supervised physical training in secondary prevention of low back pain
Authors
Irina Maul
Thomas Läubli
Michael Oliveri
Helmut Krueger
Publication date
01-08-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 6/2005
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-004-0873-3

Other articles of this Issue 6/2005

European Spine Journal 6/2005 Go to the issue