Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 2/2005

01-03-2005 | Original Article

Repositioning accuracy and movement parameters in low back pain subjects and healthy control subjects

Authors: Martin Descarreaux, Jean-Sébastien Blouin, Normand Teasdale

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 2/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

Study Design: A control group study with repeated measures. Objective: To compare trunk repositioning parameters in chronic low back pain (LBP) and healthy subjects. Summary and background data: Recent evidence suggests that chronic LBP patients exhibit deficits in trunk proprioception and motor control. Trunk repositioning and the various spatio-temporal parameters related to it can be used to evaluate sensori-motor control and movement strategies. Methods: Fifteen control subjects and 16 chronic LBP subjects participated in this study. Subjects were required to reproduce different trunk position in flexion (15°, 30° and 60°) and extension (15°). In the learning phase preceding each condition, visual feedback was provided. Following these learning trials, subjects were asked to perform ten consecutive trials without any feedback. Movement time, movement time variability and peak velocity were obtained and a temporal symmetry ratio was calculated. Peak angular position variability and absolute error in peak angular position were also calculated to evaluate spatial accuracy. Results: Two subgroups of LBP patients were identified. One subgroup of LBP subjects demonstrated longer movement time and smaller peak velocities and symmetry ratios than normal subjects. No group difference was observed for peak angular position variability and absolute error in peak angular position. Conclusion: Chronic LBP patients, when given a sufficient learning period, were able to reproduce trunk position with a spatial accuracy similar to control subjects. Some LBP subjects, however, showed modifications of movement time, peak velocity and acceleration parameters. We propose that the presence of persistent chronic pain could induce an alteration or an adaptation in the motor responses of chronic LBP subjects.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Al-Obaidi SM, Nelson RM, Al-Awadhi S, et al (2000) The role of anticipation and fear of pain in the persistence of avoidance behavior in patients with chronic LBP. Spine 25:1126–1131CrossRefPubMed Al-Obaidi SM, Nelson RM, Al-Awadhi S, et al (2000) The role of anticipation and fear of pain in the persistence of avoidance behavior in patients with chronic LBP. Spine 25:1126–1131CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Brumagne S, Cordo P, Lysens R, et al (2000) The role of paraspinal muscle spindles in lumbosacral position sense in individuals with and without LBP. Spine 25:989–994CrossRefPubMed Brumagne S, Cordo P, Lysens R, et al (2000) The role of paraspinal muscle spindles in lumbosacral position sense in individuals with and without LBP. Spine 25:989–994CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Brumagne S, Lysens R, Swinnen S, et al (1999) Effect of paraspinal muscle vibration on position sense of the lumbosacral spine. Spine 24:1328–1331CrossRefPubMed Brumagne S, Lysens R, Swinnen S, et al (1999) Effect of paraspinal muscle vibration on position sense of the lumbosacral spine. Spine 24:1328–1331CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Cholewicki J, McGill SM (1996) Mechanical stability of the in vivo lumbar spine: implications for injury and chronic LBP. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 11:1–15 Cholewicki J, McGill SM (1996) Mechanical stability of the in vivo lumbar spine: implications for injury and chronic LBP. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 11:1–15
5.
go back to reference Descarreaux M, Blouin JS, Teasdale N (2004) Force production parameters in patients with LBP and healthy control study participants. Spine 29:311–317CrossRefPubMed Descarreaux M, Blouin JS, Teasdale N (2004) Force production parameters in patients with LBP and healthy control study participants. Spine 29:311–317CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Frymoyer JW, Ducker TB (1997) The adult spine: principles and practice, 2nd edn. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia Frymoyer JW, Ducker TB (1997) The adult spine: principles and practice, 2nd edn. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia
7.
go back to reference Gill KP, Callaghan MJ (1998) The measurement of lumbar proprioception in individuals with and without LBP. Spine 23:371–377CrossRefPubMed Gill KP, Callaghan MJ (1998) The measurement of lumbar proprioception in individuals with and without LBP. Spine 23:371–377CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Holm S, Indahl A, Solomonow M (2002) Sensorimotor control of the spine. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 12:219–234CrossRefPubMed Holm S, Indahl A, Solomonow M (2002) Sensorimotor control of the spine. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 12:219–234CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Indahl A, Kaigle A, Reikeras O, et al (1995) Electromyographic response of the porcine multifidus musculature after nerve stimulation. Spine 20:2652–2658PubMed Indahl A, Kaigle A, Reikeras O, et al (1995) Electromyographic response of the porcine multifidus musculature after nerve stimulation. Spine 20:2652–2658PubMed
10.
go back to reference Indahl A, Kaigle AM, Reikeras O, et al (1997) Interaction between the porcine lumbar intervertebral disc, zygapophysial joints, and paraspinal muscles. Spine 22:2834–2840CrossRefPubMed Indahl A, Kaigle AM, Reikeras O, et al (1997) Interaction between the porcine lumbar intervertebral disc, zygapophysial joints, and paraspinal muscles. Spine 22:2834–2840CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Jaric S, Corcos DM, Latash ML (1992) Effects of practice on final position reproduction. Exp Brain Res 91:129–134CrossRefPubMed Jaric S, Corcos DM, Latash ML (1992) Effects of practice on final position reproduction. Exp Brain Res 91:129–134CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Jaric S, Gottlieb GL, Latash ML, et al (1998) Changes in the symmetry of rapid movements. Effects of velocity and viscosity. Exp Brain Res 120:52–60CrossRefPubMed Jaric S, Gottlieb GL, Latash ML, et al (1998) Changes in the symmetry of rapid movements. Effects of velocity and viscosity. Exp Brain Res 120:52–60CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Newcomer K, Laskowski ER, Yu B, et al (2000) Repositioning error in LBP. Comparing trunk repositioning error in subjects with chronic LBP and control subjects. Spine 25:245–250CrossRefPubMed Newcomer K, Laskowski ER, Yu B, et al (2000) Repositioning error in LBP. Comparing trunk repositioning error in subjects with chronic LBP and control subjects. Spine 25:245–250CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Newcomer KL, Laskowski ER, Yu B, et al (2000) Differences in repositioning error among patients with LBP compared with control subjects. Spine 25:2488–2493CrossRefPubMed Newcomer KL, Laskowski ER, Yu B, et al (2000) Differences in repositioning error among patients with LBP compared with control subjects. Spine 25:2488–2493CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Newell KM (1976) Knowledge of results and motor learning. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 4:195–228PubMed Newell KM (1976) Knowledge of results and motor learning. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 4:195–228PubMed
16.
go back to reference Newell KM, Walter CB (1981) Kinematic and kinetic parameters as information feedback in motor skill acquisition. J Human Movements Stud 7:235–254 Newell KM, Walter CB (1981) Kinematic and kinetic parameters as information feedback in motor skill acquisition. J Human Movements Stud 7:235–254
17.
go back to reference O’Sullivan PB, Burnett A, Floyd AN, et al (2003) Lumbar repositioning deficit in a specific LBP population. Spine 28:1074–1079CrossRefPubMed O’Sullivan PB, Burnett A, Floyd AN, et al (2003) Lumbar repositioning deficit in a specific LBP population. Spine 28:1074–1079CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Parkhurst TM, Burnett CN (1994) Injury and proprioception in the lower back. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 19:282–295PubMed Parkhurst TM, Burnett CN (1994) Injury and proprioception in the lower back. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 19:282–295PubMed
19.
go back to reference Radebold A, Cholewicki J, Polzhofer GK, et al (2001) Impaired postural control of the lumbar spine is associated with delayed muscle response times in patients with chronic idiopathic LBP. Spine 26:724–730CrossRefPubMed Radebold A, Cholewicki J, Polzhofer GK, et al (2001) Impaired postural control of the lumbar spine is associated with delayed muscle response times in patients with chronic idiopathic LBP. Spine 26:724–730CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Schmidt RA, Lee TD (1999) Motor control and learning: a behavioral emphasis, 3rd end. Human Kinetics, Champaign, Ill., USA Schmidt RA, Lee TD (1999) Motor control and learning: a behavioral emphasis, 3rd end. Human Kinetics, Champaign, Ill., USA
21.
go back to reference Sherwood DE (1988) Effect of bandwidth knowledge of results on movement consistency. Percept Mot Skills 66:535–542PubMed Sherwood DE (1988) Effect of bandwidth knowledge of results on movement consistency. Percept Mot Skills 66:535–542PubMed
22.
go back to reference Waddell G (1987) Volvo award in clinical sciences. A new clinical model for the treatment of low-back pain. Spine 12:632–644PubMed Waddell G (1987) Volvo award in clinical sciences. A new clinical model for the treatment of low-back pain. Spine 12:632–644PubMed
Metadata
Title
Repositioning accuracy and movement parameters in low back pain subjects and healthy control subjects
Authors
Martin Descarreaux
Jean-Sébastien Blouin
Normand Teasdale
Publication date
01-03-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 2/2005
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-004-0833-y

Other articles of this Issue 2/2005

European Spine Journal 2/2005 Go to the issue