Top

Published in:

01-05-2005 | Original Article

The costs for persons sick-listed more than one month because of low back or neck problems. A two-year prospective study of Swedish patients

Authors: Elisabeth K. Hansson, Tommy H. Hansson

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 4/2005

Abstract

The total costs for patients who are sick-listed due to back and neck problems have not previously been determined prospectively on an individual basis. This study aimed to determine the total cost to a society, based on individually assessed costs of health services and loss of production in people who are sick-listed 28 days or more for back or neck problems. Detailed data on individuals’ health-care consumption due to back or neck problems was collected through prospectively entered diaries and questionnaires, after 4 weeks, 3 months, 1 and 2 years, in a consecutively selected cohort of 1,822 employed persons aged between 18 and 59 years. Costs for health care and production losses due to work absenteeism were determined individually and combined to render total costs to society. The costs for all medical services during the 2-year study were 6.9% of total costs for back and neck problems. The single most expensive medical service was surgery. Transferred to a national level, annual total costs for back and neck problems corresponded to 1% of GNP. In conclusion, direct health-service costs were a small fraction of the total costs, consequently indirect costs offer the greatest potential for savings.

Abenhaim L, Suissa S (1987) Importance and economic burden of occupational back pain: A study of 2,500 cases representative of Quebec. J Occup Med 29:670–674PubMed

Bergendorff S, Hansson E, Hansson T et al (1997) Projektbeskrivning & undersökningsgrupp. Rikförsäkringsverket. Sahlgrenska Universitetssjukhuset, Stockholm

Bigos S (1994) Acute low-back problems in adults. In: Clinical practice guidelines. US Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD, USA

Bloch F, Prins R (eds) (2000) Who returns to work and why? A six-country study on work incapacity and reintegration. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ, USA

Coste J, Delecoeuillerie G, Cohen de Lara A et al (1994) Clinical course and prognostic factors in acute low back pain: An inception cohort study in primary care practice. BMJ 308:577–580PubMed

Coyle D, Richardson G (1994) The cost of back pain. In: Clinical Standards Advisory Group report on back pain. HMSO, London, pp 65–71

Doorn van JW (1995) Low back disability among self-employed dentists, veterinarians, physicians and physical therapists in The Netherlands. A retrospective study over a 13-year period (N=1,119) and an early intervention program with 1-year follow-up (N=134). Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 263:1–64PubMed

Drummond M, O’Brien B, Stoddart G et al (1997) Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. Oxford University, Oxford

Englund L (2000) Sick-listing attitudes and doctors’ practice. Faculty of medicine. Uppsala Universitet, Uppsala

10.

Eriksson S (1979) Statistisk undersökningsmetodik. Studentlitteraturett förlag inom. Utbildningshuset, Lund, Sweden

11.

Goossens M, Evers J (1997) Economic evaluation of back pain interventions. J Occup Rehabil 7:15–32

12.

Goossens M, Rutten-van Molken M, Vlaeyen J et al (2000) The cost diary: A method to measure direct and indirect costs in cost- effectiveness research. J Clin Epidemiol 53:688–695CrossRefPubMed

13.

Guo H-R, Tanaka S, Cameron L et al (1995) Back pain among workers in the United States: National estimates and workers at high risk. Am J Ind Med 28:591–602PubMed

14.

Hansson E, Hansson T (1999) Rygg och Nacke 3. Medicinska åtgärder för sjukskrivna med rygg- och nackbesvär. Rfv SU, Stockholm, pp 1–74

15.

Hansson T, Hansson E (2000) The effects of common medical interventions on pain, back function, and work resumption in patients with chronic low back pain: A prospective 2-year cohort study in six countries. Spine 25:3055–3064CrossRefPubMed

16.

Henriksson F (2001) Economic aspects of chronic diseases: Multiple sclerosis and diabetes mellitus. Division of Neurology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Occupational Therapy and Elderly Care Research, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge University Hospital. Stockholm University, Stockholm, pp 1–396

17.

Hutubessy R, van Tulder M, Vondeling H et al (1999) Indirect costs of back pain in The Netherlands: A comparison of the human-capital method with the friction cost method. Pain 80:201–207CrossRefPubMed

18.

Indahl A, Velund L, Reikeraas O (1995) Good prognosis for low back pain when left untampered. A randomized clinical trial. Spine 20:473–477PubMed

19.

Johannesson M, Karlsson G (1997) The friction cost method: A comment. J Health Econ 16:249–255CrossRefPubMed

20.

Koopmanschap M, Rutten F, van Ineveld B et al (1995) The friction cost method for measuring indirect costs of disease. J Health Econ 14:171–189CrossRefPubMed

21.

Landstingsförbundet (1995) Kostnad per vårdtillfälle, vårddag, läkarbesök m m 1993. Landstingsförbundet, Stockholm

22.

Maetzel A, Li L (2002) The economic burden of low back pain: A review of studies published between 1996 and 2001. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 16:23–30CrossRefPubMed

23.

Mahmud M, Webster B, Courtney T et al (2000) Clinical management and the duration of disability for work-related low back pain. J Occup Environ Med 42:1178–1187CrossRefPubMed

24.

Malmivaara A, Hakkinen U, Aro T et al (1995) The treatment of acute low back pain—bed rest, exercises, or ordinary activity? N Engl J Med 332:351–355PubMed

25.

Meltzer M (2001) Introduction to health economics for physicians. Lancet 358:993–998CrossRefPubMed

26.

Nachemson A, Jonsson E (2000) Neck and back pain. The scientific evidence of causes, diagnosis and treatment. Lippincott, Philadelphia

27.

Nachemson A, Jonsson E (eds) (2000) Ont i ryggen, ont i nacken. SBU Statens beredning för medicinsk utvärdering, Stockholm, p 417 (vol I), p 389 (vol II)

28.

Nachemson A, Spitzer W (1987) Scientific approach to the assessment and management of activity-related spinal disorders. A monograph for clinicians. Report of the Quebec Task Force on Spinal Disorders. Spine [Suppl 1] 12(7S)

29.

Riksförsäkringsverket (1996) Sjukfrånvarons diagnoser och avslutningsanledningar. RFV Redovisar 1996:3. Riksförsäkringsverket, Stockholm

30.

Riksförsäkringsverket (1997) Nybeviljade förtidspensioner/sjukbidrag 1996. RFV Informerar. Statistikinformation Is-I 1997:3. Riksförsäkringsverket, Stockholm

31.

Riksförsäkringsverket (2002) Vad kostar olika sjukdomar? Sjukpenningkostnaderna fördelade efter sjukskrivningsdiagnos RFV Redovisar 2002:2. Riksförsäkringsverket, Stockholm

32.

Riksförsäkringsverket (Försäkringskassan i Göteborg) Christer Gustavsson BA (1997) Sjukskrivningsdagar för ryggont i Göteborg 1987 respektive 1992–1996. Göteborgs Universitet, Göteborg

33.

Rossignol M, Suissa S, Abenhaim L (1988) Working disability due to occupational back pain: 3-year follow-up of 2,300 compensated workers in Quebec. J Occup Med 30:502–505PubMed

34.

Skargren E, Carlsson P, Oberg B (1998) One-year follow-up comparison of the cost and effectiveness of chiropractic and physiotherapy as primary management for back pain. Subgroup analysis, recurrence, and additional health-care utilization. Spine 23:1875–1883CrossRefPubMed

35.

Skargren E, Oberg B, Carlsson P et al (1997) Cost and effectiveness analysis of chiropractic and physiotherapy treatment for low back and neck pain. Six-month follow-up. Spine 22:2167–2177CrossRefPubMed

36.

Skovron M, Szpalski M, Nordin M et al (1994) Sociocultural factors and back pain. A population-based study in Belgian adults. Spine 19:129–137PubMed

37.

Socialförsäkringsregisterlag (1997) SFS, Sweden

38.

Spengler D, Bigos S, Martin N et al (1986) Back injuries in industry: A retrospective study. I. Overview and cost analysis. Spine 11:241–245PubMed

39.

Statens beredning för medicinsk utvärdering S (2003) Sjukskrivning—orsaker, konsekvenser och praxis. Stockholm

40.

Statistiska centralbyrån S (2000) Arbetsförhållanden och sjukskrivning med ersättning. SOU 2000:121. Statistiska centralbyrån, Stockholm

41.

Tulder van M, Koes B, Bouter L (1995) A cost-of-illness study of back pain in The Netherlands. Pain 62:233–240CrossRefPubMed

42.

Waddell G (1987) Clinical assessment of lumbar impairment. Clin Orthop:110–120

43.

Waddell G (1991) Low back disability. A syndrome of Western civilization. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2:719–738PubMed

44.

Waddell G, Aylward M, Sawney P (2002) Back pain, incapacity for work and social security benefits: An international literature review and analysis. Royal Society of Medicine, London

45.

Walker B (2000) The prevalence of low back pain: A systematic review of the literature from 1966 to 1998. J Spinal Disord 13:205–217CrossRefPubMed

46.

Weinstein M, Siegel J, Gold M et al (1996) Recommendations of the Panel on Cost-effectiveness in Health and Medicine. JAMA 276:1253–1258PubMed

Title: The costs for persons sick-listed more than one month because of low back or neck problems. A two-year prospective study of Swedish patients
Authors: Elisabeth K. Hansson
Tommy H. Hansson
Publication date: 01-05-2005
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: European Spine Journal / Issue 4/2005
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-004-0731-3

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

The costs for persons sick-listed more than one month because of low back or neck problems. A two-year prospective study of Swedish patients

Abstract

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 4/2005

Cervical intervertebral disc injury during simulated frontal impact

Biofidelic whole cervical spine model with muscle force replication for whiplash simulation

Spinal fusion in children with spina bifida: influence on ambulation level and functional abilities

Effect of constrained posterior screw and rod systems for primary stability: Biomechanical in vitro comparison of various instrumentations in a single-level corpectomy model

Posterior fixation of subaxial cervical spine fractures in patients with ankylosing spondylitis

May 2005