Top

Published in:

01-01-2016 | Original Article

Radiological and histological comparison between nano-bioglass and commercial bioglass in bone healing in a rabbit model

Authors: Saeed Habibian Dehkordi, Amin Bigham-Sadegh, Iraj Karimi, Majid Momeny, Shima Balali-Dehkordi, Mehdi Fatahi Bafghi, Hossein Amini-Khoei

Published in: Comparative Clinical Pathology | Issue 1/2016

Abstract

Fracture healing is a complex physiological process. It involves the coordination of several different types of cells, proteins, and expression of various genes. Bone healing is very essential for fracture management, malfusion, osteomyelitis, removal of bone tumors, joint attachment, and also in joint prothesis. Diverse synthetic and biological grafts are used in bone healing. In this study, we evaluated and compared the effects of nano-bioglass and commercial bioglass on healing of experimental tibial defects in ten white New Zealand rabbits. Three round holes were created in tibial bone with orthopedic drill. One of the hole was left empty as control while the other two holes were filled by experimental grafts. Radiografts were taken after 2 and 6 weeks whereas pathological slides were prepared only after 6 weeks. Radiological and histological evaluation was performed blindly, and the results score were analyzed statistically. The data showed that nano-bioglass is superior to commercial bioglass in bone healing whereas commercial bioglass is better than control.

Bharati S, Soundrapandian C, Basu D, Datta S (2009) Studies on a novel bioactive glass and composite coating with hydroxyapatite on titanium based alloys: effect of γ-sterilization on coating. J Eur Ceram Soc 29:2527–2535CrossRef

Dorea H, Mclaughlin R, Cantwell H, Read R, Armbrust L, Pool R, Roush J, Boyle C (2005) Evaluation of healing in feline femoral defects filled with cancellous autograft, cancellous allograft or Bioglass. VETERINARY AND COMPARATIVE ORTHOPAEDICS AND TRAUMATOLOGY 18:157

Ducheyne P (1987) Bioceramics: material characteristics versus in vivo behavior. J Biomed Mater Res 21:219–236PubMed

Fathi M, Doost Mohammadi A (2008) Preparation and characterization of sol–gel bioactive glass coating for improvement of biocompatibility of human body implant. Mater Sci Eng A 474:128–133CrossRef

Geris L, Gerisch A, Sloten JV, Weiner R, Oosterwyck HV (2008) Angiogenesis in bone fracture healing: a bioregulatory model. J Theor Biol 251:137–158CrossRefPubMed

Giannoudis PV, Einhorn TA, Marsh D (2007) Fracture healing: the diamond concept. Injury 38:S3–S6CrossRef

Gorustovic A, Guglielmotti M (2003) Effect of 45S5 bioactive glass particle on titanium periimplant bone healing:a histomorphometeric study in rats. Eur Cells Mater 5:66–67

Gorustovich, A., Rosenbusch, M. & Guglielmotti, M. B. 2002. Characterization of bone around titanium implants and bioactive glass particles: an experimental study in rats. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 17.

Gough J, Notingher I, Hench L (2004) Osteoblast attachment and mineralized nodule formation on rough and smooth 45S5 bioactive glass monoliths. J Biomed Mater Res A 68:640–650CrossRefPubMed

Heiple K, Goldberg V, Powell A, Bos G, Zika J (1987) Biology of cancellous bone grafts. Orthop Clin N Am 18:179

Hench LL (1991) Bioceramics: from concept to clinic. J Am Ceram Soc 74:1487–1510CrossRef

Hench LL (2006) The story of Bioglass®. J Mater Sci Mater Med 17:967–978CrossRefPubMed

Hench, L. L. & Wilson, J. 1993. An introduction to bioceramics, World Scientific

Jones JR, Lin S, Yue S, Lee P, Hanna JV, Smith ME, Newport RJ (2010) Bioactive glass scaffolds for bone regeneration and their hierarchical characterisation. Proc Inst Mech Eng H J Eng Med 224:1373–1387CrossRef

Ma PX, Zhang R, Xiao G, Franceschi R (2001) Engineering new bone tissue in vitro on highly porous poly (α‐hydroxyl acids)/hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res 54:284–293CrossRefPubMed

Matos MA, Araújo FP, Paixão FB (2008) Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. J Orthop Surg Res 3:4CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Pereira MM, Jones JR, Hench LL (2005) Bioactive glass and hybrid scaffolds prepared by sol–gel method for bone tissue engineering. Adv Appl Ceram 104:35–42CrossRef

Schepers EJ, Ducheyne P, Barbier L, Schepers S (1993) Bioactive glass particles of narrow size range: a new material for the repair of bone defects. Implant Dent 2:151–157CrossRefPubMed

Tadjoedin ES, De Lange GL, Lyaruu D, Kuiper L, Burger EH (2002) High concentrations of bioactive glass material (BioGran®) vs. autogenous bone for sinus floor elevation. Clin Oral Implants Res 13:428–436CrossRefPubMed

Vaananen H, Zhao H, Mulari M, Halleen JM (2000) The cell biology of osteoclast function. J Cell Sci 113:377–381PubMed

Xynos ID, Edgar AJ, Buttery LD, Hench LL, Polak JM (2001) Gene‐expression profiling of human osteoblasts following treatment with the ionic products of Bioglass® 45S5 dissolution. J Biomed Mater Res 55:151–157CrossRefPubMed

Title: Radiological and histological comparison between nano-bioglass and commercial bioglass in bone healing in a rabbit model
Authors: Saeed Habibian Dehkordi
Amin Bigham-Sadegh
Iraj Karimi
Majid Momeny
Shima Balali-Dehkordi
Mehdi Fatahi Bafghi
Hossein Amini-Khoei
Publication date: 01-01-2016
Publisher: Springer London
Published in: Comparative Clinical Pathology / Issue 1/2016
Print ISSN: 1618-5641
Electronic ISSN: 1618-565X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00580-015-2135-7

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Radiological and histological comparison between nano-bioglass and commercial bioglass in bone healing in a rabbit model

Abstract

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Prevalence of the C282Y and H63D mutations of the HFE hemochromatosis gene in Azerian major β-thalassemia and iron overload

A histology-based study in apparently healthy wild freshwater stingrays Potamotrygon motoro

Effects of methanolic fruit extract of Solanum macrocarpum L. (Solanaceae) on biochemical profile of albino rats (Rattus norvegicus)

Assessment of the hepatic and renal effects of sub-chronic administration of sub-lethal doses of amitraz/xylene in albino Wistar rats

Gonado-hypophyseal lesions and reproductive hormonal changes in Brucella melitensis-infected mice and its lipopolysaccharides (LPSs)

Brain and serum galanin, thyroid hormones, and TSH are not influenced by different photoperiod schedules in broiler chickens