Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Anesthesia 6/2018

01-12-2018 | Original Article

Bite injuries caused by transcranial electrical stimulation motor-evoked potentials’ monitoring: incidence, associated factors, and clinical course

Authors: Sachiko Yata, Mitsuru Ida, Hiroko Shimotsuji, Yosuke Nakagawa, Nobuhiro Ueda, Tsunenori Takatani, Hideki Shigematsu, Yasushi Motoyama, Hiroyuki Nakase, Tadaaki Kirita, Masahiko Kawaguchi

Published in: Journal of Anesthesia | Issue 6/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The incidence of bite injuries associated with transcranial electrical stimulation motor-evoked potentials monitoring reportedly ranges from 0.13 to 0.19%. However, in clinical practice, bite injuries appear to occur more frequently than previously reported. Our aim was to identify the incidence of and perioperative risk factors associated with bite injuries caused by transcranial electrical stimulation motor-evoked potential monitoring.

Methods

Patients who underwent elective surgery with transcranial electrical stimulation motor-evoked potential monitoring at a single tertiary hospital in Japan between June 2017 and December 2017 were included in this study. All patients were assessed by oral surgeons preoperatively and postoperatively. The associated factors with bite injuries were explored by the univariate analysis.

Results

12 of 186 patients experienced 13 bite injuries, including three lip, six oral mucosa, and four tongue injuries. No patient required suture repair. 11 of 12 patients had uneventful postoperative courses and were cured within 12 postoperative days. One patient with a tongue ulcer and a hematoma had difficulty in oral intake and persistent dysgeusia. Patient severe movement during transcranial electrical stimulation motor-evoked potential monitoring was associated with bite injuries (p = 0.03).

Conclusions

The incidence of bite injuries assessed by oral surgeons was 6.5% in patients with transcranial electrical stimulation motor-evoked potential monitoring, and the patients with severe movement during the monitoring tended to incur bite injuries. In rare cases, transcranial electrical stimulation motor-evoked potential monitoring may cause difficulty in oral intake and dysgeusia.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Deletis V, Sala F. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring of the spinal cord during spinal cord and spine surgery: a review focus on the corticospinal tracts. Clin Neurophysiol. 2008;119:248–64.CrossRef Deletis V, Sala F. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring of the spinal cord during spinal cord and spine surgery: a review focus on the corticospinal tracts. Clin Neurophysiol. 2008;119:248–64.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Motoyama Y, Kawaguchi M, Yamada S, Nakagawa I, Nishimura F, Hironaka Y, Park YS, Hayashi H, Abe R, Nakase H. Evaluation of combined use of transcranial and direct cortical motor evoked potential monitoring during unruptured aneurysm surgery. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2011;51:15–22.CrossRef Motoyama Y, Kawaguchi M, Yamada S, Nakagawa I, Nishimura F, Hironaka Y, Park YS, Hayashi H, Abe R, Nakase H. Evaluation of combined use of transcranial and direct cortical motor evoked potential monitoring during unruptured aneurysm surgery. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2011;51:15–22.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference MacDonald DB. Safety of intraoperative transcranial electrical stimulation motor evoked potential monitoring. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2002;19:416–29.CrossRef MacDonald DB. Safety of intraoperative transcranial electrical stimulation motor evoked potential monitoring. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2002;19:416–29.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Tamkus A, Rice K. The incidence of bite injuries associated with transcranial motor-evoked potential monitoring. Anesth Analg. 2012;115:663–7.PubMed Tamkus A, Rice K. The incidence of bite injuries associated with transcranial motor-evoked potential monitoring. Anesth Analg. 2012;115:663–7.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Schwartz DM, Sestokas AK, Dormans JP, Vaccaro AR, Hilibrand AS, Flynn JM, Li PM, Shah SA, Welch W, Drummond DS, Albert TJ. Transcranial motor evoked potential monitoring in spine surgery: is it safe? Spine. 2011;36:1046–9.CrossRef Schwartz DM, Sestokas AK, Dormans JP, Vaccaro AR, Hilibrand AS, Flynn JM, Li PM, Shah SA, Welch W, Drummond DS, Albert TJ. Transcranial motor evoked potential monitoring in spine surgery: is it safe? Spine. 2011;36:1046–9.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kakimoto M, Kawaguchi M, Yamamoto Y, Inoue S, Horiuchi T, Nakase H, Sakaki T, Furuya H. Tetanic stimulation of the peripheral nerve before transcranial electrical stimulation can enlarge general anesthesia with neuromuscular blockade. Anesthesiology. 2005;102:733–8.CrossRef Kakimoto M, Kawaguchi M, Yamamoto Y, Inoue S, Horiuchi T, Nakase H, Sakaki T, Furuya H. Tetanic stimulation of the peripheral nerve before transcranial electrical stimulation can enlarge general anesthesia with neuromuscular blockade. Anesthesiology. 2005;102:733–8.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Yamamoto Y, Kawaguchi M, Hayashi H, Horiuchi T, Inoue S, Nakase H, Sakaki T, Furuya H. The effects of the neuromuscular blockade levels on amplitudes of posttetanic motor-evoked potentials and movement in response to transcranial stimulation in patients receiving propofol and fentanyl anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2008;106:930–4.CrossRef Yamamoto Y, Kawaguchi M, Hayashi H, Horiuchi T, Inoue S, Nakase H, Sakaki T, Furuya H. The effects of the neuromuscular blockade levels on amplitudes of posttetanic motor-evoked potentials and movement in response to transcranial stimulation in patients receiving propofol and fentanyl anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2008;106:930–4.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Mahmoud M, Spaeth J, Sadhasivam S. Protection of tongue from injuries during transcranial motor-evoked potential monitoring. Paediatr Anaesth. 2008;18:902–3.CrossRef Mahmoud M, Spaeth J, Sadhasivam S. Protection of tongue from injuries during transcranial motor-evoked potential monitoring. Paediatr Anaesth. 2008;18:902–3.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Oshita K, Saeki N, Kubo T, Abekura H, Tanaka N, Kawamoto M. A novel mouthpiece prevents bite injuries caused by intraoperative transcranial electric motor-evoked potential monitoring. J Anesth. 2016;30:850–4.CrossRef Oshita K, Saeki N, Kubo T, Abekura H, Tanaka N, Kawamoto M. A novel mouthpiece prevents bite injuries caused by intraoperative transcranial electric motor-evoked potential monitoring. J Anesth. 2016;30:850–4.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Bite injuries caused by transcranial electrical stimulation motor-evoked potentials’ monitoring: incidence, associated factors, and clinical course
Authors
Sachiko Yata
Mitsuru Ida
Hiroko Shimotsuji
Yosuke Nakagawa
Nobuhiro Ueda
Tsunenori Takatani
Hideki Shigematsu
Yasushi Motoyama
Hiroyuki Nakase
Tadaaki Kirita
Masahiko Kawaguchi
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Journal of Anesthesia / Issue 6/2018
Print ISSN: 0913-8668
Electronic ISSN: 1438-8359
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-018-2562-0

Other articles of this Issue 6/2018

Journal of Anesthesia 6/2018 Go to the issue