Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Anesthesia 4/2016

01-08-2016 | Original Article

A proposal of a simple epidural simulator for training novice anesthesiologists

Authors: Sung-Moon Jeong, Jae Moon Choi, Ji Hyun Kim, Hwanhee Yoo, Sukyung Lee, Hyungseok Seo, Sooyoung Kim, Sung-Hoon Kim

Published in: Journal of Anesthesia | Issue 4/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Confirming the epidural space during epidural anesthesia relies mainly on feel and experience, which are difficult techniques for a trainee to learn. We designed an epidural simulator for trainees to experience loss of resistance (LOR) and various degrees of pressure resistance.

Methods

The simulator consists of a Perifix® LOR syringe and 1-, 5-, 10- and 50-mL syringes assembled by three-way stopcocks. A total of 89 anesthesiologists evaluated the simulator, given the choice of either the intermittent technique with air or continuous technique with saline. Sudden LOR and applicability of the simulator for training purposes were assessed using the numerical rating score (NRS). Pressure resistance at each lumbar structure was evaluated by the anesthesiologists using the intermittent technique with air.

Results

Seventy-four anesthesiologists used the intermittent technique with air and 15 used the continuous technique with saline. The NRSs for sudden LOR and the applicability for training purposes were 8 and 9 (median), respectively. The pressure resistance to a 50-mL syringe was regarded as the epidural space (odds ratio 602.3 for 5-mL syringe and 144.4 for 10-mL syringe) by 89 % of anesthesiologists using air for LOR. Resistance to the 10-mL syringe was most frequently considered as muscle, subcutaneous fat, or the interspinous ligament, while resistance to the 1-mL syringe was considered as the ligamentum flavum (odds ratio 2.3 for 5-mL syringe and 18.6 for 10-mL syringe).

Conclusions

Our epidural simulator is a simple, low-cost device that can be easily constructed. It was shown to provide valid haptic feedback as a promising tool for training novice anesthesiologists.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Konrad C, Schupfer G, Wietlisbach M, Gerber H. Learning manual skills in anesthesiology: is there a recommended number of cases for anesthetic procedures? Anesth Analg. 1998;86:635–9.CrossRefPubMed Konrad C, Schupfer G, Wietlisbach M, Gerber H. Learning manual skills in anesthesiology: is there a recommended number of cases for anesthetic procedures? Anesth Analg. 1998;86:635–9.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Kopacz DJ, Neal JM, Pollock JE. The regional anesthesia “learning curve”. What is the minimum number of epidural and spinal blocks to reach consistency? Reg Anesth. 1996;21:182–90.PubMed Kopacz DJ, Neal JM, Pollock JE. The regional anesthesia “learning curve”. What is the minimum number of epidural and spinal blocks to reach consistency? Reg Anesth. 1996;21:182–90.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Friedman Z, Siddiqui N, Katznelson R, Devito I, Bould MD, Naik V. Clinical impact of epidural anesthesia simulation on short- and long-term learning curve: high- versus low-fidelity model training. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009;34:229–32.CrossRefPubMed Friedman Z, Siddiqui N, Katznelson R, Devito I, Bould MD, Naik V. Clinical impact of epidural anesthesia simulation on short- and long-term learning curve: high- versus low-fidelity model training. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009;34:229–32.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Raj D, Williamson RM, Young D, Russell D. A simple epidural simulator: a blinded study assessing the ‘feel’ of loss of resistance in four fruits. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2013;30:405–8.CrossRefPubMed Raj D, Williamson RM, Young D, Russell D. A simple epidural simulator: a blinded study assessing the ‘feel’ of loss of resistance in four fruits. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2013;30:405–8.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Uppal V, Kearns RJ, McGrady EM. Evaluation of M43B Lumbar puncture simulator-II as a training tool for identification of the epidural space and lumbar puncture. Anaesthesia. 2011;66:493–6.CrossRefPubMed Uppal V, Kearns RJ, McGrady EM. Evaluation of M43B Lumbar puncture simulator-II as a training tool for identification of the epidural space and lumbar puncture. Anaesthesia. 2011;66:493–6.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Sawada A, Kii N, Yoshikawa Y, Yamakage M. Epidrum((R)): a new device to identify the epidural space with an epidural Tuohy needle. J Anesth. 2012;26:292–5.CrossRefPubMed Sawada A, Kii N, Yoshikawa Y, Yamakage M. Epidrum((R)): a new device to identify the epidural space with an epidural Tuohy needle. J Anesth. 2012;26:292–5.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Samhan YM, El-Sabae HH, Khafagy HF, Maher MA. A pilot study to compare epidural identification and catheterization using a saline-filled syringe versus a continuous hydrostatic pressure system. J Anesth. 2013;27:607–10.CrossRefPubMed Samhan YM, El-Sabae HH, Khafagy HF, Maher MA. A pilot study to compare epidural identification and catheterization using a saline-filled syringe versus a continuous hydrostatic pressure system. J Anesth. 2013;27:607–10.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Capogna G, Stirparo S, Caniggia S. Evaluation of a new training device to simulate the epidural and subarachnoid spaces for neuraxial anesthesia techniques. Minerva Anestesiol. 2013;79:385–90.PubMed Capogna G, Stirparo S, Caniggia S. Evaluation of a new training device to simulate the epidural and subarachnoid spaces for neuraxial anesthesia techniques. Minerva Anestesiol. 2013;79:385–90.PubMed
9.
10.
go back to reference Russell R, Douglas J. Controversies: loss of resistance to saline is better than air for obstetric epidurals. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2001;10:3302–6. Russell R, Douglas J. Controversies: loss of resistance to saline is better than air for obstetric epidurals. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2001;10:3302–6.
11.
go back to reference Wantman A, Hancox N, Howell PR. Techniques for identifying the epidural space: a survey of practice amongst anaesthetists in the UK. Anaesthesia. 2006;61:370–5.CrossRefPubMed Wantman A, Hancox N, Howell PR. Techniques for identifying the epidural space: a survey of practice amongst anaesthetists in the UK. Anaesthesia. 2006;61:370–5.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Evron S, Sessler D, Sadan O, Boaz M, Glezerman M, Ezri T. Identification of the epidural space: loss of resistance with air, lidocaine, or the combination of air and lidocaine. Anesth Analg. 2004;99:245–50.CrossRefPubMed Evron S, Sessler D, Sadan O, Boaz M, Glezerman M, Ezri T. Identification of the epidural space: loss of resistance with air, lidocaine, or the combination of air and lidocaine. Anesth Analg. 2004;99:245–50.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Grondin LS, Nelson K, Ross V, Aponte O, Lee S, Pan PH. Success of spinal and epidural labor analgesia: comparison of loss of resistance technique using air versus saline in combined spinal-epidural labor analgesia technique. Anesthesiology. 2009;111:165–72.CrossRefPubMed Grondin LS, Nelson K, Ross V, Aponte O, Lee S, Pan PH. Success of spinal and epidural labor analgesia: comparison of loss of resistance technique using air versus saline in combined spinal-epidural labor analgesia technique. Anesthesiology. 2009;111:165–72.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Schier R, Guerra D, Aguilar J, Pratt GF, Hernandez M, Boddu K, Riedel B. Epidural space identification: a meta-analysis of complications after air versus liquid as the medium for loss of resistance. Anesth Analg. 2009;109:2012–21.CrossRefPubMed Schier R, Guerra D, Aguilar J, Pratt GF, Hernandez M, Boddu K, Riedel B. Epidural space identification: a meta-analysis of complications after air versus liquid as the medium for loss of resistance. Anesth Analg. 2009;109:2012–21.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Devitt JH, Kurrek MM, Cohen MM, Cleave-Hogg D. The validity of performance assessments using simulation. Anesthesiology. 2001;95:36–42.CrossRefPubMed Devitt JH, Kurrek MM, Cohen MM, Cleave-Hogg D. The validity of performance assessments using simulation. Anesthesiology. 2001;95:36–42.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
A proposal of a simple epidural simulator for training novice anesthesiologists
Authors
Sung-Moon Jeong
Jae Moon Choi
Ji Hyun Kim
Hwanhee Yoo
Sukyung Lee
Hyungseok Seo
Sooyoung Kim
Sung-Hoon Kim
Publication date
01-08-2016
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Journal of Anesthesia / Issue 4/2016
Print ISSN: 0913-8668
Electronic ISSN: 1438-8359
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-016-2182-5

Other articles of this Issue 4/2016

Journal of Anesthesia 4/2016 Go to the issue