Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Anesthesia 3/2015

01-06-2015 | Original Article

Incidence of cannot intubate-cannot ventilate (CICV): results of a 3-year retrospective multicenter clinical study in a network of university hospitals

Authors: Nobuko Tachibana, Yukitoshi Niiyama, Michiaki Yamakage

Published in: Journal of Anesthesia | Issue 3/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence of cannot intubate-cannot ventilate (CICV) during general anesthesia during a 3-year period in a network of university hospitals and to evaluate the events related to it.

Methods

A retrospective multicenter questionnaire survey of CICV, based on medical record review, was conducted over a 3-year period (January 2010–December 2012) in Hokkaido, Japan. All cases were assessed in terms of the suspected risk factors of CICV, the clinical course during anesthesia, and the prognosis.

Results

Responses were obtained from 20 of 21 institutions (95 %) surveyed. The incidence of CICV was 3 of 97,854 cases conducted under general anesthesia (0.003 %). All incidents occurred during induction of general anesthesia. In two of the three cases, difficult airway was predicted preoperatively. In all these three cases, mask ventilation became impossible after repeated intubation attempts with devices such as the Macintosh laryngoscope, the Airwayscope, or a fiberoptic bronchoscope. A laryngeal mask was inserted in one case, but the lungs could not be adequately ventilated. Emergency tracheotomy was eventually performed in all the CICV cases. Although two of the patients did not have postoperative neurological sequelae, severe and permanent brain damage occurred in one patient.

Conclusion

In our survey, we found that the incidence of CICV during a 3-year period (2010–2012) was 0.003 % or 1 in 32,000 cases. The three CICV situations occurred after repeated intubation attempts with multiple devices. The appropriate airway devices to be used in a particular difficult airway situation should be carefully considered before performing multiple attempts.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cheney FW. The American Society of Anesthesiologists Closed Claims Project: what have we learned, how has it affected practice, and how will it affect practice in the future? Anesthesiology. 1999;91:552–6.PubMedCrossRef Cheney FW. The American Society of Anesthesiologists Closed Claims Project: what have we learned, how has it affected practice, and how will it affect practice in the future? Anesthesiology. 1999;91:552–6.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Caplan RA, Benumof JL, Berry FA, Blitt CD, Bode RH, Cheney FW. Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway: a report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology. 1993;78:597–602.CrossRef Caplan RA, Benumof JL, Berry FA, Blitt CD, Bode RH, Cheney FW. Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway: a report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology. 1993;78:597–602.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology 2003;98:1269–77. American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology 2003;98:1269–77.
4.
go back to reference American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology 2013;118:251–70. American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology 2013;118:251–70.
5.
go back to reference Peterson GN, Domino KB, Caplan RA, Posner KL, Lee LA, Cheney FW. Management of the difficult airway: a closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology. 2005;103:33–9.PubMedCrossRef Peterson GN, Domino KB, Caplan RA, Posner KL, Lee LA, Cheney FW. Management of the difficult airway: a closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology. 2005;103:33–9.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Irita K, Tsuzaki K, Sanuki M, Sawa T, Nakatsuka H, Makita K, Morita K. Recent changes in the incidence of life-threatening events in the operating room: JSA surveys between 2001 and 2005. Masui. 2007;56:1433–46.PubMed Irita K, Tsuzaki K, Sanuki M, Sawa T, Nakatsuka H, Makita K, Morita K. Recent changes in the incidence of life-threatening events in the operating room: JSA surveys between 2001 and 2005. Masui. 2007;56:1433–46.PubMed
7.
go back to reference JSA airway management guideline 2014. For improving safety of anesthesia induction. J Anesth (in press). JSA airway management guideline 2014. For improving safety of anesthesia induction. J Anesth (in press).
8.
go back to reference Henderson JJ, Popat MT, Latto IP, Pearce AC. Difficult airway society guidelines for management of the unanticipated difficult intubation. Anaesthesia. 2004;59:675–94.PubMedCrossRef Henderson JJ, Popat MT, Latto IP, Pearce AC. Difficult airway society guidelines for management of the unanticipated difficult intubation. Anaesthesia. 2004;59:675–94.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Cook TM, Woodall N, Frerk C, and on behalf of the Fourth National Audit Project. Editor’s choice: Major complications of airway management in the UK: results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society. Part 1: Anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2011;106:617–31 Cook TM, Woodall N, Frerk C, and on behalf of the Fourth National Audit Project. Editor’s choice: Major complications of airway management in the UK: results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society. Part 1: Anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2011;106:617–31
10.
go back to reference Nagaro T, Yorozuya T, Sotani M, Adachi N, Tabo E, Arai T, Dote K. Survey of patients whose lungs could not be ventilated and whose trachea could not be intubated in university hospitals in Japan. J Anesth. 2003;17(4):232–40.PubMedCrossRef Nagaro T, Yorozuya T, Sotani M, Adachi N, Tabo E, Arai T, Dote K. Survey of patients whose lungs could not be ventilated and whose trachea could not be intubated in university hospitals in Japan. J Anesth. 2003;17(4):232–40.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Chambers D, Paulden M, Paton F, Heirs M, Duffy S, Hunter JM, Sculpher M, Woolacott N. Sugammadex for reversal of neuromuscular block after rapid sequence intubation: a systematic review and economic assessment. Br J Anaesth. 2010;105:568–75.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Chambers D, Paulden M, Paton F, Heirs M, Duffy S, Hunter JM, Sculpher M, Woolacott N. Sugammadex for reversal of neuromuscular block after rapid sequence intubation: a systematic review and economic assessment. Br J Anaesth. 2010;105:568–75.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference de Boer HD, Driessen JJ, Marcus MAE, Kerkkamp H, Heeringa M, Klimek M. Reversal of rocuronium-induced (1.2 mg/kg) profound neuromuscular block by sugammadex. Anesthesiology. 2007;107:239–44.PubMedCrossRef de Boer HD, Driessen JJ, Marcus MAE, Kerkkamp H, Heeringa M, Klimek M. Reversal of rocuronium-induced (1.2 mg/kg) profound neuromuscular block by sugammadex. Anesthesiology. 2007;107:239–44.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Malik MA, Subramaniam R, Maharaj CH, Harte BH, Laffey JG. Randomized controlled trial of the Pentax AWS®, Glidescope®, and Macintosh laryngoscopes in predicted difficult intubation. Br J Anaesth. 2009;103:761–8.PubMedCrossRef Malik MA, Subramaniam R, Maharaj CH, Harte BH, Laffey JG. Randomized controlled trial of the Pentax AWS®, Glidescope®, and Macintosh laryngoscopes in predicted difficult intubation. Br J Anaesth. 2009;103:761–8.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Abdallah R, Galway U, You J, Kurz A, Sessler DI, Doyle DJ. A randomized comparison between the Pentax AWS video laryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope in morbidly obese patients. Anesth Analg. 2011;113:1082–7.PubMedCrossRef Abdallah R, Galway U, You J, Kurz A, Sessler DI, Doyle DJ. A randomized comparison between the Pentax AWS video laryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope in morbidly obese patients. Anesth Analg. 2011;113:1082–7.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Taylor M, Peck M, Launcelott A, Hung OR, Law JA, Macquarrie K, Mckkeen D, George RB, Ngan J. The McGrath® Series 5 videolaryngoscope vs. the Macintosh laryngoscope: a randomized, controlled trial in patients with a simulated difficult airway. Anaesthesia. 2013;68:142–7.PubMedCrossRef Taylor M, Peck M, Launcelott A, Hung OR, Law JA, Macquarrie K, Mckkeen D, George RB, Ngan J. The McGrath® Series 5 videolaryngoscope vs. the Macintosh laryngoscope: a randomized, controlled trial in patients with a simulated difficult airway. Anaesthesia. 2013;68:142–7.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Incidence of cannot intubate-cannot ventilate (CICV): results of a 3-year retrospective multicenter clinical study in a network of university hospitals
Authors
Nobuko Tachibana
Yukitoshi Niiyama
Michiaki Yamakage
Publication date
01-06-2015
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Journal of Anesthesia / Issue 3/2015
Print ISSN: 0913-8668
Electronic ISSN: 1438-8359
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-014-1847-1

Other articles of this Issue 3/2015

Journal of Anesthesia 3/2015 Go to the issue