Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Anesthesia 5/2010

01-10-2010 | Short Communication

Better postoperative oxygenation in thoracoscopic esophagectomy in prone positioning

Authors: Tomoaki Yatabe, Hiroyuki Kitagawa, Koichi Yamashita, Toyokazu Akimori, Kazuhiro Hanazaki, Masataka Yokoyama

Published in: Journal of Anesthesia | Issue 5/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Intrathoracic procedures can be performed with thoracoscopy in esophagectomy because the laparoscopic technique has recently been developed. During intrathoracic procedures, prone positioning of the patient allows gravity to facilitate optimal exposure of the esophagus, thereby affording a superb surgical view. In the current study, we compared the influence of prone positioning with lateral decubitus positioning on oxygenation in esophagectomy. We enrolled 18 patients and divided them into two groups: patients who underwent esophagectomy via thoracoscopy in the prone position (group P) and patients who underwent thoracotomy in the lateral decubitus position (control group, group L). Arterial blood gas analyses were performed before the operation was started (T1), 20 min after the initiation of one-lung ventilation (OLV) (T2), and two other points. The P/F ratio at T2 in group P was higher. Further, percent (%) change of the P/F ratios from T1 and thereafter in group P was higher at all points. We thought the reason why the prone position had contributed to maintenance oxygenation was as follows. First, the functional residual capacity and ventilation/perfusion matching in the prone position are satisfactory. Second, a bronchial blocker might contribute to reduction of atelectasis. Third, minimally invasive esophagectomy might reduce respiratory complications and blood loss because this procedure reduces edema and inflammation in the lung. In conclusion, the oxygenation provided by prone positioning is better than that provided by the lateral decubitus position during OLV in esophagectomy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Whooley BP, Law S, Murthy SC, Alexandrou A, Wong J. Analysis of reduced death and complication rates after esophageal resection. Ann Surg. 2001;233:338–44.CrossRefPubMed Whooley BP, Law S, Murthy SC, Alexandrou A, Wong J. Analysis of reduced death and complication rates after esophageal resection. Ann Surg. 2001;233:338–44.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Atkins BZ, Shah AS, Hutcheson KA, Mangum JH, Pappas TN, Harpole DH Jr, D’Amico TA. Reducing hospital morbidity and mortality following esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;78:1170–6.CrossRefPubMed Atkins BZ, Shah AS, Hutcheson KA, Mangum JH, Pappas TN, Harpole DH Jr, D’Amico TA. Reducing hospital morbidity and mortality following esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;78:1170–6.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Choi YS, Shim JK, Na S, Hong SB, Hong YW, Oh YJ. Pressure-controlled versus volume-controlled ventilation during one-lung ventilation in the prone position for robot-assisted esophagectomy. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:2286–91.CrossRefPubMed Choi YS, Shim JK, Na S, Hong SB, Hong YW, Oh YJ. Pressure-controlled versus volume-controlled ventilation during one-lung ventilation in the prone position for robot-assisted esophagectomy. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:2286–91.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Dapri G, Himpens J, Cadiere GB. Minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer: laparoscopic transhiatal procedure or thoracoscopy in prone position followed by laparoscopy? Surg Endosc. 2008;22:1060–9.CrossRefPubMed Dapri G, Himpens J, Cadiere GB. Minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer: laparoscopic transhiatal procedure or thoracoscopy in prone position followed by laparoscopy? Surg Endosc. 2008;22:1060–9.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Kim DJ, Hyung WJ, Lee CY, Lee JG, Haam SJ, Park IK, Chung KY. Thoracosopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: feasibility and safety of robotic assistance in the prone position. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010;139:53–59.e1. Kim DJ, Hyung WJ, Lee CY, Lee JG, Haam SJ, Park IK, Chung KY. Thoracosopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: feasibility and safety of robotic assistance in the prone position. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010;139:53–59.e1.
6.
go back to reference Kitagawa H, Akimori T, Okabayashi T, Namikawa T, Sugimoto T, Kobayashi M, Hanazaki K. Total laparoscopic gastric mobilization for esophagectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2009;394:617–21.CrossRefPubMed Kitagawa H, Akimori T, Okabayashi T, Namikawa T, Sugimoto T, Kobayashi M, Hanazaki K. Total laparoscopic gastric mobilization for esophagectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2009;394:617–21.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Froese AB, Bryan AC. Effects of anesthesia and paralysis on diaphragmatic mechanics in man. Anesthesiology. 1974;41:242–55.CrossRefPubMed Froese AB, Bryan AC. Effects of anesthesia and paralysis on diaphragmatic mechanics in man. Anesthesiology. 1974;41:242–55.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Pneumatikos IA, Dragoumanis CK, Bouros DE. Ventilator-associated pneumonia or endotracheal tube-associated pneumonia? An approach to the pathogenesis and preventive strategies emphasizing the importance of endotracheal tube. Anesthesiology. 2009;110:673–80.CrossRefPubMed Pneumatikos IA, Dragoumanis CK, Bouros DE. Ventilator-associated pneumonia or endotracheal tube-associated pneumonia? An approach to the pathogenesis and preventive strategies emphasizing the importance of endotracheal tube. Anesthesiology. 2009;110:673–80.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Bussieres JS. Open or minimally invasive esophagectomy: are the outcomes different? Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2009;22:56–60.CrossRefPubMed Bussieres JS. Open or minimally invasive esophagectomy: are the outcomes different? Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2009;22:56–60.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Better postoperative oxygenation in thoracoscopic esophagectomy in prone positioning
Authors
Tomoaki Yatabe
Hiroyuki Kitagawa
Koichi Yamashita
Toyokazu Akimori
Kazuhiro Hanazaki
Masataka Yokoyama
Publication date
01-10-2010
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Journal of Anesthesia / Issue 5/2010
Print ISSN: 0913-8668
Electronic ISSN: 1438-8359
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-010-0968-4

Other articles of this Issue 5/2010

Journal of Anesthesia 5/2010 Go to the issue