Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences 1/2010

01-01-2010 | Guidelines

Assessment of severity of acute pancreatitis according to new prognostic factors and CT grading

Authors: Kazunori Takeda, Masamichi Yokoe, Tadahiro Takada, Keisho Kataoka, Masahiro Yoshida, Toshifumi Gabata, Masahiko Hirota, Toshihiko Mayumi, Masumi Kadoya, Eigoro Yamanouchi, Takayuki Hattori, Miho Sekimoto, Hodaka Amano, Keita Wada, Yasutoshi Kimura, Seiki Kiriyama, Shinju Arata, Yoshifumi Takeyama, Morihisa Hirota, Koichi Hirata, Tooru Shimosegawa

Published in: Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences | Issue 1/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

The assessment of severity at the initial medical examination plays an important role in introducing adequate early treatment and the transfer of patients to a medical facility that can cope with severe acute pancreatitis. Under these circumstances, “criteria for severity assessment” have been prepared in various countries, including Japan, and these criteria are now being evaluated. The criteria for severity assessment of acute pancreatitis in Japan were determined in 1990 (of which a partial revision was made in 1999). In 2008, an overall revision was made and the new Japanese criteria for severity assessment of acute pancreatitis were prepared. In the new criteria for severity assessment, the diagnosis of severe acute pancreatitis can be made according to 9 prognostic factors and/or the computed tomography (CT) grades based on contrast-enhanced CT. Patients with severe acute pancreatitis are expected to be transferred to a specialist medical center or to an intensive care unit to receive adequate treatment there. In Japan, severe acute pancreatitis is recognized as being a specified intractable disease on the basis of these criteria, so medical expenses associated with severe acute pancreatitis are covered by Government payment.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ogawa M, Hirota M, Hayasaka T, et al. Development and use of a new staging system for severe acute pancreatitis based on a nationwide survey in Japan. Pancreas. 2002;25:325–30.CrossRefPubMed Ogawa M, Hirota M, Hayasaka T, et al. Development and use of a new staging system for severe acute pancreatitis based on a nationwide survey in Japan. Pancreas. 2002;25:325–30.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Forell MM. Die konservative Behandulung der Pankreaserkrankungen. Der Internist. 1964;5:453–7.PubMed Forell MM. Die konservative Behandulung der Pankreaserkrankungen. Der Internist. 1964;5:453–7.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Bank S, Wise L, Gersten M. Risk factors in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 1983;78:637–40.PubMed Bank S, Wise L, Gersten M. Risk factors in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 1983;78:637–40.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Imrie CW, Benjamin IS, Ferguson JC, et al. A single-centre double-blind trial of Trasylol therapy in primary acute pancreatitis. Br J Surg. 1978;65:337–41.CrossRefPubMed Imrie CW, Benjamin IS, Ferguson JC, et al. A single-centre double-blind trial of Trasylol therapy in primary acute pancreatitis. Br J Surg. 1978;65:337–41.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Bradley EL III. A clinically based classification system for acute pancreatitis. Summary of the International Symposium on Acute Pancreatitis, Atlanta, Ga, September 11 through 13, 1992. Arch Surg. 1993;128:586–90.PubMed Bradley EL III. A clinically based classification system for acute pancreatitis. Summary of the International Symposium on Acute Pancreatitis, Atlanta, Ga, September 11 through 13, 1992. Arch Surg. 1993;128:586–90.PubMed
6.
go back to reference British Society of Gastroenterology. United Kingdom guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis. Gut. 1998; 42 S2:1S–13S. British Society of Gastroenterology. United Kingdom guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis. Gut. 1998; 42 S2:1S–13S.
7.
go back to reference UK Working Party on Acute Pancreatitis. UK guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis. Gut. 2005;54 Suppl III: iii1–iii9. UK Working Party on Acute Pancreatitis. UK guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis. Gut. 2005;54 Suppl III: iii1–iii9.
8.
go back to reference Viedma JA, Perez MM, Agullo J, et al. Inflammatory response in the early prediction of severity in human acute pancreatitis. Gut. 1994;35:822–7.CrossRefPubMed Viedma JA, Perez MM, Agullo J, et al. Inflammatory response in the early prediction of severity in human acute pancreatitis. Gut. 1994;35:822–7.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Pezzilli R, Billi P, Miniero R, et al. Serum interleukin-6, interleukin-8, and beta 2-microglobulin in early assessment of severity of acute pancreatitis. Comparison with serum C-reactive protein. Dig Dis Sci. 1995;40:2341–8.CrossRefPubMed Pezzilli R, Billi P, Miniero R, et al. Serum interleukin-6, interleukin-8, and beta 2-microglobulin in early assessment of severity of acute pancreatitis. Comparison with serum C-reactive protein. Dig Dis Sci. 1995;40:2341–8.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Uchikov PA, Sirakova IP, Murdjeva MA, Uchikov AP. Changes in plasma levels of acute phase proteins in pancreatitis. Folia Med (Plovdiv). 2000;42:23–30. Uchikov PA, Sirakova IP, Murdjeva MA, Uchikov AP. Changes in plasma levels of acute phase proteins in pancreatitis. Folia Med (Plovdiv). 2000;42:23–30.
11.
go back to reference Dervenis C, Johnson CD, Bassi C, et al. Diagnosis, objective assessment of severity, and management of acute pancreatitis. Santorini Consensus Conference. Int J Pancreatol. 1999;25:195–210.PubMed Dervenis C, Johnson CD, Bassi C, et al. Diagnosis, objective assessment of severity, and management of acute pancreatitis. Santorini Consensus Conference. Int J Pancreatol. 1999;25:195–210.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Toouli J, Brooke-Smith M, Bassi C, et al. Working party of the program committee of the Bankok World Congress of Gastroenterology 2002. Guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002;17(Suppl):S15–39.CrossRefPubMed Toouli J, Brooke-Smith M, Bassi C, et al. Working party of the program committee of the Bankok World Congress of Gastroenterology 2002. Guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002;17(Suppl):S15–39.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Rau BM, Kemppainen EA, Gumbs A, et al. Early assessment of pancreatic infections and overall prognosis in severe acute pancreatitis by procalcitonin (PCT): a prospective international multicenterstudy. Ann Surg. 2007;245:745–54.CrossRefPubMed Rau BM, Kemppainen EA, Gumbs A, et al. Early assessment of pancreatic infections and overall prognosis in severe acute pancreatitis by procalcitonin (PCT): a prospective international multicenterstudy. Ann Surg. 2007;245:745–54.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Funnell IC, Bornman PC, Weakley SP, et al. Obesity: an important prognostic factor in acute pancreatitis. Br J Surg. 1993;80:484–6.CrossRefPubMed Funnell IC, Bornman PC, Weakley SP, et al. Obesity: an important prognostic factor in acute pancreatitis. Br J Surg. 1993;80:484–6.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Martinez J, Sanchez PJ, Palazon JM, et al. Obesity: a prognostic factor of severity in acute pancreatitis. Pancreas. 1999;19:15–20.PubMedCrossRef Martinez J, Sanchez PJ, Palazon JM, et al. Obesity: a prognostic factor of severity in acute pancreatitis. Pancreas. 1999;19:15–20.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Martinez J, Sanchez-Paya J, Palazon JM, et al. Is obesity a risk factor in acute pancreatitis? A meta-analysis. Pancreatology. 2004;4:42–8.CrossRefPubMed Martinez J, Sanchez-Paya J, Palazon JM, et al. Is obesity a risk factor in acute pancreatitis? A meta-analysis. Pancreatology. 2004;4:42–8.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Sempere L, Martinez J, de Madaria E, et al. Obesity and fat distribution imply a greater systemic inflammatory response and a worse prognosis in acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology. 2008;8:257–64.CrossRefPubMed Sempere L, Martinez J, de Madaria E, et al. Obesity and fat distribution imply a greater systemic inflammatory response and a worse prognosis in acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology. 2008;8:257–64.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Hirota M, Ogawa M. Obesity in acute pancreatitis. Kan-Tan-Sui. 2001;42:53–6. (in Japanese). Hirota M, Ogawa M. Obesity in acute pancreatitis. Kan-Tan-Sui. 2001;42:53–6. (in Japanese).
20.
go back to reference Vesentini S, Bassi C, Talamini G, et al. Prospective comparison of C-reactive protein level, Ranson score and contrast-enhanced computed tomography in the prediction of septic complications of acute pancreatitis. Br J Surg. 1993;80:755–7.CrossRefPubMed Vesentini S, Bassi C, Talamini G, et al. Prospective comparison of C-reactive protein level, Ranson score and contrast-enhanced computed tomography in the prediction of septic complications of acute pancreatitis. Br J Surg. 1993;80:755–7.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Kemppainen E, Sainio V, Haapiainen R, et al. Early localization of necrosis by contrast-enhanced computed tomography can predict outcome in severe acute pancreatitis. Br J Surg. 1996;83:924–9.CrossRefPubMed Kemppainen E, Sainio V, Haapiainen R, et al. Early localization of necrosis by contrast-enhanced computed tomography can predict outcome in severe acute pancreatitis. Br J Surg. 1996;83:924–9.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Bradley EL III, Murphy F, Ferguson C. Prediction of pancreatic necrosis by dynamic pancreatography. Ann Surg. 1989;210:495–503.CrossRefPubMed Bradley EL III, Murphy F, Ferguson C. Prediction of pancreatic necrosis by dynamic pancreatography. Ann Surg. 1989;210:495–503.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Larvin M, Chalmers AG, McMahon MJ. Dynamic contrast enhanced computed tomography: a precise technique for identifying and localizing pancreatic necrosis. BMJ. 1990;300:1425–8.CrossRefPubMed Larvin M, Chalmers AG, McMahon MJ. Dynamic contrast enhanced computed tomography: a precise technique for identifying and localizing pancreatic necrosis. BMJ. 1990;300:1425–8.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Lytras D, Manes K, Triantopoulou C, et al. Persistent early organ failure defining the high-risk group of patients with severe acute pancreatitis? Pancreas. 2008;36:249–54.CrossRefPubMed Lytras D, Manes K, Triantopoulou C, et al. Persistent early organ failure defining the high-risk group of patients with severe acute pancreatitis? Pancreas. 2008;36:249–54.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Carmona-Sanchez R, Uscanga L, Bezaury-Rivas P, et al. Potential harmful effect of Iodinated intravenous contrast medium on the clinical course of mild acute pancreatitis. Arch Surg. 2000;135:1280–4.CrossRefPubMed Carmona-Sanchez R, Uscanga L, Bezaury-Rivas P, et al. Potential harmful effect of Iodinated intravenous contrast medium on the clinical course of mild acute pancreatitis. Arch Surg. 2000;135:1280–4.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Hwang TL, Chang KY, Ho YP. Contrast-enhanced dynamic computed tomography does not aggravate the clinical severity of patients with severe acute pancreatitis. Reevaluation of the effect of intravenous contrast medium on the severity of acute pancreatitis. Arch Surg. 2000;135:287–90.CrossRefPubMed Hwang TL, Chang KY, Ho YP. Contrast-enhanced dynamic computed tomography does not aggravate the clinical severity of patients with severe acute pancreatitis. Reevaluation of the effect of intravenous contrast medium on the severity of acute pancreatitis. Arch Surg. 2000;135:287–90.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Uhl W, Roggo A, Kirschstein T, et al. Influence of contrast-enhanced computed tomography on course and outcome in patients with acute pancreatitis. Pancreas. 2002;24:191–7.CrossRefPubMed Uhl W, Roggo A, Kirschstein T, et al. Influence of contrast-enhanced computed tomography on course and outcome in patients with acute pancreatitis. Pancreas. 2002;24:191–7.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Matsuno S, Ogawa M, Takeda K et al. Annual report, 2001, Committee of Intractable Disease of the Pancreas, Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare; 2001. p. 19–26 (in Japanese). Matsuno S, Ogawa M, Takeda K et al. Annual report, 2001, Committee of Intractable Disease of the Pancreas, Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare; 2001. p. 19–26 (in Japanese).
29.
go back to reference Balthazar EJ, Robinson DL, Megibow AJ, Ranson JH. Acute pancreatitis: value of CT in establishing prognosis. Radiology. 1990;174:331–6.PubMed Balthazar EJ, Robinson DL, Megibow AJ, Ranson JH. Acute pancreatitis: value of CT in establishing prognosis. Radiology. 1990;174:331–6.PubMed
30.
go back to reference Takeda K, Matsuno S. Management of acute necrotizing pancreatitis based on CT grading. J Abdom Emerg Med. 1998;18:961–5. (in Japanese). Takeda K, Matsuno S. Management of acute necrotizing pancreatitis based on CT grading. J Abdom Emerg Med. 1998;18:961–5. (in Japanese).
31.
go back to reference London NJ, Leese T, Lavelle JM, et al. Rapid-bolus contrast-enhanced dynamic computed tomography in acute pancreatitis: a prospective study. Br J Surg. 1991;78:1452–6.CrossRefPubMed London NJ, Leese T, Lavelle JM, et al. Rapid-bolus contrast-enhanced dynamic computed tomography in acute pancreatitis: a prospective study. Br J Surg. 1991;78:1452–6.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Clavien PA, Hauser H, Meyer P, Rohner A. Value of contrast-enhanced computerized tomography in the early diagnosis and prognosis of acute pancreatitis. Am J Surg. 1988;155:457–66.CrossRefPubMed Clavien PA, Hauser H, Meyer P, Rohner A. Value of contrast-enhanced computerized tomography in the early diagnosis and prognosis of acute pancreatitis. Am J Surg. 1988;155:457–66.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Rotman N, Chevret S, Pezet D, et al. Prognostic value of early computed tomographic scans in severe acute pancreatitis. J Am Coll Surg. 1994;179:538–44.PubMed Rotman N, Chevret S, Pezet D, et al. Prognostic value of early computed tomographic scans in severe acute pancreatitis. J Am Coll Surg. 1994;179:538–44.PubMed
34.
go back to reference Hirota M, Kimura Y, Ishiko T, et al. Visualization of the heterogenous internal structure of so-called pancreatic necrosis by magnetic resonance imaging. Pancreas. 2002;25:63–7.CrossRefPubMed Hirota M, Kimura Y, Ishiko T, et al. Visualization of the heterogenous internal structure of so-called pancreatic necrosis by magnetic resonance imaging. Pancreas. 2002;25:63–7.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Ward J, Chalmers AG, Guthrie AJ, et al. T2-weighted and dynamic enhanced MRI in acute pancreatitis: comparison with contrast enhanced CT. Clin Radiol. 1997;52:109–14.CrossRefPubMed Ward J, Chalmers AG, Guthrie AJ, et al. T2-weighted and dynamic enhanced MRI in acute pancreatitis: comparison with contrast enhanced CT. Clin Radiol. 1997;52:109–14.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Lecesne R, Taourel P, Bret PM, et al. Acute pancreatitis: interobserver agreement and correlation of CT and MR cholangiopancreatography with outcome. Radiology. 1999;211:727–36.PubMed Lecesne R, Taourel P, Bret PM, et al. Acute pancreatitis: interobserver agreement and correlation of CT and MR cholangiopancreatography with outcome. Radiology. 1999;211:727–36.PubMed
37.
go back to reference Blamey SL, Imrie CW, O’Neill J, et al. Prognostic factors in acute pancreatitis. Gut. 1984;25:1340–6.CrossRefPubMed Blamey SL, Imrie CW, O’Neill J, et al. Prognostic factors in acute pancreatitis. Gut. 1984;25:1340–6.CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Ranson JHC, Rifkind KM, Turner JW. Prognostic signs and nonoperative peritoneal lavage in acute pancreatitis. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1976;143:209–19.PubMed Ranson JHC, Rifkind KM, Turner JW. Prognostic signs and nonoperative peritoneal lavage in acute pancreatitis. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1976;143:209–19.PubMed
39.
go back to reference Leese T, Shaw D. Comparison of three Glasgow multifactor prognostic scoring system in acute pancreatitis. Br J Surg. 1988;75:460–2.CrossRefPubMed Leese T, Shaw D. Comparison of three Glasgow multifactor prognostic scoring system in acute pancreatitis. Br J Surg. 1988;75:460–2.CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Wilson C, Heath DI, Imrie CW. Prediction of outcome in acute pancreatitis: a comparative study of APACHE II, clinical assessment and multiple factor scoring systems. Br J Surg. 1990;77:1260–4.CrossRefPubMed Wilson C, Heath DI, Imrie CW. Prediction of outcome in acute pancreatitis: a comparative study of APACHE II, clinical assessment and multiple factor scoring systems. Br J Surg. 1990;77:1260–4.CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Larvin M. Assessment of severity and prognosis in acute pancreatitis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1997;9:122–30.PubMed Larvin M. Assessment of severity and prognosis in acute pancreatitis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1997;9:122–30.PubMed
42.
go back to reference Kitagawa M, Naruse T, Hayakawa T, et al. Prediction of exacerbation of acute pancreatitis. Suizou. 2005;20:17–30. (in Japanese).CrossRef Kitagawa M, Naruse T, Hayakawa T, et al. Prediction of exacerbation of acute pancreatitis. Suizou. 2005;20:17–30. (in Japanese).CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Matsuno S, Takeda K, Kitagawa M et al. Annual report, 2005, Committee of Intractable Disease of the Pancreas, Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare; 2005. p. 32–8 (in Japanese). Matsuno S, Takeda K, Kitagawa M et al. Annual report, 2005, Committee of Intractable Disease of the Pancreas, Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare; 2005. p. 32–8 (in Japanese).
44.
go back to reference Matsuno S, Takeda K, Ogawa M, et al. Re-evaluation of CT Grade in acute pancreatitis. Suizou. 2002;7:93–9. (in Japanese). Matsuno S, Takeda K, Ogawa M, et al. Re-evaluation of CT Grade in acute pancreatitis. Suizou. 2002;7:93–9. (in Japanese).
45.
go back to reference Takeda K, Ootsuki M, Kihara Y et al. Annual report, 2008, Committee of Intractable Disease of the Pancreas, Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare; 2008. p. 43–7 (in Japanese). Takeda K, Ootsuki M, Kihara Y et al. Annual report, 2008, Committee of Intractable Disease of the Pancreas, Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare; 2008. p. 43–7 (in Japanese).
46.
go back to reference Yokoe M, Mayumi T, Hayashi K. Clinical evaluation of the revised staging system for acute pancreatitis in Japan. Suizou. 2009;24:140–6. (in Japanese).CrossRef Yokoe M, Mayumi T, Hayashi K. Clinical evaluation of the revised staging system for acute pancreatitis in Japan. Suizou. 2009;24:140–6. (in Japanese).CrossRef
47.
go back to reference Bank PA, Freeman ML. Practice guidelines in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:2379–400.CrossRef Bank PA, Freeman ML. Practice guidelines in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:2379–400.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Assessment of severity of acute pancreatitis according to new prognostic factors and CT grading
Authors
Kazunori Takeda
Masamichi Yokoe
Tadahiro Takada
Keisho Kataoka
Masahiro Yoshida
Toshifumi Gabata
Masahiko Hirota
Toshihiko Mayumi
Masumi Kadoya
Eigoro Yamanouchi
Takayuki Hattori
Miho Sekimoto
Hodaka Amano
Keita Wada
Yasutoshi Kimura
Seiki Kiriyama
Shinju Arata
Yoshifumi Takeyama
Morihisa Hirota
Koichi Hirata
Tooru Shimosegawa
Publication date
01-01-2010
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences / Issue 1/2010
Print ISSN: 1868-6974
Electronic ISSN: 1868-6982
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-009-0213-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2010

Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences 1/2010 Go to the issue

Guidelines

Foreword