Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 12/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Original Article

Mastication, swallowing, and salivary flow in patients with head and neck cancer: objective tests versus patient-reported outcomes

Authors: Jorine A. Vermaire, Cornelis P. J. Raaijmakers, Irma M. Verdonck-de Leeuw, Femke Jansen, C. René Leemans, Chris H. J. Terhaard, Caroline M. Speksnijder

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 12/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Before and after treatment for head and neck cancer (HNC), many patients have problems with mastication, swallowing, and salivary flow. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between objective test outcomes of mastication, swallowing, and salivary flow versus patient-reported outcomes (PROs) measuring mastication-, swallowing-, and salivary flow–related quality of life.

Methods

Data of the prospective cohort “Netherlands Quality of Life and Biomedical Cohort Study” was used as collected before treatment, and 3 and 6 months after treatment. Spearman’s rho was used to test the association between objective test outcomes of the mixing ability test (MAT) for masticatory performance, the water-swallowing test (WST) for swallowing performance, and the salivary flow test versus PROs (subscales of the EORTC QLQ-H&N35, Swallow Quality of Life questionnaire (SWAL-QoL-NL) and Groningen Radiation-Induced Xerostomia (GRIX)).

Results

Data of 142 patients were used, and in total, 285 measurements were performed. No significant correlations were found between the MAT or WST and subscales of the EORTC QLQ-H&N35. Significant but weak correlations were found between the MAT or WST and 4 subscales of the SWAL-QoL-NL. Weak to moderate correlations were found between the salivary flow test and GRIX at 3 and 6 months after treatment, with the highest correlation between salivary flow and xerostomia during the day (Spearman’s rho =  − 0.441, p = 0.001).

Conclusion

The association between objective test outcomes and PROs is weak, indicating that these outcome measures provide different information about masticatory performance, swallowing, and salivary flow in patients with HNC.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
4.
go back to reference Kamal M, Rosenthal DI, Volpe S, Goepfert RP, Garden AS, Hutcheson KA, Al Feghali KA, Meheissen MAM, Eraj SA, Dursteler AE, Williams B, Smith JB, Aymard JM, Berends J, White AL, Frank SJ, Morrison WH, Cardoso R, Chambers MS, Sturgis EM, Mendoza TR, Lu C, Mohamed ASR, Fuller CD, Gunn GB (2018) Patient reported dry mouth: instrument comparison and model performance for correlation with quality of life in head and neck cancer survivors. Radiother Oncol 126(1):75–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2017.10.037CrossRefPubMed Kamal M, Rosenthal DI, Volpe S, Goepfert RP, Garden AS, Hutcheson KA, Al Feghali KA, Meheissen MAM, Eraj SA, Dursteler AE, Williams B, Smith JB, Aymard JM, Berends J, White AL, Frank SJ, Morrison WH, Cardoso R, Chambers MS, Sturgis EM, Mendoza TR, Lu C, Mohamed ASR, Fuller CD, Gunn GB (2018) Patient reported dry mouth: instrument comparison and model performance for correlation with quality of life in head and neck cancer survivors. Radiother Oncol 126(1):75–80. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​radonc.​2017.​10.​037CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Hamlet S, Faull J, Klein B, Aref A, Fontanesi J, Stachler R, Shamsa F, Jones L, Simpson M (1997) Mastication and swallowing in patients with postirradiation xerostomia. Int J Radiation Oncology Biol 37(4):789–796CrossRef Hamlet S, Faull J, Klein B, Aref A, Fontanesi J, Stachler R, Shamsa F, Jones L, Simpson M (1997) Mastication and swallowing in patients with postirradiation xerostomia. Int J Radiation Oncology Biol 37(4):789–796CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Bjordal K, de Graeff A, Fayers PM, Hammerlid E, van Pottelsberghe C, Curran D, Ahlner-Elmqvist M, Maher EJ, Meyza JW, Bredart A, Soderholm AL, Arraras JJ, Feine JS, Abendstein H, Morton RP, Pignon T, Huguenin P, Bottomly A, Kaasa S (2000) A 12 country field study of the EORTC QLQ-C30 (version 3.0) and the head and neck cancer specific module EORTC QLQ-H&N35 in head and neck patients. EORTC Quality of Life Group. European journal of cancer 36(14):1796–1807. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0959-8049(00)00186-6CrossRefPubMed Bjordal K, de Graeff A, Fayers PM, Hammerlid E, van Pottelsberghe C, Curran D, Ahlner-Elmqvist M, Maher EJ, Meyza JW, Bredart A, Soderholm AL, Arraras JJ, Feine JS, Abendstein H, Morton RP, Pignon T, Huguenin P, Bottomly A, Kaasa S (2000) A 12 country field study of the EORTC QLQ-C30 (version 3.0) and the head and neck cancer specific module EORTC QLQ-H&N35 in head and neck patients. EORTC Quality of Life Group. European journal of cancer 36(14):1796–1807. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​s0959-8049(00)00186-6CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Verdonck-de Leeuw IM, Jansen F, Brakenhoff RH, Langendijk JA, Takes R, Terhaard CHJ, Baatenburg de Jong RJ, Smit JH, Leemans CR (2019) Advancing interdisciplinary research in head and neck cancer through a multicenter longitudinal prospective cohort study: the NETherlands QUality of life and BIomedical Cohort (NET-QUBIC) data warehouse and biobank. BMC Cancer 19(1):765. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5866-zCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Verdonck-de Leeuw IM, Jansen F, Brakenhoff RH, Langendijk JA, Takes R, Terhaard CHJ, Baatenburg de Jong RJ, Smit JH, Leemans CR (2019) Advancing interdisciplinary research in head and neck cancer through a multicenter longitudinal prospective cohort study: the NETherlands QUality of life and BIomedical Cohort (NET-QUBIC) data warehouse and biobank. BMC Cancer 19(1):765. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s12885-019-5866-zCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
go back to reference Sherman AC, Simonton S, Adams DC, Vural E, Owens B, Hanna E (2000) Assessing quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer: cross-validation of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Head and Neck module (QLQ-H&N35). Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 126(4):459–467CrossRefPubMed Sherman AC, Simonton S, Adams DC, Vural E, Owens B, Hanna E (2000) Assessing quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer: cross-validation of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Head and Neck module (QLQ-H&N35). Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 126(4):459–467CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Eisbruch A, Kim HJ, Terrell JE, Marsh LH, Dawson LA, Ship JA (2001) Xerostomia and its predictors following parotid-sparing irradiation of head-and-neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 50(3):695–704CrossRefPubMed Eisbruch A, Kim HJ, Terrell JE, Marsh LH, Dawson LA, Ship JA (2001) Xerostomia and its predictors following parotid-sparing irradiation of head-and-neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 50(3):695–704CrossRefPubMed
40.
42.
go back to reference Felce D, Perry J (1995) Quality of life: its definition and measurement. Res Dev Disabil 16(1):51–74CrossRefPubMed Felce D, Perry J (1995) Quality of life: its definition and measurement. Res Dev Disabil 16(1):51–74CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference Chen AY, Frankowski R, Bishop-Leone J, Hebert T, Leyk S, Lewin J, Goepfert H (2001) The development and validation of a dysphagia-specific quality-of-life questionnaire for patients with head and neck cancer: the M. D. Anderson dysphagia inventory. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 127(7):870–876PubMed Chen AY, Frankowski R, Bishop-Leone J, Hebert T, Leyk S, Lewin J, Goepfert H (2001) The development and validation of a dysphagia-specific quality-of-life questionnaire for patients with head and neck cancer: the M. D. Anderson dysphagia inventory. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 127(7):870–876PubMed
Metadata
Title
Mastication, swallowing, and salivary flow in patients with head and neck cancer: objective tests versus patient-reported outcomes
Authors
Jorine A. Vermaire
Cornelis P. J. Raaijmakers
Irma M. Verdonck-de Leeuw
Femke Jansen
C. René Leemans
Chris H. J. Terhaard
Caroline M. Speksnijder
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 12/2021
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06368-6

Other articles of this Issue 12/2021

Supportive Care in Cancer 12/2021 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine