Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 6/2020

01-06-2020 | Breast Cancer | Original Article

Increasing access to breast reconstruction for women living in underserved non-metropolitan areas of Australia

Authors: Kathy Flitcroft, Meagan Brennan, Shehnarz Salindera, Andrew Spillane

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 6/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The potential quality of life benefits of breast reconstruction (BR) for women who have undergone mastectomy for breast cancer have long been recognised. While many women will not want to have BR, international best-practice guidance mandates that all should be given the choice. The aim of this article is to highlight potential policies to support patients’ informed discussion of BR options and to improve access to BR for women living in underserved locations.

Methods

Ninety semi-structured interviews were conducted from May 2015 to May 2017 with a convenience sample of 31 breast reconstructive surgeons, 37 breast cancer health professionals and a purposive sample of 22 women who underwent mastectomy as part of their breast cancer treatment. Breast, plastic reconstructive surgeons and health professionals based in major cities also provided information about how they cared for patients from more remote areas.

Results

Analysis of interview data revealed a range of barriers that were grouped into four major categories describing issues for women living outside major cities: population characteristics associated with lower socioeconomic status; locational barriers including limited health services resources and distance; administrative barriers such as hospital policies and inadequate support for women who need to travel; and surgical workforce recruitment barriers.

Conclusions

Suggestions for potential solutions included the following: greater geographical centralisation of BR services within major cities; the creation of designated breast centres with minimum caseload requirements similar to the UK’s system; and a buddy system, whereby smaller hospitals network with multidisciplinary teams based in larger hospitals.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Howes BHL, Watson DI, Xu C, Fosh B, Canepa M, Dean NR (2016) Quality of life following total mastectomy with and without reconstruction versus breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer: a case-controlled cohort study. J Plast Reconstr Aesth Surg 69:1184–1191CrossRef Howes BHL, Watson DI, Xu C, Fosh B, Canepa M, Dean NR (2016) Quality of life following total mastectomy with and without reconstruction versus breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer: a case-controlled cohort study. J Plast Reconstr Aesth Surg 69:1184–1191CrossRef
2.
go back to reference National Clinical Audit Support Programme (NCASP) A national audit of provision and outcomes of mastectomy and breast reconstruction surgery for women in England. Fourth Annual Report 2011. The information Centre (NHS), London https://digitalnhsuk/catalogue/PUB02731 Accessed 10 April 2019 National Clinical Audit Support Programme (NCASP) A national audit of provision and outcomes of mastectomy and breast reconstruction surgery for women in England. Fourth Annual Report 2011. The information Centre (NHS), London https://​digitalnhsuk/​catalogue/​PUB02731 Accessed 10 April 2019
3.
go back to reference Musgrave KJ, Bochner M, Kollias J (2010) Surgical decision-making in immediate breast reconstruction. World J Surg 34:3029–3035CrossRef Musgrave KJ, Bochner M, Kollias J (2010) Surgical decision-making in immediate breast reconstruction. World J Surg 34:3029–3035CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Cordeiro PG (2008) Breast reconstruction after surgery for breast cancer. New Eng J Med 359:1590–1601CrossRef Cordeiro PG (2008) Breast reconstruction after surgery for breast cancer. New Eng J Med 359:1590–1601CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Nano MT, Gill PG, Kollias J, Bochner MA, Malycha P, Winefield HR (2005) Psychological impact and cosmetic outcome of surgical breast cancer strategies. ANZ J Surg 75:940–947CrossRef Nano MT, Gill PG, Kollias J, Bochner MA, Malycha P, Winefield HR (2005) Psychological impact and cosmetic outcome of surgical breast cancer strategies. ANZ J Surg 75:940–947CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Rowland JH, Holland JC, Chaglassian T, Kinne D (1993) Psychological response to breast reconstruction: expectations for and impact on postmastectomy functioning. Psychosomatics 34(3):241–250CrossRef Rowland JH, Holland JC, Chaglassian T, Kinne D (1993) Psychological response to breast reconstruction: expectations for and impact on postmastectomy functioning. Psychosomatics 34(3):241–250CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Flitcroft K, Brennan M, Costa D, Spillane A (2016) Documenting patterns of access to breast reconstruction in Australia: the National Picture. Breast 30:47–53CrossRef Flitcroft K, Brennan M, Costa D, Spillane A (2016) Documenting patterns of access to breast reconstruction in Australia: the National Picture. Breast 30:47–53CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Flitcroft KL, Brennan ME, Costa DSJ, Spillane AJ (2017) Regional variation in immediate breast reconstruction in Australia. Br J Surg Open 1:114–121 Flitcroft KL, Brennan ME, Costa DSJ, Spillane AJ (2017) Regional variation in immediate breast reconstruction in Australia. Br J Surg Open 1:114–121
18.
go back to reference Porter ME, Lee TH (2013) The strategy that will fix health care. Harvard Business Review, October Porter ME, Lee TH (2013) The strategy that will fix health care. Harvard Business Review, October
20.
go back to reference Galiano-Castillo N, Cantarero-Villanueva I, Fernández-Lao C, Ariza-García A, Díaz-Rodríguez L, Del-Moral-Ávila R et al (2016) Telehealth system: a randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of an internet-based exercise intervention on quality of life, pain, muscle strength, and fatigue in breast cancer survivors. Cancer 122(20):3166–3174. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.30172 CrossRefPubMed Galiano-Castillo N, Cantarero-Villanueva I, Fernández-Lao C, Ariza-García A, Díaz-Rodríguez L, Del-Moral-Ávila R et al (2016) Telehealth system: a randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of an internet-based exercise intervention on quality of life, pain, muscle strength, and fatigue in breast cancer survivors. Cancer 122(20):3166–3174. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​cncr.​30172 CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Ferrah N, Stephan K, Lovell J, Beiles, Ibrahim JE. Rural centres do not have a higher prevalence of post-operative complications than urban centres: A retrospective analysis of a mortality audit. ANZ J Surg 2019. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.15083 Ferrah N, Stephan K, Lovell J, Beiles, Ibrahim JE. Rural centres do not have a higher prevalence of post-operative complications than urban centres: A retrospective analysis of a mortality audit. ANZ J Surg 2019. Doi: https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​ans.​15083
Metadata
Title
Increasing access to breast reconstruction for women living in underserved non-metropolitan areas of Australia
Authors
Kathy Flitcroft
Meagan Brennan
Shehnarz Salindera
Andrew Spillane
Publication date
01-06-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 6/2020
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-05130-3

Other articles of this Issue 6/2020

Supportive Care in Cancer 6/2020 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine