Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 1/2020

01-01-2020 | Breast Cancer | Original Article

Impact of breast cancer–related lymphedema on working women

Authors: Stéphane Vignes, Pascal Fau-Prudhomot, Laura Simon, Marie-Laure Sanchez-Bréchot, Maria Arrault, Fabrice Locher

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The professional impact of upper limb lymphedema, which affects 15–20% of women after breast cancer treatment, has been poorly evaluated.

Objective

To analyze lymphedema characteristics and global lymphedema- and/or sleeve-attributed impact (mildly inconvenient to severely debilitating) on professional activities, workplace relationships, and workstation ergonomics.

Methods

Patients received a standardized, anonymous, self-administered questionnaire at consultation/hospitalization for treatment in a specialized lymphedema management center.

Results

All 134 consecutive women (March/2015–March/2017; median age 54), with 53-month median lymphedema duration and 34% median excess volume, were included; 35% considered global impact (arm-use impairment) high. For high vs. low global impact during occupational activities, univariate analyses identified global impairment as being associated with the low (23.8%), intermediate (60%), or high (63.2%) (p < 0.01) arm-use level, while multivariate analyses retained intermediate (OR 6.9 [95% CI 1.1–118.1], p < 0.01) and high (OR 4.5 [95% CI 1.5–37.3], p < 0.05) vs. low arm-use level. Lymphedema affected the careers of 70 (52.2%) patients, mostly those with severely impaired arm movement (53.8% vs. 10.2, p < 0.001), without modifying their relationships with colleagues and superiors for 84 (62.7%). Highly impaired women reported changed relationships with colleagues (45% vs. 20%, p < 0.01) and superiors (43.6% vs. 16.9%, p < 0.01). Only 10 women’s (7.5%) job changes reflected lymphedema or its treatment. Workplace adaptations (53% ergonomic) were made for 36 (26.9%) patients, mostly those with greater arm-movement impairment (43.6% vs. 25.3%, p < 0.05), who were highly satisfied (86%).

Conclusion

Upper limb lymphedema can significantly impact work, sometimes upending careers. The rare workstation adaptations were beneficial. Occupational physicians should assess lymphedema-attributed difficulties to improve working conditions.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Velanovich V, Szymanski W (1999) Quality of life of breast cancer patients with lymphedema. Am J Surg 177(3):184–188CrossRef Velanovich V, Szymanski W (1999) Quality of life of breast cancer patients with lymphedema. Am J Surg 177(3):184–188CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Engel J, Kerr J, Schlesinger-Raab A, Eckel R, Sauer H, Hölzel D (2003) Predictors of quality of life of breast cancer patients. Acta Oncol 42(7):710–718CrossRef Engel J, Kerr J, Schlesinger-Raab A, Eckel R, Sauer H, Hölzel D (2003) Predictors of quality of life of breast cancer patients. Acta Oncol 42(7):710–718CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Pyszel A, Malyszczak K, Pyszel K, Andrzejak R, Szuba A (2006) Disability, psychological distress and quality of life in breast cancer survivors with arm lymphedema. Lymphology 39(4):185–192PubMed Pyszel A, Malyszczak K, Pyszel K, Andrzejak R, Szuba A (2006) Disability, psychological distress and quality of life in breast cancer survivors with arm lymphedema. Lymphology 39(4):185–192PubMed
10.
go back to reference Armer JM, Stewart BR (2005) A comparison of four diagnostic criteria for lymphedema in a post-breast cancer population. Lymphat Res Biol 3(4):208–217CrossRef Armer JM, Stewart BR (2005) A comparison of four diagnostic criteria for lymphedema in a post-breast cancer population. Lymphat Res Biol 3(4):208–217CrossRef
11.
go back to reference International Society of Lymphology (2013) The diagnosis and treatment of peripheral lymphedema: 2013 consensus document of the International Society of Lymphology. Lymphology 46(4):1–11 International Society of Lymphology (2013) The diagnosis and treatment of peripheral lymphedema: 2013 consensus document of the International Society of Lymphology. Lymphology 46(4):1–11
12.
go back to reference Soran A, D’Angelo G, Begovic M, Ardic F, Harlak A, Samuel Wieand H, Vogel VG, Johnson RR (2006) Breast cancer-related lymphedema – what are the significant predictors and how they affect the severity of lymphedema? Breast J 12(6):536–543CrossRef Soran A, D’Angelo G, Begovic M, Ardic F, Harlak A, Samuel Wieand H, Vogel VG, Johnson RR (2006) Breast cancer-related lymphedema – what are the significant predictors and how they affect the severity of lymphedema? Breast J 12(6):536–543CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Sitzia J (1995) Volume measurement in lymphoedema treatment: examination of formulae. Eur J Cancer Care 4(1):11–16CrossRef Sitzia J (1995) Volume measurement in lymphoedema treatment: examination of formulae. Eur J Cancer Care 4(1):11–16CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Galland C, Auvert JF, Flahault A, Vayssairat M (2002) Why and how post-mastectomy edema should be quantified in patients with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 75(1):87–89CrossRef Galland C, Auvert JF, Flahault A, Vayssairat M (2002) Why and how post-mastectomy edema should be quantified in patients with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 75(1):87–89CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Mock V (1998) Breast cancer and fatigue: issues for the workplace. AAOHN J 46(9):425–431CrossRef Mock V (1998) Breast cancer and fatigue: issues for the workplace. AAOHN J 46(9):425–431CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Maunsell E, Drolet M, Brisson J, Brisson C, Mâsse B, Deschênes L (2004) Work situation after breast cancer: results from a population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst 96(24):1813–1822CrossRef Maunsell E, Drolet M, Brisson J, Brisson C, Mâsse B, Deschênes L (2004) Work situation after breast cancer: results from a population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst 96(24):1813–1822CrossRef
19.
26.
go back to reference Ridner SH (2005) Quality of life and a symptom cluster associated with breast cancer treatment-related lymphedema. Support Care Cancer 13(11):904–911CrossRef Ridner SH (2005) Quality of life and a symptom cluster associated with breast cancer treatment-related lymphedema. Support Care Cancer 13(11):904–911CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Maxeiner S, Downer A (2009) Comparing the psychosocial issues experienced by individuals with primary vs secondary lymphedema. Rehab Oncol 27(2):9–15 Maxeiner S, Downer A (2009) Comparing the psychosocial issues experienced by individuals with primary vs secondary lymphedema. Rehab Oncol 27(2):9–15
29.
go back to reference Kennedy F, Haslam C, Munir F, Pryce J (2007) Returning to work following cancer: a qualitative exploratory study into the experience of returning to work following cancer. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 16(1):17–25CrossRef Kennedy F, Haslam C, Munir F, Pryce J (2007) Returning to work following cancer: a qualitative exploratory study into the experience of returning to work following cancer. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 16(1):17–25CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Spelten ER, Sprangers MA, Verbeek JH (2002) Factors reported to influence the return to work of cancer survivors: a literature review. Psychooncology 11(2):124–131CrossRef Spelten ER, Sprangers MA, Verbeek JH (2002) Factors reported to influence the return to work of cancer survivors: a literature review. Psychooncology 11(2):124–131CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Buijs P, van Amstel R, van Dijk F (1999) Dutch occupational physicians and general practitioners wish to improve cooperation. Occup Environ Med 56(10):709–713CrossRef Buijs P, van Amstel R, van Dijk F (1999) Dutch occupational physicians and general practitioners wish to improve cooperation. Occup Environ Med 56(10):709–713CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Steiner JF, Cavender TA, Main DS, Bradley CJ (2004) Assessing the impact of cancer on work outcomes: what are the research needs? Cancer 101(8):1703–1711CrossRef Steiner JF, Cavender TA, Main DS, Bradley CJ (2004) Assessing the impact of cancer on work outcomes: what are the research needs? Cancer 101(8):1703–1711CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Impact of breast cancer–related lymphedema on working women
Authors
Stéphane Vignes
Pascal Fau-Prudhomot
Laura Simon
Marie-Laure Sanchez-Bréchot
Maria Arrault
Fabrice Locher
Publication date
01-01-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 1/2020
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-04804-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Supportive Care in Cancer 1/2020 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine