Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 3/2019

01-03-2019 | Original Article

Breaking bad news of a breast cancer diagnosis over the telephone: an emerging trend

Authors: Jane A. McElroy, Christine M. Proulx, LaShaune Johnson, Katie M. Heiden-Rootes, Emily L. Albright, Jamie Smith, Maria T. Brown

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 3/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

This study evaluated how breast cancer diagnoses were shared with patients.

Methods

Current members of the Dr. Susan Love Research Foundation’s Army of Women cohort were sent one email with a link to a survey assessing how their breast cancer diagnosis was communicated, a description of their support system during treatment, basic demographic information, and breast cancer diagnosis details.

Results

Participants (n = 2896) were more likely to be given their diagnosis over the telephone in more recent years (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.06–1.08). Up until about 10 years ago (1967–2006), breast cancer diagnoses were communicated in person more often than by telephone. Since 2006, more than half of participants learned about their diagnosis over the telephone. From 2015 to 2017, almost 60% of participants learned about their diagnosis over the telephone. Among those who heard the news in person, a steady 40% were alone. Characteristics of those who received the news over the telephone included having identified support members, heterosexual identity, and a diagnosis of in situ breast cancer.

Conclusions

Receiving a telephone call about breast cancer diagnosis may be the norm rather than the exception in health care today. Trends in practice, as well as current best practices based primarily on expert opinion, may not provide optimal care for women diagnosed with breast cancer. Patient outcome research to guide future practice, such as the impact of modes of delivery of bad news, is urgently needed to determine appropriate patient-centered approaches for notification of breast cancer diagnoses.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference O’Connor K (2007) Toward the “tipping point”. A new coalition of groups is working quietly to reform U.S. health care. Health Prog 88(3):32–34PubMed O’Connor K (2007) Toward the “tipping point”. A new coalition of groups is working quietly to reform U.S. health care. Health Prog 88(3):32–34PubMed
15.
go back to reference Schofield PE, Butow PN, Thompson JF, Tattersall MH, Beeney LJ, Dunn SM (2003) Psychological responses of patients receiving a diagnosis of cancer. Ann Oncol 14(1):48–56CrossRefPubMed Schofield PE, Butow PN, Thompson JF, Tattersall MH, Beeney LJ, Dunn SM (2003) Psychological responses of patients receiving a diagnosis of cancer. Ann Oncol 14(1):48–56CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Baile WF, Buckman R, Lenzi R, Glober G, Beale EA, Kudelka AP (2000) SPIKES-A six-step protocol for delivering bad news: application to the patient with cancer. Oncologist 5(4):302–311CrossRefPubMed Baile WF, Buckman R, Lenzi R, Glober G, Beale EA, Kudelka AP (2000) SPIKES-A six-step protocol for delivering bad news: application to the patient with cancer. Oncologist 5(4):302–311CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Kaye P (1996) Breaking bad news : a 10 step approach. EPL, Northampton Kaye P (1996) Breaking bad news : a 10 step approach. EPL, Northampton
21.
go back to reference Purnell CA, Arnold RM (2010) Retrospective analysis of communication with patients undergoing radiological breast biopsy. J Support Oncol 8(6):259–263CrossRefPubMed Purnell CA, Arnold RM (2010) Retrospective analysis of communication with patients undergoing radiological breast biopsy. J Support Oncol 8(6):259–263CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Boxer RJ (2017) Telemedicine: remote cancer care improves communication. Oncol Times 39(2):1, 10, 16 Boxer RJ (2017) Telemedicine: remote cancer care improves communication. Oncol Times 39(2):1, 10, 16
26.
go back to reference Sheetz SD, Kavanagh AM, Quek F, Kim BJ, Lu S (2009) Expectation of connectedness and cell phone use in crisis. In: Landgren J, Bvd W, Jul S (eds) ISCRAM 2009, Boundary spanning initiatives and new perspectives: Conference proceedings: 10th–13th of May, Gothenburg, Sweden. University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg Sheetz SD, Kavanagh AM, Quek F, Kim BJ, Lu S (2009) Expectation of connectedness and cell phone use in crisis. In: Landgren J, Bvd W, Jul S (eds) ISCRAM 2009, Boundary spanning initiatives and new perspectives: Conference proceedings: 10th–13th of May, Gothenburg, Sweden. University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg
27.
go back to reference Giardina TD, Modi V, Parrish DE, Singh H (2015) The patient portal and abnormal test results: an exploratory study of patient experiences. Patient Exp J 2(1):148–154PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Giardina TD, Modi V, Parrish DE, Singh H (2015) The patient portal and abnormal test results: an exploratory study of patient experiences. Patient Exp J 2(1):148–154PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
29.
30.
go back to reference Arora NK (2003) Interacting with cancer patients: the significance of physicians’ communication behavior. Soc Sci Med 57(5):791–806CrossRefPubMed Arora NK (2003) Interacting with cancer patients: the significance of physicians’ communication behavior. Soc Sci Med 57(5):791–806CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Herndon JH, Pollick KJ (2002) Continuing concerns, new challenges, and next steps in physician-patient communication. J Bone Joint Surg (Am Vol) 84-A(2):309–315CrossRef Herndon JH, Pollick KJ (2002) Continuing concerns, new challenges, and next steps in physician-patient communication. J Bone Joint Surg (Am Vol) 84-A(2):309–315CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Monden KR, Gentry L, Cox TR (2016) Delivering bad news to patients. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 29(1):101–102CrossRef Monden KR, Gentry L, Cox TR (2016) Delivering bad news to patients. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 29(1):101–102CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Breaking bad news of a breast cancer diagnosis over the telephone: an emerging trend
Authors
Jane A. McElroy
Christine M. Proulx
LaShaune Johnson
Katie M. Heiden-Rootes
Emily L. Albright
Jamie Smith
Maria T. Brown
Publication date
01-03-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4383-y

Other articles of this Issue 3/2019

Supportive Care in Cancer 3/2019 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine