Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 10/2018

01-10-2018 | Original Article

Priorities of a “good death” according to cancer patients, their family caregivers, physicians, and the general population: a nationwide survey

Authors: Young Ho Yun, Kyoung-Nam Kim, Jin-Ah Sim, EunKyo Kang, Jihye Lee, Jiyeon Choo, Shin Hye Yoo, Miso Kim, Young Ae Kim, Beo Deul Kang, Hyun-Jeong Shim, Eun-Kee Song, Jung Hun Kang, Jung Hye Kwon, Jung Lim Lee, Soon Nam Lee, Chi Hoon Maeng, Eun Joo Kang, Young Rok Do, Yoon Seok Choi, Kyung Hae Jung

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 10/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Understanding the concept of a “good death” is crucial to end-of-life care, but our current understanding of what constitutes a good death is insufficient. Here, we investigated the components of a good death that are important to the general population, cancer patients, their families, and physicians.

Methods

We conducted a stratified nationwide cross-sectional survey of cancer patients and their families from 12 hospitals, physicians from 12 hospitals and the Korean Medical Association, and the general population, investigating their attitudes toward 10 good-death components.

Findings

Three components—“not be a burden to the family,” “presence of family,” and “resolve unfinished business”—were considered the most important components by more than 2/3 of each of the three groups, and an additional three components—“freedom from pain,” “feel that life was meaningful,” and “at peace with God”—were considered important by all but the physicians group. Physicians considered “feel life was meaningful,” “presence of family,” and “not be a burden to family” as the core components of a good death, with “freedom from pain” as an additional component. “Treatment choices’ followed, “finances in order,” “mentally aware,” and “die at home” were found to be the least important components among all four groups.

Conclusion

While families strongly agreed that “presence of family” and “not be a burden to family” were important to a good death, the importance of other factors differed between the groups. Health care providers should attempt to discern each patient’s view of a good death.
Literature
4.
go back to reference Miyashita M, Kawakami S, Kato D, Yamashita H, Igaki H, Nakano K, Kuroda Y, Nakagawa K (2015) The importance of good death components among cancer patients, the general population, oncologists, and oncology nurses in Japan: patients prefer “fighting against cancer”. Support Care Cancer 23(1):103–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2323-z CrossRefPubMed Miyashita M, Kawakami S, Kato D, Yamashita H, Igaki H, Nakano K, Kuroda Y, Nakagawa K (2015) The importance of good death components among cancer patients, the general population, oncologists, and oncology nurses in Japan: patients prefer “fighting against cancer”. Support Care Cancer 23(1):103–110. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00520-014-2323-z CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Cagle JG, Pek J, Clifford M, Guralnik J, Zimmerman S (2015) Correlates of a good death and the impact of hospice involvement: findings from the national survey of households affected by cancer. Support Care Cancer: Off J Multinatl Assoc Support Care Cancer 23(3):809–818. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2404-z CrossRef Cagle JG, Pek J, Clifford M, Guralnik J, Zimmerman S (2015) Correlates of a good death and the impact of hospice involvement: findings from the national survey of households affected by cancer. Support Care Cancer: Off J Multinatl Assoc Support Care Cancer 23(3):809–818. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00520-014-2404-z CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Spathis A, Booth S (2008) End of life care in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: in search of a good death. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 3(1):11–29PubMedPubMedCentral Spathis A, Booth S (2008) End of life care in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: in search of a good death. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 3(1):11–29PubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Steinhauser KE, Clipp EC, McNeilly M, Christakis NA, McIntyre LM, Tulsky JA (2000) In search of a good death: observations of patients, families, and providers. Ann Intern Med 132(10):825–832CrossRefPubMed Steinhauser KE, Clipp EC, McNeilly M, Christakis NA, McIntyre LM, Tulsky JA (2000) In search of a good death: observations of patients, families, and providers. Ann Intern Med 132(10):825–832CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference McNamara B, Waddell C, Colvin M (1994) The institutionalization of the good death. Soc Sci Med 39(11):1501–1508CrossRefPubMed McNamara B, Waddell C, Colvin M (1994) The institutionalization of the good death. Soc Sci Med 39(11):1501–1508CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Steinhauser KE, Christakis NA, Clipp EC, McNeilly M, McIntyre L, Tulsky JA (2000) Factors considered important at the end of life by patients, family, physicians, and other care providers. JAMA 284(19):2476–2482CrossRefPubMed Steinhauser KE, Christakis NA, Clipp EC, McNeilly M, McIntyre L, Tulsky JA (2000) Factors considered important at the end of life by patients, family, physicians, and other care providers. JAMA 284(19):2476–2482CrossRefPubMed
18.
19.
go back to reference Yun Y, Rhee Y, Nam S, Chae Y, Heo D, Lee S, Hong Y, Kim S, Lee K (2004) Public attitudes toward dying with dignity and hospice. Korean journal of hospice and. Palliat Care 7(1):17–18 Yun Y, Rhee Y, Nam S, Chae Y, Heo D, Lee S, Hong Y, Kim S, Lee K (2004) Public attitudes toward dying with dignity and hospice. Korean journal of hospice and. Palliat Care 7(1):17–18
20.
go back to reference Association KM (2015) Annual Report Membership Statistics Korean Medical Association Association KM (2015) Annual Report Membership Statistics Korean Medical Association
Metadata
Title
Priorities of a “good death” according to cancer patients, their family caregivers, physicians, and the general population: a nationwide survey
Authors
Young Ho Yun
Kyoung-Nam Kim
Jin-Ah Sim
EunKyo Kang
Jihye Lee
Jiyeon Choo
Shin Hye Yoo
Miso Kim
Young Ae Kim
Beo Deul Kang
Hyun-Jeong Shim
Eun-Kee Song
Jung Hun Kang
Jung Hye Kwon
Jung Lim Lee
Soon Nam Lee
Chi Hoon Maeng
Eun Joo Kang
Young Rok Do
Yoon Seok Choi
Kyung Hae Jung
Publication date
01-10-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 10/2018
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4209-y

Other articles of this Issue 10/2018

Supportive Care in Cancer 10/2018 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine