Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 9/2018

Open Access 01-09-2018 | Original Article

Examining variation across treatment clinics in cancer patients’ psychological outcomes: results of a cross sectional survey

Authors: Mariko Carey, Robert Sanson-Fisher, Tara Clinton-McHarg, Allison Boyes, Ian Olver, Christopher Oldmeadow, Christine Paul, Catherine D’Este, Frans Henskens

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 9/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The majority of research on psychological outcomes for cancer patients has focussed on the role of individual characteristics, and disease and treatment factors. There has been very little exploration of the potential contribution of the treatment clinic to these outcomes. This study explored whether there is variation among clinics in cancer patients’ psychological outcomes.

Methods

Cancer outpatients were recruited from 22 medical oncology and haematology clinics in Australia. Participants completed a pen and paper survey including the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), as well as sociodemographic, disease and treatment characteristics.

Results

Of those eligible to participate, 4233 (82%) consented and 2811 (81% of consenters) returned the completed survey. There was no statistically significant variation in HADS depression scores across clinics. Some difference in anxiety scores derived from the HADS questionnaire between clinics (p = 0.03) was found with the percentage of between-clinic variation estimated to be 1.11%. However, once all demographic, disease and treatment predictors were adjusted for there was no statistical differences between clinics (percent of between-clinic variation = 0.53%; p = 0.1415).

Conclusions

Psychological outcomes were not found to vary between clinics. Other sources of variation including patient characteristics may over-ride between-clinic variability, if it exists.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Linden W, Vodermaier A, MacKenzie R, Greig D (2012) Anxiety and depression after cancer diagnosis: prevalence rates by cancer type, gender, and age. J Affect Disord 141(2):343–351CrossRefPubMed Linden W, Vodermaier A, MacKenzie R, Greig D (2012) Anxiety and depression after cancer diagnosis: prevalence rates by cancer type, gender, and age. J Affect Disord 141(2):343–351CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Forsythe LP, Kent EE, Weaver KE, Buchanan N, Hawkins NA, Rodriguez JL, Blythe Ryerson A, Rowland JH (2013) Receipt of psychosocial care among cancer survivors in the United States. J Clin Oncol 31(13):1961–1969CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Forsythe LP, Kent EE, Weaver KE, Buchanan N, Hawkins NA, Rodriguez JL, Blythe Ryerson A, Rowland JH (2013) Receipt of psychosocial care among cancer survivors in the United States. J Clin Oncol 31(13):1961–1969CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Carver C, Pozo C, Harris S, Noriega V, Scheier M, Robinson D, Ketcham A, Moffat F, Clark K (1993) How coping mediates the effect of optimism on distress: a study of women with early stage breast cancer. J Pers Soc Psychol 62(5):375–390CrossRef Carver C, Pozo C, Harris S, Noriega V, Scheier M, Robinson D, Ketcham A, Moffat F, Clark K (1993) How coping mediates the effect of optimism on distress: a study of women with early stage breast cancer. J Pers Soc Psychol 62(5):375–390CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Luckett T, Butow PN, King MT, Oguchi M, Heading G, Hackl NA, Rankin N, Price MA (2010) A review and recommendations for optimal outcome measures of anxiety, depression and general distress in studies evaluating psychosocial interventions for English-speaking adults with heterogeneous cancer diagnoses. Support Care Cancer 18(10):1241–1262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-010-0932-8 CrossRefPubMed Luckett T, Butow PN, King MT, Oguchi M, Heading G, Hackl NA, Rankin N, Price MA (2010) A review and recommendations for optimal outcome measures of anxiety, depression and general distress in studies evaluating psychosocial interventions for English-speaking adults with heterogeneous cancer diagnoses. Support Care Cancer 18(10):1241–1262. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00520-010-0932-8 CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Jacobsen PB, Shibata D, Siegel M, Lee JH, Fulp WJ, Alemany C, Abesada-Terk G, Brown R, Cartwright T, Faig D, Kim G, Levine R, Markham MJ, Schreiber F, Sharp P, Malafa M, Shibata D, Siegel M, Lee JH, Fulp WJ, Alemany C, Abesada-Terk G, Brown R, Cartwright T, Faig D, Kim G, Levine R, Markham MJ, Schreiber F, Sharp P, Malafa M (2010) Evaluating the quality of psychosocial care in outpatient medical oncology settings using performance indicators. Psychooncology Jacobsen PB, Shibata D, Siegel M, Lee JH, Fulp WJ, Alemany C, Abesada-Terk G, Brown R, Cartwright T, Faig D, Kim G, Levine R, Markham MJ, Schreiber F, Sharp P, Malafa M, Shibata D, Siegel M, Lee JH, Fulp WJ, Alemany C, Abesada-Terk G, Brown R, Cartwright T, Faig D, Kim G, Levine R, Markham MJ, Schreiber F, Sharp P, Malafa M (2010) Evaluating the quality of psychosocial care in outpatient medical oncology settings using performance indicators. Psychooncology
17.
go back to reference National Breast Cancer Centre, National Cancer Control Initiative (2003) Clinical practice guidelines for the psychosocial care of adults with cancer. National Breast Cancer Centre, Camperdown National Breast Cancer Centre, National Cancer Control Initiative (2003) Clinical practice guidelines for the psychosocial care of adults with cancer. National Breast Cancer Centre, Camperdown
18.
go back to reference Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2016) Australia’s hospitals 2014–15 at a glance. AIHW, Canberra Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2016) Australia’s hospitals 2014–15 at a glance. AIHW, Canberra
20.
go back to reference Parahoo K, McDonough S, McCaughan E, Noyes J, Semple C, Halstead E, Neuberger M, Dahm P (2013) Psychosocial interventions for men with prostate cancer. [Review] Cochrane Database Syst Rev Parahoo K, McDonough S, McCaughan E, Noyes J, Semple C, Halstead E, Neuberger M, Dahm P (2013) Psychosocial interventions for men with prostate cancer. [Review] Cochrane Database Syst Rev
23.
go back to reference Green L, Glasgow R (2006) Evaluating the relevance, generalization and applicability of research. Issues in external validation and translation methodology. Eval Health Prof 29(1):126–153CrossRefPubMed Green L, Glasgow R (2006) Evaluating the relevance, generalization and applicability of research. Issues in external validation and translation methodology. Eval Health Prof 29(1):126–153CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Examining variation across treatment clinics in cancer patients’ psychological outcomes: results of a cross sectional survey
Authors
Mariko Carey
Robert Sanson-Fisher
Tara Clinton-McHarg
Allison Boyes
Ian Olver
Christopher Oldmeadow
Christine Paul
Catherine D’Este
Frans Henskens
Publication date
01-09-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 9/2018
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4188-z

Other articles of this Issue 9/2018

Supportive Care in Cancer 9/2018 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine