Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 3/2018

01-03-2018 | Original Article

Integrating referral to community-based cancer information and support services in a hospital setting

Authors: David J. T. Marco, Anna G. Boltong, Adrian Dabscheck, Georgina Akers, Michelle Pryce, Victoria M. White

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 3/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To implement and evaluate a hospital-based referral mechanism to increase patient uptake of community-based cancer information and support services. Feasibility and acceptability of the intervention and education program was evaluated. Changes in usage of Cancer Council Victoria’s cancer information and support telephone line were investigated.

Methods

A 6-month study was conducted in one metropolitan and one regional cancer treatment hospital. Clinicians attended an education session regarding referral mechanisms to Cancer Council support services. Clinicians completed a questionnaire, and consenting patients participated in a semi-structured telephone interview for the project evaluation. The number of calls made from patients at study sites was monitored.

Results

Fifty-two clinicians were trained and referred a total of 430 patients to the cancer information and support service during the study period. Calls from patients increased by up to 100% per month from baseline following the implementation of the referral mechanism. Staff evaluations showed support for the referral mechanism and its incorporation into routine practice. Interviews were conducted with 45 patients; most remembered receiving the referral and were positive towards the intervention. Common reasons patients gave for not acting on the referral included forgetting, lack of need, timing and burden of information.

Conclusions

There is preliminary evidence that this intervention increases awareness and uptake of community-based cancer information and support services. Ongoing clinician education and improvements in patient-clinician communication are important for effective translation from referral to service uptake. Consideration of the most appropriate time in a patients’ care trajectory to introduce a referral is warranted.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Dunn J, Lynch B, Rinaldis M, Pakenham K, McPherson L, Owen N, Leggett B, Newman B, Aitken J (2006) Dimensions of quality of life and psychosocial variables most salient to colorectal cancer patients. Psychooncology 15:20–30CrossRefPubMed Dunn J, Lynch B, Rinaldis M, Pakenham K, McPherson L, Owen N, Leggett B, Newman B, Aitken J (2006) Dimensions of quality of life and psychosocial variables most salient to colorectal cancer patients. Psychooncology 15:20–30CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Liekweg A, Eckhardt M, Taylor SC, Erdfelder E, Jaehde U (2005) Psychometric assessment and application of a questionnaire measuring patient: satisfaction with information on cancer treatment. Pharm World Sci 27(2):96–103CrossRefPubMed Liekweg A, Eckhardt M, Taylor SC, Erdfelder E, Jaehde U (2005) Psychometric assessment and application of a questionnaire measuring patient: satisfaction with information on cancer treatment. Pharm World Sci 27(2):96–103CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Clarke SA, Booth L, Velikova G, Hewison J (2006) Social support: gender differences in cancer patients in the United Kingdom. Cancer Nurs 29(1):66–72CrossRefPubMed Clarke SA, Booth L, Velikova G, Hewison J (2006) Social support: gender differences in cancer patients in the United Kingdom. Cancer Nurs 29(1):66–72CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Eakin EG, Strycker LA (2001) Awareness and barriers to use of cancer support and information resources by HMO patients with breast, prostate, or colon cancer: patient and provider perspectives. Psychooncology 10(2):103–113CrossRefPubMed Eakin EG, Strycker LA (2001) Awareness and barriers to use of cancer support and information resources by HMO patients with breast, prostate, or colon cancer: patient and provider perspectives. Psychooncology 10(2):103–113CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Broadstock MJ, Hill D (1997) Evaluation and impact of promotion of a cancer helpline to cancer patients through their specialists. Patient Educ Couns 32(3):141–146CrossRefPubMed Broadstock MJ, Hill D (1997) Evaluation and impact of promotion of a cancer helpline to cancer patients through their specialists. Patient Educ Couns 32(3):141–146CrossRefPubMed
19.
22.
go back to reference Grimshaw JM, Shirran L, Thomas R, Mowatt G, Fraser C, Bero L, Grilli R, Harvey E, Oxman A, O'Brien MA (2001) Changing provider behavior: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions. Med Care 39(8 Suppl 2):II2–I45PubMed Grimshaw JM, Shirran L, Thomas R, Mowatt G, Fraser C, Bero L, Grilli R, Harvey E, Oxman A, O'Brien MA (2001) Changing provider behavior: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions. Med Care 39(8 Suppl 2):II2–I45PubMed
Metadata
Title
Integrating referral to community-based cancer information and support services in a hospital setting
Authors
David J. T. Marco
Anna G. Boltong
Adrian Dabscheck
Georgina Akers
Michelle Pryce
Victoria M. White
Publication date
01-03-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-3890-6

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

Supportive Care in Cancer 3/2018 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine