Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 5/2017

01-05-2017 | Original Article

Associations between dyadic coping and supportive care needs: findings from a study with hematologic cancer patients and their partners

Authors: Gregor Weißflog, Klaus Hönig, Harald Gündel, Dirk Lang, Dietger Niederwieser, Hartmut Döhner, Martin Vogelhuber, Anja Mehnert, Jochen Ernst

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 5/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The way couples mutually cope with hematologic cancer is likely to influence their levels of supportive care needs (SCN). Therefore, this study evaluated the levels of dyadic coping (DC) and SCN and the concurrent associations between both variables.

Methods

Three hundred thirty patients with a hematologic malignancy (63% male) and their partners completed the dyadic coping inventory (DCI) and the supportive care needs survey (SCNS-SF-34-G). The levels of dyadic coping (DC) and supportive care needs (SCN) were compared with representative validation samples. Correlational analyses and actor-partner interdependence models (APIM) were calculated to estimate the association between DC and SCN.

Results

Partners’ stress communication of cancer patients (as part of DC) was decreased in contrast to that of a non-cancer sample. The perception of partners’ delegated DC was higher (both with a moderate effect size of g ≥ |0.50|). SCN of patients and partners were lower in the dimensions health system/information and physical problems/daily living in contrast to those of a cancer patients’ validation sample (both with a small effect of g ≥ |0.20|). Higher perceptions of partners’ negative DC were associated with higher SCN for both patients and partners. The same was true for patients’ own stress communication and SCN, but only for the patients. Sociodemographic and illness-related factors were only partially related with the SCN of patients and partners.

Conclusions

In order to diminish SCN of patients and partners, a possible way is to strengthen the quality of the dyadic relation. Due to its associations with elevated SCN, stress communication and negative dyadic coping behaviours may be useful targets for psychosocial interventions.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Aizer AA, Chen MH, McCarthy EP, Mendu ML, Koo S, Wilhite TJ, Graham PL, Choueiri TK, Hoffman KE, Martin NE, JC H, Nguyen PL (2013) Marital status and survival in patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 31:3869–3876CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Aizer AA, Chen MH, McCarthy EP, Mendu ML, Koo S, Wilhite TJ, Graham PL, Choueiri TK, Hoffman KE, Martin NE, JC H, Nguyen PL (2013) Marital status and survival in patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 31:3869–3876CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Kayser K, Watson LE, Andrade JT (2007) Cancer as a “we-disease”: examining the process of coping from a relational perspective. Families, Systems & Health 25:404–418CrossRef Kayser K, Watson LE, Andrade JT (2007) Cancer as a “we-disease”: examining the process of coping from a relational perspective. Families, Systems & Health 25:404–418CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Regan TW, Lambert SD, Kelly B, Falconier M, Kissane D, Levesque JV (2015) Couples coping with cancer: exploration of theoretical frameworks from dyadic studies. Psychooncology 24:1605–1617CrossRefPubMed Regan TW, Lambert SD, Kelly B, Falconier M, Kissane D, Levesque JV (2015) Couples coping with cancer: exploration of theoretical frameworks from dyadic studies. Psychooncology 24:1605–1617CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Bodenmann G (2000) Stress und Coping bei Paaren. Hogrefe, Göttingen Bodenmann G (2000) Stress und Coping bei Paaren. Hogrefe, Göttingen
7.
go back to reference Rottmann N, Hansen DG, Larsen PV, Nicolaisen A, Flyger H, Johansen C, Hagedoorn M (2015) Dyadic coping within couples dealing with breast cancer: a longitudinal, population-based study. Health Psychol 34:486–495CrossRefPubMed Rottmann N, Hansen DG, Larsen PV, Nicolaisen A, Flyger H, Johansen C, Hagedoorn M (2015) Dyadic coping within couples dealing with breast cancer: a longitudinal, population-based study. Health Psychol 34:486–495CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Regan TW, Lambert SD, Kelly B, McElduff P, Girgis A, Kayser K, Turner J (2014) Cross-sectional relationships between dyadic coping and anxiety, depression, and relationship satisfaction for patients with prostate cancer and their spouses. Patient Educ Couns 96:120–127CrossRefPubMed Regan TW, Lambert SD, Kelly B, McElduff P, Girgis A, Kayser K, Turner J (2014) Cross-sectional relationships between dyadic coping and anxiety, depression, and relationship satisfaction for patients with prostate cancer and their spouses. Patient Educ Couns 96:120–127CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Hall A, Lynagh M, Bryant J, Sanson-Fisher R (2013) Supportive care needs of hematological cancer survivors: a critical review of the literature. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 88:102–116CrossRefPubMed Hall A, Lynagh M, Bryant J, Sanson-Fisher R (2013) Supportive care needs of hematological cancer survivors: a critical review of the literature. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 88:102–116CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Swash B, Hulbert-Williams N, Bramwell R (2014) Unmet psychosocial needs in haematological cancer: a systematic review. Support Care Cancer 22:1131–1141CrossRefPubMed Swash B, Hulbert-Williams N, Bramwell R (2014) Unmet psychosocial needs in haematological cancer: a systematic review. Support Care Cancer 22:1131–1141CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Girgis A, Lambert SD, McElduff P, Bonevski B, Lecathelinais C, Boyes A, Stacey F (2013) Some things change, some things stay the same: a longitudinal analysis of cancer caregivers’ unmet supportive care needs. Psychooncology 22:1557–1564CrossRefPubMed Girgis A, Lambert SD, McElduff P, Bonevski B, Lecathelinais C, Boyes A, Stacey F (2013) Some things change, some things stay the same: a longitudinal analysis of cancer caregivers’ unmet supportive care needs. Psychooncology 22:1557–1564CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Boyes AW, Clinton-McHarg T, Waller AE, Steele A, D’Este CA, Sanson-Fisher RW (2015) Prevalence and correlates of the unmet supportive care needs of individuals diagnosed with a haematological malignancy. Acta Oncol 54:507–514CrossRefPubMed Boyes AW, Clinton-McHarg T, Waller AE, Steele A, D’Este CA, Sanson-Fisher RW (2015) Prevalence and correlates of the unmet supportive care needs of individuals diagnosed with a haematological malignancy. Acta Oncol 54:507–514CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Sklenarova H, Krumpelmann A, Haun MW, Friederich HC, Huber J, Thomas M, Winkler EC, Herzog W, Hartmann M (2015) When do we need to care about the caregiver? Supportive care needs, anxiety, and depression among informal caregivers of patients with cancer and cancer survivors. Cancer 121:1513–1519CrossRefPubMed Sklenarova H, Krumpelmann A, Haun MW, Friederich HC, Huber J, Thomas M, Winkler EC, Herzog W, Hartmann M (2015) When do we need to care about the caregiver? Supportive care needs, anxiety, and depression among informal caregivers of patients with cancer and cancer survivors. Cancer 121:1513–1519CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Hodgkinson K, Butow P, Hunt GE, Wyse R, Hobbs KM, Wain G (2007) Life after cancer: couples’ and partners’ psychological adjustment and supportive care needs. Support Care Cancer 15:405–415CrossRefPubMed Hodgkinson K, Butow P, Hunt GE, Wyse R, Hobbs KM, Wain G (2007) Life after cancer: couples’ and partners’ psychological adjustment and supportive care needs. Support Care Cancer 15:405–415CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Bodenmann G (2008) Dyadisches coping Inventar. Huber, Bern Bodenmann G (2008) Dyadisches coping Inventar. Huber, Bern
16.
go back to reference Levesque C, Lafontaine M-F, Caron A, Fitzpatrick J (2014) Validation of the English version of the dyadic coping inventory. Meas Eval Couns Dev 47:215–225CrossRef Levesque C, Lafontaine M-F, Caron A, Fitzpatrick J (2014) Validation of the English version of the dyadic coping inventory. Meas Eval Couns Dev 47:215–225CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Randall AK, Hilpert P, Jimenez-Arista LE, Walsh KJ, Bodenmann G (2016) Dyadic coping in the US: psychometric properties and validity for use of the English version of the dyadic coping inventory. Curr Psychol 570–582 Randall AK, Hilpert P, Jimenez-Arista LE, Walsh KJ, Bodenmann G (2016) Dyadic coping in the US: psychometric properties and validity for use of the English version of the dyadic coping inventory. Curr Psychol 570–582
18.
go back to reference Lehmann C, Koch U, Mehnert A (2012) Psychometric properties of the German version of the short-form supportive care needs survey questionnaire (SCNS-SF34-G). Support Care Cancer 20:2415–2424CrossRefPubMed Lehmann C, Koch U, Mehnert A (2012) Psychometric properties of the German version of the short-form supportive care needs survey questionnaire (SCNS-SF34-G). Support Care Cancer 20:2415–2424CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Boyes A, Girgis A, Lecathelinais C (2009) Brief assessment of adult cancer patients’ perceived needs: development and validation of the 34-item supportive care needs survey (SCNS-SF34). J Eval Clin Pract 15:602–606CrossRefPubMed Boyes A, Girgis A, Lecathelinais C (2009) Brief assessment of adult cancer patients’ perceived needs: development and validation of the 34-item supportive care needs survey (SCNS-SF34). J Eval Clin Pract 15:602–606CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR (2009) Introduction to meta-analysis. Wiley, ChichesterCrossRef Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR (2009) Introduction to meta-analysis. Wiley, ChichesterCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Langer SL, Brown JD, Syrjala KL (2009) Intrapersonal and interpersonal consequences of protective buffering among cancer patients and caregivers. Cancer 115:4311–4325CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Langer SL, Brown JD, Syrjala KL (2009) Intrapersonal and interpersonal consequences of protective buffering among cancer patients and caregivers. Cancer 115:4311–4325CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Zimmermann T, Heinrichs N, Scott J (2006) CanCOPE ‘step by step’: the effectiveness of a couple-based intervention program for women with breast or gynecological cancer. Verhaltenstherapie 16:247–255CrossRef Zimmermann T, Heinrichs N, Scott J (2006) CanCOPE ‘step by step’: the effectiveness of a couple-based intervention program for women with breast or gynecological cancer. Verhaltenstherapie 16:247–255CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Manne S, Kashy DA, Siegel S, Myers Virtue S, Heckman C, Ryan D (2014) Unsupportive partner behaviors, social-cognitive processing, and psychological outcomes in couples coping with early stage breast cancer. J Fam Psychol 28:214–224CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Manne S, Kashy DA, Siegel S, Myers Virtue S, Heckman C, Ryan D (2014) Unsupportive partner behaviors, social-cognitive processing, and psychological outcomes in couples coping with early stage breast cancer. J Fam Psychol 28:214–224CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Bartley EJ, Edmond SN, Wren AA, Somers TJ, Teo I, Zhou S, Rowe KA, Abernethy AP, Keefe FJ, Shelby RA (2014) Holding back moderates the association between health symptoms and social well-being in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. J Pain Symptom Manag 48:374–384CrossRef Bartley EJ, Edmond SN, Wren AA, Somers TJ, Teo I, Zhou S, Rowe KA, Abernethy AP, Keefe FJ, Shelby RA (2014) Holding back moderates the association between health symptoms and social well-being in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. J Pain Symptom Manag 48:374–384CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Dagan M, Hagedoorn M (2014) Response rates in studies of couples coping with cancer: a systematic review. Health Psychol 33:845–852CrossRefPubMed Dagan M, Hagedoorn M (2014) Response rates in studies of couples coping with cancer: a systematic review. Health Psychol 33:845–852CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Terp H, Rottmann N, Larsen PV, Hagedoorn M, Flyger H, Kroman N, Johansen C, Dalton S, Hansen DG (2015) Participation in questionnaire studies among couples affected by breast cancer. Support Care Cancer 23:1907–1916CrossRefPubMed Terp H, Rottmann N, Larsen PV, Hagedoorn M, Flyger H, Kroman N, Johansen C, Dalton S, Hansen DG (2015) Participation in questionnaire studies among couples affected by breast cancer. Support Care Cancer 23:1907–1916CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Revenson TA, Griva K, Luszczynska A, Morrison V, Panagopoulou E, Vilchinsky N, Hagedoorn M (2016) Caregiving as a dyadic process. In: Revenson TA et al (eds) Caregiving in the illness context. Palgrave Macmillan UK, London, pp. 25–37 Revenson TA, Griva K, Luszczynska A, Morrison V, Panagopoulou E, Vilchinsky N, Hagedoorn M (2016) Caregiving as a dyadic process. In: Revenson TA et al (eds) Caregiving in the illness context. Palgrave Macmillan UK, London, pp. 25–37
28.
go back to reference Li Q, Loke AY (2014) A systematic review of spousal couple-based intervention studies for couples coping with cancer: direction for the development of interventions. Psychooncology 23:731–739CrossRefPubMed Li Q, Loke AY (2014) A systematic review of spousal couple-based intervention studies for couples coping with cancer: direction for the development of interventions. Psychooncology 23:731–739CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Taylor K, Chan RJ, Monterosso L (2015) Models of survivorship care provision in adult patients with haematological cancer: an integrative literature review. Support Care Cancer 23:1447–1458CrossRefPubMed Taylor K, Chan RJ, Monterosso L (2015) Models of survivorship care provision in adult patients with haematological cancer: an integrative literature review. Support Care Cancer 23:1447–1458CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Landis M, Bodenmann G, Bradbury TN, Brandstätter V, Peter-Wight M, Backes S, Sutter-Stickel D, Nussbeck FW (2014) Commitment and dyadic coping in long-term relationships. GeroPsych: The Journal of Gerontopsychology and Geriatric Psychiatry 27:139–149CrossRef Landis M, Bodenmann G, Bradbury TN, Brandstätter V, Peter-Wight M, Backes S, Sutter-Stickel D, Nussbeck FW (2014) Commitment and dyadic coping in long-term relationships. GeroPsych: The Journal of Gerontopsychology and Geriatric Psychiatry 27:139–149CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Nicholls W, Hulbert-Williams N, Bramwell R (2014) The role of relationship attachment in psychological adjustment to cancer in patients and caregivers: a systematic review of the literature. Psychooncology 23:1083–1095CrossRefPubMed Nicholls W, Hulbert-Williams N, Bramwell R (2014) The role of relationship attachment in psychological adjustment to cancer in patients and caregivers: a systematic review of the literature. Psychooncology 23:1083–1095CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Badr H, Acitelli LK (2017) Re-thinking dyadic coping in the context of chronic illness. Current Opinion in Psychology 13:44–48CrossRef Badr H, Acitelli LK (2017) Re-thinking dyadic coping in the context of chronic illness. Current Opinion in Psychology 13:44–48CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Berg CA, Upchurch R (2007) A developmental-contextual model of couples coping with chronic illness across the adult life span. Psychol Bull 133:920–954CrossRefPubMed Berg CA, Upchurch R (2007) A developmental-contextual model of couples coping with chronic illness across the adult life span. Psychol Bull 133:920–954CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Associations between dyadic coping and supportive care needs: findings from a study with hematologic cancer patients and their partners
Authors
Gregor Weißflog
Klaus Hönig
Harald Gündel
Dirk Lang
Dietger Niederwieser
Hartmut Döhner
Martin Vogelhuber
Anja Mehnert
Jochen Ernst
Publication date
01-05-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 5/2017
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-016-3541-3

Other articles of this Issue 5/2017

Supportive Care in Cancer 5/2017 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine