Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 1/2017

01-01-2017 | Original Article

Treating an oft-unrecognized and troublesome entity: using gastric electrical stimulation to reduce symptoms of malignancy-associated gastroparesis

Authors: Hamza Shah, Gregg Wendorf, Shifat Ahmed, Lindsay McElmurray, Chris Lahr, Michael Hughes, Brian Beauerle, Ed Miller, Abigail Stocker, Thomas L. Abell

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Malignancy-associated gastroparesis (MAG) is a cause of morbidity in cancer patients but therapies are lacking. Gastric electrical stimulation (GES) is a novel treatment for MAG. Here, we describe 19 patients with MAG who underwent temporary GES placement.

Patients and methods

Nineteen patients (6 males, 13 females) with various malignancies were reviewed for symptom scores and physiologic measures at baseline and after temporary GES placement. Symptoms were scored by three variables: nausea (N), vomiting (V), and GI total symptom score (TSS). Physiologic profiles were measured by solid and liquid phase gastric emptying scans (GET) at 1, 2, and 4 h and cutaneous electrogastrogram (EGG) and mucosal electrogram (EG) frequencies. Symptoms were measured for 5 days after temporary endoscopic GES placement, and measures were repeated post GES placement.

Results

Baseline GET results displayed delayed gastric emptying in 16 of 19 patients (mean solid retention 21.7 % at 4 h, normal <10 %; mean liquid retention 10.4 % at 4 h, normal <5 %). Cutaneous EGG (mean frequency 5.5 cpm) and EG (mean proximal frequency 5.1 cpm; mean distal frequency 5.1 cpm) showed evidence of neuromuscular dysfunction (normal 2.5–3.3 cpm). Symptom scores in N, V, and TSS showed statistically significant reduction after GES placement.

Conclusion

A small sample of patients with MAG and receiving temporary GES experienced symptom improvement, with less change on gastric emptying time or gastric electrical amplitude or frequency. GES may provide a potential therapeutic option for symptomatic management of MAG and evaluation of these MAG patients after permanent GES placement is ongoing. Prospective studies of MAG using temporary and permanent GES may be warranted.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Shafi MA, Nasser E, Javle MM (2015) Malignancy-associated gastroparesis: pathophysiology and management. In: Savarese D (ed) UpToDate. MA, Waltham Shafi MA, Nasser E, Javle MM (2015) Malignancy-associated gastroparesis: pathophysiology and management. In: Savarese D (ed) UpToDate. MA, Waltham
2.
go back to reference Pasricha PJ (2007) The riddle, mystery, and enigma of gastroparesis. J Support Oncol 5:368–370PubMed Pasricha PJ (2007) The riddle, mystery, and enigma of gastroparesis. J Support Oncol 5:368–370PubMed
3.
go back to reference Shah H, Kedar A, McElmurray L, et al. (2014) Gastric stimulator, a novel approach in treating malignancy associated gastroparesis. Gastroenterology 146:S695–S696CrossRef Shah H, Kedar A, McElmurray L, et al. (2014) Gastric stimulator, a novel approach in treating malignancy associated gastroparesis. Gastroenterology 146:S695–S696CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Donthireddy KR, Ailawadhi S, Nasser E, et al. (2007) Malignant gastroparesis: pathogenesis and management of an underrecognized disorder. J Support Oncol 5:355–363PubMed Donthireddy KR, Ailawadhi S, Nasser E, et al. (2007) Malignant gastroparesis: pathogenesis and management of an underrecognized disorder. J Support Oncol 5:355–363PubMed
5.
go back to reference Abell T, McCallum R, Hocking M, et al. (2003) Gastric electrical stimulation for medically refractory gastroparesis. Gastroenterology 125:421–428CrossRefPubMed Abell T, McCallum R, Hocking M, et al. (2003) Gastric electrical stimulation for medically refractory gastroparesis. Gastroenterology 125:421–428CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Wood GJ, Shega JW, Lynch B, et al. (2007) Management of intractable nausea and vomiting in patients at the end of life: “I was feeling nauseous all of the time... nothing was working”. JAMA 298:1196–1207CrossRefPubMed Wood GJ, Shega JW, Lynch B, et al. (2007) Management of intractable nausea and vomiting in patients at the end of life: “I was feeling nauseous all of the time... nothing was working”. JAMA 298:1196–1207CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Camilleri M, Parkman HP, Shafi MA, et al. (2013) Clinical guideline: management of gastroparesis. Am J Gastroenterol 108:18–37 quiz 38CrossRefPubMed Camilleri M, Parkman HP, Shafi MA, et al. (2013) Clinical guideline: management of gastroparesis. Am J Gastroenterol 108:18–37 quiz 38CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Abell TL, Johnson WD, Kedar A, et al. (2011) A double-masked, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of temporary endoscopic mucosal gastric electrical stimulation for gastroparesis. Gastrointest Endosc 74:496–503 e493CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Abell TL, Johnson WD, Kedar A, et al. (2011) A double-masked, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of temporary endoscopic mucosal gastric electrical stimulation for gastroparesis. Gastrointest Endosc 74:496–503 e493CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Tougas G, Eaker EY, Abell TL, et al. (2000) Assessment of gastric emptying using a low fat meal: establishment of international control values. Am J Gastroenterol 95:1456–1462CrossRefPubMed Tougas G, Eaker EY, Abell TL, et al. (2000) Assessment of gastric emptying using a low fat meal: establishment of international control values. Am J Gastroenterol 95:1456–1462CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Guo JP, Maurer AH, Fisher RS, et al. (2001) Extending gastric emptying scintigraphy from two to four hours detects more patients with gastroparesis. Dig Dis Sci 46:24–29CrossRefPubMed Guo JP, Maurer AH, Fisher RS, et al. (2001) Extending gastric emptying scintigraphy from two to four hours detects more patients with gastroparesis. Dig Dis Sci 46:24–29CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Hasler WL (2009) Methods of gastric electrical stimulation and pacing: a review of their benefits and mechanisms of action in gastroparesis and obesity. Neurogastroenterol Motil 21:229–243CrossRefPubMed Hasler WL (2009) Methods of gastric electrical stimulation and pacing: a review of their benefits and mechanisms of action in gastroparesis and obesity. Neurogastroenterol Motil 21:229–243CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Pasricha PJ, Colvin R, Yates K, et al. (2011) Characteristics of patients with chronic unexplained nausea and vomiting and normal gastric emptying. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 9(7):567–576 e1-4CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pasricha PJ, Colvin R, Yates K, et al. (2011) Characteristics of patients with chronic unexplained nausea and vomiting and normal gastric emptying. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 9(7):567–576 e1-4CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Treating an oft-unrecognized and troublesome entity: using gastric electrical stimulation to reduce symptoms of malignancy-associated gastroparesis
Authors
Hamza Shah
Gregg Wendorf
Shifat Ahmed
Lindsay McElmurray
Chris Lahr
Michael Hughes
Brian Beauerle
Ed Miller
Abigail Stocker
Thomas L. Abell
Publication date
01-01-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 1/2017
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-016-3375-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Supportive Care in Cancer 1/2017 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine