Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 5/2016

01-05-2016 | Original Article

Polypharmacy in the terminal stage of cancer

Authors: Katharina A. Kierner, Dietmar Weixler, Eva K. Masel, Verena Gartner, Herbert H. Watzke

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 5/2016

Login to get access

Abstracts

Purpose

This study aims to determine the numbers of patients with advanced cancer receiving polypharmacy at the end of their lives and analyze differences in drug prescription at a general oncology ward and a dedicated palliative care ward.

Methods

A retrospective single-center cohort study at a university hospital with a large cancer center was conducted. The charts of 100 patients who had died because of advanced cancer were reviewed; data concerning sociodemographic variables and medications were collected at four predefined time points (9, 6, 3, 0 days before death).

Results

Nine days before death, polypharmacy was registered in 95 % of patients; they had prescriptions for 11 (9–13) different medications per day (median, IQR). Although this number dropped significantly, on the last day as many as 61 % of the patients were still taking more than 4 drugs (median 6.5, IQR 4–9). No significant difference was noted between the oncology ward and the palliative care ward. Polypharmacy was largely dependent on the patients’ ECOG performance status as well as the type of ward, the number of days before death, and age. It was not influenced by gender, the duration of hospital stays, and the devices facilitating drug administration. The medications fulfilled the requirements of palliative care in the majority of patients; 90 % received treatment for pain and anxiety. Patients treated at the palliative ward received more opioids and psychoactive drugs while those at the oncology ward received more anti-cancer drugs and fluids.

Conclusions

Polypharmacy still is a problem in the large majority of patients with terminal cancer. Further studies should be focused on the patients’ quality of life, drug interactions, and adverse events.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kaufman DW, Kelly JP, Rosenberg L et al (2002) Recent patterns of medication use in the ambulatory adult population of the United States: the Slone survey. JAMA 287:337–344CrossRefPubMed Kaufman DW, Kelly JP, Rosenberg L et al (2002) Recent patterns of medication use in the ambulatory adult population of the United States: the Slone survey. JAMA 287:337–344CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Merlis S, Sheppard C, Collins L, Fiorentino D (1970) Polypharmacy in psychiatry: patterns of differential treatment. Am J Psychiatry 126:1647–1651CrossRefPubMed Merlis S, Sheppard C, Collins L, Fiorentino D (1970) Polypharmacy in psychiatry: patterns of differential treatment. Am J Psychiatry 126:1647–1651CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Cullen SC (1957) Polypharmacy in anesthesia. Surg Gynecol Obstet 104:113–114PubMed Cullen SC (1957) Polypharmacy in anesthesia. Surg Gynecol Obstet 104:113–114PubMed
4.
go back to reference Grant-Whyte H (1961) Irrational polypharmacy in anaesthesia. S Afr Med J 35:1016–1021PubMed Grant-Whyte H (1961) Irrational polypharmacy in anaesthesia. S Afr Med J 35:1016–1021PubMed
5.
go back to reference (1966) Patients and polypharmacy. Can Med Assoc J 94:456. (1966) Patients and polypharmacy. Can Med Assoc J 94:456.
6.
go back to reference Veehof L, Stewart R, Haaijer-Ruskamp F, Jong BM (2000) The development of polypharmacy. A longitudinal study. Fam Pract 17:261–267CrossRefPubMed Veehof L, Stewart R, Haaijer-Ruskamp F, Jong BM (2000) The development of polypharmacy. A longitudinal study. Fam Pract 17:261–267CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Jyrkkä J, Enlund H, Lavikainen P et al (2011) Association of polypharmacy with nutritional status, functional ability and cognitive capacity over a three-year period in an elderly population. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 20:514–522. doi:10.1002/pds.2116 CrossRefPubMed Jyrkkä J, Enlund H, Lavikainen P et al (2011) Association of polypharmacy with nutritional status, functional ability and cognitive capacity over a three-year period in an elderly population. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 20:514–522. doi:10.​1002/​pds.​2116 CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Garfinkel D, Zur-Gil S, Ben-Israel J (2007) The war against polypharmacy: a new cost-effective geriatric-palliative approach for improving drug therapy in disabled elderly people. Isr Med Assoc J 9:430–434PubMed Garfinkel D, Zur-Gil S, Ben-Israel J (2007) The war against polypharmacy: a new cost-effective geriatric-palliative approach for improving drug therapy in disabled elderly people. Isr Med Assoc J 9:430–434PubMed
20.
22.
go back to reference Nauck F, Ostgathe C, Klaschik E et al (2004) Drugs in palliative care: results from a representative survey in Germany. Palliat Med 18:100–107CrossRefPubMed Nauck F, Ostgathe C, Klaschik E et al (2004) Drugs in palliative care: results from a representative survey in Germany. Palliat Med 18:100–107CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Polypharmacy in the terminal stage of cancer
Authors
Katharina A. Kierner
Dietmar Weixler
Eva K. Masel
Verena Gartner
Herbert H. Watzke
Publication date
01-05-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 5/2016
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-3007-z

Other articles of this Issue 5/2016

Supportive Care in Cancer 5/2016 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine