Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 4/2016

01-04-2016 | Original Article

Measuring the impact of guideline-based antiemetic therapy on nausea and vomiting control in breast cancer patients with multiple risk factors

Authors: George Dranitsaris, Sasha Mazzarello, Stephanie Smith, Lisa Vandermeer, Nathaniel Bouganim, Mark Clemons

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 4/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The objective of this exploratory analysis was to determine if individual patient risk factors could be used to optimize chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV).

Methods

Through validated risk prediction models which quantify patient risk factors, 152 patients with early-stage breast cancer scheduled to received adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy were categorized as being at low (level 0) or high-risk (level 1) for CINV. Prior to the first cycle of chemotherapy, low-risk patients received ondansetron and dexamethasone, while high-risk level 1 patients also received aprepitant. For subsequent cycles, patients who experienced CINV had their antiemetics changed in a stepwise manner to level 2 (extended-duration dexamethasone) or level 3 (extended-duration dexamethasone and low-dose olanzapine).

Results

The study enrolled 152 patients who received 484 cycles of chemotherapy. Forty patient cycles were classified as low risk (level 0) compared to 201, 162 and 81 that were classified as high-risk levels 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Complete control of acute and delayed vomiting was comparable and was achieved in over 85 % of patients across all risk levels (p = 0.56 and p = 0.99). In contrast, complete control of acute and delayed nausea was reduced in risk levels 1 to 3 compared to level 0 (acute = 51.2, 58.0, 45.7 vs. 70.0 %; p = 0.013)—(delayed = 32.8, 45.7, 34.6 vs. 62.5 %; p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Despite the addition of aprepitant, extended-duration dexamethasone and olanzapine, patients at high risk for CINV due to personal risk factors failed to achieve good nausea control.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hesketh P (1994) Treatment of chemotherapy-induced emesis in the 1990s: impact of the 5-HT3 receptor antagonists. Support Care Cancer 2:286–292CrossRefPubMed Hesketh P (1994) Treatment of chemotherapy-induced emesis in the 1990s: impact of the 5-HT3 receptor antagonists. Support Care Cancer 2:286–292CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Schmoll HJ, Aapro MS, Poli-Bigelli S, et al. (2006) Comparison of an aprepitant regimen with a multiple-day ondansetron regimen, both with dexamethasone, for anti-emetic efficacy in high-dose cisplatin treatment. Ann Oncol 7:1000–1006CrossRef Schmoll HJ, Aapro MS, Poli-Bigelli S, et al. (2006) Comparison of an aprepitant regimen with a multiple-day ondansetron regimen, both with dexamethasone, for anti-emetic efficacy in high-dose cisplatin treatment. Ann Oncol 7:1000–1006CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hocking CM, Kichenadasse G (2014) Olanzapine for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a systematic review. Support Care Cancer 22:1143–1151CrossRefPubMed Hocking CM, Kichenadasse G (2014) Olanzapine for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a systematic review. Support Care Cancer 22:1143–1151CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Navari RM, Nagy CK, Gray SE (2013) The use of olanzapine versus metoclopramide for the treatment of breakthrough chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer 21:1655–1663CrossRefPubMed Navari RM, Nagy CK, Gray SE (2013) The use of olanzapine versus metoclopramide for the treatment of breakthrough chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer 21:1655–1663CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Basch E, Prestrud AA, Hesketh PJ, et al. (2011) Antiemetics: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol 29:4189–4198CrossRefPubMed Basch E, Prestrud AA, Hesketh PJ, et al. (2011) Antiemetics: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol 29:4189–4198CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Herrstedt J, Roila F, Guidelines Working Group ESMO (2009) Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: ESMO clinical recommendations for prophylaxis. Ann Oncol 20(Suppl 4):156–158PubMed Herrstedt J, Roila F, Guidelines Working Group ESMO (2009) Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: ESMO clinical recommendations for prophylaxis. Ann Oncol 20(Suppl 4):156–158PubMed
7.
go back to reference Dranitsaris G, Joy A, Young S, et al. (2009) Identifying patients at high-risk for nausea and vomiting after chemotherapy: the development of a practical prediction tool. J Supp Oncol 7:W1–W8 Dranitsaris G, Joy A, Young S, et al. (2009) Identifying patients at high-risk for nausea and vomiting after chemotherapy: the development of a practical prediction tool. J Supp Oncol 7:W1–W8
8.
go back to reference Petrella T, Clemons M, Joy A, et al. (2009) Identifying patients at high risk for nausea and vomiting after chemotherapy: the development of a practical validated prediction tool. J Supp Oncol:W9–W16 Petrella T, Clemons M, Joy A, et al. (2009) Identifying patients at high risk for nausea and vomiting after chemotherapy: the development of a practical validated prediction tool. J Supp Oncol:W9–W16
9.
go back to reference Aapro MS, Bohlius J, Cameron DA, et al. (2011) 2010 update of EORTC guidelines for the use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor to reduce the incidence ofchemotherapy induced febrile neutropenia in adult patients with lymphoproliferative disorders and solid tumours. Eur J Cancer 47:8–32CrossRefPubMed Aapro MS, Bohlius J, Cameron DA, et al. (2011) 2010 update of EORTC guidelines for the use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor to reduce the incidence ofchemotherapy induced febrile neutropenia in adult patients with lymphoproliferative disorders and solid tumours. Eur J Cancer 47:8–32CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Smith TJ, Khatcheressian J, Lyman GH, et al. (2006) 2006 update of recommendations for the use of white blood cell growth factors: an evidence-based clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol 24:3187–3205CrossRefPubMed Smith TJ, Khatcheressian J, Lyman GH, et al. (2006) 2006 update of recommendations for the use of white blood cell growth factors: an evidence-based clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol 24:3187–3205CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Bouganim N, Dranitsaris G, Hopkins S, et al. (2012) Prospective validation of risk prediction indices for acute and delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Curr Oncol 19:e414–e421PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Bouganim N, Dranitsaris G, Hopkins S, et al. (2012) Prospective validation of risk prediction indices for acute and delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Curr Oncol 19:e414–e421PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Dranitsaris G, Bouganim N, Milano C, et al. (2013) Prospective validation of a prediction tool for identifying patients at high-risk for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. J Support Oncol 11:14–21PubMed Dranitsaris G, Bouganim N, Milano C, et al. (2013) Prospective validation of a prediction tool for identifying patients at high-risk for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. J Support Oncol 11:14–21PubMed
13.
go back to reference Clemons M, Bouganim N, Smith S, et al. (2015) A randomized trial comparing risk model guided antiemetic prophylaxis to physician’s choice in patients receiving chemotherapy for early stage breast cancer. JAMA Oncol(in press) Clemons M, Bouganim N, Smith S, et al. (2015) A randomized trial comparing risk model guided antiemetic prophylaxis to physician’s choice in patients receiving chemotherapy for early stage breast cancer. JAMA Oncol(in press)
14.
go back to reference Decker GM, DeMeyer ES, Kisko DL (2006) Measuring the maintenance of daily life activities using the functional living index-emesis (FLIE) in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. J Support Oncol 4(35–41):52 Decker GM, DeMeyer ES, Kisko DL (2006) Measuring the maintenance of daily life activities using the functional living index-emesis (FLIE) in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. J Support Oncol 4(35–41):52
15.
go back to reference Martin AR, Pearson JD, Cai B, et al. (2003) Assessing the impact of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting on patients’ daily lives: a modified version of the Functional Living Index-Emesis (FLIE) with 5-day recall. Support Care Cancer 11:522–527CrossRefPubMed Martin AR, Pearson JD, Cai B, et al. (2003) Assessing the impact of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting on patients’ daily lives: a modified version of the Functional Living Index-Emesis (FLIE) with 5-day recall. Support Care Cancer 11:522–527CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Saito H, Yoshizawa H, Yoshimori K, et al. (2013) Efficacy and safety of single-dose fosaprepitant in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving high-dose cisplatin: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Ann Oncol 24:1067–1073PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Saito H, Yoshizawa H, Yoshimori K, et al. (2013) Efficacy and safety of single-dose fosaprepitant in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving high-dose cisplatin: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Ann Oncol 24:1067–1073PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Grunberg S, Chua D, Maru A, et al. (2011) Single-dose fosaprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting associated with cisplatin therapy: randomized, double-blind study protocol–EASE. J Clin Oncol 29:1495–1501CrossRefPubMed Grunberg S, Chua D, Maru A, et al. (2011) Single-dose fosaprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting associated with cisplatin therapy: randomized, double-blind study protocol–EASE. J Clin Oncol 29:1495–1501CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Hesketh PJ, Rossi G, Rizzi G, et al. (2014) Efficacy and safety of NEPA, an oral combination of netupitant and palonosetron, for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting following highly emetogenic chemotherapy: a randomized dose-ranging pivotal study. Ann Oncol 25:1340–1346PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Hesketh PJ, Rossi G, Rizzi G, et al. (2014) Efficacy and safety of NEPA, an oral combination of netupitant and palonosetron, for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting following highly emetogenic chemotherapy: a randomized dose-ranging pivotal study. Ann Oncol 25:1340–1346PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Tamura K, Aiba K, Saeki T, Nakanishi Y, et al. (2015). Testing the effectiveness of antiemetic guidelines: results of a prospective registry by the CINV Study Group of Japan. Int J Clin Oncol Feb 15. Tamura K, Aiba K, Saeki T, Nakanishi Y, et al. (2015). Testing the effectiveness of antiemetic guidelines: results of a prospective registry by the CINV Study Group of Japan. Int J Clin Oncol Feb 15.
Metadata
Title
Measuring the impact of guideline-based antiemetic therapy on nausea and vomiting control in breast cancer patients with multiple risk factors
Authors
George Dranitsaris
Sasha Mazzarello
Stephanie Smith
Lisa Vandermeer
Nathaniel Bouganim
Mark Clemons
Publication date
01-04-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 4/2016
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-2944-x

Other articles of this Issue 4/2016

Supportive Care in Cancer 4/2016 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine