Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 6/2015

01-06-2015 | Original Article

Early referral makes the decision-making about fertility preservation easier: a pilot survey study of young female cancer survivors

Authors: Jayeon Kim, Jennifer E. Mersereau

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 6/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of the study was to investigate the association between patients’ decision-making about fertility preservation (FP) and time between cancer diagnosis and FP consultation in young female cancer survivors.

Methods

This is a pilot survey study of women aged 18–43 years seen for FP consultation between April 2009 and December 2010.

Results

Among 52 women who completed the survey, 15 (29 %) had their FP consultation more than 2 weeks after their cancer diagnosis (late referral group) and 37 (71 %) were within 2 weeks of their cancer diagnosis (early referral group). In univariate analysis, the only difference between the late referral and early referral groups was a higher decisional conflict scale (DCS) in late referral group (p = 0.04). In multivariable analysis, late referral group was more likely to have high DCS (>35) compared to early referral group (odds ratio 4.8, 95 % confidence interval 1.5, 21.6) after adjusting for age, center, and type of cancer.

Conclusion

Early referral to a fertility specialist can help patients make better decision about FP. This is the first study to suggest that early referral is important in patients’ decision-making process about FP treatment. Our finding supports the benefit of early referral in patients who are interested in FP which is consistent with prior studies about FP referral patterns.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bryson CA, Sykes DH, Traub AI (2000) In vitro fertilization: a long-term follow-up after treatment failure. Hum Fertil (Camb) 3(3):214–220CrossRef Bryson CA, Sykes DH, Traub AI (2000) In vitro fertilization: a long-term follow-up after treatment failure. Hum Fertil (Camb) 3(3):214–220CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Forman EJ, Anders CK, Behera MA (2010) A nationwide survey of oncologists regarding treatment-related infertility and fertility preservation in female cancer patients. Fertil Steril 94(5):1652–1656CrossRefPubMed Forman EJ, Anders CK, Behera MA (2010) A nationwide survey of oncologists regarding treatment-related infertility and fertility preservation in female cancer patients. Fertil Steril 94(5):1652–1656CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Leiblum SR, Aviv A, Hamer R (1998) Life after infertility treatment: a long-term investigation of marital and sexual function. Hum Reprod 13(12):3569–3574CrossRefPubMed Leiblum SR, Aviv A, Hamer R (1998) Life after infertility treatment: a long-term investigation of marital and sexual function. Hum Reprod 13(12):3569–3574CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Kim J, Oktay K, Gracia C, Lee S, Morse C, Mersereau JE (2012) Which patients pursue fertility preservation treatments? A multicenter analysis of the predictors of fertility preservation in women with breast cancer. Fertil Steril 97(3):671–676CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Kim J, Oktay K, Gracia C, Lee S, Morse C, Mersereau JE (2012) Which patients pursue fertility preservation treatments? A multicenter analysis of the predictors of fertility preservation in women with breast cancer. Fertil Steril 97(3):671–676CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
5.
go back to reference Lawrenz B, Jauckus J, Kupka MS, Strowitzki T, von Wolff M (2011) Fertility preservation in >1,000 patients: patient’s characteristics, spectrum, efficacy and risks of applied preservation techniques. Arch Gynecol Obstet 283(3):651–656CrossRefPubMed Lawrenz B, Jauckus J, Kupka MS, Strowitzki T, von Wolff M (2011) Fertility preservation in >1,000 patients: patient’s characteristics, spectrum, efficacy and risks of applied preservation techniques. Arch Gynecol Obstet 283(3):651–656CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Lee S, Ozkavukcu S, Heytens E, Moy F, Oktay K (2010) Value of early referral to fertility preservation in young women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 28(31):4683–4686CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Lee S, Ozkavukcu S, Heytens E, Moy F, Oktay K (2010) Value of early referral to fertility preservation in young women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 28(31):4683–4686CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
7.
go back to reference Loren AW, Mangu PB, Beck LN, Brennan L, Magdalinski AJ, Partridge AH et al (2013) Fertility preservation for patients with cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol 31(19):2500–2510CrossRefPubMed Loren AW, Mangu PB, Beck LN, Brennan L, Magdalinski AJ, Partridge AH et al (2013) Fertility preservation for patients with cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol 31(19):2500–2510CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Ethics Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine (2013) Fertility preservation and reproduction in patients facing gonadotoxic therapies: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 100(5):1224–1231CrossRef Ethics Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine (2013) Fertility preservation and reproduction in patients facing gonadotoxic therapies: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 100(5):1224–1231CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Stacey D, Legare F, Col NF, Bennett CL, Barry MJ, Eden KB et al.(2014) Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev1:CD001431 Stacey D, Legare F, Col NF, Bennett CL, Barry MJ, Eden KB et al.(2014) Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev1:CD001431
10.
go back to reference Hack TF, Pickles T, Ruether JD, Weir L, Bultz BD, Mackey J et al (2010) Predictors of distress and quality of life in patients undergoing cancer therapy: impact of treatment type and decisional role. Psychooncology 19(6):606–616CrossRefPubMed Hack TF, Pickles T, Ruether JD, Weir L, Bultz BD, Mackey J et al (2010) Predictors of distress and quality of life in patients undergoing cancer therapy: impact of treatment type and decisional role. Psychooncology 19(6):606–616CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Metcalfe KA, Poll A, O’Connor A, Gershman S, Armel S, Finch A et al (2007) Development and testing of a decision aid for breast cancer prevention for women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Clin Genet 72(3):208–217CrossRefPubMed Metcalfe KA, Poll A, O’Connor A, Gershman S, Armel S, Finch A et al (2007) Development and testing of a decision aid for breast cancer prevention for women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Clin Genet 72(3):208–217CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Gattellari M, Ward JE (2005) Men’s reactions to disclosed and undisclosed opportunistic PSA screening for prostate cancer. Med J Aust 182(8):386–389PubMed Gattellari M, Ward JE (2005) Men’s reactions to disclosed and undisclosed opportunistic PSA screening for prostate cancer. Med J Aust 182(8):386–389PubMed
13.
go back to reference Brehaut JC, O’Connor AM, Wood TJ, Hack TF, Siminoff L, Gordon E et al (2003) Validation of a decision regret scale. Med Decis Making 23(4):281–292CrossRefPubMed Brehaut JC, O’Connor AM, Wood TJ, Hack TF, Siminoff L, Gordon E et al (2003) Validation of a decision regret scale. Med Decis Making 23(4):281–292CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Balthazar U, Deal AM, Fritz MA, Kondapalli LA, Kim JY, Mersereau JE (2012) The current fertility preservation consultation model: are we adequately informing cancer patients of their options? Hum Reprod 27(8):2413–2419CrossRefPubMed Balthazar U, Deal AM, Fritz MA, Kondapalli LA, Kim JY, Mersereau JE (2012) The current fertility preservation consultation model: are we adequately informing cancer patients of their options? Hum Reprod 27(8):2413–2419CrossRefPubMed
15.
16.
go back to reference Kim J, Deal AM, Balthazar U, Kondapalli LA, Gracia C, Mersereau JE (2013) Fertility preservation consultation for women with cancer: are we helping patients make high-quality decisions? Reprod Biomed Online 27(1):96–103CrossRefPubMed Kim J, Deal AM, Balthazar U, Kondapalli LA, Gracia C, Mersereau JE (2013) Fertility preservation consultation for women with cancer: are we helping patients make high-quality decisions? Reprod Biomed Online 27(1):96–103CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Dambacher M, Hubner R (2014) Time pressure affects the efficiency of perceptual processing in decisions under conflict. Psychol Res 2 Dambacher M, Hubner R (2014) Time pressure affects the efficiency of perceptual processing in decisions under conflict. Psychol Res 2
18.
go back to reference Senapati S, Morse CB, Sammel MD, Kim J, Mersereau JE, Efymow B et al (2014) Fertility preservation in patients with haematological disorders: a retrospective cohort study. Reprod Biomed Online 28(1):92–98CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Senapati S, Morse CB, Sammel MD, Kim J, Mersereau JE, Efymow B et al (2014) Fertility preservation in patients with haematological disorders: a retrospective cohort study. Reprod Biomed Online 28(1):92–98CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
19.
go back to reference I Bendasat AD (1986) An investigation of the effectiveness of color and graphical information presentation under varying time constraints. MIS Q 10:59–81CrossRef I Bendasat AD (1986) An investigation of the effectiveness of color and graphical information presentation under varying time constraints. MIS Q 10:59–81CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Hwang M (1994) Decision making under time pressure. A model for information systems research. Inform Manag 27:197–203CrossRef Hwang M (1994) Decision making under time pressure. A model for information systems research. Inform Manag 27:197–203CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Niemasik EE, Letourneau J, Dohan D, Katz A, Melisko M, Rugo H et al (2012) Patient perceptions of reproductive health counseling at the time of cancer diagnosis: a qualitative study of female California cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv 6(3):324–332CrossRefPubMed Niemasik EE, Letourneau J, Dohan D, Katz A, Melisko M, Rugo H et al (2012) Patient perceptions of reproductive health counseling at the time of cancer diagnosis: a qualitative study of female California cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv 6(3):324–332CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Peddie VL, Porter MA, Barbour R, Culligan D, MacDonald G, King D et al (2012) Factors affecting decision making about fertility preservation after cancer diagnosis: a qualitative study. BJOG 119(9):1049–1057CrossRefPubMed Peddie VL, Porter MA, Barbour R, Culligan D, MacDonald G, King D et al (2012) Factors affecting decision making about fertility preservation after cancer diagnosis: a qualitative study. BJOG 119(9):1049–1057CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Early referral makes the decision-making about fertility preservation easier: a pilot survey study of young female cancer survivors
Authors
Jayeon Kim
Jennifer E. Mersereau
Publication date
01-06-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 6/2015
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2526-3

Other articles of this Issue 6/2015

Supportive Care in Cancer 6/2015 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine