Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 9/2014

Open Access 01-09-2014 | Original Article

Feasibility and safety of a reduced duration of therapy of colony-stimulating factor in a dose-dense regimen

Authors: Luigi Rigacci, Benedetta Puccini, Sofia Kovalchuk, Elisa Fabbri, Erminio Bonizzoni, Tania Perrone, Alberto Bosi

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 9/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The risk of febrile neutropenia (FN) in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy is mainly due to the type of chemotherapy regimen and the presence of specific risk factors in patients. The recent trend of using a dose-dense treatment schedule has enhanced the risk of FN. In the present prospective study, we evaluated the feasibility of a reduction of duration of therapy with colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in a dose-dense regimen.

Methods

Between June 2002 and December 2011, 107 patients with a new diagnosis of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) receiving dose-dense chemotherapy, every 14 days, were included in the study. The primary endpoint was defined as the completion of planned chemotherapy cycles as scheduled. Secondary endpoints were median number of administered G-CSF doses (vials), incidence of FN, hospitalization and toxicity.

Results

The planned chemotherapy cycles (primary endpoint) were completed by 84.1 % of patients. The median number of G-CSF (lenograstim) doses administered for each patient was 24 (range 10–35), which corresponds to a median of five vials (range 0–10) for each cycle. Grades 3–4 toxicities, related to G-CSF administration, included neutropenia and thrombocytopenia (14.0 and 1.9 %, respectively). No grades 3–4 bone pain was detected. The incidence of FN and hospitalization was 9.3 % (10/107) and 4.5 % (5/107), respectively.

Conclusions

Reduced dosage of G-CSF allows dose-dense chemotherapy scheduling, limits exposure to G-CSF and also represents an opportunity for cost savings.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Aapro MS, Bohilus J, Cameron DA et al (2011) 2010 update of EORTC guidelines for the use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor to reduce the incidence of chemotherapy—induced febrile neutropenia in adult patients with lymphoproliferative disorders and solid tumors. Eur J Cancer 47(1):8–32PubMedCrossRef Aapro MS, Bohilus J, Cameron DA et al (2011) 2010 update of EORTC guidelines for the use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor to reduce the incidence of chemotherapy—induced febrile neutropenia in adult patients with lymphoproliferative disorders and solid tumors. Eur J Cancer 47(1):8–32PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Aapro M, Crawford J, Kamioner D (2010) Prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia with granulocyte colony-stimulating factors: where are we now? Support Care Cancer 18(5):529–541PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Aapro M, Crawford J, Kamioner D (2010) Prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia with granulocyte colony-stimulating factors: where are we now? Support Care Cancer 18(5):529–541PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Crawford J, Caserta C, Roila F (2010) Hematopoietic growth factors: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for the applications. Ann Oncol 21(S5):v248–v251PubMedCrossRef Crawford J, Caserta C, Roila F (2010) Hematopoietic growth factors: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for the applications. Ann Oncol 21(S5):v248–v251PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Holmes FA, Jones SE, O’Shaughnessy S et al (2002) Comparable efficacy and safety profiles of once-per-cycle pegfilgrastim and daily injection filgrastim in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: a multicenter dose finding study in women with breast cancer. Ann Oncol 13:903–909PubMedCrossRef Holmes FA, Jones SE, O’Shaughnessy S et al (2002) Comparable efficacy and safety profiles of once-per-cycle pegfilgrastim and daily injection filgrastim in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: a multicenter dose finding study in women with breast cancer. Ann Oncol 13:903–909PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Holmes FA, O’Shaughnessy S, Vukelja S et al (2002) Blinded, randomized, multicenter study to evaluate single administration pegfilgrastim once per cycle versus daily filgrastim as an adjunct to chemotherapy in patients with high-risk stage III/IV breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 20:727–731PubMedCrossRef Holmes FA, O’Shaughnessy S, Vukelja S et al (2002) Blinded, randomized, multicenter study to evaluate single administration pegfilgrastim once per cycle versus daily filgrastim as an adjunct to chemotherapy in patients with high-risk stage III/IV breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 20:727–731PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Green MD, Koelbl H, Baselga J et al (2003) A randomized double blind multicenter phase III study of fixed-dose single-administration pegfilgrastim versus daily filgrastim in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Ann Oncol 14:29–35PubMedCrossRef Green MD, Koelbl H, Baselga J et al (2003) A randomized double blind multicenter phase III study of fixed-dose single-administration pegfilgrastim versus daily filgrastim in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Ann Oncol 14:29–35PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Falandry C, Campone M, Carton C et al (2010) Trends in G-CSF use in 990 patients after EORTC and ASCO guidelines. Eur J Cancer 46:2389–2398PubMedCrossRef Falandry C, Campone M, Carton C et al (2010) Trends in G-CSF use in 990 patients after EORTC and ASCO guidelines. Eur J Cancer 46:2389–2398PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Cairo MS, Shen V, Krailo MD et al (2001) Prospective randomized trial between two doses of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor after ifosfamide, carboplatin and etoposide in children with recurrent or refractory solid tumors: a children’s Cancer Group report. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 23:30–38PubMedCrossRef Cairo MS, Shen V, Krailo MD et al (2001) Prospective randomized trial between two doses of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor after ifosfamide, carboplatin and etoposide in children with recurrent or refractory solid tumors: a children’s Cancer Group report. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 23:30–38PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Papaldo P, Lopez M, Marolla P et al (2005) Impact of five prophylactic filgrastim schedules on hematologic toxicity in early breast cancer patients treated with epirubicin and cyclophosphamide. J Clin Oncol 23:6908–6918PubMedCrossRef Papaldo P, Lopez M, Marolla P et al (2005) Impact of five prophylactic filgrastim schedules on hematologic toxicity in early breast cancer patients treated with epirubicin and cyclophosphamide. J Clin Oncol 23:6908–6918PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Hendler D, Rizel S, Yerushalmi R et al (2011) Different schedules of granulocyte growth factor support for patients with breast cancer receiving adjuvant dose-dense chemotherapy. A prospective nonrandomized study. Am J Clin Oncol 34:619–624PubMedCrossRef Hendler D, Rizel S, Yerushalmi R et al (2011) Different schedules of granulocyte growth factor support for patients with breast cancer receiving adjuvant dose-dense chemotherapy. A prospective nonrandomized study. Am J Clin Oncol 34:619–624PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Wolff AC, Jones RJ, Davidson NE et al (2006) Myeloid toxicity in breast cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy with pegfilgrastim support. J Clin Oncol 24:2392–2394PubMedCrossRef Wolff AC, Jones RJ, Davidson NE et al (2006) Myeloid toxicity in breast cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy with pegfilgrastim support. J Clin Oncol 24:2392–2394PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Le Deley MC, Suzan F, Cutuli B et al (2007) Anthracyclines, mitoxantrone, radiotherapy, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: risk factors for leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome after breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 25(3):292–300PubMedCrossRef Le Deley MC, Suzan F, Cutuli B et al (2007) Anthracyclines, mitoxantrone, radiotherapy, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: risk factors for leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome after breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 25(3):292–300PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Ferretti G, Lopez M, Terzoli E et al (2006) Myeloid toxicity in breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy: what is the appropriate use of filgrastim? J Clin Oncol 24(35):5618–5619PubMedCrossRef Ferretti G, Lopez M, Terzoli E et al (2006) Myeloid toxicity in breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy: what is the appropriate use of filgrastim? J Clin Oncol 24(35):5618–5619PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Green V, Bounthavong M, Margileth DA et al (2010) Retrospective evaluation to examine efficacy and safety of half-dose pegfilgrastim in breast cancer patients receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol (suppl; abstr 116) Green V, Bounthavong M, Margileth DA et al (2010) Retrospective evaluation to examine efficacy and safety of half-dose pegfilgrastim in breast cancer patients receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol (suppl; abstr 116)
15.
go back to reference Ramaekers RC, Olsen J, Obermiller AM et al (2012) Efficacy and safety of half-dose pegfilgrastim in cancer patients receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 30 (suppl; abstr 9110) Ramaekers RC, Olsen J, Obermiller AM et al (2012) Efficacy and safety of half-dose pegfilgrastim in cancer patients receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 30 (suppl; abstr 9110)
16.
go back to reference Cheson BD, Horning SJ, Coiffier B et al (1999) Report of an international workshop to standardize response criteria for non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas. NCI Sponsored International Working Group. J Clin Oncol 17:1244PubMed Cheson BD, Horning SJ, Coiffier B et al (1999) Report of an international workshop to standardize response criteria for non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas. NCI Sponsored International Working Group. J Clin Oncol 17:1244PubMed
17.
go back to reference Newcombe RG (1998) Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods. Stat Med 17:857–872PubMedCrossRef Newcombe RG (1998) Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods. Stat Med 17:857–872PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Vainas O, Ariad S, Amir O et al (2012) Personalising docetaxel and G-CSF schedules in cancer patients by a clinically validated computational model. Br J Cancer 107:814–822PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Vainas O, Ariad S, Amir O et al (2012) Personalising docetaxel and G-CSF schedules in cancer patients by a clinically validated computational model. Br J Cancer 107:814–822PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Shochat E, Rom-Kedar V (2008) Novel strategies for granulocyte colonystimulating factor treatment of severe prolonged neutropenia suggested by mathematical modeling. Clin Cancer Res 14(20):6354–6363PubMedCrossRef Shochat E, Rom-Kedar V (2008) Novel strategies for granulocyte colonystimulating factor treatment of severe prolonged neutropenia suggested by mathematical modeling. Clin Cancer Res 14(20):6354–6363PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Badalamenti G, Incorvaia L, Provenzano S et al (2013) Lenograstim in preventing chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in patients with soft tissue sarcoma. Anticancer Res 33(2):679–684PubMed Badalamenti G, Incorvaia L, Provenzano S et al (2013) Lenograstim in preventing chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in patients with soft tissue sarcoma. Anticancer Res 33(2):679–684PubMed
21.
go back to reference Ria R, Reale A, Moschetta M et al (2012) Neutropenia and G-CSF in lymphoproliferative diseases. Hematology 18(3):131–137PubMedCrossRef Ria R, Reale A, Moschetta M et al (2012) Neutropenia and G-CSF in lymphoproliferative diseases. Hematology 18(3):131–137PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Potosky AL, Malin JL, Kim B et al (2011) Use of colony-stimulating factors with chemotherapy: opportunities for cost savings and improved outcomes. J Natl Cancer Inst 103:979–982PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Potosky AL, Malin JL, Kim B et al (2011) Use of colony-stimulating factors with chemotherapy: opportunities for cost savings and improved outcomes. J Natl Cancer Inst 103:979–982PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Schnipper LE, Smith TJ, Raghavan D et al (2012) American Society of Clinical Oncology identifies five key opportunities to improve care and reduce costs: the top five list for oncology. J Clin Oncol 30(14):1715–1724PubMedCrossRef Schnipper LE, Smith TJ, Raghavan D et al (2012) American Society of Clinical Oncology identifies five key opportunities to improve care and reduce costs: the top five list for oncology. J Clin Oncol 30(14):1715–1724PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Feasibility and safety of a reduced duration of therapy of colony-stimulating factor in a dose-dense regimen
Authors
Luigi Rigacci
Benedetta Puccini
Sofia Kovalchuk
Elisa Fabbri
Erminio Bonizzoni
Tania Perrone
Alberto Bosi
Publication date
01-09-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 9/2014
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2237-9

Other articles of this Issue 9/2014

Supportive Care in Cancer 9/2014 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine