Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 9/2014

01-09-2014 | Original Article

Symptoms from treatment with sunitinib or sorafenib: a multicenter explorative cohort study to explore the influence of patient-reported outcomes on therapy decisions

Authors: J. J. Koldenhof, P. O. Witteveen, R. de Vos, M. Walraven, C. N. Tillier, H. M. W. Verheul, S. C. C. M. Teunissen

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 9/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Optimal long-lasting treatment with sunitinib and sorafenib is limited by dose modifications (DMs) due to adverse events (AEs). These AEs may be underrecognized and their influence on health-related quality of life (HRQL) underestimated. Improved insight into the relationship between AEs and therapy decisions is needed. To improve decision making around managing symptoms and reduce DMs, this study was set up to explore the influence of patient-reported symptoms on therapy decisions.

Methods

In this multicenter cohort study, patient characteristics, reasons for and different forms of used dose modifications, and AEs were prospectively obtained from cancer patients on sunitinib/sorafenib treatment. Used instruments to get insight into AEs were the patient-scored Utrecht Symptom Diary (USD) and the professional-scored Common Terminology Criteria for AEs version 3.0.

Results

Median total treatment duration in 42 patients was 16 weeks. Median time till dose modification was 10 weeks. DMs occurred mostly due to multiple mild AEs. By using the USD, a higher prevalence of most AEs was found compared to the literature. Sixty percent of the patients experienced a decreased HRQL due to multiple AEs.

Conclusions

Because severe AEs due to sunitinib/sorafenib treatment seldom occur, it is more important to focus on treating and preventing multiple mild AEs with higher impact on HRQL, when trying to avoid dose modifications. Using patient self-reported measurement methods helps to early recognize symptoms and to differentiate among symptom intensities. This systematic approach might help to achieve the optimal dosing, which might improve PFS and OS.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Porta C, Szczylik C (2009) Tolerability of first-line therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Treat Rev 35:297–307PubMedCrossRef Porta C, Szczylik C (2009) Tolerability of first-line therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Treat Rev 35:297–307PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Hutson TE (2007) Safety and tolerability of sorafenib in clear-cell renal cell carcinoma: a Phase III overview. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 7:1193–1202PubMedCrossRef Hutson TE (2007) Safety and tolerability of sorafenib in clear-cell renal cell carcinoma: a Phase III overview. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 7:1193–1202PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference van der Veldt AA, Boven E, Helgason HH et al (2008) Predictive factors for severe toxicity of sunitinib in unselected patients with advanced renal cell cancer. Br J Cancer 99:259–265PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef van der Veldt AA, Boven E, Helgason HH et al (2008) Predictive factors for severe toxicity of sunitinib in unselected patients with advanced renal cell cancer. Br J Cancer 99:259–265PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Houk BE, Bello CL, Poland B et al (2010) Relationship between exposure to sunitinib and efficacy and tolerability endpoints in patients with cancer: results of a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic meta-analysis. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 66:357–371PubMedCrossRef Houk BE, Bello CL, Poland B et al (2010) Relationship between exposure to sunitinib and efficacy and tolerability endpoints in patients with cancer: results of a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic meta-analysis. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 66:357–371PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Maluf FC, Fernandes GS, Kann AG et al (2008) Exploring the role of novel agents in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Treat Rev 34:750–760PubMedCrossRef Maluf FC, Fernandes GS, Kann AG et al (2008) Exploring the role of novel agents in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Treat Rev 34:750–760PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Wolter P, Schoffski P (2010) Targeted therapies in the treatment of GIST: adverse events and maximising the benefits of sunitinib through proactive therapy management. Acta Oncol 49:13–23PubMedCrossRef Wolter P, Schoffski P (2010) Targeted therapies in the treatment of GIST: adverse events and maximising the benefits of sunitinib through proactive therapy management. Acta Oncol 49:13–23PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Abou-Alfa GK, Schwartz L, Ricci S et al (2006) Phase II study of sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 24:4293–4300PubMedCrossRef Abou-Alfa GK, Schwartz L, Ricci S et al (2006) Phase II study of sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 24:4293–4300PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Gupta K, Miller JD, Li JZ et al (2008) Epidemiologic and socioeconomic burden of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): a literature review. Cancer Treat Rev 34:193–205PubMedCrossRef Gupta K, Miller JD, Li JZ et al (2008) Epidemiologic and socioeconomic burden of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): a literature review. Cancer Treat Rev 34:193–205PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Costa LJ, Drabkin HA (2007) Renal cell carcinoma: new developments in molecular biology and potential for targeted therapies. Oncologist 12:1404–1415PubMedCrossRef Costa LJ, Drabkin HA (2007) Renal cell carcinoma: new developments in molecular biology and potential for targeted therapies. Oncologist 12:1404–1415PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Escudier B, Eisen T, Stadler WM et al (2007) Sorafenib in advanced clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 356:125–134PubMedCrossRef Escudier B, Eisen T, Stadler WM et al (2007) Sorafenib in advanced clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 356:125–134PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference La Vine DB, Coleman TA, Davis CH et al (2010) Frequent dose interruptions are required for patients receiving oral kinase inhibitor therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma. Am J Clin Oncol 33:217–220PubMed La Vine DB, Coleman TA, Davis CH et al (2010) Frequent dose interruptions are required for patients receiving oral kinase inhibitor therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma. Am J Clin Oncol 33:217–220PubMed
12.
go back to reference Herrmann E, Bierer S, Gerss J et al (2008) Prospective comparison of sorafenib and sunitinib for second-line treatment of cytokine-refractory kidney cancer patients. Oncology 74:216–222PubMedCrossRef Herrmann E, Bierer S, Gerss J et al (2008) Prospective comparison of sorafenib and sunitinib for second-line treatment of cytokine-refractory kidney cancer patients. Oncology 74:216–222PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Motzer RJ, Hutson TE, Tomczak P et al (2007) Sunitinib versus interferon alfa in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 356:115–124PubMedCrossRef Motzer RJ, Hutson TE, Tomczak P et al (2007) Sunitinib versus interferon alfa in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 356:115–124PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference McCaffery M, Ferrell BR (1997) Nurses’ knowledge of pain assessment and management: how much progress have we made? J Pain Symptom Manag 14:175–188CrossRef McCaffery M, Ferrell BR (1997) Nurses’ knowledge of pain assessment and management: how much progress have we made? J Pain Symptom Manag 14:175–188CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Gill A, Daines P, Selby D (2010) What do symptom scores mean: observations on discrepancies when defining symptoms using words and numbers. Eur J Oncol Nurs 14:435–438PubMedCrossRef Gill A, Daines P, Selby D (2010) What do symptom scores mean: observations on discrepancies when defining symptoms using words and numbers. Eur J Oncol Nurs 14:435–438PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Selby D, Cascella A, Gardiner K et al (2010) A single set of numerical cutpoints to define moderate and severe symptoms for the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System. J Pain Symptom Manag 39:241–249CrossRef Selby D, Cascella A, Gardiner K et al (2010) A single set of numerical cutpoints to define moderate and severe symptoms for the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System. J Pain Symptom Manag 39:241–249CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Bruera E, Kuehn N, Miller MJ et al (1991) The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS): a simple method for the assessment of palliative care patients. J Palliat Care 7:6–9PubMed Bruera E, Kuehn N, Miller MJ et al (1991) The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS): a simple method for the assessment of palliative care patients. J Palliat Care 7:6–9PubMed
19.
go back to reference Richardson LA, Jones GW (2009) A review of the reliability and validity of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System. Curr Oncol 16:55PubMedCentralPubMed Richardson LA, Jones GW (2009) A review of the reliability and validity of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System. Curr Oncol 16:55PubMedCentralPubMed
20.
go back to reference Philip J, Smith WB, Craft P et al (1998) Concurrent validity of the modified Edmonton Symptom Assessment System with the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist and the Brief Pain Inventory. Support Care Cancer 6:539–541PubMedCrossRef Philip J, Smith WB, Craft P et al (1998) Concurrent validity of the modified Edmonton Symptom Assessment System with the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist and the Brief Pain Inventory. Support Care Cancer 6:539–541PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Teunissen SC, de Graeff A, de Haes HC et al (2006) Prognostic significance of symptoms of hospitalised advanced cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 42:2510–2516PubMedCrossRef Teunissen SC, de Graeff A, de Haes HC et al (2006) Prognostic significance of symptoms of hospitalised advanced cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 42:2510–2516PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Teunissen SC, Wesker W, Kruitwagen C et al (2007) Symptom prevalence in patients with incurable cancer: a systematic review. J Pain Symptom Manag 34:94–104CrossRef Teunissen SC, Wesker W, Kruitwagen C et al (2007) Symptom prevalence in patients with incurable cancer: a systematic review. J Pain Symptom Manag 34:94–104CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Investigator’s brochure BAY43--9006. 1-4-2007 Investigator’s brochure BAY43--9006. 1-4-2007
24.
go back to reference Investigator’s brochure sunitinib malate. 1-4-2007 Investigator’s brochure sunitinib malate. 1-4-2007
25.
go back to reference de Boer AG, van Lanschot JJ, Stalmeier PF et al (2004) Is a single-item visual analogue scale as valid, reliable and responsive as multi-item scales in measuring quality of life? Qual Life Res 13:311–320PubMedCrossRef de Boer AG, van Lanschot JJ, Stalmeier PF et al (2004) Is a single-item visual analogue scale as valid, reliable and responsive as multi-item scales in measuring quality of life? Qual Life Res 13:311–320PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Bonett DG, Price RM (2002) Statistical inference for a linear function of medians: confidence intervals, hypothesis testing, and sample size requirements. Psychol Methods 7:370–383PubMedCrossRef Bonett DG, Price RM (2002) Statistical inference for a linear function of medians: confidence intervals, hypothesis testing, and sample size requirements. Psychol Methods 7:370–383PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Agresti A, Coull BA (1998) Approximate is better than “exact” for interval estimation of binomial proportions. Am Stat Assoc 52:119–126 Agresti A, Coull BA (1998) Approximate is better than “exact” for interval estimation of binomial proportions. Am Stat Assoc 52:119–126
28.
go back to reference Cella D (2009) Quality of life in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: the importance of patient-reported outcomes. Cancer Treat Rev 35:733–737PubMedCrossRef Cella D (2009) Quality of life in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: the importance of patient-reported outcomes. Cancer Treat Rev 35:733–737PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Wagner LI, Wenzel L, Shaw E et al (2007) Patient-reported outcomes in phase II cancer clinical trials: lessons learned and future directions. J Clin Oncol 25:5058–5062PubMedCrossRef Wagner LI, Wenzel L, Shaw E et al (2007) Patient-reported outcomes in phase II cancer clinical trials: lessons learned and future directions. J Clin Oncol 25:5058–5062PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Wood LS (2009) Management of vascular endothelial growth factor and multikinase inhibitor side effects. Clin J Oncol Nurs 13(Suppl):13–18PubMedCrossRef Wood LS (2009) Management of vascular endothelial growth factor and multikinase inhibitor side effects. Clin J Oncol Nurs 13(Suppl):13–18PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Bhojani N, Jeldres C, Patard JJ et al (2008) Toxicities associated with the administration of sorafenib, sunitinib, and temsirolimus and their management in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 53:917–930PubMedCrossRef Bhojani N, Jeldres C, Patard JJ et al (2008) Toxicities associated with the administration of sorafenib, sunitinib, and temsirolimus and their management in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 53:917–930PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL et al (2010) The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res 19:539–549PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL et al (2010) The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res 19:539–549PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Blay JY (2010) Pharmacological management of gastrointestinal stromal tumours: an update on the role of sunitinib. Ann Oncol 21:208–215PubMedCrossRef Blay JY (2010) Pharmacological management of gastrointestinal stromal tumours: an update on the role of sunitinib. Ann Oncol 21:208–215PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T (1999) Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Soc Sci Med 49:651–661PubMedCrossRef Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T (1999) Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Soc Sci Med 49:651–661PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Stacey D, Samant R, Bennett C (2008) Decision making in oncology: a review of patient decision aids to support patient participation. CA Cancer J Clin 58:293–304PubMedCrossRef Stacey D, Samant R, Bennett C (2008) Decision making in oncology: a review of patient decision aids to support patient participation. CA Cancer J Clin 58:293–304PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Rini BI (2007) Vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted therapy in renal cell carcinoma: current status and future directions. Clin Cancer Res 13:1098–1106PubMedCrossRef Rini BI (2007) Vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted therapy in renal cell carcinoma: current status and future directions. Clin Cancer Res 13:1098–1106PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Symptoms from treatment with sunitinib or sorafenib: a multicenter explorative cohort study to explore the influence of patient-reported outcomes on therapy decisions
Authors
J. J. Koldenhof
P. O. Witteveen
R. de Vos
M. Walraven
C. N. Tillier
H. M. W. Verheul
S. C. C. M. Teunissen
Publication date
01-09-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 9/2014
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2223-2

Other articles of this Issue 9/2014

Supportive Care in Cancer 9/2014 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine