Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 2/2014

Open Access 01-02-2014 | Original Article

The Knowledge Exchange–Decision Support Model: application to cancer navigation programs

Authors: A. Fuchsia Howard, Kirsten Smillie, Vivian Chan, Sandra Cook, Arminee Kazanjian

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 2/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The Knowledge Exchange–Decision Support (KE-DS) Model provides a framework outlining essential components of knowledge generation and exchange. The purpose of this research was to illustrate how the Model makes explicit the different contextual aspects implicit in the planning and implementation of two cancer navigation programs in Canada.

Methods

The KE-DS Model guided the collection and analysis of interviews with program personnel and narrative data. A qualitative thematic analysis was conducted wherein we compared and contrasted the planning and implementation of these two navigation programs.

Results

The planning and implementation of these two programs was conceptualized differently and adapted to meet local contingencies. The KE-DS Model highlighted three factors that influenced program delivery. First, the structure of health services was shaped by the interaction of professionals and services operating in the region, and the existing health services influenced the program’s approach to navigation. Second, while there were similarities in the professional roles and responsibilities of the navigators, these roles and responsibilities also reflected local context in their approaches to patient assessment, referral, education, coordination of services, and advocacy. Third, these two distinct approaches to navigation have responded to the needs of diverse populations being served by improving access to care.

Conclusions

Evidence generated using the KE-DS Model could ensure a more robust and structured approach to the planning and implementation of future navigation programs. The Model prompts users to make explicit the different types of evidence utilized during program planning and implementation. The systematic collection of new information on program implementation using the KE-DS Model in future initiatives will contribute to an improved understanding of the science of knowledge exchange.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Baumbusch JL, Kirkham SR, Khan KB, McDonald H, Semeniuk P, Tan E, Anderson JM (2008) Pursuing common agendas: a collaborative model for knowledge translation between research and practice in clinical settings. Res Nurs Health 31:130–140. doi:10.1002/nur.20242 PubMedCrossRef Baumbusch JL, Kirkham SR, Khan KB, McDonald H, Semeniuk P, Tan E, Anderson JM (2008) Pursuing common agendas: a collaborative model for knowledge translation between research and practice in clinical settings. Res Nurs Health 31:130–140. doi:10.​1002/​nur.​20242 PubMedCrossRef
11.
14.
go back to reference Banta HD, Luce BR (1993) Health care technology and it’s assessment: an international perspective. Oxford University, New York Banta HD, Luce BR (1993) Health care technology and it’s assessment: an international perspective. Oxford University, New York
20.
go back to reference Freeman HP, Muth BJ, Kerner JF (1995) Expanding access to cancer screening and clinical follow-up among the medically underserved. Cancer Pract 3(1):19–30PubMed Freeman HP, Muth BJ, Kerner JF (1995) Expanding access to cancer screening and clinical follow-up among the medically underserved. Cancer Pract 3(1):19–30PubMed
21.
go back to reference Oluwole SF, Ali AO, Adu A, Blane BP, Barlow B, Oropeza R, Freeman HP (2003) Impact of a cancer screening program on breast cancer stage at diagnosis in a medically underserved urban community. J Am Coll Surg 196:180–188. doi:10.1016/S1072-7515(02)01765-9 PubMedCrossRef Oluwole SF, Ali AO, Adu A, Blane BP, Barlow B, Oropeza R, Freeman HP (2003) Impact of a cancer screening program on breast cancer stage at diagnosis in a medically underserved urban community. J Am Coll Surg 196:180–188. doi:10.​1016/​S1072-7515(02)01765-9 PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Thorne S, Truant T (2010) Will designated patient navigators fix the problem? Oncology nursing in transition. Can Oncol Nurs J20(3):116–128CrossRef Thorne S, Truant T (2010) Will designated patient navigators fix the problem? Oncology nursing in transition. Can Oncol Nurs J20(3):116–128CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Straus S, Tetroe J, Graham I (2009) Knowledge translation in health care: moving from evidence to practice. Blackwell Publishing, OxfordCrossRef Straus S, Tetroe J, Graham I (2009) Knowledge translation in health care: moving from evidence to practice. Blackwell Publishing, OxfordCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Loiselle C, Peters O, Haase KR, Girouard L, Korner A, Wiljer D, Fitch M (2013) Virtual navigation in colorectal cancer and melanoma: an exploration of patients’ views. Support Care Cancer 21(8):2289–2296. doi:10.1007/s00520-013-1771-1 PubMedCrossRef Loiselle C, Peters O, Haase KR, Girouard L, Korner A, Wiljer D, Fitch M (2013) Virtual navigation in colorectal cancer and melanoma: an exploration of patients’ views. Support Care Cancer 21(8):2289–2296. doi:10.​1007/​s00520-013-1771-1 PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The Knowledge Exchange–Decision Support Model: application to cancer navigation programs
Authors
A. Fuchsia Howard
Kirsten Smillie
Vivian Chan
Sandra Cook
Arminee Kazanjian
Publication date
01-02-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 2/2014
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-013-1982-5

Other articles of this Issue 2/2014

Supportive Care in Cancer 2/2014 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine