Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 10/2013

Open Access 01-10-2013 | Review Article

Clinical experience with Zarzio® in Europe: what have we learned?

Authors: Pere Gascón, Hans Tesch, Karl Verpoort, Maria Sofia Rosati, Nello Salesi, Samir Agrawal, Nils Wilking, Helen Barker, Michael Muenzberg, Matthew Turner

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 10/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Biosimilars are similar, but non-identical, versions of existing biological drugs for which patents have expired. Despite the rigorous approval process for biosimilars, concerns have been expressed about the efficacy and safety of these products in clinical practice. Biosimilars of filgrastim, based on the originator product Neupogen®, have been available since 2008 and are now in widespread clinical use in Europe and elsewhere. Three biosimilar G-CSFs have been approved based on a combination of physicochemical and biological protein characterisation, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic assessment in healthy volunteers and efficacy and safety data in patients with cancer. To assess whether biosimilars are effective in the real-world clinical practice setting, a pooled analysis of five post-approval studies of biosimilar G-CSF (Zarzio®) that included 1,302 adult patients who received at least one cycle of chemotherapy with G-CSF support for the prevention of neutropenia was conducted. A total of 36 % of patients had a febrile neutropenia risk of >20 %, while 39.6 % had a risk of 10–20 % based on chemotherapy regimen. The occurrence of severe or febrile neutropenia was within the range of that observed in previous studies of originator G-CSF. In addition, the safety profile of Zarzio® was consistent with that reported for originator G-CSF and the known safety profile of G-CSF. Initial concerns about the use of biosimilars, at least with regard to biosimilar G-CSFs, appear to be unfounded. Adoption of cost-effective biosimilars should help reduce healthcare costs and improve patient access to biological treatments.
Literature
5.
go back to reference Gascón P (2012) Presently available biosimilars in hematology–oncology: G-CSF. Target Oncol 7(suppl 1):S29–S34 Gascón P (2012) Presently available biosimilars in hematology–oncology: G-CSF. Target Oncol 7(suppl 1):S29–S34
6.
go back to reference Aapro MS, Bohlius J, Cameron DA et al (2011) Update of EORTC guidelines for the use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor to reduce the incidence of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in adult patients with lymphoproliferative disorders and solid tumours. Eur J Cancer 47:8–32CrossRefPubMed Aapro MS, Bohlius J, Cameron DA et al (2011) Update of EORTC guidelines for the use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor to reduce the incidence of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in adult patients with lymphoproliferative disorders and solid tumours. Eur J Cancer 47:8–32CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Genazzani AA, Biggio G, Caputi AP et al (2007) Biosimilar drugs: concerns and opportunities. BioDrugs 21:351–356CrossRefPubMed Genazzani AA, Biggio G, Caputi AP et al (2007) Biosimilar drugs: concerns and opportunities. BioDrugs 21:351–356CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Mellstedt H (2010) Implications of the development of biosimilars for cancer treatment. Future Oncol 6:1065–1067CrossRefPubMed Mellstedt H (2010) Implications of the development of biosimilars for cancer treatment. Future Oncol 6:1065–1067CrossRefPubMed
9.
10.
go back to reference Niederwieser D, Schmitz S (2011) Biosimilar agents in oncology/haematology: from approval to practice. Eur J Haematol 86:277–288CrossRefPubMed Niederwieser D, Schmitz S (2011) Biosimilar agents in oncology/haematology: from approval to practice. Eur J Haematol 86:277–288CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Zelenetz AD, Ahmed I, Braud EL, et al. NCCN biosimilars white paper: regulatory, scientific, and patient safety perspectives. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2011; Suppl 4: S1–S22 Zelenetz AD, Ahmed I, Braud EL, et al. NCCN biosimilars white paper: regulatory, scientific, and patient safety perspectives. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2011; Suppl 4: S1–S22
12.
go back to reference Schellekens H, Moors E (2010) Clinical comparability and European biosimilar regulations. Nat Biotechnol 28:28–31CrossRefPubMed Schellekens H, Moors E (2010) Clinical comparability and European biosimilar regulations. Nat Biotechnol 28:28–31CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Sörgel F, Lerch H, Lauber T (2010) Physicochemical and biologic comparability of a biosimilar granulocyte colony-stimulating factor with its reference product. BioDrugs 24:347–357CrossRefPubMed Sörgel F, Lerch H, Lauber T (2010) Physicochemical and biologic comparability of a biosimilar granulocyte colony-stimulating factor with its reference product. BioDrugs 24:347–357CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Skrlin A, Radic I, Vuletic M, Schwinke D, Runac D, Kusalic T, Paskvan I, Krsic M, Bratos M, Marinc S (2010) Comparison of the physicochemical properties of a biosimilar filgrastim with those of reference filgrastim. Biologicals 38:557–566CrossRefPubMed Skrlin A, Radic I, Vuletic M, Schwinke D, Runac D, Kusalic T, Paskvan I, Krsic M, Bratos M, Marinc S (2010) Comparison of the physicochemical properties of a biosimilar filgrastim with those of reference filgrastim. Biologicals 38:557–566CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Gascón P, Fuhr U, Sörgel F et al (2010) Development of a new G-CSF product based on biosimilarity assessment. Ann Oncol 21:1419–1429CrossRefPubMed Gascón P, Fuhr U, Sörgel F et al (2010) Development of a new G-CSF product based on biosimilarity assessment. Ann Oncol 21:1419–1429CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Green MD, Koelbl H, Baselga J et al (2003) A randomized double-blind multicenter phase III study of fixed-dose single-administration pegfilgrastim versus daily filgrastim in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Ann Oncol 14:29–35CrossRefPubMed Green MD, Koelbl H, Baselga J et al (2003) A randomized double-blind multicenter phase III study of fixed-dose single-administration pegfilgrastim versus daily filgrastim in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Ann Oncol 14:29–35CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Holmes FA, O'Shaughnessy JA, Vukelja S et al (2002) Blinded, randomized, multicenter study to evaluate single administration pegfilgrastim once per cycle versus daily filgrastim as an adjunct to chemotherapy in patients with high-risk stage II or stage III/IV breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 20:727–731CrossRefPubMed Holmes FA, O'Shaughnessy JA, Vukelja S et al (2002) Blinded, randomized, multicenter study to evaluate single administration pegfilgrastim once per cycle versus daily filgrastim as an adjunct to chemotherapy in patients with high-risk stage II or stage III/IV breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 20:727–731CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Lubenau H, Bias P, Maly AK, Siegler KE, Mehltretter K (2009) Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of new biosimilar filgrastim XM02 equivalent to marketed filgrastim Neupogen: single-blind, randomized, crossover trial. BioDrugs 23:43–51CrossRefPubMed Lubenau H, Bias P, Maly AK, Siegler KE, Mehltretter K (2009) Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of new biosimilar filgrastim XM02 equivalent to marketed filgrastim Neupogen: single-blind, randomized, crossover trial. BioDrugs 23:43–51CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Lubenau H, Sveikata A, Gumbrevicius G, Macijauskiene J, Fokas V, Kazlauskas S, Janulionis V (2009) Bioequivalence of two recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor products after subcutaneous injection in healthy volunteers. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 47:275–282PubMed Lubenau H, Sveikata A, Gumbrevicius G, Macijauskiene J, Fokas V, Kazlauskas S, Janulionis V (2009) Bioequivalence of two recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor products after subcutaneous injection in healthy volunteers. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 47:275–282PubMed
20.
go back to reference del Giglio A, Eniu A, Ganea-Motan D, Topuzov E, Lubenau H (2008) XM02 is superior to placebo and equivalent to Neupogen in reducing the duration of severe neutropenia and the incidence of febrile neutropenia in cycle 1 in breast cancer patients receiving docetaxel/doxorubicin chemotherapy. BMC Cancer 8:332CrossRefPubMed del Giglio A, Eniu A, Ganea-Motan D, Topuzov E, Lubenau H (2008) XM02 is superior to placebo and equivalent to Neupogen in reducing the duration of severe neutropenia and the incidence of febrile neutropenia in cycle 1 in breast cancer patients receiving docetaxel/doxorubicin chemotherapy. BMC Cancer 8:332CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Gatzemeier U, Ciuleanu T, Dediu M, Ganea-Motan E, Lubenau H, Del Giglio A (2009) XM02, the first biosimilar G-CSF, is safe and effective in reducing the duration of severe neutropenia and incidence of febrile neutropenia in patients with small cell or non-small cell lung cancer receiving platinum-based chemotherapy. J Thorac Oncol 4:736–740CrossRefPubMed Gatzemeier U, Ciuleanu T, Dediu M, Ganea-Motan E, Lubenau H, Del Giglio A (2009) XM02, the first biosimilar G-CSF, is safe and effective in reducing the duration of severe neutropenia and incidence of febrile neutropenia in patients with small cell or non-small cell lung cancer receiving platinum-based chemotherapy. J Thorac Oncol 4:736–740CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Engert A, Griskevicius L, Zyuzgin Y, Lubenau H, del Giglio A (2009) XM02, the first granulocyte colony-stimulating factor biosimilar, is safe and effective in reducing the duration of severe neutropenia and incidence of febrile neutropenia in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma receiving chemotherapy. Leuk Lymphoma 50:374–379CrossRefPubMed Engert A, Griskevicius L, Zyuzgin Y, Lubenau H, del Giglio A (2009) XM02, the first granulocyte colony-stimulating factor biosimilar, is safe and effective in reducing the duration of severe neutropenia and incidence of febrile neutropenia in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma receiving chemotherapy. Leuk Lymphoma 50:374–379CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Waller CF, Bronchud M, Mair S, Challand R (2010) Comparison of the pharmacodynamic profiles of a biosimilar filgrastim and Amgen filgrastim: results from a randomized, phase I trial. Ann Hematol 89:971–978CrossRefPubMed Waller CF, Bronchud M, Mair S, Challand R (2010) Comparison of the pharmacodynamic profiles of a biosimilar filgrastim and Amgen filgrastim: results from a randomized, phase I trial. Ann Hematol 89:971–978CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Waller CF, Bronchud M, Mair S, Challand R (2010) Pharmacokinetic profiles of a biosimilar filgrastim and Amgen filgrastim: results from a randomized, phase I trial. Ann Hematol 89:927–933CrossRefPubMed Waller CF, Bronchud M, Mair S, Challand R (2010) Pharmacokinetic profiles of a biosimilar filgrastim and Amgen filgrastim: results from a randomized, phase I trial. Ann Hematol 89:927–933CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Waller CF, Semiglazov VF, Tjulandin S, Bentsion D, Chan S, Challand R (2010) A phase III randomized equivalence study of biosimilar filgrastim versus Amgen filgrastim in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy for breast cancer. Onkologie 33:504–511CrossRefPubMed Waller CF, Semiglazov VF, Tjulandin S, Bentsion D, Chan S, Challand R (2010) A phase III randomized equivalence study of biosimilar filgrastim versus Amgen filgrastim in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy for breast cancer. Onkologie 33:504–511CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Gascón P, Aapro M, Ludwig H et al (2011) Background and methodology of MONITOR-GCSF, a pharmaco-epidemiological study of the multi-level determinants, predictors, and clinical outcomes of febrile neutropenia prophylaxis with biosimilar granulocyte-colony stimulating factor filgrastim. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 77:184–197CrossRefPubMed Gascón P, Aapro M, Ludwig H et al (2011) Background and methodology of MONITOR-GCSF, a pharmaco-epidemiological study of the multi-level determinants, predictors, and clinical outcomes of febrile neutropenia prophylaxis with biosimilar granulocyte-colony stimulating factor filgrastim. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 77:184–197CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Verpoort K, Möhler TM. A non-interventional study of biosimilar granulocyte colony-stimulating factor as prophylaxis for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in a community oncology centre. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2012, doi: 10.1177/1758834012461330 Verpoort K, Möhler TM. A non-interventional study of biosimilar granulocyte colony-stimulating factor as prophylaxis for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in a community oncology centre. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2012, doi: 10.​1177/​1758834012461330​
29.
go back to reference Salesi N, Di Cocco B, Colonna M, Veltri E (2012) Biosimilar medicines in oncology: single-center experience with biosimilar G-CSF. Future Oncol 8:625–630CrossRefPubMed Salesi N, Di Cocco B, Colonna M, Veltri E (2012) Biosimilar medicines in oncology: single-center experience with biosimilar G-CSF. Future Oncol 8:625–630CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Rosati MS, Baciarello G, Di Seri M, Basile ML, Lo Russo V, Frati L (2011) Biosimilar filgrastim in routine clinical practice: a single centre experience. J Geriatr Oncol 2(Suppl 1):S54, P79 Rosati MS, Baciarello G, Di Seri M, Basile ML, Lo Russo V, Frati L (2011) Biosimilar filgrastim in routine clinical practice: a single centre experience. J Geriatr Oncol 2(Suppl 1):S54, P79
31.
go back to reference Morrison VA, Wong M, Hershman D et al (2007) Observational study of the prevalence of febrile neutropenia in patients who received filgrastim or pegfilgrastim associated with 3–4 week chemotherapy regimens in community oncology practices. J Manag Care Pharm 13:337–348PubMed Morrison VA, Wong M, Hershman D et al (2007) Observational study of the prevalence of febrile neutropenia in patients who received filgrastim or pegfilgrastim associated with 3–4 week chemotherapy regimens in community oncology practices. J Manag Care Pharm 13:337–348PubMed
32.
go back to reference Skarlos DV, Timotheadou E, Galani E et al (2009) Pegfilgrastim administered on the same day with dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer is associated with a higher incidence of febrile neutropenia as compared to conventional growth factor support: matched case–control study of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group. Oncology 77:107–112CrossRefPubMed Skarlos DV, Timotheadou E, Galani E et al (2009) Pegfilgrastim administered on the same day with dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer is associated with a higher incidence of febrile neutropenia as compared to conventional growth factor support: matched case–control study of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group. Oncology 77:107–112CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Lefrère F, Brignier AC, Elie C et al (2011) First experience of autologous peripheral blood stem cell mobilization with biosimilar granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Adv Ther 28:304–310CrossRefPubMed Lefrère F, Brignier AC, Elie C et al (2011) First experience of autologous peripheral blood stem cell mobilization with biosimilar granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Adv Ther 28:304–310CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Ianotto JC, Tempescul A, Yan X et al (2012) Experience (1 year) of G-CSF biosimilars in PBSCT for lymphoma and myeloma patients. Bone Marrow Transplant 47:874–876CrossRefPubMed Ianotto JC, Tempescul A, Yan X et al (2012) Experience (1 year) of G-CSF biosimilars in PBSCT for lymphoma and myeloma patients. Bone Marrow Transplant 47:874–876CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Dmoszynska A, Manko J, Croneck AW et al (2012) Comparable efficacy and safety of biosimilar and originator G-CSF in patients undergoing haematopoietic stem cell mobilisation. Bone Marrow Transplant 47(suppl. 1):S243, P700 Dmoszynska A, Manko J, Croneck AW et al (2012) Comparable efficacy and safety of biosimilar and originator G-CSF in patients undergoing haematopoietic stem cell mobilisation. Bone Marrow Transplant 47(suppl. 1):S243, P700
36.
go back to reference Yafour N, Osmani S, Talhi S et al (2012) Biosimilar G-CSF (filgrastim) is also efficient for peripheral blood stem cell mobilisation and no cryopreserved autologous transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 47(Suppl 1):S243, P725 Yafour N, Osmani S, Talhi S et al (2012) Biosimilar G-CSF (filgrastim) is also efficient for peripheral blood stem cell mobilisation and no cryopreserved autologous transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 47(Suppl 1):S243, P725
37.
go back to reference Czerw T, Kruzel T, Sadus-Wojciechowska M et al (2012) Comparison of two formulations of filgrastim, Neupogen (Amgen) and Zarzio (Sandoz), used to accelerate neutrophil recovery after autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 47(suppl 1):S316, P872 Czerw T, Kruzel T, Sadus-Wojciechowska M et al (2012) Comparison of two formulations of filgrastim, Neupogen (Amgen) and Zarzio (Sandoz), used to accelerate neutrophil recovery after autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 47(suppl 1):S316, P872
38.
go back to reference Kotwica K, Cioch M, Wach M et al (2012) Biosimilar G-CSF is effective in reducing the duration of neutropenia after autologous bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 47(Suppl 1):S316, P873) Kotwica K, Cioch M, Wach M et al (2012) Biosimilar G-CSF is effective in reducing the duration of neutropenia after autologous bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 47(Suppl 1):S316, P873)
39.
go back to reference Shaw BE, Confer DL, Hwang WY, Pamphilon DH, Pulsipher MA (2011) Concerns about the use of biosimilar granulocyte colony-stimulating factors for the mobilization of stem cells in normal donors: position of the World Marrow Donor Association. Haematologica 96:942–7CrossRefPubMed Shaw BE, Confer DL, Hwang WY, Pamphilon DH, Pulsipher MA (2011) Concerns about the use of biosimilar granulocyte colony-stimulating factors for the mobilization of stem cells in normal donors: position of the World Marrow Donor Association. Haematologica 96:942–7CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Azar N, Choquet S, Garnier A et al (2012) Use of a biosimilar G-CSF in allogeneic stem cell mobilisation. Bone Marrow Transplant 47(suppl 1):S316, P727 Azar N, Choquet S, Garnier A et al (2012) Use of a biosimilar G-CSF in allogeneic stem cell mobilisation. Bone Marrow Transplant 47(suppl 1):S316, P727
41.
go back to reference Schmitt M, Lena D, Schneider, et al. Use of the G-CSF biosimilar Ratiograstim® to mobilize peripheral stem cells in healthy donors for allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Abstract presented at the 53rd annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology, December 10–13, 2011, San Diego, CA, USA. Available online at: https://ash.confex.com/ash/2011/webprogram/Paper38776.html [Accessed 24 August 20120] Schmitt M, Lena D, Schneider, et al. Use of the G-CSF biosimilar Ratiograstim® to mobilize peripheral stem cells in healthy donors for allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Abstract presented at the 53rd annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology, December 10–13, 2011, San Diego, CA, USA. Available online at: https://​ash.​confex.​com/​ash/​2011/​webprogram/​Paper38776.​html [Accessed 24 August 20120]
42.
go back to reference Becker P, Brauninger S, Bialleck H et al (2013) Biosimilar filgrastim mobilizes haematopoietic stem cells in healthy volunteer donors with expected efficiency and typical acute adverse effects: interim results of a post-authorization safety study. Bone Marrow Transplant 48(suppl 2s):O177 Becker P, Brauninger S, Bialleck H et al (2013) Biosimilar filgrastim mobilizes haematopoietic stem cells in healthy volunteer donors with expected efficiency and typical acute adverse effects: interim results of a post-authorization safety study. Bone Marrow Transplant 48(suppl 2s):O177
43.
go back to reference Cornes P (2012) The economic pressures for biosimilar drug use in cancer medicine. Target Oncol 7(suppl 1):S57–S67CrossRefPubMed Cornes P (2012) The economic pressures for biosimilar drug use in cancer medicine. Target Oncol 7(suppl 1):S57–S67CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference Aapro M, Cornes P, Abraham I (2012) Comparative cost-efficiency across the European G5 countries of various regimens of filgrastim, biosimilar filgrastim, and pegfilgrastim to reduce the incidence of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia. J Oncol Pharm Pract 18:171–179CrossRefPubMed Aapro M, Cornes P, Abraham I (2012) Comparative cost-efficiency across the European G5 countries of various regimens of filgrastim, biosimilar filgrastim, and pegfilgrastim to reduce the incidence of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia. J Oncol Pharm Pract 18:171–179CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Clinical experience with Zarzio® in Europe: what have we learned?
Authors
Pere Gascón
Hans Tesch
Karl Verpoort
Maria Sofia Rosati
Nello Salesi
Samir Agrawal
Nils Wilking
Helen Barker
Michael Muenzberg
Matthew Turner
Publication date
01-10-2013
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 10/2013
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-013-1911-7

Other articles of this Issue 10/2013

Supportive Care in Cancer 10/2013 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine