Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Supportive Care in Cancer
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 12/2012

Open Access 01-12-2012 | Original Article

A randomized controlled trial comparing two types of pneumatic compression for breast cancer-related lymphedema treatment in the home

Authors: Caroline E. Fife, Suzanne Davey, Erik A. Maus, Renie Guilliod, Harvey N. Mayrovitz

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 12/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Pneumatic compression devices (PCDs) are used in the home setting as adjunctive treatment for lymphedema after acute treatment in a clinical setting. PCDs range in complexity from simple to technologically advanced. The objective of this prospective, randomized study was to determine whether an advanced PCD (APCD) provides better outcomes as measured by arm edema and tissue water reductions compared to a standard PCD (SPCD) in patients with arm lymphedema after breast cancer treatment.

Methods

Subjects were randomized to an APCD (Flexitouch system, HCPCS E0652) or SPCD (Bio Compression 2004, HCPCS E0651) used for home treatment 1 h/day for 12 weeks. Pressure settings were 30 mmHg for the SPCD and upper extremity treatment program (UE01) with standard pressure for the APCD. Thirty-six subjects (18 per group) with unilateral upper extremity lymphedema with at least 5% arm edema volume at the time of enrollment, completed treatments over the 12-week period. Arm volumes were determined from arm girth measurements and suitable model calculations, and tissue water was determined based on measurements of the arm tissue dielectric constant (TDC).

Results

The APCD-treated group experienced an average of 29% reduction in edema compared to a 16% increase in the SPCD group. Mean changes in TDC values were a 5.8% reduction for the APCD group and a 1.9% increase for the SPCD group.

Conclusion

This study suggests that for the home maintenance phase of treatment of arm lymphedema secondary to breast cancer therapy, the adjuvant treatment with an APCD provides better outcomes than with a SPCD.
Literature
1.
Armer JM (2005) The problem of post-breast cancer lymphedema: impact and measurement issues. Cancer Invest 23:76–83PubMedCrossRef
2.
Sakorafas GH, Peros G, Cataliotti L, Vlastos G (2006) Lymphedema following axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer. Surg Oncol 15:153–165PubMedCrossRef
3.
Bennett Britton TM, Purushotham AD (2009) Understanding breast cancer-related lymphoedema. Surgeon 7:120–124PubMedCrossRef
4.
Khan SA (2009) Axillary reverse mapping to prevent lymphedema after breast cancer surgery: defining the limits of the concept. J Clin Oncol 27:5494–5496PubMedCrossRef
5.
McLaughlin SA, Wright MJ, Morris KT et al (2008) Prevalence of lymphedema in women with breast cancer 5 years after sentinel lymph node biopsy or axillary dissection: objective measurements. J Clin Oncol 26:5213–5219PubMedCrossRef
6.
Ponzone R, Cont NT, Maggiorotto F et al (2009) Extensive nodal disease may impair axillary reverse mapping in patients with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 27:5547–5551PubMedCrossRef
7.
Morgan PA, Franks PJ, Moffatt CJ (2005) Health-related quality of life with lymphoedema: a review of the literature. Int Wound J 2:47–62PubMedCrossRef
8.
Finegold DN, Schacht V, Kimak MA et al (2008) GF and MET mutations in primary and secondary lymphedema. Lymphat Res Biol 6:65–68PubMedCrossRef
9.
Rasmussen JC, Tan IC, Marshall MV et al (2010) Human lymphatic architecture and dynamic transport imaged using near-infrared fluorescence. Transl Oncol 3:362–372PubMed
10.
Mayrovitz HN (2009) The standard of care for lymphedema: current concepts and physiological considerations. Lymphat Res Biol 7:101–108PubMedCrossRef
11.
Foldi M, Foldi E, Kubik S (2003) Textbook of lymphology. English ed. Elsevier, Munich
12.
Adams KE, Rasmussen JC, Darne C et al (2010) Direct evidence of lymphatic function improvement after advanced pneumatic compression device treatment of lymphedema. Biomed Opt Express 1:114–125PubMedCrossRef
13.
Dery MA, Yonuschot G, Winterson BJ (2000) The effects of manually applied intermittent pulsation pressure to rat ventral thorax on lymph transport. Lymphology 33:58–61PubMed
14.
Cheville AL, McGarvey CL, Petrek JA et al (2003) Lymphedema management. Semin Radiat Oncol 13:290–301PubMedCrossRef
15.
Swedborg I (1984) Effects of treatment with an elastic sleeve and intermittent pneumatic compression in post-mastectomy patients with lymphoedema of the arm. Scand J Rehabil Med 16:35–41PubMed
16.
Zanolla R, Monzeglio C, Balzarini A, Martino G (1984) Evaluation of the results of three different methods of postmastectomy lymphedema treatment. J Surg Oncol 26:210–213PubMedCrossRef
17.
Richmand DM, O’Donnell TF Jr, Zelikovski A (1985) Sequential pneumatic compression for lymphedema. A controlled trial. Arch Surg 120:1116–1119PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zelikovski A, Bair A, Haddad M, Reiss R (1985) The mobile pneumatic arm sleeve: a new device for treatment of arm lymphedema. Lymphology 18:68–71PubMed
19.
Klein MJ, Alexander MA, Wright JM, Redmond CK, LeGasse AA (1988) Treatment of adult lower extremity lymphedema with the Wright linear pump: statistical analysis of a clinical trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 69(3 Pt 1):202–206PubMed
20.
Pappas CJ, O’Donnell TF Jr (1992) Long-term results of compression treatment for lymphedema. J Vasc Surg 16:555–562, discussion 562-4PubMedCrossRef
21.
Bunce IH, Mirolo BR, Hennessy JM, Ward LC, Jones LC (1994) Post-mastectomy lymphoedema treatment and measurement. Med J Aust 161:125–128PubMed
22.
Johansson K, Lie E, Ekdahl C, Lindfeldt J (1998) A randomized study comparing manual lymph drainage with sequential pneumatic compression for treatment of postoperative arm lymphedema. Lymphology 31:56–64PubMed
23.
Dini D, Del Mastro L, Gozza A et al (1998) The role of pneumatic compression in the treatment of postmastectomy lymphedema. A randomized phase III study. Ann Oncol 9:187–190PubMedCrossRef
24.
Miranda F Jr, Perez MC, Castiglioni ML et al (2001) Effect of sequential intermittent pneumatic compression on both leg lymphedema volume and on lymph transport as semi-quantitatively evaluated by lymphoscintigraphy. Lymphology 34:135–141PubMed
25.
Szuba A, Achalu R, Rockson SG (2002) Decongestive lymphatic therapy for patients with breast carcinoma-associated lymphedema. A randomized, prospective study of a role for adjunctive intermittent pneumatic compression. Cancer 95:2260–2267PubMedCrossRef
26.
Maul S, Devine J, Wincer C (2009) Development of a framework for pneumatic device selection for lymphedema treatment. Medical Devices: Evidence and Research 2:57–65CrossRef
27.
Wilburn O, Wilburn P, Rockson SG (2006) A pilot, prospective evaluation of a novel alternative for maintenance therapy of breast cancer-associated lymphedema [ISRCTN76522412]. BMC Cancer 6:84PubMedCrossRef
28.
29.
30.
Sander AP, Hajer NM, Hemenway K, Miller AC (2002) Upper-extremity volume measurements in women with lymphedema: a comparison of measurements obtained via water displacement with geometrically determined volume. Phys Ther 82:1201–1212PubMed
31.
Meijer RS, Rietman JS, Geertzen JH, Bosmans JC, Dijkstra PU (2004) Validity and intra- and interobserver reliability of an indirect volume measurements in patients with upper extremity lymphedema. Lymphology 37:127–133PubMed
32.
Mayrovitz HN, Sims N, Macdonald J (2000) Assessment of limb volume by manual and automated methods in patients with limb edema or lymphedema. Adv Skin Wound Care 13:272–276PubMed
33.
Latchford S, Casley-Smith JR (1997) Estimating limb volumes and alterations in peripheral edema from circumferences measured at different intervals. Lymphology 30:161–164PubMed
34.
Nuutinen J, Ikaheimo R, Lahtinen T (2004) Validation of a new dielectric device to assess changes of tissue water in skin and subcutaneous fat. Physiol Meas 25:447–454PubMedCrossRef
35.
Aimoto A, Matsumoto T (1996) Noninvasive method for measuring the electrical properties of deep tissues using an open-ended coaxial probe. Med Eng Phys 18:641–646PubMedCrossRef
36.
Mayrovitz HN, Weingrad DN, Davey S (2009) Local tissue water in at-risk and contralateral forearms of women with and without breast cancer treatment-related lymphedema. Lymphat Res Biol 7:153–158PubMedCrossRef
37.
Mayrovitz HN, Davey S, Shapiro E (2008) Localized tissue water changes accompanying one manual lymphatic drainage (MLD) therapy session assessed by changes in tissue dielectric constant inpatients with lower extremity lymphedema. Lymphology 41:87–92PubMed
38.
Mayrovitz HN (2007) Assessing local tissue edema in postmastectomy lymphedema. Lymphology 40:87–94PubMed
39.
Mayrovitz HN (2007) Interface pressures produced by two different types of lymphedema therapy devices. Phys Ther 87:1379–1388PubMedCrossRef
40.
Unno N, Nishiyama M, Suzuki M, Tanaka H, Yamamoto N, Sagara D, Mano Y, Konno H (2010) A novel method of measuring human lymphatic pumping using indocyanine green fluorescence lymphography. Journel of Vascular Surgery 52:946–952CrossRef
41.
Segers P, Belgrado JP, Leduc A, Leduc O, Verdonck P (2002) Excessive pressure in multichambered cuffs used for sequential compression therapy. Phys Ther 82:1000–1008PubMed
42.
Eliska O, Eliskova M (1995) Are peripheral lymphatics damaged by high pressure manual massage? Lymphology 28:21–30PubMed
43.
44.
Olszewski WL (1991) Lymph stasis: pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment. CRC Press, Boca Raton
45.
Cormier JN, Xing Y, Zaniletti I, Askew RL, Stewart BR, Armer JM (2009) Minimal limb volume change has a significant impact on breast cancer survivors. Lymphology 42:161–175PubMed
Metadata
Title
A randomized controlled trial comparing two types of pneumatic compression for breast cancer-related lymphedema treatment in the home
Authors
Caroline E. Fife
Suzanne Davey
Erik A. Maus
Renie Guilliod
Harvey N. Mayrovitz
Publication date
01-12-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 12/2012
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-012-1455-2

Other articles of this Issue 12/2012

Supportive Care in Cancer 12/2012 Go to the issue

Original Article

Change in extracellular fluid and arm volumes as a consequence of a single session of lymphatic massage followed by rest with or without compression

Original Article

Probiotic factors partially prevent changes to caspases 3 and 7 activation and transepithelial electrical resistance in a model of 5-fluorouracil-induced epithelial cell damage

Original Article

Short post-infusion scalp cooling time in the prevention of docetaxel-induced alopecia

Original Article

Cancer patients’ willingness to answer survey questions about life expectancy

Original Article

A qualitative exploration of the role of primary care in supporting colorectal cancer patients

Original Article

A survey of the sedation practice of Portuguese palliative care teams
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Watch now

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Image Credits