Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 11/2012

01-11-2012 | Original Article

A qualitative study exploring the experience of the partners of cancer survivors and their views on the role of primary care

Authors: Eike Adams, Mary Boulton, Peter W. Rose, Susi Lund, Alison Richardson, Sue Wilson, Eila K. Watson

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 11/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The partners of cancer survivors may experience distress, anxiety, fear and uncertainty whilst also caring for and supporting a partner who is ill. As they concentrate on the cancer survivor’s needs, their own needs may remain unaddressed. Primary care staff may be well placed to support partners as they are generally accessible and may have a better knowledge of the patient’s background and family relationships. However, their current involvement in the cancer survivor’s and partner’s cancer-related care is unclear. This study aimed to describe the experience of the partners of cancer survivors in dealing with cancer-related issues in the first 3 years post-diagnosis, their use of primary care services in relation to these issues and the barriers in doing so and their views on the role that primary care could potentially play in supporting them as carers during this period.

Methods

Semi-structured interviews with 22 partners of cancer survivors diagnosed within the last 3 years and recruited through six GP practices in the Thames Valley Region of the UK were analysed using the ‘framework’ approach to thematic analysis.

Results

Three issues were identified as of particular concern to partners: providing practical support, providing emotional support and managing their own health and well-being. Few partners had sought or received support from primary care specifically for cancer-related issues, indicating confidentiality, lack of knowledge of family relationships and the greater need of the cancer survivor as barriers. Most partners would welcome a proactive approach from primary care and felt that this would provide an opportunity to discuss issues they were concerned about.

Conclusions

Needs and concerns of the partners of cancer survivors in caring for patients are often not addressed. There is a scope for primary care to elicit these needs and provide greater support. Changes to clinical practice in primary care could lead to greater involvement of and to better outcomes for cancer survivors and their partners. A proactive approach to patients and their partners or other close family members at the time of diagnosis through an offer of support and the inclusion in a designated review appointment at the end of initial treatment would be useful.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Baider L, Cooper CL, Kaplan De-Nour A (eds) (2000) Cancer and the family, 2nd edn. Chichester, Wiley Baider L, Cooper CL, Kaplan De-Nour A (eds) (2000) Cancer and the family, 2nd edn. Chichester, Wiley
2.
go back to reference Edwards B, Clarke V (2002) The psychological impact of a cancer diagnosis on families: the influence of family functioning and patients’ illness characteristics on depression and anxiety. Psychooncology 13(8):562–576 Edwards B, Clarke V (2002) The psychological impact of a cancer diagnosis on families: the influence of family functioning and patients’ illness characteristics on depression and anxiety. Psychooncology 13(8):562–576
3.
go back to reference Cliff A, MacDonagh R (2000) Psychosocial morbidity in prostate cancer: II. A comparison of patients and partners. BJU Int 86:834–839PubMedCrossRef Cliff A, MacDonagh R (2000) Psychosocial morbidity in prostate cancer: II. A comparison of patients and partners. BJU Int 86:834–839PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Adams E, Boulton M, Watson E (2009) The information needs of partners and family members of cancer patients: a systematic literature review. Patient Educ Counsell 77(2):179–186CrossRef Adams E, Boulton M, Watson E (2009) The information needs of partners and family members of cancer patients: a systematic literature review. Patient Educ Counsell 77(2):179–186CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Northouse LL, Katapodi MC, Song L, Zhang L, Mood DW (2010) Interventions with family caregivers of cancer patients: meta-analysis of randomized trials. CA Cancer J Clin 60:317–339PubMed Northouse LL, Katapodi MC, Song L, Zhang L, Mood DW (2010) Interventions with family caregivers of cancer patients: meta-analysis of randomized trials. CA Cancer J Clin 60:317–339PubMed
7.
go back to reference National Primary Care Development Centre (2007) The Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) of the General Medical Services contract for primary care: final report for cancer indicators—2008/9 contract. National Primary Care Development Centre, Manchester National Primary Care Development Centre (2007) The Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) of the General Medical Services contract for primary care: final report for cancer indicators—2008/9 contract. National Primary Care Development Centre, Manchester
8.
go back to reference Anvik T, Holtedahl KA, Mikalsen H (2006) "When patients have cancer, they stop seeing me"—the role of the general practitioner in early follow-up of patients with cancer—a qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract 7:19PubMedCrossRef Anvik T, Holtedahl KA, Mikalsen H (2006) "When patients have cancer, they stop seeing me"—the role of the general practitioner in early follow-up of patients with cancer—a qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract 7:19PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Augestad KM, Vonen B, Aspevik R, Nestvold T, Ringberg U, Johnsen R, Norum J, Lindsetmo RO (2008) Should the surgeon or the general practitioner (GP) follow up patients after surgery for colon cancer? A randomized controlled trial protocol focusing on quality of life, cost-effectiveness and serious clinical events. BMC Health Serv Res 8:137PubMedCrossRef Augestad KM, Vonen B, Aspevik R, Nestvold T, Ringberg U, Johnsen R, Norum J, Lindsetmo RO (2008) Should the surgeon or the general practitioner (GP) follow up patients after surgery for colon cancer? A randomized controlled trial protocol focusing on quality of life, cost-effectiveness and serious clinical events. BMC Health Serv Res 8:137PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Bober SL, Recklitis CJ, Campbell EG, Park ER, Kutner JS, Najita JS, Diller L (2009) Caring for cancer survivors: a survey of primary care physicians. Cancer 115(18 Suppl):4409–4418PubMedCrossRef Bober SL, Recklitis CJ, Campbell EG, Park ER, Kutner JS, Najita JS, Diller L (2009) Caring for cancer survivors: a survey of primary care physicians. Cancer 115(18 Suppl):4409–4418PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Adams E, Boulton M, Rose P, Lund S, Richardson A, Wilson S, Watson E (2011) Views of cancer care reviews in primary care: a qualitative study. Br J Gen Pract 61(585):274–275CrossRef Adams E, Boulton M, Rose P, Lund S, Richardson A, Wilson S, Watson E (2011) Views of cancer care reviews in primary care: a qualitative study. Br J Gen Pract 61(585):274–275CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Patton M (1990) Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Sage, London Patton M (1990) Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Sage, London
13.
go back to reference Ritchie J, Spencer L (1993) Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman A, Burgess R (eds) Analysing qualitative data. Routledge, London, pp 173–194 Ritchie J, Spencer L (1993) Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman A, Burgess R (eds) Analysing qualitative data. Routledge, London, pp 173–194
15.
go back to reference Johnston B, Milligan S, Foster C, Kearney N (2010) Self-care and end of life care—patients’ and carers’ experience a qualitative study utilising serial triangulated interviews. Support Care Cancer. doi:10.1007/s00520-011-1252-3 Johnston B, Milligan S, Foster C, Kearney N (2010) Self-care and end of life care—patients’ and carers’ experience a qualitative study utilising serial triangulated interviews. Support Care Cancer. doi:10.​1007/​s00520-011-1252-3
16.
go back to reference McGregor W, Jabareen H, O’Donnell C, Mercer S, Watt G (2008) Impact of the 2004 GMS contract on practice nurses: a qualitative study. Br J Gen Pract 58(555):711–719PubMedCrossRef McGregor W, Jabareen H, O’Donnell C, Mercer S, Watt G (2008) Impact of the 2004 GMS contract on practice nurses: a qualitative study. Br J Gen Pract 58(555):711–719PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Zipp J, Toth J (2002) She said, he said, they said: the impact of spousal presence in survey research. Public Opinion Quarterly 66:177–208. doi:10.1086/340028 CrossRef Zipp J, Toth J (2002) She said, he said, they said: the impact of spousal presence in survey research. Public Opinion Quarterly 66:177–208. doi:10.​1086/​340028 CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Morris SM (2001) Joint and individual interviewing in the context of cancer. Qual Heal Res 11(4):553–567CrossRef Morris SM (2001) Joint and individual interviewing in the context of cancer. Qual Heal Res 11(4):553–567CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Taylor B, de Vocht H (2011) Interviewing separately or as couples? Considerations of authenticity of method. Qual Heal Res 21(11):1576–1587CrossRef Taylor B, de Vocht H (2011) Interviewing separately or as couples? Considerations of authenticity of method. Qual Heal Res 21(11):1576–1587CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Stajduhar K, Davies B (2005) Variations in and factors influencing family members’ decisions for palliative home care. Palliat Med 19:21–32PubMedCrossRef Stajduhar K, Davies B (2005) Variations in and factors influencing family members’ decisions for palliative home care. Palliat Med 19:21–32PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Hudson P (2004) Positive aspects and challenges associated with caring for a dying relative at home. Int J Palliat Nurs 10:58–65PubMed Hudson P (2004) Positive aspects and challenges associated with caring for a dying relative at home. Int J Palliat Nurs 10:58–65PubMed
22.
go back to reference Plant H, Moore S, Richardson A, Cornwall A, Medina J, Ream E (2011) Nurses’ experience of delivering a supportive intervention for family members of patients with lung cancer. Eur J Cancer Care 20(4):436–444CrossRef Plant H, Moore S, Richardson A, Cornwall A, Medina J, Ream E (2011) Nurses’ experience of delivering a supportive intervention for family members of patients with lung cancer. Eur J Cancer Care 20(4):436–444CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A qualitative study exploring the experience of the partners of cancer survivors and their views on the role of primary care
Authors
Eike Adams
Mary Boulton
Peter W. Rose
Susi Lund
Alison Richardson
Sue Wilson
Eila K. Watson
Publication date
01-11-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 11/2012
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-012-1400-4

Other articles of this Issue 11/2012

Supportive Care in Cancer 11/2012 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine