Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 5/2012

01-05-2012 | Original Article

Are different groups of cancer patients offered rehabilitation to the same extent? A report from the population-based study “The Cancer Patient’s World”

Authors: Lone Ross, Morten Aagaard Petersen, Anna Thit Johnsen, Louise Hyldborg Lundstrøm, Mogens Groenvold

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 5/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The number of cancer survivors is growing and cancer is now viewed as a chronic disease. This has highlighted the importance of providing adequate rehabilitation to prevent physical, psychological, and social sequelae of cancer. However, it is unclear whether those in need of rehabilitation are offered this.

Methods

Using patient–observer agreement and cognitive interviews, we validated a seven-item questionnaire designed to assess cancer patients’ perception of the sufficiency of the offered rehabilitation. A cross-sectional study among 2,202 Danish cancer patients affiliated with hospitals was carried out.

Results

The questionnaire was well understood, indicating good validity. In the cross-sectional study, 1,490 patients (68%) participated. Up to 39% of cancer patients did not receive the physical rehabilitation they felt they needed. About half of those who had felt a need to talk to a psychologist were offered this. Insufficiency of other rehabilitation offers was reported by 10–24%. Age most consistently predicted insufficient rehabilitation; higher age predicted insufficient information about support from other sources (than hospital staff) and younger age predicted lack of help to manage symptoms, return to everyday life, and deal with financial and especially work-related consequences. We found no consistent signs of traditional social inequality in the perception of rehabilitation, but we observed some signs of social inequality for unemployed or divorced/separated patients.

Conclusions

Age predicted sufficiency of the rehabilitation in two directions, possibly reflecting different needs in younger and older patients. When tailoring rehabilitation programs, it should be ensured that the different needs are met.
Literature
1.
go back to reference McQuellon R, Danhauer S (2007) Psychosocial rehabilitation in cancer care. In: Ganz P (ed) Cancer survivorship: today and tomorrow. Springer, New York, pp 1942–1954 McQuellon R, Danhauer S (2007) Psychosocial rehabilitation in cancer care. In: Ganz P (ed) Cancer survivorship: today and tomorrow. Springer, New York, pp 1942–1954
2.
go back to reference van Harten WH, van NO, Warmerdam R, Hendricks H, Seidel E (1998) Assessment of rehabilitation needs in cancer patients. Int J Rehabil Res 21:247–257PubMedCrossRef van Harten WH, van NO, Warmerdam R, Hendricks H, Seidel E (1998) Assessment of rehabilitation needs in cancer patients. Int J Rehabil Res 21:247–257PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Tvede CF, Brandstrup B, Engholm G, Tonnesen H (2003) Potential number of rehabilitated cancer patients in Denmark—an estimate. Ugeskr Laeger 165:123–128 [in Danish]PubMed Tvede CF, Brandstrup B, Engholm G, Tonnesen H (2003) Potential number of rehabilitated cancer patients in Denmark—an estimate. Ugeskr Laeger 165:123–128 [in Danish]PubMed
4.
go back to reference Johnsen A, Jensen C, Pedersen C, Groenvold M (2006) The Cancer Patient’s World—an investigation of the problems experienced by Danish cancer patients. Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen [in Danish] Johnsen A, Jensen C, Pedersen C, Groenvold M (2006) The Cancer Patient’s World—an investigation of the problems experienced by Danish cancer patients. Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen [in Danish]
5.
go back to reference Groenvold M, Klee M, Sprangers M, Aaronson N (1997) Validation of the EORTC QLQ-C30 Quality of Life Questionnaire through combined qualitative and quantitative assessment of patient–observer agreement. J Clin Epidemiol 50:441–450PubMedCrossRef Groenvold M, Klee M, Sprangers M, Aaronson N (1997) Validation of the EORTC QLQ-C30 Quality of Life Questionnaire through combined qualitative and quantitative assessment of patient–observer agreement. J Clin Epidemiol 50:441–450PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Johnsen A, Petersen M, Pedersen L, Groenvold M (2011) Development and initial validation of the Three-Levels-of-Needs Questionnaire for self-assessment of palliative needs in patients with cancer. J Pain Symptom Manage. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.08.013 Johnsen A, Petersen M, Pedersen L, Groenvold M (2011) Development and initial validation of the Three-Levels-of-Needs Questionnaire for self-assessment of palliative needs in patients with cancer. J Pain Symptom Manage. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jpainsymman.​2010.​08.​013
7.
go back to reference Cohen J (1960) Coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 20:37–46CrossRef Cohen J (1960) Coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 20:37–46CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174PubMedCrossRef Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Feinstein AR, Cicchetti DV (1990) High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes. J Clin Epidemiol 43:543–549PubMedCrossRef Feinstein AR, Cicchetti DV (1990) High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes. J Clin Epidemiol 43:543–549PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Willis G, Cognitive interviewing (2005) A tool for improving questionnaire design, 1st edn. Sage Publications, Inc, Thousand Oaks Willis G, Cognitive interviewing (2005) A tool for improving questionnaire design, 1st edn. Sage Publications, Inc, Thousand Oaks
11.
go back to reference Willis G, Lessler J (1999) Question appraisal system QAS-99. Research Triangle Institute, Rockville Willis G, Lessler J (1999) Question appraisal system QAS-99. Research Triangle Institute, Rockville
12.
go back to reference Gordon LG, Battistutta D, Scuffham P, Tweeddale M, Newman B (2005) The impact of rehabilitation support services on health-related quality of life for women with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 93:217–226PubMedCrossRef Gordon LG, Battistutta D, Scuffham P, Tweeddale M, Newman B (2005) The impact of rehabilitation support services on health-related quality of life for women with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 93:217–226PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Meyerhardt JA, Giovannucci EL, Holmes MD, Chan AT, Chan JA, Colditz GA et al (2006) Physical activity and survival after colorectal cancer diagnosis. J Clin Oncol 24:3527–3534PubMedCrossRef Meyerhardt JA, Giovannucci EL, Holmes MD, Chan AT, Chan JA, Colditz GA et al (2006) Physical activity and survival after colorectal cancer diagnosis. J Clin Oncol 24:3527–3534PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Meyerhardt JA, Heseltine D, Niedzwiecki D, Hollis D, Saltz LB, Mayer RJ et al (2006) Impact of physical activity on cancer recurrence and survival in patients with stage III colon cancer: findings from CALGB 89803. J Clin Oncol 24:3535–3541PubMedCrossRef Meyerhardt JA, Heseltine D, Niedzwiecki D, Hollis D, Saltz LB, Mayer RJ et al (2006) Impact of physical activity on cancer recurrence and survival in patients with stage III colon cancer: findings from CALGB 89803. J Clin Oncol 24:3535–3541PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Holmes MD, Chen WY, Feskanich D, Kroenke CH, Colditz GA (2005) Physical activity and survival after breast cancer diagnosis. JAMA 293:2479–2486PubMedCrossRef Holmes MD, Chen WY, Feskanich D, Kroenke CH, Colditz GA (2005) Physical activity and survival after breast cancer diagnosis. JAMA 293:2479–2486PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Giovannucci EL, Liu Y, Leitzmann MF, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC (2005) A prospective study of physical activity and incident and fatal prostate cancer. Arch Intern Med 165:1005–1010PubMedCrossRef Giovannucci EL, Liu Y, Leitzmann MF, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC (2005) A prospective study of physical activity and incident and fatal prostate cancer. Arch Intern Med 165:1005–1010PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference De Backer I, Van BE, Vreugdenhil A, Nijziel MR, Kester AD, Schep G (2007) High-intensity strength training improves quality of life in cancer survivors. Acta Oncol 46:1143–1151PubMedCrossRef De Backer I, Van BE, Vreugdenhil A, Nijziel MR, Kester AD, Schep G (2007) High-intensity strength training improves quality of life in cancer survivors. Acta Oncol 46:1143–1151PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Adamsen L, Quist M, Midtgaard J, Andersen C, Moller T, Knutsen L et al (2006) The effect of a multidimensional exercise intervention on physical capacity, well-being and quality of life in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer 14:116–127PubMedCrossRef Adamsen L, Quist M, Midtgaard J, Andersen C, Moller T, Knutsen L et al (2006) The effect of a multidimensional exercise intervention on physical capacity, well-being and quality of life in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer 14:116–127PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Irwin ML, Ainsworth BE (2004) Physical activity interventions following cancer diagnosis: methodologic challenges to delivery and assessment. Cancer Invest 22(1):30–50PubMedCrossRef Irwin ML, Ainsworth BE (2004) Physical activity interventions following cancer diagnosis: methodologic challenges to delivery and assessment. Cancer Invest 22(1):30–50PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference McNeely ML, Campbell KL, Rowe BH, Klassen TP, Mackey JR, Courneya KS (2006) Effects of exercise on breast cancer patients and survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ 175:34–41PubMedCrossRef McNeely ML, Campbell KL, Rowe BH, Klassen TP, Mackey JR, Courneya KS (2006) Effects of exercise on breast cancer patients and survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ 175:34–41PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Cramp F, Daniel J (2008) Exercise for the management of cancer-related fatigue in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2):CD006145 Cramp F, Daniel J (2008) Exercise for the management of cancer-related fatigue in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2):CD006145
22.
go back to reference Thewes B, Butow P, Girgis A, Pendlebury S (2004) The psychosocial needs of breast cancer survivors; a qualitative study of the shared and unique needs of younger versus older survivors. Psychooncology 13:177–189PubMedCrossRef Thewes B, Butow P, Girgis A, Pendlebury S (2004) The psychosocial needs of breast cancer survivors; a qualitative study of the shared and unique needs of younger versus older survivors. Psychooncology 13:177–189PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Peuckmann V, Ekholm O, Rasmussen NK, Moller S, Groenvold M, Christiansen P et al (2007) Health-related quality of life in long-term breast cancer survivors: nationwide survey in Denmark. Breast Cancer Res Treat 104:39–46PubMedCrossRef Peuckmann V, Ekholm O, Rasmussen NK, Moller S, Groenvold M, Christiansen P et al (2007) Health-related quality of life in long-term breast cancer survivors: nationwide survey in Denmark. Breast Cancer Res Treat 104:39–46PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Schrijvers CT, Mackenbach JP (1994) Cancer patient survival by socioeconomic status in seven countries: a review for six common cancer sites [corrected]. J Epidemiol Community Health 48:441–446PubMedCrossRef Schrijvers CT, Mackenbach JP (1994) Cancer patient survival by socioeconomic status in seven countries: a review for six common cancer sites [corrected]. J Epidemiol Community Health 48:441–446PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Kogevinas M, Porta M (1997) Socioeconomic differences in cancer survival: a review of the evidence. IARC Sci Publ 138:177–206PubMed Kogevinas M, Porta M (1997) Socioeconomic differences in cancer survival: a review of the evidence. IARC Sci Publ 138:177–206PubMed
26.
go back to reference Gorey KM, Luginaah IN, Holowaty EJ, Fung KY, Hamm C (2009) Breast cancer survival in Ontario and California, 1998–2006: socioeconomic inequity remains much greater in the United States. Ann Epidemiol 19:121–124PubMedCrossRef Gorey KM, Luginaah IN, Holowaty EJ, Fung KY, Hamm C (2009) Breast cancer survival in Ontario and California, 1998–2006: socioeconomic inequity remains much greater in the United States. Ann Epidemiol 19:121–124PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Kristinsson SY, Derolf AR, Edgren G, Dickman PW, Bjorkholm M (2009) Socioeconomic differences in patient survival are increasing for acute myeloid leukemia and multiple myeloma in Sweden. J Clin Oncol 27:2073–2080PubMedCrossRef Kristinsson SY, Derolf AR, Edgren G, Dickman PW, Bjorkholm M (2009) Socioeconomic differences in patient survival are increasing for acute myeloid leukemia and multiple myeloma in Sweden. J Clin Oncol 27:2073–2080PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Dalton SO, Ross L, During M, Carlsen K, Mortensen PB, Lynch J et al (2007) Influence of socioeconomic factors on survival after breast cancer—a nationwide cohort study of women diagnosed with breast cancer in Denmark 1983–1999. Int J Cancer 121:2524–2531PubMedCrossRef Dalton SO, Ross L, During M, Carlsen K, Mortensen PB, Lynch J et al (2007) Influence of socioeconomic factors on survival after breast cancer—a nationwide cohort study of women diagnosed with breast cancer in Denmark 1983–1999. Int J Cancer 121:2524–2531PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Dalton SO, Schuz J, Engholm G, Johansen C, Kjaer SK, Steding-Jessen M et al (2008) Social inequality in incidence of and survival from cancer in a population-based study in Denmark, 1994–2003: summary of findings. Eur J Cancer 44:2074–2085PubMedCrossRef Dalton SO, Schuz J, Engholm G, Johansen C, Kjaer SK, Steding-Jessen M et al (2008) Social inequality in incidence of and survival from cancer in a population-based study in Denmark, 1994–2003: summary of findings. Eur J Cancer 44:2074–2085PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Bradshaw J (1972) A taxonomy of social needs. In: McLachlan G (ed) Problems and progress in medical care. Oxford University Press, London, pp 69–81 Bradshaw J (1972) A taxonomy of social needs. In: McLachlan G (ed) Problems and progress in medical care. Oxford University Press, London, pp 69–81
Metadata
Title
Are different groups of cancer patients offered rehabilitation to the same extent? A report from the population-based study “The Cancer Patient’s World”
Authors
Lone Ross
Morten Aagaard Petersen
Anna Thit Johnsen
Louise Hyldborg Lundstrøm
Mogens Groenvold
Publication date
01-05-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 5/2012
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-011-1189-6

Other articles of this Issue 5/2012

Supportive Care in Cancer 5/2012 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine